| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
   |
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
met worst wrote:If you truly think as I do that the CSM selection system is flawed, pointless and no more than a 0.0 boys club, don't stand, don't select and don't vote.
If CCP can see that the CSM is wasted effort for THE MAJORITY (as it always has been), emphasise the irrelevance by treating it like the festering sore it has become.
Force the issue to a fairer method of representation. Better to have no system than a bad system.
Show your disgust. DO NOTHING.
Because doing nothing, and then complaining about the resulting ****-sandwich is always better than doing something, amirite?
[/sarcasm]
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Just vote me in as a write in. I promises to do sweet **** all for my entire term. Odds are pretty good I won't even be bothered to get on the Icelandic gravy train...er...plane. I can't be bought because I'm already rich and frankly, I just don't give a **** about what any of you think. I only care about the needs of Mr. Epeen. Actually, come to think of it, I'm pretty much like the current CSM.. As you were. Mr Epeen 
You have my vote!
(And my Quarterstaff of Ass-beating +5, mustn't forget that...)
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm not sure which nulltard concern you're hiding behind that generic forum alt, OP, but I must say...
Well-played, mate, well-played!
Troll-rating: 9/10 (-1 for slight lack of subtlety, but damned if it doesn't get the job done!)
[/golfclap]
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
met worst wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:met worst wrote:If you truly think as I do that the CSM selection system is flawed, pointless and no more than a 0.0 boys club, don't stand, don't select and don't vote.
If CCP can see that the CSM is wasted effort for THE MAJORITY (as it always has been), emphasise the irrelevance by treating it like the festering sore it has become.
Force the issue to a fairer method of representation. Better to have no system than a bad system.
Show your disgust. DO NOTHING.
Because doing nothing, and then complaining about the resulting ****-sandwich is always better than doing something, amirite? [/sarcasm] lol. Tell me honestly now Lyrrashae (and from what I can understand you've thrown your hat in the ring), do you think you will get voted in on a highsec platform. If not you, who? And even if a highseccer DOES get in, how influential do you think they can be? Now tell me that if the total vote was decimated by disinterest, whether CCP would take a SERIOUS look at what WILL work? As I said above, the majority can make the loudest noise by saying the least. An inaction can carry far more weight than any action if used appropriately.
I've considered throwing my hat in.
The chances of me doing so, after some dealings with the certain examples of the "average" playerbase in the thread you indirectly reference have taught me that I would make a really crap politician, and it's really not for me....But maybe I still might, who knows?
My platform would not be hisec exclusively. Empire-PvP (NB for the terminally confused: Losec is empire-space, too) and wormhole-generalist, thank you very much.
"And even if a highseccer DOES get in, how influential do you think they can be?" (Forum troll-alt)
Thank you for proving your affiliations with your generic condescension to any/all non-null players. Once again, whose sock-puppet are you?
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tallianna Avenkarde wrote:Met worst is an obvious goon troll to get people to not vote, so that mittens wins the vote by a longshot.
Constituents really wanting to make a difference should vote to me,I vow to oppose anything that mittens aggrees with!!
"Whatever it is, we're against it!" (Marx Brothers, IIRC)
Works for me 
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:55:00 -
[6] - Quote
Andski wrote:I fully support this. Boycott the vote.
Your troll-fu is lacking finesse and panache, Young One.
So...Met Worst =...hmmmm....not Mittani, he's usually more openly up-himself about this sort of thing...
Vile Rat? Maybe the return of Karttoon?
E: Well, whatever--in any case, this thread: It delivers.
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions
Reckless Ambition
172
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 06:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:What's wrong with the current CSM?
Oh.
Hi, there.
You're a bit late, aren't you?
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs.
NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare
NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers."
**** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
| |
|