|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
sdthujfg
State War Academy
   |
Posted - 2008.03.19 23:32:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Vadimik
Repeating myself, but still:
There is no need for a complete recon overhaul to fix pilgrim.
Just give it range on NOS/neut. And, likewise, there is no need for some insane tradeoff's. Just give it a fair 20%/level to range on NOS/neut, while lowering it's amount bonus to 15%/level.
It's vital to understand that all other force recons are "cloaking combat recon", in essense.
Have you even seen actual bonuses combat recons get over force recons ? They are pathetic. PATHETIC.
It's always a 5% damage bonus on a spilit weapon platform.
If curse would get a 5% amount bonus and 20% range bonus per level over pilgrim, it would be in line with all other combat recons with regard to bonuses over force counterpart.
So just boost pilgrim to be more curse-like, leave curse alone, and learn to live with the fact that all force recons are "cloaking combat recon".
P.S. The "pilgrim is not a cloaking curse" argument no longer holds. No other role was implemented for over a year, while all other force recons clearly enjoy being "cloaking combat counterpart".
The combat recons need a dps boost to make them viable.
|
sdthujfg
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.03.20 12:38:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Diomidis
Now, please explain how could the range bonus SAVE the pilgrim?
Give me one good scenario / setup that would make range > efficiency.
Because when you have range you dont need to put so much cap into cap wich in turn gives you more cap over to compensate for neut usage.
|
sdthujfg
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.03.20 14:42:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Diomidis
Originally by: sdthujfg
Originally by: Diomidis
Now, please explain how could the range bonus SAVE the pilgrim?
Give me one good scenario / setup that would make range > efficiency.
Because when you have range you dont need to put so much cap into cap wich in turn gives you more cap over to compensate for neut usage.
OK, I admit I was a bit hasty on my quoted post...
I know of good scenarios like : capping out ceptors and other frigs...but...still I'd prefer efficiency...
But I don't get you at all sdthujfg....
I think a pilgrim with range bonus could bleed bigger stuff of cap tbh. Would take a bit longer maybe. But Id increase the cap of pilgrim and curse a tiny bit so they can use neuts easier.
|
sdthujfg
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.03.24 21:48:00 -
[4]
When is this ship going to get fixed? Its been broken ever since ccp took a wild swing with the nerf bat on nos.
|
sdthujfg
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 13:21:00 -
[5]
Where is the love? We have been waiting for a pilgrim fix for years now.
|
sdthujfg
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 16:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Depp Knight
I have come up with a decent setup that can help out in the style that we BoB pilot fight at = large scale battles, however I am still at unease to use it, mainly because other ships can do a similar, and much better at that. Thats the problem, the very few things that pilgrim can do, other ships can do better at.
Again, why would the pilgrim only get a 100pg increase so it can fit a 150pg module = med booster?
Why not give it any more cap or cap recharge when they took away the nos advantage?
Why not boosts its tank as its a close combat web range ship?
Exactly. There is not much point in using the pilgrim at all. They messed up its role.
|
|
|
| |
|