| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
651
   |
Posted - 2012.02.02 06:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have no specific issues with this, I don't care who sees what opinions I'm representing at the summit. The problem for me, as somebody who wrote several minutes, is the style we used just wouldn't have worked well with this. We didn't just puke out a log of the conversation, we tried to write it in a way that gave the ideas and set up the bigger picture as much as possible. Well, that's how I did it. My logs would have looked kinda crappy if I had to go in and attribute what each person said not to mention it would have been impossible for the most part.
... Impossible??
Yes, impossible. They recorded the meetings and we knew they were being recorded and uploaded for review. The only problem is since we knew they were doing this (having experienced it the first summit) few of us took detailed notes knowing we'd have the whole meeting available for review afterwards.
The camera recorded the CCP speakers but all I saw was the back of laptops and several drinks on the table from the CSM side. I couldn't have properly attributed specific statements if you paid me for it. |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
651
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 06:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Venus Rinah wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:But seriously changing pronouns to names is really that much of a big ask? Not really, just a lack of "professionalism" even if they are volunteers. As its just another smack in the face to CCP intentions for the CSM and every "paying" player as a result.
Yes ok great you got an axe to grind and want to come here to throw silly punches. Are you wanting a serious discussion or is this just a drive by poop post? |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
651
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 14:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Venus Rinah wrote:Vile rat wrote:Venus Rinah wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:But seriously changing pronouns to names is really that much of a big ask? Not really, just a lack of "professionalism" even if they are volunteers. As its just another smack in the face to CCP intentions for the CSM and every "paying" player as a result. Yes ok great you got an axe to grind and want to come here to throw silly punches. Are you wanting a serious discussion or is this just a drive by poop post? This may be hard for you to understand, but as a voter I thought I might express my opinion on the matter. If you simply want to dismiss it by projecting "your" inaccurate take on things thats up to you. Seems you simply have (maybe a pattern of behaviour on the subject).
I explained my reasons why, trebor explained his. I took the time to break down some other reasons why it won't work this time around (not to say that it is impossible for the future) and you post to throw punches right after these explanations.
You suggested we're unprofessional, explain why in this context.
You suggested that we're dismissing somehow by... explaining our reasoning? Maybe this whole 'reading' and 'words' thing is a tough one to grasp?
If you want to have an adult conversation about this subject then back up a bit, rethink your post, and engage on an adult level instead of posting silliness like:
Quote:Not really, just a lack of "professionalism" even if they are volunteers.
As its just another smack in the face to CCP intentions for the CSM and every "paying" player as a result.
See? You aren't even talking to us, you're just trying to make a snarky one liner.
|
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
651
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 14:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Venus Rinah wrote:Please explain why I should afford to explain my reasoning to someone who childishly accuses me of having an "axe to grind" and doesn't support any of their reasoning or explantion for their baseless accusations? Pot, kettle, black, Sir.
I seem to have missed where you even commented on any specifics of what we've been saying. Link? Heh that was a joke.
Quote:
One rule for you, different rule for everyone else I guess. Otherwise I'm free to express my concerns how I like. Just because you disagree with a persons opinions does not make them invalid. As such I don't see it as a "snarky one liner" but a strong reflection of how dissapointed Iam with members of the CSM on this matter, seemed pretty obvious to me.
Or is now the primary concern of the CSM total mind control and censorship of all "unregulated" posting against their interests?
Did you read what I posted? Care to comment?
|
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
651
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 15:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Venus Rinah wrote:
Simply fulfill your remaining term of office as you suggested and resign as you have announced it will be one less "clown" on the Council.
laffo.
-edit-
If anybody wants to comment on what we've said about the subject go for it otherwise this one looks done. |
| |
|