|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.21 16:02:00 -
[1]
Look if this becomes a reality then I'm telling you right now i quit
you guys always make a ship or mod, then nerf it...
So I as many other do spend tons of our time training it, and then its useless..
Is this a ploy to keep us shelling Bucks your way
MOthership. Why should a 30 billion + dollar ship reck havoc on a battlefield?
If you nerf the carrier then i want all the isk and skillpoints reimbursed!!!! because it will be useless. as it pretty much already is anyways
Whoever thought of this idea at eve should be FIRED!!! BLOWN UP AND PODDED
|
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 00:23:00 -
[2]
Once again i say
Whoever thought of this idea at eve and/or players who are whinning ; should be FIRED!!! BLOWN UP AND PODDED
|
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 00:36:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Valandril Edited by: Valandril on 22/10/2007 00:13:11
Originally by: Karyuudo Tydraad
Originally by: ZelRox
Try pwning a small gang with a carrier and see what happens. Ill buy you a carrier if you survive.
Depends on the composition of the gang, its size, etc. I doubt your idea of a small gang is anything like mine. It really doesn't matter. The point is that capital ships were rapidly becoming the prevalent combat ship class. Which is to say, if you were to pick any single ship to be in an engagement, for the majority of scenarios a carrier would out perform any other ship in its role save for a tackler and EW. All while providing unrivaled logistical support. Carriers, when ganged, became exponentially more dangerous because of this. To the point where it made little sense to bring anything else if you could fly one.
Yes, its very unfair that if u put 10 carriers on battlefield, u can't just counter it with t1 frigs/cruisers but u have to put adequate assets on your own side to kill em. Totaly unfair and should be nerfed. /sarcasm off
Then dont attack a freaking fleet of carriers and stop whinning & and get your A**a back to High Sec where u belong carebear!...
Its not called low sec for the hell of it....
Why the heck should or would a t1 frigs/cruisers be able to counter a Capital Ship??? So in fact what your saying is that a T1 Frig, which cost what , maybe a million. should be able to counter a carrier / ms who prices start at 1 billion upto 30?
Thats like saying America ( which we can compare to a MotherShip ) should be able to get blown up by Iraq (which we can compare to a T1 frig).
You guys want to nerf something. Then nerf nerfing!
|
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.22 15:40:00 -
[4]
NaRoaN: look at last line of my post "/sarcrasm off" means i was beeing sarcastinc in that post.
Sorry bout that =)
|
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.24 01:49:00 -
[5]
We had a fleet of 20 or so ships the other day , few battleships and mostly BC or Cruiser, frigs... Killed 10+ battleships and 2 carriers they warped in towards the end..
SO once again carriers are not solo machines and frankly are worthless in up close combat and usually end up dead... Hence they do not need anything done to them because they are not to powerful
You want to change something?? ADD cpu to chimera
And fix the fighter so they actual work right
|
NaRoaN
|
Posted - 2007.10.24 01:52:00 -
[6]
CCP should run for President.....
Promises so much and never delivers.
Vote for Pedro
|
|
|
|