EVE Search - Supers/Titans

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Supers/Titans

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Petrus Blackshell Rifterlings 301	Posted - 2012.01.18 17:29:00 - [31] - Quote Aiwha wrote: Anybody who says "that's what she said" is on my list. That's what she said.
ElQuirko The Demonfuge Malevolent Fan Club 318	Posted - 2012.01.18 17:34:00 - [32] - Quote Frankly, Aiwha won this thread, and gained a like on nearly every post. He amused me that much. His points are also incredibly valid.
Ganagati Perkone Caldari State 67	Posted - 2012.01.31 18:46:00 - [33] - Quote EHP: 2,015,921 Tank: 13,775dps DPS: 16,108dps with dps implant. (15,141 without) Alpha: 64,492 [Moros, Moros: 16k dps with G2.5-Delta implant] Power Diagnostic System II Power Diagnostic System II Damage Control II Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Federation Navy Magnetic Field Stabilizer Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Photon Scattering Field II Heat Dissipation Field II Capital Neutron Saturation Injector I Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Limited Mega Ion Siege Blaster I, Guristas Antimatter Charge XL Siege Module II Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I
FeralShadow Mom 'n' Pop Ammo Shoppe R.E.P.O. 47	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:02:00 - [34] - Quote now that moros is just silly.
Stonecrusher Mortlock University of Caille Gallente Federation 19	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:08:00 - [35] - Quote Jafit McJafitson wrote: 1. Gradually nerf supers to the point of complete uselessness. 2. Alter CSAAs to function as titan reprocessors. 3. Remove Supers from the game and gradually refund everyone's skillpoints to correct for the horrendous mistake that was made in introducing them in the first place because CCP assumed that they would be rare Worried about the market having 1000 titans worth of minerals dumped on it? It may be painful, but maybe not so painful if CCP ban all mining bots around the same time, and changed the drone regions so that the rats dropped bounties! WHAT A MASTERSTROKE! Game = Fixed. that image makes me sick, and that's just 1 of nulls groups.
Avid Bumhumper Furian Necromongers 21	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:09:00 - [36] - Quote Andski wrote: leich wrote: It's bad enough that a single HIC has the ability to solo a super let alone have a falcon able to do the same job. Oh boy. Show me where a single HIC has soloed a supercarrier. Hint: it doesn't happen. If you fly around in a faction battleship, a single Rifter can keep you tackled if he manages to keep transversal on you while his friends burn across space to murder you. That's how EVE is - even a Rifter can be dangerous. Supercapitals should not be an exception to that rule. Should they be completely defenseless against them? Even most battleships have some way of dealing with a pesky little rifter, why shouldn't an expensive, and expensive to train super?
ILikeMarkets Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 55	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:36:00 - [37] - Quote Jafit McJafitson wrote: 1. Gradually nerf supers to the point of complete uselessness. 2. Alter CSAAs to function as titan reprocessors. 3. Remove Supers from the game and gradually refund everyone's skillpoints to correct for the horrendous mistake that was made in introducing them in the first place because CCP assumed that they would be rare Worried about the market having 1000 titans worth of minerals dumped on it? It may be painful, but maybe not so painful if CCP ban all mining bots around the same time, and changed the drone regions so that the rats dropped bounties! WHAT A MASTERSTROKE! Game = Fixed. +1 Protect highsec.-áWe are the 66%. https://p.twimg.com/Ajc6KNBCQAAT9my.png (Source: https://twitter.com/ccp_diagoras )
Asuka Solo Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises 1148	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:39:00 - [38] - Quote Aye. Add t2 Capital EWAR good for super pointing/nerfing. Boost current Sub Cap EWAR to be awesome vs sub caps and caps. Prevent the midgets from touching the giants and vice versa, boost caps for epic sub cap pew pew and super cap suicide.
Alistair Cononach The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 119	Posted - 2012.01.31 19:43:00 - [39] - Quote Super-Cap Fix. 1. Make Super Carriers into Tier 2 (not Tech 2, but Tier 2) Carriers. 2. Make Titans into Tier 2 (not Tech 2) Dreadnaughts. Just like it sounds, a Super Carrier would eb nothign more than a slightly better Carrier. A Titan, a slightly better Dreadnaught. Adjust costs and min req's to balance. Done. As it probably should have been doen in the first place.
Kestrix Industrial Renaissance MinTek Conglomerate 4	Posted - 2012.01.31 20:06:00 - [40] - Quote McRoll wrote: The only way to keep things in line and prevent extensive usage of ships is to make them less and less desirable the more powerful they become. Be it vulnerability to subcaps, lack of practical application or whatever. People will get them anyway as cost doesn't matter anymore in today's Eve. Just a while ago averybody and their mother used them and hotdropped Drakes, was that better than what we have now? Resoruce scarcity... Isk and skill points are no longer an issue with such vessels. But if the alliances cannot accumulate sufficent materials to produce many Titans or Motherships then the loss of these vessels will be a blow as they cannot be quickly/easly replaced.
arcca jeth Dark Alliance Dark Empire Alliance 60	Posted - 2012.01.31 20:07:00 - [41] - Quote Jafit McJafitson wrote: Aiwha wrote: Did not consider implants Make implants unplugable. May as well considering that's all we use JCs for now. "But that'll crash the market for implants-" GOOD! Christ I'm sick of people having to stay docked and not going out to play and try to enjoy this damn game because they're scared of losing a head full of these stupid things, I just want to pod them just so they can be done with them and go have some fun. Fucks sake! And I'm tired of people who choose not to PvP having an advantage when it comes to skill training, along with their zero-risk empire money fountains. I do not always agree with TEST/GOONS but as a long time Indy non-pvp player who is starting to fly in 0.0/low I fully agree with this. I do think the various implants are a great feature, but they could be replaced by some tweaking of modules stats to supplement the removal of the implants. Now that i have 2 toons with 0 implants, I am having more fun because: 1.) the cost of loss is highly reduced when i have no implants 2.) the worry of loss is only mitigated to the ship fit and if you fit cheap then who cares 3.) i can quickly return to poke the monsters with a twig if i have a JC nearby or a clone nearby. after you've lost them a few times you sure get tired quickly of paying to replace them, i would have to say that they are a counter productive to the game. people just get too scared, i being one who used to be
arcca jeth Dark Alliance Dark Empire Alliance 60	Posted - 2012.01.31 20:30:00 - [42] - Quote Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote: Jafit McJafitson wrote: 1. Gradually nerf supers to the point of complete uselessness. 2. Alter CSAAs to function as titan reprocessors. 3. Remove Supers from the game and gradually refund everyone's skillpoints to correct for the horrendous mistake that was made in introducing them in the first place because CCP assumed that they would be rare Worried about the market having 1000 titans worth of minerals dumped on it? It may be painful, but maybe not so painful if CCP ban all mining bots around the same time, and changed the drone regions so that the rats dropped bounties! WHAT A MASTERSTROKE! Game = Fixed. that image makes me sick, and that's just 1 of nulls groups. that image is why EVE is truly broken, it makes EVE look stupid honestly
Dowla Daupor 2	Posted - 2012.01.31 20:33:00 - [43] - Quote arcca jeth wrote: that image is why EVE is truly broken, it makes EVE look stupid honestly It's what happens when you introduce anything 'more powerful' and 'hard to get' in an mmo, they just become the norm and in EVE's case they simultaneously create a barrier to entry for new corps and alliances.
ElQuirko Gravit Negotii 353	Posted - 2012.01.31 21:04:00 - [44] - Quote Alistair Cononach wrote: 1. Make Super Carriers into Tier 2 (not Tech 2, but Tier 2) Carriers. Truly a masterpiece, but have you even looked at the skill requirements of a supercarrier? What about their market category - have you checked that? If we distribute pictures of people, does that mean God can file copyright claims under SOPA?
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1840	Posted - 2012.01.31 21:39:00 - [45] - Quote Avid Bumhumper wrote: Andski wrote: leich wrote: It's bad enough that a single HIC has the ability to solo a super let alone have a falcon able to do the same job. Oh boy. Show me where a single HIC has soloed a supercarrier. Hint: it doesn't happen. If you fly around in a faction battleship, a single Rifter can keep you tackled if he manages to keep transversal on you while his friends burn across space to murder you. That's how EVE is - even a Rifter can be dangerous. Supercapitals should not be an exception to that rule. Should they be completely defenseless against them? Even most battleships have some way of dealing with a pesky little rifter, why shouldn't an expensive, and expensive to train super? The cost of the ship only determines what you risk by fielding it. Training time and cost should not determine their performance - a Vindicator may cost 10 times as much as a Mega, and it takes significantly longer to train for, but it does not have 10 times the performance. andski for csm7~

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.