| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
   |
Posted - 2007.09.14 19:37:00 -
[1]
Well I got to test my new FPS and thats all I wanted.
With 300 or so on grid, and a huge fighter, max settings + full effects on, I got 20 FPS while frapsing 
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 20:09:00 -
[2]
Would you like some lag with your CapFleet?
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 20:53:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: LoveLoveHate
Meanwhile BoB sticks massive amounts of lag inducing fighters on gates to avoid/ruin fights and these two circumstances are somehow equal?
Rofl, we warped in our capitals only AFTER we had visual on theirs. We saw a cyno, but due to the lag, no capitals. Once we actually had a report of a capital, we warped the carriers in.
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 21:05:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nlewis
It's funny how all the dread killmails are full of fighters. oh thats right fighters operate the same whether there's lag or not
Exploits are great, hey?
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 22:23:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Sentinel Eeex
Originally by: fire 59
You're braggin that a numerically inferior foe was unable to siege outnumbered foe near your core systems 2-3-1. Dam, you showed us.
Just saying ^^
It is so cute becasue you are struggling when you arent at home with your safety blob, just saying, mad propz, respect and honour
Edit - Methinx goons should have gloated, puffed out chests and talked e-tough after victory instead of this huge failure 
Oh, noes. Safety blob! 
Picture
There were more fighters than players in 0OY. That's just sad...
Well, all it would take would be 1 in 9 players to be in a well-fitted carrier, and yes, there would be more fighters than players. 
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 22:29:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Elder Bob
And why would 1 in 9 players be in carriers?
If you're fighting on grid, dreads tank better and do more damage. On the other hand, carriers make the server unplayable.
Exactly what was the reasoning behind the decision to order dreadnoughts to not show up, and for every available player to be in a carrier?
Loooooooooool
Lol
lololol
haahaha
Rofl.
Dreads do more damage than carriers to a completely static structure or another capital ship, yes, but we expected you to bring a huge non-cap gang, which is what you did, no? 
Carriers are better tanks as they will be loaded with remote repairers, meaning they can remote rep each other and other ships in the fleet. Dreads in siege can't be remote repped, and can't FIT a remote rep capably, so there is no point in using a dread in that scenario.
Please don't troll - Serathu ([email protected])
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
lofty29
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.09.14 22:30:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Elder Bob
Originally by: Dooshotron
The lag saved some of your capitals, any less we would have scrambled far more.
If there hadn't been lag, your capitals would have been outnumbered and outgunned by the force jumping in. Sadly, around 1/7 of them got in, and they didn't load. 
Also, do you think we didnt have eyes on you? About 1/2 of your fleet got in, so dont BS us.
---
Project Mayhem 2 |
| |
|