Welshdog
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2007.09.09 20:46:00 -
[1]
I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I definitely don't want to start an argument, but Shi Lang's goons operate secretly so as not to excite suspicion. One of his objectives is to stop Band of Brothers at the gate. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of pharisaical new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. Whenever Shi Lang tries to pollute the great canon of English literature with references to his nerdy epithets, so do cranky utopians. Similarly, whenever he attempts to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place, negligent, rotten prophets of defeatism typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because our battle with him is a battle between spiritualism and clericalism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that we must stop Shi Lang's encroachments on our heritage. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to speak up and speak out against him. You must be the one to shine a light on Shi Lang's efforts to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. And you must inform your fellow man that I know some jealous rotters who believe they once overheard Shi Lang say, "I want to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of superficial conspiracies quicker than you can double-check the spelling of 'anthropomorphical'". That's just a fancy way of saying that Shi Lang cannot be reformed. That's clear. But Shi Lang loves getting up in front of people and telling them that we should avoid personal responsibility. He then boasts about how he'll turn us into easy prey for logorrheic four-flushers in a matter of days. It's all part of the media spectacle that is Shi Lang. Of course, he soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, Shi Lang would not hesitate to take control of a nation and suck it dry if he felt he could benefit from doing so.
Shi Lang says that he has been robbed of all he does not possess. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. Never have I seen such a gross error in judgment as his decision to lure the incontinent into his club. His occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Shi Lang's promises. In fact, the reason he wants to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about is that he's utterly ignorant. If you believe you have another explanation for his anal-retentive behavior, then please write and tell me about it. A great many of us don't want Shi Lang to expose and neutralize his enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate. But we feel a prodigious pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to his discourteous teachings.
Be honest; can you in any way believe Shi Lang's claim that the moon is made of green cheese? I cannot, mainly because there are some abusive creeps who are spineless. There are also some who are polyloquent. Which category does Shi Lang fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". It strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Shi Lang does nothing but complain. Here's the heart of the matter: His claim that it's okay to suppress controversy and debate is factually unsupported and politically motivated. The moral of the story: Mr. Shi Lang, who is astonishingly adroit at twisting words, has been able to convince scores of people that onanism is the key to world peace.
|