EVE Search - What's YouWhat Up To?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

What's YouWhat Up To?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Verite Rendition Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:37:00 - [1] As I'm looking through today's influence map, I noticed that YW has dropped sovereignty in 5 systems today. Furthermore they've also dropped sov in a couple of systems over the last 2 days, brining the total to 9 lost systems and the I-UU station in far Fade. So, far be it from me to be smart enough to keep my mouth shut, what's YouWhat up to? I haven't seen any posts here in COAD that would explain/hint to what's up. Would anyone like to comment? ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic EVE Automated Influence Map: Keeping Down The Clone Business Since 2007AD
Attak Trioptimum FREGE Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:40:00 - [2] first in what's sure to be a hillarious thread
Wodanonline Pringles Inc. YouWhat	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:41:00 - [3] Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ?
Verite Rendition Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:43:00 - [4] Originally by: Wodanonline Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ? Well then don't be a stranger, stop on by and let out all that troubles you. ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic EVE Automated Influence Map: Keeping Down The Clone Business Since 2007AD
Wodanonline Pringles Inc. YouWhat	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:44:00 - [5] Originally by: Verite Rendition Originally by: Wodanonline Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ? Well then don't be a stranger, stop on by and let out all that troubles you. we leave that to forum warriors like you
Sasha Evergreen Gallente Sand Castle Generals	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:45:00 - [6] Keeping a low profile means no trouble coming their way. The drone regions guys could learn some, at least the ones who aren't there anymore.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:45:00 - [7] speaking of losing soveriegnty, whats up with the makhai?
Verite Rendition Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.	Posted - 2007.09.17 00:47:00 - [8] Originally by: Graalum speaking of losing soveriegnty, whats up with the makhai? They're disbanding AFAIK. ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic EVE Automated Influence Map: Keeping Down The Clone Business Since 2007AD
Gordon Red SteelVipers YouWhat	Posted - 2007.09.17 01:56:00 - [9] Through the fact that CCP made a mistake with that Sov4 System. 3 conquerable stations are not enough to give Sov4 (you need at last one outpost). So, we don't need that much useless POSes anymore. (to get X percentage of the constellation claimed) I-UU was a mistake by the corps that wanted to switch the POS-duty for that system. :-/
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2007.09.17 02:26:00 - [10] Originally by: Graalum speaking of losing soveriegnty, whats up with the makhai? speaking of losing sovereignty, whats up with the rule of three? ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2007.09.17 02:30:00 - [11] Originally by: Gordon Red Through the fact that CCP made a mistake with that Sov4 System. 3 conquerable stations are not enough to give Sov4 (you need at last one outpost). So, we don't need that much useless POSes anymore. (to get X percentage of the constellation claimed) I-UU was a mistake by the corps that wanted to switch the POS-duty for that system. :-/ Originally by: TQ Issues news post This Monday it was brought to our attention that an alliance couldn't get Sovereignty 4 in their capital system even though they should. Looking into it we concluded that their capital station was a conquerable station which shouldn't be possible to set as a capital station. Fixing this required changing procedures in the database so attempting to set a conquerable station as capital station causes an error. So does this mean conquerables are workable in reaching sov 4 or did the CCP attempt to allow it prove too problematic? ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
Deschenus Maximus Amarr Digital Fury Corporation Digital Renegades	Posted - 2007.09.17 02:49:00 - [12] I hear YW are making a stack of pancakes so high that it will actually become the world's newest tallest structure. This has yet to be confirmed by my extensive network of spies, though. Anyone can C/D?
Altair Mogwa Elite Storm Enterprises Storm Armada	Posted - 2007.09.17 02:53:00 - [13] You weren't supposed to be able to pic a conqureable as your capital, it was to give an error. There is a longer explantion of the hanging session created by this and the DB issues it caused. Conquerable(s) add to sov, but you can only pick outposts as the capital. So 2 conquerable, 1 outpost (as capital) is the smalles combo with the least outposts. Three conquerables in a constellation? have to deploy an outpost so you can pick the capital and get sov 4.
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2007.09.17 03:03:00 - [14] Originally by: Altair Mogwa Conquerable(s) add to sov, but you can only pick outposts as the capital. So 2 conquerable, 1 outpost (as capital) is the smalles combo with the least outposts. Three conquerables in a constellation? have to deploy an outpost so you can pick the capital and get sov 4. roger, thanks Quote: There is a longer explantion of the hanging session created by this and the DB issues it caused. Yeah I saw the thread related to the news item, it looks like one big circlejerk. ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
Solid Wilko Finite Horizon	Posted - 2007.09.17 03:58:00 - [15] I believe they are pulling out to devote their resources to fueling their Titan so they can jump it down in a perfectly executed trap in collusion with MC
Verite Rendition Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.	Posted - 2007.09.17 04:44:00 - [16] Originally by: Gordon Red Through the fact that CCP made a mistake with that Sov4 System. 3 conquerable stations are not enough to give Sov4 (you need at last one outpost). So, we don't need that much useless POSes anymore. (to get X percentage of the constellation claimed) I-UU was a mistake by the corps that wanted to switch the POS-duty for that system. :-/ Well that makes sense. Sorry to hear CCP screwed you guys up though. ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic EVE Automated Influence Map: Keeping Down The Clone Business Since 2007AD
NATMav F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.09.17 04:45:00 - [17] Originally by: Gordon Red I-UU was a mistake by the corps that wanted to switch the POS-duty for that system. :-/ Where did we see this before?
Gnulpie Minmatar Miner Tech	Posted - 2007.09.17 05:13:00 - [18] Originally by: Wodanonline Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ? Hehe, I certainly remember lots of posts from YouWhat when they joined MC against D2 + allies and when the war went well. Also I remember a recent post about losing a 40+ BS fleet to 2 AAA-titans. So almost never?
Beshta New Balkan Mafia Circle 0f Two	Posted - 2007.09.17 05:19:00 - [19] Originally by: Solid Wilko I believe they are pulling out to devote their resources to fueling their Titan so they can jump it down in a perfectly executed trap in collusion with MC lol, cov ops titans brought to you by rev4
Ather Ialeas Amarr Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United Cult of War	Posted - 2007.09.17 05:26:00 - [20] Originally by: NATMav Originally by: Gordon Red I-UU was a mistake by the corps that wanted to switch the POS-duty for that system. :-/ Where did we see this before? Apparently changing in-alliance sovereignity management is one of the hardest things to do with POS. BTW doesn't all those sov drops mean YouWhat lost its constellation sovereignity? -
Solid Wilko Finite Horizon	Posted - 2007.09.17 06:48:00 - [21] Originally by: Beshta Originally by: Solid Wilko I believe they are pulling out to devote their resources to fueling their Titan so they can jump it down in a perfectly executed trap in collusion with MC lol, cov ops titans brought to you by rev4 If these show up I'm blaming you
Kasak Black The Collective Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2007.09.17 07:33:00 - [22] Originally by: Wodanonline Originally by: Verite Rendition Originally by: Wodanonline Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ? Well then don't be a stranger, stop on by and let out all that troubles you. we leave that to forum warriors like you Do you even know who Vertie Rendition is? Show him some f***ing respect.
mama guru Gallente Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency	Posted - 2007.09.17 09:42:00 - [23] Edited by: mama guru on 17/09/2007 09:43:16 make it quick gents whatever the situation, Toxin owns the pipe. or atleast did last week -YOU ARE NOW READING MY SIGNATURE- EVE is like the "Fisherman's Friend" of MMOs. If it's too hard, you are too weak.
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.09.17 13:19:00 - [24] last I checked they were helping bob down south
Tarantelita Ragna Rok Corp	Posted - 2007.09.17 14:28:00 - [25] Originally by: Wodanonline Quote: I haven't seen any posts here maybe becouse we almost never post here ?
Tarantelita Ragna Rok Corp	Posted - 2007.09.17 14:30:00 - [26] Could it be because you su** as one alliance?
NATMav F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.09.17 22:21:00 - [27] And no Verite, you can't buy I-UU as your own private carebearing system.
Astarte Nosferatu We Know Derek Derek Knows Us	Posted - 2007.09.17 22:31:00 - [28] Isn't YouWhat disbanding in two weeks? signature removed - please email us to find out why - Jacques([email protected]) snip Do not discuss moderation in your sig - hutch
Shpuntik Minmatar Biohazzard Task Force Mass Destruction.	Posted - 2007.09.17 22:39:00 - [29] Originally by: Graalum speaking of losing soveriegnty, whats up with the makhai? makhai are merging with Hydra and MM.
Gordon Red SteelVipers YouWhat	Posted - 2007.09.17 23:02:00 - [30] Originally by: Astarte Nosferatu Isn't YouWhat disbanding in two weeks? Not really.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.