EVE Search - Sani Sabik AzA II -A- Diabolus fecit, ut id facerem!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

Sani Sabik AzA II -A- Diabolus fecit, ut id facerem!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Revan Neferis Amarr Bloodveil The Sani Sabik	Posted - 2007.10.16 03:27:00 - [1] DIABOLOUS FECIT, UT ID FACEREM! The devil made me do it! Blood of Betrayal ! And so it happens that Sylph Alliance choose to betray their long time friends under the command of their slave Masters CVA. A coward attack unde blue standings was executed. May the war Blood of Betrayal begin.
Keerie Jeanmot Gallente Venom's Asylum VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 08:02:00 - [2] Just for my records, is this a war inside AzA second campaign? And did Sylph shot at one of the AzA members when they were still blue?
Olavane Riftsnake Clan Shadow Wolf Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 08:16:00 - [3] Hey Revan use some diffusion and transparency next time, the alliance logos do not fit well. PS: btw where do you get those banner, I like them
Keerie Jeanmot Gallente Venom's Asylum VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 08:22:00 - [4] Originally by: Olavane Riftsnake Hey Revan use some diffusion and transparency next time, the alliance logos do not fit well. PS: btw where do you get those banner, I like them I think that the banner is fantastic, specially what the Sylph guy is doing between his legs when CVA whispers.
zoolkhan Minmatar Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2007.10.16 08:37:00 - [5] i find this very fitting...
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:07:00 - [6] Sylph have often been accused of betraying their friends. It stems back to the days of the CVA/UK battle for Providence. Sylph, with their newly acquired outpost, decided that they'd favour the victors whilst sitting tightly upon the fence, watching which way the wind blows upon the battlefield. The truth is, Sylph have changed and their friendly old reliable ways have evaporated in favour of the back stabbing, cold, ruthless profit machine they have become. I speak today against Sylph, despite still holding several friends within the Sylph Alliance (I hope), but I will not have Sylph pilots blur the truth with any manner of fiction regarding the past 48 hours. CRMSN, a long time friend to Sylph, had been in contact that very day with their vice president,... The illustrious Kaik Baker; Mortim. I was told that we would remain blue, and any changes to this standing, would be advised prior to any action. Strangely, whilst one of my pilots visited his old home of the Sylph outpost in IS-R7P, he was attacked, by a Sylph fleet. Fortunately, his Thorax was more than a match for the entire fleet, and managed to escape the pursuing interceptors. Whilst we had Sylph blue, and even considered them our friends, a war had begun. Last night, Sylph went one step further... Repo Industries, who I do not speak for but merely have the pleasure of flying alongside at present, had always held Sylph in a mutual blue relationship. They (to my knowledge, from being on TS with Repo last night), had a similar arrangement to us, and were not notified of any standings alteration. Yet, whilst we sat on the gate in KBP7, Sylph arrived with a 20+ fleet and shot at not only their reds (CRMSN, UK etc), but blues too (Repo). The mighty Sylph alliance, forged by the moral "There is Beauty in Trust" set their friends red, and engage without warning, in a cheap attempt to get early kills before their opponents fire back. I was once a Sylph Fleet Commander, but left due to the indecisive nature of the leadership, the slow response time of the fleet and the way in which they treat their oldest friends. Seems they seriously deserve the title of CVA pets, and will backstab anyone to ever object to CVA's tyrrany. At first I hoped Sylph would carry on with their fence sitting policy and avoid the conflict, but now I only hope they burn in the hell fire they deserve. Tiger.
Maurelle Laurette	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:21:00 - [7] Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:26:51 Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:25:18 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But when they start flying in gangs with people slyph consider hostile, it seems logical somethings going to be done. ultimately though, it seems to me, they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy
Keerie Jeanmot Gallente Venom's Asylum VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:27:00 - [8] Originally by: Maurelle Laurette Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:25:18 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy Use your main, clonejack.
Maurelle Laurette	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:28:00 - [9] Originally by: Keerie Jeanmot Originally by: Maurelle Laurette Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:25:18 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy Use your main, clonejack. i can use whatever character i want thanks, its not like anyone with a brain cant track this character to my main anyway
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:29:00 - [10] There we have it. A mighty Sylph alt trying to defend their actions, which alone, speaks volumes. "when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok?" Basically, that reads "CVA are being shot at, and we're in trouble from CVA if we don't defend them" (but with a little less punctuation and grammar). No amount of excuses will ever cover up the hostile intent shown by the backstabbing Sylph alliance. What little amount of friendship they still have beyond the realms of CVA, isn't deserved. Maybe today, maybe tomorrow, Sylph will fire on you. But only if it's in their best interest of course. Tiger.

Gladiator Jonny Repo Industries	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:37:00 - [11] Originally by: Maurelle Laurette Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:30:12 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But when they start flying in gangs with people slyph consider hostile, it seems logical somethings going to be done. ultimately though, it seems to me, they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy I belive it was your kestrel that fired first. he just got owned shrotly after, thats just what i hear. might need conformation.
Keerie Jeanmot Gallente Venom's Asylum VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:40:00 - [12] Originally by: Gladiator Jonny Originally by: Maurelle Laurette Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:30:12 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But when they start flying in gangs with people slyph consider hostile, it seems logical somethings going to be done. ultimately though, it seems to me, they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy I belive it was your kestrel that fired first. he just got owned shrotly after, thats just what i hear. might need conformation. From REPO killboard, a comment about the fact: Aslovi on Tuesday 16th Oct 00:30 Who would have thought that this little kessie locking and shoot me would cause Sylph so much hassle. Oh well bring on the RED I think this confirms that the agression was made by SYLPH ALLIANCE
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:51:00 - [13] Not also forgetting: "when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok?" We were camping a CVA station, and Mortim undocked in a hauler providing intel to the CVA forces about our deployed bubble. Now, lets establish a few facts here. I have considered Mortim a friend for years. We've flown together many times, and had a friendship beyond the confines of the respective alliances to which we both belong. In fact, we used to share many a drink and laugh over previous campaigns, etc. However, when I asked him to stop telling CVA about the bubble in local, he didn't. So, yes, I locked him. That's what aparently started the war here. This evil, terrible, heinous act of agression to lock a Hoarder, belonging to a friend of several years started a war. For me, an act of agression would have been to blow his hauler to pieces, and being of long standing friendship, know he also realises this. I put it to you, that Sylph's cowardice in the subject, sees them sitting behind a feable excuse, desperately attempting to jutify their hostility, if even only to themselves. Sylph, I pity you. Tiger.
Commander Nixon Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:51:00 - [14] here is the log from our pilot. you will notice he was fired upon but didn't fire back. http://www.jaesign.com/adam/eve/logs/20071015_225517.txt the log speaks for its self. if their is proof to the contrary plz post it. this pilot was podded too.
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 09:59:00 - [15] Yes indeed,... Nixon has a valid point! Look at this log! In a fight that lasted only 5 minutes, there was a full 60 seconds between this kestrel (scan res?) firing at Balmung and getting shot at. What was that Kestrel pilot doing for over a minute in that fight? You'll all burn. Every one of you, and your station too. Tiger.
Commander Nixon Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 10:06:00 - [16] tiger as always you show your true colors , your new friends will too find this out as have so many others. as this point is between us and repro not you, i would appreciate it if you allow them to answer.
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 10:09:00 - [17] I am answering for CRMSN alone. I do not speak for Repo, and make no attempt to do so. I only question what your pilot was doing for 60 seconds. Didn't mean to touch a sore nerve there, Nixon. My true colours? What would they be? The hiding behind alts? The firing at blues? For now, I've ranted for too long, so will back off. Besides, I have work to attend to. Tiger.
Keerie Jeanmot Gallente Venom's Asylum VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 10:18:00 - [18] Originally by: Tigerfish Torpedo Yes indeed,... Nixon has a valid point! Look at this log! In a fight that lasted only 5 minutes, there was a full 60 seconds between this kestrel (scan res?) firing at Balmung and getting shot at. What was that Kestrel pilot doing for over a minute in that fight? You'll all burn. Every one of you, and your station too. Tiger. By knowing REPO's reputation I'd doubt they would attenpt to say something that never happened. By knowing Sylph's reputation of several betrayals it's easy to draw conclusions. I have a question though: to Sylph, what is it worth to have an alliance carrying the label of being a slave, dirty and non trusted entity at space? Seriously here, don't you guys have any desire to be something more positive at the public view?
Gladiator Jonny Repo Industries	Posted - 2007.10.16 10:28:00 - [19] Edited by: Gladiator Jonny on 16/10/2007 10:28:15 Edit: after thinking thru my message, i think ill ask if its ok to post
Commander Nixon Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 11:42:00 - [20] Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 11:44:34 Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 11:43:40 Originally by: Keerie Jeanmot Originally by: Gladiator Jonny Originally by: Maurelle Laurette Edited by: Maurelle Laurette on 16/10/2007 09:30:12 so when crimson provide intelligence to AzA while they are blue to slyph. its ok? when crimson are camp outposts and lock slyph haulers. its ok? when repo insist on being friendly when they abuse that to attack slyph allies from there outpost. its ok? when repo shoot down a slyph kestrel before any standings change. its ok? slyph are being made out to be the big bad wolves in alot of posts recently. To me it looks like they have been forced into choosing between one group of friends and another. I think the fact that one of there group of friends allied themselves with the same group of people that are trying to kill them might have something to do with the standing changes. Crimson and REPO can blame slyph all they want for being set red. But when they start flying in gangs with people slyph consider hostile, it seems logical somethings going to be done. ultimately though, it seems to me, they choose that route when they desided to ally themselves with Revan, Sani Sabik and the AzA project. your enemies friend is you enemy I belive it was your kestrel that fired first. he just got owned shrotly after, thats just what i hear. might need conformation. From REPO killboard, a comment about the fact: Aslovi on Tuesday 16th Oct 00:30 Who would have thought that this little kessie locking and shoot me would cause Sylph so much hassle. Oh well bring on the RED I think this confirms that the agression was made by SYLPH ALLIANCE can you show me where on his kill mail said ship kessie is. if i am seeing game mechanics wrong plz inform me. as if the ship in question would have shot at him he would be listed on the killmail would he not ?. http://repo.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=5859

Shadowraven213 Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 11:59:00 - [21] Backstabbers are we? hmm lets have a little history lesson HERE! This is the only official statement Sylph alliance has ever made regarding the Ushrakhan war which our enemys endlessly say is wrong and ignore everything in that message and conveniently forget it ever existed but its the truth and the only thing sylph ever needs to say Now on to current matters If you click that link above you will see that the next post is tigerfish torpedo ex-sylph fleet commander who left sylph because we would not fire on ISS for haveing a jump POS in one of our systems (this was diplomaticaly resolved with ISS and no ISS pos exists in our space)so whatever he says to you about sylph is through the eyes of an agressor which sylph alliance is not and has never been There are times when we have been attacked, we where once sieged in our home system by forces loyal to the ushrakhan and this was in retaliation for setting them red after 4 months of being shot at by their freinds in the littlest hobos and then BUM who grew in the station known as UNITY under direct ushrakhan control 4 jumps from sylph alliances outpost THIS was the reason for the standings change ultimately but the fact that about 3 other corps and 2 other alliances one of which was EVOKE who had a titan and where all red to us threatening to take our outpost on a daily basis didnt help either So if you actually read and understand what that offical statement actually says you will see that sylph are fiercely loyal to our freinds, ushrakhan being one of them a long time ago thats why we took 4 months of diplomacy work before setting them red CVA we didnt talk to untill we set ushrakhan red not that you will belive me but i dont honestly care, think what you want about our relationship with CVA if you want the truth CVA do not tell sylph what to do and sylph do not tell CVA what to do and thats called friendship earned for the fact that unlike the ushrakhan CVA never once told or threatened us into shooting at ushrakhan THAT is why we are allied to CVA and we seem to share the same reds, but not all of them REPO where blue now they have lied after being set hostile for actively agressing sylph forces (first might i add) and aiding our enemys, CRIMSON being our enemys for provideing sani sabik with passwords to sylph POS, as well as flying with all of AZA everything else you will read here is an outright lie and shows just how pathetic your propaganda war really is AZA, lets see if your shooting is up to the quality of your lies Tiger you are as dishonourable as the ex madison pilot who now flys with you, but i must thank you for bringing him within my sights and rest assured when you are within them yourself i wont hestitate to destroy you, thats if you even dare to attack us because you more than anyone knows what sylph alliance is truly capable of, and if you dont by now you will soon find out
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 12:26:00 - [22] A very rousing speech Shad,... I'm actually impressed. Perhaps if I was going for some Alliance Tournament official cheerleader position, I'd borrow it for my acceptence speech. However, this being a time for war, I'll save it and the crowd pleasing jostle it's bound to create. Truth is, you guys set UK red after 4 months of diplomacy, and with us was a 5 minute decision. I wouldn't have minded had you of told us first. There lies my problem Shad. Furthermore, yes, the ISS POS was the reason I left. Sylph were, at the time sitting there with an ISS POS in their space. A discussion which lasted about 5 hours on Vent ended with the decision to issue them an ultimatum. The plan was simple, give them 24 hours to shift it, or have it destroyed. The clock started ticking,... 23:59, 23:58, etc.... As we reached the very final minute of that 24 hour ultimatum, it was announced that the POS was still present in Sylph space. ISS themselves told Sylph they would simply have to "deal with it". With the 24 hour period over, we then spent a further 7 hours discussing whether to kill it. Diplomacy be damned. If you don't intend to kill something, you don't threaten. It makes you look weak,... Very weak in fact. I was embarrassed to be in Sylph on that day, and left to form my own alliance with Steel. As for knowing what Sylph is capible of, yes, I know full well the horrible fate in store for me. Lets take last night for example. We got blobbed. We lost ships. My respects to the party involved, however, a more detailed look may be in order... We moved into KBP to attack a gang of Severence ships in the system. 15 sniping battleships that ran away as soon as 7 frigates and cruisers jumped into local. Then, we sat and awaited the mighty gank, that we knew was coming. How long did it take? How capible is Sylph of dealing with such a deadly force? 3 hours. 3 hours to mount 20(ish) ships and come 6 or 7 jumps. We were bored out of our minds in truth. The Severence gang alone could have killed us all, without waiting for the Sylph fleet. Though, if you really wanna go into the details of Sylph's level of competence, you may remember an issue of 2 carriers (Slammers were they?) that got attacked 4 or 5 jumps from IS. The opposing force had a reported 20 something battleships. The carriers begged Sylph for help in defending their carriers, and naturally Sylph agreed. At first, I didn't care whether those carriers were killed or not. I waited and mulled the decision over for an easy 5 minutes, before forming my fleet to go and help save them. But when I undocked, what did I find? The Sylph fleet hadn't left yet. In fact, I sat and watched the Sylph fleet take a further 2 minutes to assemble. Yes, those 2 carriers managed to tank a full 7 minutes on their own, before they were both destroyed. At the end of that 7 minutes, where was Sylph? Still 3 jumps off. So please forgive me, if I'm not overly scared of the prospect of fighting you Shad. Afterall, your fleet arrived in Thakala once that POS had already been put into reinforced mode. Again, Sylph arrives just in time for Kaik, and to count it's minimal level of loss (considering it never entered the fight). Your crediblity is slipping Shad,... You're in no position to say anything is a lie when Sylph has been tarnished with it's reputation of late for firing on friends, and lying over matters of diplomacy. I await your next desperate attempt to clear your consciences of such levels of idiocy. With fondest regards, Tiger.
Shadowraven213 Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 12:59:00 - [23] Originally by: Tigerfish Torpedo Sylph has been tarnished with it's reputation of late for firing on friends, and lying over matters of diplomacy Prove that we fired on our friends (as commander nixon has quite adequately proved that repo have gotten it wrong) and prove that we have lied over diplomatic matters then i might take you a little more seriously, sylphs credibility has only been damaged by our enemys and only our enemys seem to take it seriously which of course gives me hours of pleasure through watching this circus as for your laughable analysis of sylph response times just goes to show exactly why i wasnt sad when sylphs fleet lost you as a commander and your awesome capability in battle was demonstrated by the fact that your gatecamp that a sylph fleet just happened upon (yes we couldnt care less that you camp a gate we arent anywhere near) you and that ex madison pilot who shall remain nameless unless he wishes to post here werent among the destroyed ships, when i cant say the same for the rest of your fleet that was turned to dust at the gate along with the REPO ships that opened fire upon sylph ships (please refer to commander nixons post that proves beyond a doubt they are lieing) Dont accuse me of idiocy when you dont have evidence just like your so called "freindly fire" incident, and it just goes to show that your a lot more profecient at talking than you ever where at fighting All respect that i once had for you has now been destroyed by this display of arrogance and lies not that you care because we both know that you betrayed sylph long before this incident with repo ever happened I look forward to repaying your insults with volley after volley of missiles If you want to discuss this further you know where i am, i think ive made my point here and i have infinately more important things to do with my time
Tigerfish Torpedo Underworld Protection Agency The Crimson Federation	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:09:00 - [24] "I look forward to repaying your insults with volley after volley of missiles" That's once you've sat down, talked about the possibility of entering combat, then gathered authorisation from the leadership, then spent 24 hours putting a fleet together, then having to move them all through the endlessly challenging 5 or 6 jumps, oh and then coordinating with CVA (Afterall, CVA even told us last night that it was their op, and that you were simply 'tagging along')... I laugh at you sir, and your respect isn't wanted, nor appreciated. So typical that Sylph pilots feel the need to let a matter of diplomacy fall between a friendship. As for illiterate Nixon,... His post proved nothing. Repo have yet to officially comment on the subject, and the matter of that 60 seconds hasn't yet been explained. I can't help but wonder how many lines of text are missing between those two actions. Afterall, I can copy, paste, and even edit logs too. Realistically though, your post was almost credible, right up until the point at which you started talking. Please carry on, it entertains me. Tiger.
Setana Manoro Gallente Firefly Inc.	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:12:00 - [25] Originally by: Commander Nixon Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 10:46:24 here is the log from our pilot. you will notice he was fired upon but didn't fire back. http://www.jaesign.com/adam/eve/logs/20071015_225517.txt the log speaks for its self. if their is proof to the contrary plz post it. this pilot was podded too. the first repo kill happened at 23:01 http://repo.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=5849 this is not to insist anyone is wrong just pointing out what i know to be ture. The log shows your pilot firing 2-3 salvo's, then stayed there for 1 minute. After that Aslovi popped him. It's nice that you were able to confirm that you agressed first. :) I'm not neutral in RAGOON vs BOB, I just dislike both sides. :)
Shadowraven213 Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:17:00 - [26] Edited by: Shadowraven213 on 16/10/2007 13:18:07 Originally by: Tigerfish Torpedo Please carry on, it entertains me. I see your ability to lie is far surpassed by your ability to read you know where i am
Commander Nixon Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:18:00 - [27] so why is he not listed on the killmail of 4 minutes later ?. and to you tiger i am dyslectic as you know, put thanks for clearing it up i thought personal insults weren't allowed on the forums ?
Olavane Riftsnake Clan Shadow Wolf Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:18:00 - [28] Originally by: Setana Manoro Originally by: Commander Nixon Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 10:46:24 here is the log from our pilot. you will notice he was fired upon but didn't fire back. http://www.jaesign.com/adam/eve/logs/20071015_225517.txt the log speaks for its self. if their is proof to the contrary plz post it. this pilot was podded too. the first repo kill happened at 23:01 http://repo.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=5849 this is not to insist anyone is wrong just pointing out what i know to be ture. The log shows your pilot firing 2-3 salvo's, then stayed there for 1 minute. After that Aslovi popped him. It's nice that you were able to confirm that you agressed first. :) Sorry Setana but you read it wrong, the salvo you see are directed at Lord Balmung CRMSN and not to a REPO pilot. This is what the log show.
Setana Manoro Gallente Firefly Inc.	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:20:00 - [29] Originally by: Olavane Riftsnake Originally by: Setana Manoro Originally by: Commander Nixon Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 10:46:24 here is the log from our pilot. you will notice he was fired upon but didn't fire back. http://www.jaesign.com/adam/eve/logs/20071015_225517.txt the log speaks for its self. if their is proof to the contrary plz post it. this pilot was podded too. the first repo kill happened at 23:01 http://repo.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=5849 this is not to insist anyone is wrong just pointing out what i know to be ture. The log shows your pilot firing 2-3 salvo's, then stayed there for 1 minute. After that Aslovi popped him. It's nice that you were able to confirm that you agressed first. :) Sorry Setana but you read it wrong, the salvo you see are directed at Lord Balmung CRMSN and not to a REPO pilot. This is what the log show. Did i also misread the 1 minute gap ? I'm not neutral in RAGOON vs BOB, I just dislike both sides. :)
Commander Nixon Caldari Madison Industrial Co. Sylph Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.16 13:24:00 - [30] Edited by: Commander Nixon on 16/10/2007 13:24:45 if i am not mistaken if he would have fired upon the repo pilot. he would be on the repo pilots killmail 4 minutes later would he not http://repo.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=5859



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.