|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
CopyCatz
   |
Posted - 2007.10.21 14:13:00 -
[1]
 Quote:
Iæm posting here now because the last few days weæve been looking at the way capital and supercapital ships are functioning on Tranquility, and to be honest weære a little concerned with the direction itæs taking.
Yeah and I'm a little concerned with the direction CCP is taking lately. Recycling more and more ship models to cut on development time, pushing every aspect of the game to get more stuff destroyed so new stuff has to be bought, increasing isk flow and CCP's wallet. Nothing is being done to afk cloaking, nano coward pirates etc. If you're "concerned", please state the real concerns if any. The only problems I see with the number of fighters is the lag that cant seem to be fixed and loosing yet another few hundred mils worth of them due to a node crash.
|
CopyCatz
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 14:34:00 -
[2]
On the bright side, a lot of people (like me) won't see the need for a second account anymore, so hopefully this change will nerf CCP's income as well..
|
CopyCatz
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 16:07:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Snakebloke
p.s i promise thats my last post :P
------------------------
Thanks dude.. most people inhere already have red spots in their eyes with anger, no need to see your huge red balls all the time.
|
CopyCatz
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 19:54:00 -
[4]
Originally by: John MacCoy
Originally by: CCP Zulupark
Thanks for your input guys, there's some interesting points here. We are of course taking all your comments seriously into consideration and will reflect upon it over the next days. We will keep you up to date of our findings, now go enjoy your Sunday night slaughter.
I hope you do. I think alot of people wil be very annoyed it you just go "Screw them, we're doing it anyways."
I'm afraid that that is going to be the outcome...
|
CopyCatz
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 21:53:00 -
[5]
Edited by: CopyCatz on 21/10/2007 21:54:39
Quote:
and to be honest weære a little concerned with the direction itæs taking.
Could some dev elaborate on what you mean by that? The whole blog is about what you're going to do about it, but you don't explain what is wrong?
Quote:
Well, we have an idea, and before you go ballistic remember that this is an idea and weære still working on it:
Do you envision an end point on the road you've taken now that will make the majority of veteran players less ballistic then?
Quote:
But wait! Thereæs more! Not only do we want to limit the amount of fighters you can launch, but also the amount of drones!
You might want to take some PR training before thinking up sentences like that?
Quote:
we feel that capital ships are being used way too much as better-than-battleships-at-killing-stuff ships
and battleships are better-than-cruisers-at-killing-stuff?
cruisers better-than-frigates-at-killing-stuff?
Quote:
when we in fact think that they should be used more as the-ships-that-keep-other-ships-alive-and-provide-them-with-additional-firepower ships.
Umm I don't know if you ever read up on naval battles, but in the real world it's kinda the other way around?
Why not plainly admit that you feel there are too many capitals in the game, resulting in amounts of lag you can't fix? Just be honest about it and people will be happy to think about a solution constructively.
|
CopyCatz
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 10:22:00 -
[6]
Originally by: CCP Eris Discordia
Verone gets a cookie
Also it would help if people could try to look passed their own bias when they reply with constructive criticism.
Constructive criticism on what? All I know is that ZuluBrain isn't happy about the way things are now. I still havent seen an explanation what that means exactly?
|
CopyCatz
Caldari
Adeptus Illuminati Aegis Authentica
Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 14:41:00 -
[7]
2 days, 80 pages, 2300+ posts and only 3 dev post that didn't give any insight on the matter...
|
|
|
| |
|