| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TZeer
BURN EDEN
   |
Posted - 2007.11.06 14:25:00 -
[1]
Edited by: TZeer on 06/11/2007 14:25:12
I`m not talking about the recalibrationtime after decloaking, but the hit they get in scanresolution for fitting a cloak.
So they are designed to fit a cloak, but they still get nerfed on lockingtime...
Please take that away
|
Tonto Auri
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 14:36:00 -
[2]
Please, explain, why?
--
Thanks CCP for cu<end of sig> |
Azuse
The Brotherhood Of The Blade
Pure.
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 15:04:00 -
[3]
On the frig idk, on the bs though i'll second the op. Not like it's going to be locking at any real speed anyway.
--------------------------
|
Tonto Auri
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 15:06:00 -
[4]
Use remote sensor links then.
You need only one with script to scan resolution as far as cloak not touch locking range.
--
Thanks CCP for cu<end of sig> |
TZeer
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 15:46:00 -
[5]
Edited by: TZeer on 06/11/2007 15:48:04
 Originally by: Tonto Auri
Please, explain, why?
So they are able to lock anything in time, and use their mids for what they are supposed to and not filling them with sensorboosters.
Quote:
Use remote sensor links then.
You need only one with script to scan resolution as far as cloak not touch locking range.
So gang mate need to lock you, before you can lock. How do that fix anything?
And saying just do that or just do that, not interested in a small blob to do basic stuff.
|
ElCoCo
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 15:47:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tonto Auri
Please, explain, why?
So he won't have to put that sensorbooster when he could fit an extra damp now that they're nerfed?
|
TZeer
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 15:49:00 -
[7]
Originally by: ElCoCo
Originally by: Tonto Auri
Please, explain, why?
So he won't have to put that sensorbooster when he could fit an extra damp now that they're nerfed?
LOL, would have rather have a jammer 
|
Jay Deah
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 17:04:00 -
[8]
methinks your gangs of cloaking/dampening ravens will be replaced by gangs of widows :)
imho, what he said makes sense... why give the ship bonuses to overcome a module's penalties on speed to encourage it's use, but ignore the penalties to scan res?
i'm guessing this is a simple oversight rather than a desired game mechanic?
|
Bellum Eternus
Gallente
Death of Virtue
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 17:27:00 -
[9]
Totally agree with the OP. Heck, let's go one further and allow *both* SBs and BlackOps to fit COC2s.
Bellum Eternus
[Vid] L E G E N D A R Y
[Vid] L E G E N D A R Y I I |
TZeer
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 21:10:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Jay Deah
methinks your gangs of cloaking/dampening ravens will be replaced by gangs of widows :)
imho, what he said makes sense... why give the ship bonuses to overcome a module's penalties on speed to encourage it's use, but ignore the penalties to scan res?
i'm guessing this is a simple oversight rather than a desired game mechanic?
Ship is way to expensive, add less firepower and the chancebased system cause you would need BCU`s to get decent firepower and the ship is a high risk investment.
|
|
|
Gaogan
Gallente
Solar Storm
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2007.11.06 21:15:00 -
[11]
Add recons to that list. They also get hit with the sensor penalty.
|
TZeer
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2007.11.10 16:36:00 -
[12]
CCP looked into this?
Example:
You have a stelathbomber/blackops whatever who has a bonus to use cloak.
Now, decloak cause you wanna surprise someone. What is this? You start locking, but it takes forever, and by the time you get a lock you are in deep armour cause they locked you much faster. Or they jammed/damped you before you could do anything. Yeay!!
Please do something about this. And dont come with the "use a sensorbosoterthingy", they are getting nerfed to...
|
Celedris
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2007.11.10 17:34:00 -
[13]
Oh wow I didn't even notice it got the scan res penalty for the cloak too. Widow should have 67 scan resolution with sig analysis V. Ouch.
|
DiseL
Dirt Nap Squad
|
Posted - 2007.11.11 05:55:00 -
[14]
Give it some time. In two or three years it will be fixed. To many other important things to do like kill another race of recons, gimp the dictors, do a 180 on ECM and buff the ships to counter the ECM nerf from two years ago.
|
violator2k5
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.11.11 10:24:00 -
[15]
i believe ships which are dedicated to using cloaks should have that nerfing taken away and the ships which arent should be getting a greater hit then they are 
win win situation 
----------------------------
BOB 4 LIFE NOT JUST 4 A DAY
----------------------------
|
Derious
Incognito Inc
|
Posted - 2007.11.11 14:44:00 -
[16]
I agree the logic behind the stealth bombers and in that case covert ops battleships are obviously flawed. Like stated previously in this thread; They suffer from the scan resolution negative while decloaking to surprise the enemy well.. This doesn't work with the scan resolution penalty therefor and finally the scan resolution penalty should be removed especially with the sensor booster nerf. These go hand in hand with this class of ship in order to compete with scan resolutions of the enemy you're shooting at you need the sensor boosters. So, I'll say it one more time either remove the cloaking penalty or buff SB/Covert Ops scan resolution. |
Gaogan
Gallente
Solar Storm
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2007.11.13 22:52:00 -
[17]
Originally by: violator2k5
i believe ships which are dedicated to using cloaks should have that nerfing taken away and the ships which arent should be getting a greater hit then they are
win win situation
Agreed.
|
Paxx Aerion
|
Posted - 2007.11.15 04:58:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Gaogan
Originally by: violator2k5
i believe ships which are dedicated to using cloaks should have that nerfing taken away and the ships which arent should be getting a greater hit then they are
win win situation
Agreed.
Agreed. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |