|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4459
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 00:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
GǪwhich solves what, exactly? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4459
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 01:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
YesGǪ but what are you trying to solve?
I can tell you now: the guy sitting AFK in your system will not show up as AFK, and the guy showing up as AFK will most likely drop a whole heap of ships on you very very soonGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4459
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 01:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tepir wrote:im not the case here m8... i live in lowsec as my entire corp . All i want is more people get trough lowsec.... Your suggestion doesn't particularly address that wish.
Quote:All though i like his tactic (which i did alot of times) its starting to ruin my gameplay =p less and less people visit lowsec. Your causal chain is lacking.
Quote:And if somebody goes to sleep with cloakie alt in local he will get dced after few hours No, they won't, because if he wants to disrupt people in space, it'll be trivial for him to not trigger the game's AFK timer. Likewise, for those who do indeed intend to attack, they can trivially activate that flag. Either way, the flagging won't make any difference. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4461
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 02:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tepir wrote:i don see whats the fuss about than. IF its easy to avoid afk detection and set up scripts who will move mouse at same time every 2 hour which ccp cant detect etc... why opose this update ? Because it serves no purpose. It doesn't solve anything. It most definitely does not address the issue you're having.
Quote:AFK detection is one good way of getting this . IF anything afking will get harder . Why does being AFK need to be GÇ£hardGÇ¥? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4462
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 07:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tepir wrote:You are not just afking.. you are disabling Aliiance income... that needs to be hard . It is hard. You have to make the entire alliance agree to have their income disabled by a single person. If they choose not to, you're stuck.
If the alliance chooses to go along with your scheme, then that's their choice and their problem GÇö it's not something you can burden the AFK player for.
Oh, and as mentioned, your idea won't actually solve this (non-)issue. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4462
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 08:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tepir wrote:what you say have no logic, you want it to have logic but it doesnt . Which part? The part where the guy going AFK has no control over how people respond? The part where it's the alliance that choses to decrease their power, not the AFK:er?
Or the part where, due to how having an GÇ£AFKGÇ¥ flag beside your name won't convey any kind of useful information?
Quote:Having afk player in every system where ratting is worth doin is way to decrease certain alliance and/or corporation power. Same as killing POS. GǪexcept that losing a POS isn't something the alliance chooses to do, whereas flipping out over a single AFK player is.
Quote:If not disable it atleast make it harder . The question remains: why? The problem lies with the alliance that chooses to fold up and cower in fear, not with the guy going AFK. That's what needs to be fixed, if anything.
Quote:And this would make sleeping in enemy's important systems harder . No, it wouldn't. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4472
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tepir wrote:wasnt speaking about Flag anywhere.... GǪexcept for in the OP, you mean?
And the same flag will be used to determine when to boot the player, which will be GÇ£neverGÇ¥ for those who are looking to take advantage of alliances' crippling fear of the unknown.
Quote:Alliance on its own cant do anything about it. Of course they can. The problem is that it requires a tiny bit of effort and involvement, which is antithetical to what they want to do: they want to be spoon-fed with income without any resistance, and run crying when even something as vastly removed from GÇ£resistanceGÇ¥ as a single AFK player shows up.
Again, the problem lies with the alliance people, not with the AFKer. Their abject failure and utter and complete uselessness is only their own fault and cannot be fixed through game mechanics GÇö especially not through game mechanics that affect completely different people.
Quote:When you are cloaked in space you are invulnerable . You are also completely harmless. Seems like a fair balance.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
|
|
|