Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 67 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Gyle
Caldari Knights of Chaos Chaos Incarnate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 18:05:00 -
[1321]
Originally by: THEGREAT LOBO /Signed with 3 accounts
Carriers i see no problem with, motherships just need a way to be tackled in low sec
neuts tackle em. job done
|
Zeno Zotycus
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 18:07:00 -
[1322]
/signed
|
Ian203
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 18:44:00 -
[1323]
Signed
|
Lazarus 745
Gallente Ore Mongers R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 18:50:00 -
[1324]
plz stop the freaking nerfs we should have the right to know when we train something that we get what we trained for
|
Probita
Gallente 3B Legio IX Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 18:56:00 -
[1325]
Signed Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum |
Miamoto Mataky
Gallente Garoun Investment Bank
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 19:10:00 -
[1326]
/signed do I need to have a sig? |
XephonRah
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 19:23:00 -
[1327]
Signed! by a noob
|
Moon Kitten
GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 19:43:00 -
[1328]
I'm not so sure about Gyle's proposal. Could anyone try to convince me why no change is good?
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 20:18:00 -
[1329]
Originally by: R3dSh1ft NOT signed - this petition makes all the carrier pilots look like TOOLS.
The proposed changes may not be perfect, but its a damn sight better than what we have now. As a carrier pilot myself - I have never found the carrier to be useful as a solo PvP ship. About the only thing its good at in pvp is tanking itself and other ships.
Now, just imagine the battlefield of 2 years in the future - each alliance has 50-100 motherships, and launches 25 fighters each. In a typical alliance vs. alliance fight, what would it be like? Theres no reason currently not to use them as they provide a massive tank, damage dealing ability, logistics and remote rep to one another, not to mention the remote ECM burst.
Motherships online? I don't want to play that game - battleships should be where the fight is, and capital ships are overused.
Allegedly the devs had the intention that BSs were to be uncommonly used ships when they first came out. The capital ships of the then new Eve. Look at where they are now. Players will automatically fly the best ship they possibly can.
Stop being a bump on the log and cave to peer pressure...sign.
|
infinityshok
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 20:23:00 -
[1330]
Originally by: Tillek
What role shift? Carriers were designed as, have been, and will continue to be logistics ships. If you're referring to the changes which are designed to make them fit their role instead of being the primary combatant in an engagement, that is INDEED balance.
I think it's laughable that so many people have trained hard for a logistics/support ship, and when suddenly it's really going to be a logistics/support ship, there's massive outcry, dozens of petition threads, rampant flaming, threats of leaving the game, long term implausible senseless predictions about combat in eve ...
And this is before the change is even tested!
TEH SKY IS FALLING!!111
QFTW to all you childish whiners out there
Please edit your post to read 'I know nothing about carriers or their application in the overall scheme of the Eve community but will sign this petition anyway because that is what everyone else is doing.'
k?thx.have a lovely day.
|
|
Star Shadow
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 20:46:00 -
[1331]
Signed with all three of my accounts!
|
Razel
Caldari Seraphin Technologies Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 21:19:00 -
[1332]
signed
|
Corn Hollio
Minmatar Free Space Pilots aka Banderlogs Red Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 22:00:00 -
[1333]
/signed |
Siras Jha
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 22:04:00 -
[1334]
/signed mon
|
Tagg'net
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 22:50:00 -
[1335]
/signed with 3 accounts.
|
nukebie
The Establishment
|
Posted - 2007.10.25 22:59:00 -
[1336]
Signed. 5 accounts.
|
R Sharpe
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 00:02:00 -
[1337]
Signed.2 accounts and 5 Mates
|
Earnol
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 00:04:00 -
[1338]
I'll not leave the game if this will happen, but i'm against this change. Carrier and mother ship is supposed to be like it is now. And yes, i do not have carrier, so i just protecting nature of the game. Let holy light of Darkness enlighten you! |
A wiseman
Vendetta Underground Rule of Three
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 00:42:00 -
[1339]
DEF sighned if the new nerf goes thru i see a kestrel or cormarant able to lock down a carrier indefenitly hehe and i just thought of somthing a corm able to lock down a fleet of carriers :)
|
Danjira Ryuujin
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 00:43:00 -
[1340]
Originally by: Earnol Carrier and mother ship is supposed to be like it is now. And yes, i do not have carrier, so i just protecting nature of the game.
If carriers at present were fulfilling their intended role, there would be no need for changes. So clearly you're wrong, and they are not fine. Amarr - Annoying the Eve Community since 2005 |
|
Miho Pravis
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 00:48:00 -
[1341]
/signed
|
Pol Muaddib
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 01:01:00 -
[1342]
signed
|
Helios Elemental
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 01:28:00 -
[1343]
/signed
|
NOK NOK
Bounteous Immortals TALIONIS ALLIANCE
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 01:31:00 -
[1344]
signed with 6 accounts on the line..
CEO of Bounteous Immortals Talionis Alliance
Bounteous we are, Immortal you are not.... |
NSA Bivas
Gallente Viper Squad Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 02:01:00 -
[1345]
signed if u wana nerf them i say better delete them and the titans and the pos and the dreads and make the station like they where befor not invulnerable and also for avoiding future lag in jita make jita 0.0
|
Shinzann
Beast Cat Industries
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 02:33:00 -
[1346]
/signed === Q u o t e: If the servers aren't up, its not a hotfix. |
Kelishnikov
Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 03:10:00 -
[1347]
Signed
|
CHAOS100
Momentum. The Reckoning.
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 04:10:00 -
[1348]
/signed --------------
|
Dreck
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 04:25:00 -
[1349]
Signed.
|
Bulletproof Monk
|
Posted - 2007.10.26 04:27:00 -
[1350]
/Signed
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 67 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |