EVE Search - SiSi: No cargo allowed in ships inside a carrier ship maint. array

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

SiSi: No cargo allowed in ships inside a carrier ship maint. array

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.26 20:43:00 - [1] Bein, you traitorous****got, nerfing logistics in any way that does not include a viable alternative (such as the prompt introduction of a ship designed for logistics, NOT THE RORQUAL)is a terrible idea for the game as a whole. We are hit, BoB is hit, RISE would have been hit. Everyone if affected by this in a very negative way. Oh, and the lack of any information on from them to us is a god awful way to run a game, since so far they've given no indication that they know how to run a game without having to be forced to understand by the player base. You wouldn't join a corp with an aloof directorate, so why would you support a game as such? Also, I'd like to see the adding of more heavily specialized ships, in the course of a natural evolution of technology, in a time as advanced as EVE is set in, you would see far more ships designed to do one thing, and that one thing very well. All purpose ships would be limited to smaller things designed as handymen 2.0.
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.26 21:00:00 - [2] Originally by: Bein Glorious Originally by: Ungdall nerfing logistics in any way that does not include a viable alternative (such as the prompt introduction of a ship designed for logistics, NOT THE RORQUAL)is a terrible idea for the game as a whole. So did you miss the part where I speculated they could be releasing a viable alternative that we just don't know about? And where I said it'd be nice if we had some information so people wouldn't flip out and say stupid, hyperreactionary things (much like your posting)? That aside, I'm not sure if the jump freighter is going to be released in Trinity, since there's no information on it and its not among the ships they said were planned for introduction in Oveur's dev blog. welp, I did miss that part, sorry daddy Bein, I didn't mean no nothin' by it, I just got all riled up and couldn't contain my self. I's real sorry. Fwends?
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.27 06:42:00 - [3] There is nothing so god awful annoying about CCP as their infernal silence on every matter that inevitably spawns from the trickle down way in which they reveal information. In dev blogs, if you don't want us to know about it, or discuss it yet, stay silent until such times as you are ready to discuss it with us. Remember, EVE is just as much our game as it is yours. When these discussions do inevitably begin, have a person who is involved with the changes, not just someone payed to talk to us, begin the thread. Don't wait for the players to act, take the initiative, site us down, and talk. No one wants to be instructed from behind a wall. You can't even call it a two-way mirror, because as of now, there is little evidence you are actually watching what is going on. You may have your visions for what EVE should be, but how well does it mesh with what the players want it to be?
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.27 18:44:00 - [4] CCP just needs to release tier 2 and 3 carriers that are specialized to perform different tasks that go with the carriers assorted duties. Make one for fighters, one for logistics and one for I don't know.
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.28 08:31:00 - [5] Originally by: velocity7 You guys do realize that jump freighters are being introduced to replace this aspect of carriers? It's cute when you post without reading a thread. So cute, it makes one tempted to wear your hands like gloves.
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.30 03:38:00 - [6] Hey CCP, if you rally want to change something, try this: the only time you will get a message about your insurance is when you open the insurance tab in a station. Unless you do that, you have no way to know if your ship is still insured. Fix dat, bitte.
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.30 11:36:00 - [7] Originally by: Gerry Ryan Originally by: Ungdall Hey CCP, if you rally want to change something, try this: the only time you will get a message about your insurance is when you open the insurance tab in a station. Unless you do that, you have no way to know if your ship is still insured. Fix dat, bitte. You can show info on the ship and there's an insurance tab last time I checked ? Correct, but when your insurance runs out you are supposed to receive an evemail telling you so. However, you only get that mail when you open the insurance tab, so you'll magically have multiple ships lose insurance all at once.
Ungdall Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.30 21:18:00 - [8] guys guys guys! I've figured out how CCP makes decisions concerning major, massive and very important game mechanic changes: 1.brainstorm (light showers) 2.begin changes 3.whoops, turns out they didn't think more than one jump ahead 4.not profit

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.