EVE Search - FSW-3C battle report

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

FSW-3C battle report

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Darcuese Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.09.22 12:19:00 - [61] Dont wanna sound egoistic or similar, but fighting guys in FSW remind me of bowling. Honestly, it even felt like being in belts chaining npc's. Those that know me, know i speak what i honestly feel. Props to launching spheres at POs however. That tower is nasty thing. We lack some logistic ships to done with all. me, myself and I ------>
Yazoul Samaiel Caldari Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.09.22 12:45:00 - [62] Originally by: Ilmonstre Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Originally by: Touched darkness ******** nonsense Ok since you and the other forum jockys fail to even understand how pos work and thats the first pos to come out of reinforced for the day and the other will be up in a few hours later , i guess its ok for you to be clueless . I suggest you go busy your time getting on ur knees begging daddy AAA and RA to come save your butts or else you mean like all the pets have to beg you lot to save them but i guess you are not gonna that when your paying pets ask you. but you have helped out fix plemty of times so why is it weak then for iac to call in some friends Feel free not to compare FIX with the bearfest called IAC , FIX has been attacked for more times that i can remember and they hold their ground and we are happy to lend them a hand . Also FIX have their space while IAC puppies used to get shot if they attempt to do the plexes in their own space by AAA so no comparison what so ever. Reading IAC forums and checking their daily kb stats makes me wonder why they call it KB and not just loss board @ Tyrax , get off your high horse or do you need more local gems made by you about being a smacktard?
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.09.22 13:20:00 - [63] I don't refer to myself as a smacktard, there's a difference between the way I do it and the way you do it. You lack all wit and style, and you're a discredit to your alliance. BoB has a lot of people like you, it's one of the main reasons people don't like BoB. http://eve.klaki.net/
Banlish Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:03:00 - [64] Good battle report Hardin, always liked reading yours (go join in all of IAC's so we can have similar reports all the time plz!) To CVA, IAC and friends/allies keep it up. I have friends in many of those alliances and some good pew pew goes a long way. Not really sure why BoB went and opened up a 3rd front with CVA and gang, I can understand the jump points and such. But is stirring up a hornets nest of a few thousand people really something they want to do atm when goons are in the east, IAC/AAA is in the north-east and now CVA-others are in the Northern areas and a bit angry? I can understand the search for good fights and pew pew, but this really is alot of fronts. Even BoB community has to be saying 'god damn, alot of brush fires going on.' while yes, at the same time some of them are saying "W00t fights-a-paloza!" Btw, I feel very sorry for the logistics ppl in BoBs faction, they must be cursing you horribly! p.s. Hi Uly.
Hellaciouss Genco Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:09:00 - [65] Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Reading IAC forums and checking their daily kb stats makes me wonder why they call it KB and not just loss board Thank god your K:D ratio is so good. It's obviously winning you this war by an extremely large margin. I sense failure cascade in the Coalition any day now due to your overwhelmingly good K:D ratio.
Mah Kraah Minmatar Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:22:00 - [66] now the audience may understand why the tiny 300pilot alliance ushrakhan could not held unity station and the surounding area against cva and there allys after they started seriously to try and push us out of the way. all the involved defenders of fsw where also attackers of the lost unity station. on top we had noon of the new nice defense tools u have nowdays: cynojammers, manned posguns...
Sameth Technology Acquisition Collective	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:29:00 - [67] Originally by: Mah Kraah now the audience may understand why the tiny 300pilot alliance ushrakhan could not held unity station and the surounding area against cva and there allys after they started seriously to try and push us out of the way. all the involved defenders of fsw where also attackers of the lost unity station. on top we had noon of the new nice defense tools u have nowdays: cynojammers, manned posguns... Bitter much?
Darko1107 Caldari E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:46:00 - [68] Edited by: Darko1107 on 22/09/2007 14:46:17 Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Originally by: Ilmonstre Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Originally by: Touched darkness ******** nonsense Ok since you and the other forum jockys fail to even understand how pos work and thats the first pos to come out of reinforced for the day and the other will be up in a few hours later , i guess its ok for you to be clueless . I suggest you go busy your time getting on ur knees begging daddy AAA and RA to come save your butts or else you mean like all the pets have to beg you lot to save them but i guess you are not gonna that when your paying pets ask you. but you have helped out fix plemty of times so why is it weak then for iac to call in some friends Feel free not to compare FIX with the bearfest called IAC , FIX has been attacked for more times that i can remember and they hold their ground and we are happy to lend them a hand . Also FIX have their space while IAC puppies used to get shot if they attempt to do the plexes in their own space by AAA so no comparison what so ever. Reading IAC forums and checking their daily kb stats makes me wonder why they call it KB and not just loss board @ Tyrax , get off your high horse or do you need more local gems made by you about being a smacktard? All you do is come out with generalisations about entire alliances and pathetic insults that insinuate you are a high level of human being in comparison to them. You come out with comments of people being completely clueless and fail to even back up your own. Not to mention the fact that you tell people like tyrax... an alliance leader to get off his high horse, when your just a mere member following orders passed down to you by your seniors. Every post you make is just you trying to pretend your higher than you are. Oh btw, nice report hardin, enjoyed it, sounds like a mighty fine POS . ------------------ Sig removed, please keep it under the 24,000 byte limit, if you have any questions please email [email protected] - Xorus
Anton Marx Caldari Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.09.22 14:51:00 - [69] I'm gonna try again Yazoul (or whatever your nickname is). For the love of 21-century civilized communication, end yourself! - Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate - [UMCON]Anton Marx
Emeline Cabernet Amarr DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:09:00 - [70] Originally by: Yazoul Samaiel Originally by: Hellaciouss Carry on with those fighter swarm blobs though, let me know how well that goes taking down POS's! rofl 1 IAC large tower in FAT just came out of reinforced and got killed by regular fleet just now while iac where no where to be found . Try again kiddo or at least come and show us how tough u r ingame instead of forums how about you big bad boys come met us where the real action is, its not like you guys are known to pick the easy fights.
Zagum Darkfin Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:13:00 - [71] Respect to that Tower setup and its gunners. It was scary warping in and gettting instant locked. /bows ..i..
Eveliddia Amarr The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:22:00 - [72] Has anyone noticed the trend that when CVA is involved everyone leaves happy (UK excluded I guess). It stands that the CVA is GOOD and no matter what happens in this ever changing universe the CVA will always be GOOD GF everyone involved...
Rianharte Polaris Project Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:23:00 - [73] Was a great fight and both sides respected each other after it. (which is rare after an ingagement). I lost 2 battleships and a couple of inty's but they are small for what was gained in this. To BOB i say great team work on your part and your FC deserves a pat on the back. I admit i had little or no respect for before this battle but that has changed slightly now . All tho numbers in kills where on BOBs side i feel it was a provi victory as we saved the jammer and pos. To my CVA brothers and our friend you perfomed a great duty and unselfishly threw wave after wave of shps at the foes (not many ppl would do that and most would roll over and fade away NOT US) Our POS gunners deserve massive Kudos and our FC's. Great fight all and let try and keep this thread at that stop the smack and let stay on wat the thread is about. Which is good fight and respect on both sides for that.
NATMav F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:31:00 - [74] Originally by: Pilk As it stands, we "fell back" to dock in a station that was IAC's as of a week or so ago. I think that pretty much says it all. --P Don't forget to give RISE docking rights.
Seleene Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.09.22 17:33:00 - [75] Edited by: Seleene on 22/09/2007 17:33:39 Hardin rocks. ACE report and sums it up nicely. Paxton & Allies - I don't give a damn how many ships you lost (and it was a lot) but the tower still stands and that is a win for you. Period. I said as much in local last night as we left. That tower is an almost mirror copy of 'Natalie', the Dark Blood tower that MC has in FAT. IAC felt her wrath yesterday and I figured it would be a nasty battle last night going up against her sister. In the end, we simply lacked the numbers and the fight went on for too long. There were some excellent fleet fights and the lag was actually not bad at all for many of us. Maybe we'll be back, maybe we won't. I had fun and got to jump through gates and everything last night! \o/ - THIS FLEET FOR RENT!
Silvestri Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.09.22 18:09:00 - [76] Congrats to CVA and the rest of providence. I'm really glad you are on the coalition side. Keep it up over there! Look forward to all the battle reports as always....
Hardin Amarr Paxton Industries Paxton Federation	Posted - 2007.09.22 18:12:00 - [77] We are not on Coalition side - we are on IAC side. This was clearly demonstrated today as United Legion took the opportunity to pod a few of our pilots returning from FAT on their way home C'est la vie! ------------------------------ CVA - Kicking Arse For The Empire - http://eve-files.com/dl/83607
Lazuran Gallente Time And ISK Sink Corporation	Posted - 2007.09.22 18:23:00 - [78] Originally by: Yaay Originally by: Pnuka Grats Paxton/CVA/others on defending your objective. Actually, Paxton and friends failed miserably, the control tower just proved how out of balance POS warfare is becoming... Something even goons complain about on here. Take your whines about gameplay to MSN. isn't it funny how some people advocate both GTC<=>ISK trades and EVE being superior due to its cruelty and costly losses, when they use the former to circumvent the latter?
Conlin Gallente Yiotul Fighters Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.09.24 07:06:00 - [79] Originally by: Sameth Originally by: Mah Kraah now the audience may understand why the tiny 300pilot alliance ushrakhan could not held unity station and the surounding area against cva and there allys after they started seriously to try and push us out of the way. all the involved defenders of fsw where also attackers of the lost unity station. on top we had noon of the new nice defense tools u have nowdays: cynojammers, manned posguns... Bitter much? Unity was lost through spamming , CVA saw an easy route and took it , hence the bitterness that leaves a foul taste . If it had been taken by strategy and good fights then the bitterness would never have appeared . After the loss ,the spam , the bitterness has now been replaced by relief . Our small alliance held Unity for longer than anyone expected , that in itself was a victory and even to this day we are still a force to be reckoned with . It maybe politically correct to call us terrorists or pirates to justify the events that took place at our loss ? , but we learned to adapt and nobody can say we havent adapted well . We continue our Burn Providence policy !! .
Omega Man The Geddy Foundation	Posted - 2007.09.24 07:12:00 - [80] Originally by: Hardin We are not on Coalition side - we are on IAC side. This was clearly demonstrated today as United Legion took the opportunity to pod a few of our pilots returning from FAT on their way home C'est la vie! Choose your friends more carefully. - Happy user of CAOD troll cleaner http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=584345
tartrus Templars of Space Freelancer Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.24 07:22:00 - [81] Originally by: Hellaciouss Originally by: Nick Curso Originally by: Hellaciouss Edited by: Hellaciouss on 22/09/2007 04:10:07 Originally by: Yaay Waaaa We can no longer steamroll well set up poses without losing a single ship waaaaa well set up poses can kill our uber officer tanked dreads waaaa Bahaha. Archived for later use. It seems the only time something is imbalanced and overpowered is when BoB has trouble dealing with it. omfg roflmao the ironoy is so bad it hurts. I sometimes wonder if these kinda ppl are the type that go on x-factor and are absolutly terrible but are adament there better than madonna lmao. Sorry to smack in ure well written thread. Im so ****ed i missed the scrap sounds like great fun on both sides gj pax on a well organised defende of ure pos :) The sad thing is I've never once said they were overpowered. I think they need more HP now a`days to be quite @#$%ing honest, and I repair the things perrty much every day! But that's just me. I don't honestly mind repping when I know the things I've repped will cause McBoB ships to explode later. Carry on with those fighter swarm blobs though, let me know how well that goes taking down POS's! rofl hehe I would rather fight bob than old friends. personal feelings aside
Octavinus Augustus Amarr Auctoritan Syndicate Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.24 07:54:00 - [82] Originally by: Conlin Our small alliance held Unity for longer than anyone expected , that in itself was a victory and even to this day we are still a force to be reckoned with . It maybe politically correct to call us terrorists or pirates to justify the events that took place at our loss ? , but we learned to adapt and nobody can say we havent adapted well . We continue our Burn Providence policy !! . In my opinion U'K has fought CVA & Friends long and hard over the past few years. I don't think there's many wars that has been going on for so long or with such a fervor on both sides. Many people have expressed their admiration of the capabilities of CVA & Friends in this thread and others. I do believe that whatever our capabilities are, they have been honed through that long and (RP wise) bitter war. I do not think that CVA would be what it is today had it not been for U'K. You certainly deserve a lot of respect for that. On a sidenote, I (and many others) did feel very sad that U'K came to the 0.0 Providence war with different expectations than CVA which ultimately led to the 9UY debacle. I'm glad to hear that you have overcome it and are prospering again. OOC I wish you the best of luck. IC I wish you may all burn in whatever version of hell we Amarr believe in. Q: Do you know how to make a disobediant Minmatar slave scream? A: Skin him and roll him in salt.
Vaustrien Caldari The Greater Goon The OSS	Posted - 2007.09.24 07:56:00 - [83] Geez I hate you all, hearing about the well timed shield reppers/warpouts, the flying a vaga in POS range to tackle support and warpouts four times when being primaried... ... my computer's too crappy to be able to do that, even with all the settings minimal. Geez I lag on 10 v 10 fights let alone neato massive battles. Hate you... all.
Oosel Nightmare Holdings Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.24 16:03:00 - [84] this thread almost makes me want to actually put all of my years of training weapons and caps ship to use.well done to all maybe i shall give up ship sales and actualy them instead
Mangold Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.09.24 16:17:00 - [85] Edited by: Mangold on 24/09/2007 16:18:28 Originally by: Octavinus Augustus Originally by: Conlin Our small alliance held Unity for longer than anyone expected , that in itself was a victory and even to this day we are still a force to be reckoned with . It maybe politically correct to call us terrorists or pirates to justify the events that took place at our loss ? , but we learned to adapt and nobody can say we havent adapted well . We continue our Burn Providence policy !! . In my opinion U'K has fought CVA & Friends long and hard over the past few years. I don't think there's many wars that has been going on for so long or with such a fervor on both sides. Many people have expressed their admiration of the capabilities of CVA & Friends in this thread and others. I do believe that whatever our capabilities are, they have been honed through that long and (RP wise) bitter war. I do not think that CVA would be what it is today had it not been for U'K. You certainly deserve a lot of respect for that. On a sidenote, I (and many others) did feel very sad that U'K came to the 0.0 Providence war with different expectations than CVA which ultimately led to the 9UY debacle. I'm glad to hear that you have overcome it and are prospering again. OOC I wish you the best of luck. IC I wish you may all burn in whatever version of hell we Amarr believe in. The reasons for the bitterness has been debated at length at other places and there's no reason to start it over again. Short version is that U'K kept allies outside the fight in the beginning while CVA got alliances we had never even heard of to help them out. CVA's diplomacy skills were obviously much better than U'K's. CVA couldn't kill U'K's towers and spammed the system with their own (perfectly legit) and U'K didn't want to/couldn't do that and basically left 9UY to CVA. +1 outpost to CVA. Congrats. After that most of U'K thought "**** CVA, we don't care about them anyway" and that's when the oldest conflict in EVE died. At least that's my opinion. The official U'K version may be different. CVA are good fighters and seldom smack (one sure as hell do, but most of us have him blocked by now) and used to be fun to fight. I'm not surpriced that MCBOBFIX had trouble killing them. It's not easy. The loss of Unity station wasn't a bad thing for us as it was both expected and tied us into carebearing. It's much more fun not having to defend it. All of this are my personal thoughts and may not be the official U'K version.
El Torrent Gallente Paxton Industries Paxton Federation	Posted - 2007.09.25 05:45:00 - [86] Originally by: Mangold Short version is that U'K kept allies outside the fight in the beginning while CVA got alliances we had never even heard of to help them out. CVA's diplomacy skills were obviously much better than U'K's. Paxton's side, of exactly this story is easy explained. When we came to the area a long time ago, the CVA did not shoot my people, but the UK did, despite claiming doing NRDS. At that time we were small, like a corp with 5-10 active members, and neutral to everyone. The CVA let us become, what we are now. Nobody ever asked us to help in that conflict. We offered help on our own. The UK made picking a side really easy for us. -- Hello World.
Sehanine Caldari Solitary Confinement	Posted - 2007.09.25 06:07:00 - [87] mmm FSW, I remember the days when it had Crokite in the belts That was another lifetime in EVE though
Eveliddia Amarr The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.09.25 06:09:00 - [88] This issue is non existent let it die. Good fight was had, both then and now. Congrats PXF on a well designed PoS setup and to BoB/Friends for bringing it. I for one anxiously await your next trip into lower Providence.
IHaveTenFingers Caldari ADVANCED Combat and Engineering Axiom Empire	Posted - 2007.09.25 06:12:00 - [89] Posting not-so-high up in a not-all-that-epic thread! -TF
ForumPosterAlt HERRO KITTY	Posted - 2007.09.25 06:54:00 - [90] Originally by: Pilk And to all the carriers-blobs-are-how-they-win naysayers, note that MC/BoB/FIX/AXE/friends fought without benefit of capital support, while Paxton had multiple carriers, etc Well people were saying it was a good fight, to me this automatically means that McBob didn't ruin the node with 1000 fighters. If you guys want to flex your fleet muscles then do so like this, or at least without 50+ carriers/moms. People know why McBob monopolizes the field when they produce unplayable lag with such a tactic. When neither side can actually play, AI wins. And whoever brings more AI wins. Your fighter-blob tactic is smart but don't look for any high fives, it still ruins the game for those who can't do a damn thing when your cloud of drones is ruining their **. Because posting on the forums is serious business.**

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.