| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4620
   |
Posted - 2012.01.29 14:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Faceless Lady wrote:Hi-sec is not hi-sec when gankers can pop you with impunity. Good thing that they can't, then. Gankers attacking people comes with a wide selection of punitive measures that separate highsec from low and nullsec.
Quote:The insurance nerf means nothing to someone with deep pockets. There has to be a more painful deterent. Why?
Quote:1. Concord will not just destroy your ship but also pod you. No. NPCs don't pod GÇö that's a privilege reserved for the players. You offer no reason why this should change.
Quote:2. EVE has account based limits in place (for example, training only one character at a time). Since criminals like to hide behind such limits and imposing fines on a toon with empty pockets is pointless, there should be an account based isk fine imposed equal to the insurance payoff to the vicitim, if not more. There already is a cost to ganking people, and it already affects the account holder. You offer no reason why more fines is needed.
Quote:3. Denial of killmail. HI-sec ganking should not give the crminal bragging rights. Why not?
Your key problem (aside from your ideas being quite awful) is that you fail to explain why on earth such measures are needed when highsec is already insanely safe (and, if anything, needs to be made much less safe so people get rid of their entitlement issues and their false sense of security). If highsec space was actually dangerous, mechanics-wise, people would learn defensive tactics that would keep them more safe than they currently are (unless they were stupid, in which case a swift death is rather appropriate).
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4620
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 14:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Honnete Du Decimer wrote:Andski wrote:Why should gankers be punished beyond ship loss through game mechanics? When 5M ISK ships can kill 200M ISK ships.
So what? Bigger isn't better. Welcome to balance.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4623
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 17:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Honnete Du Decimer wrote:It funny. Topic like this is get many argue but if so many feel strong for two side it usually are problem. Non sequitur.
It could just as easily be that one side is just horribly wrong.
Aqriue wrote:Yeah, will never happen. But would be nice if they did It would probably help if you could provide even a shred of an argument for why it's needed.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4623
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 19:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kelly Kavanagh wrote:This most definitely is a problem In what way is it a problem?
As for the escorts, they already exist. People just choose not to do them.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4627
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 19:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kelly Kavanagh wrote:Too much fun for criminals, not enough fun for victims. Oh, I don't know. Staying away from the criminals is quite funGǪ or it would be, if it wasn't so incredibly trivial to do.
Quote:NPC escorts, not player escorts. Why are they needed when a solution already exists?
Competing with player-run businesses isn't really something NPCs should do.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
| |
|