EVE Search - Epic Lag in FAT - Huge battle underway

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Epic Lag in FAT - Huge battle underway

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 18:58:00 - [1] Originally by: Chip2k3 hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone? of course
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:09:00 - [2] Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk I don't think anyone doomsdayed the servers did
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:17:00 - [3] Originally by: Chip2k3 Originally by: Phear meh here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system. \ ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags.. imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play Thats what I said and got called a troll! :'( maybe no one likes you
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:32:00 - [4] Originally by: jernej Originally by: Hellaciouss Originally by: Timmehh Originally by: Hellaciouss Originally by: Phear meh here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system. \ ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags.. imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play Yep, what a good ***** idea. Tell 98% of your alliance they're not allowed to *** help defend their home. Good *** idea! Why didn't anyone else *** think of this! Phear meh for #1 Dev. i see a lot of stars bitter? Me? Bitter? Na. As some forum alt above just sayed, Mc and BoB only managed to kill one PoS out of the 11 that came out over the past two days. I'm just sad we didn't get to completely ***their capital fleet because no one could reload. I guess you could say I am bitter? We didn't reload either. We only used amarr ships. Nerf amarr. Oh and I think I pwned tempest at some point, but mail didn't load yet wrong alliance. it would make more sense if this reply was toward goons
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:41:00 - [5] Edited by: Nlewis on 03/10/2007 19:42:01 Originally by: Silvestri Originally by: Gontard Originally by: Bluebear8 BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase. IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS! All your alliance is as ******** as you ? I'm guessing the word that is bleaped out is....... hungover?? Do I win? if you hit quote you can see what they said. but your answer is much more fitting
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:43:00 - [6] Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Wainak SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL! You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance. what
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 19:54:00 - [7] Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Nlewis Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Wainak SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL! You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance. what Less pixels = less effort please cite some sources
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 20:07:00 - [8] Originally by: Optical Nerve I can't describe the fustration about this game when involving alliance vs. alliance clashes. Why did they in CCP even bother to create such into the game when this clearly doesn't work in practice. Can't you guys at CCP focus on performance now for a while. Buy some epic computing hardware just to house these kinds of 500+ clashes of players? I think that I have read that the new engine supposedly will be optimized when it comes to sending info back and forth to the server reducing server load. So if this is correct and it actually will do that, then all this **** may be over with shortly
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 20:15:00 - [9] Edited by: Nlewis on 03/10/2007 20:16:20 Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Nlewis Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Nlewis Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Wainak SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL! You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance. what Less pixels = less effort please cite some sources Well logically, the fewer pixels there are being told to do things, the less strain it will put on hardware. Running at that resolution on your "core quad 6600(o/c up to 3Mhz)" is going to take more effort than running a resolution which is lower. This is also why Anti-Aliasing reduces FPS - 2x AA will render at twice the size and scale it down, giving it smoother edges. 6x AA does the same at 6x etc. And if you do have a Core[b]2[b]Quad 6600, overclocked to 3mhz (lol, I'll overlook this and assume you meant Ghz Underclocking ftw), why not record at full size? Fraps will run at more or less the same speed at that size, due to load being shifted to a different core. Just fyi, I run a core2quad and frapsed that entire 'fight' at full resolution with max effects on, 6x AA, 16x AF and zoomed in quite often, getting 10 - 20 fps. Kay 1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 20:53:00 - [10] Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Nlewis 1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason /cuts the quote-pyramid Anyway "1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768." Lawl wtf? It will run slower at a higher resolution, just not noticeably slower. Besides, 1280x800 isn't a widescreen resolution, just a wide aspect ratio. The original res of that video, by doubling the half-size res, is 1680x1048. That's 1.7 million pixels, as opposed to 1024x768 / 1280x800 running at under 1 million. 70% more pixels to render makes no difference? any other game and I agree with you but we are talking about eve

Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 21:00:00 - [11] Originally by: Kara Ivanova Originally by: Nlewis Originally by: Ms Tolarri Originally by: Nlewis 1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason /cuts the quote-pyramid Anyway "1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768." Lawl wtf? It will run slower at a higher resolution, just not noticeably slower. Besides, 1280x800 isn't a widescreen resolution, just a wide aspect ratio. The original res of that video, by doubling the half-size res, is 1680x1048. That's 1.7 million pixels, as opposed to 1024x768 / 1280x800 running at under 1 million. 70% more pixels to render makes no difference? any other game and I agree with you but we are talking about eve Any idea how badly you just failed? why? I have switched many times between 1280x1024 and 1024x768 many times and I have noticed no difference whatsoever
Nlewis GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.03 23:32:00 - [12] Originally by: Timmehh What? im not in any alliance. and what is "alt"? what you are posting with. post with your main

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.