| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Omu Matol
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
0
   |
Posted - 2012.01.31 15:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Can somebody recommend a remote shield rep drake fit for lower end sleeper sites? |
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
106
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 16:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
You dont need to remote rep, just passive tank. |
Omu Matol
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 16:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
oh ok thanks. whats a good passive fit then? |
Squidgey
Perkone
Caldari State
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 17:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Omu Matol wrote:oh ok thanks. whats a good passive fit then?
No offense but if you can't even passive fit a drake then you should stay away from sleepers.
That being said, omni tank. Start with a C1, watch for scrambling. Get used to how they work before moving to harder stuff. Once you get into a C3 (with a drake that is pretty lol) they begin neuting and fully passive is REQUIRED from a drake or it is dead. There is a C3 site which does not neut the hell out of you, but takes ages with crappy DPS. |
mxzf
Shovel Bros
418
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 17:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cheap passive tanked Drake fit for WHs:
[Drake, WHs]
Damage Control II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Photon Scattering Field I
Y-S8 Hydrocarbon Afterburners
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Advanced 'Limos' Heavy Missile Bay I, Scourge Heavy Missile
Core Probe Launcher I, Sisters Core Scanner Probe I
Medium Core Defence Field Purger I
Medium Core Defence Field Purger I
Medium Core Defence Field Purger I
Warrior I x5
|
Omu Matol
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 18:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Squidgey wrote:Omu Matol wrote:oh ok thanks. whats a good passive fit then? No offense but if you can't even passive fit a drake then you should stay away from sleepers. That being said, omni tank. Start with a C1, watch for scrambling. Get used to how they work before moving to harder stuff. Once you get into a C3 (with a drake that is pretty lol) they begin neuting and fully passive is REQUIRED from a drake or it is dead. There is a C3 site which does not neut the hell out of you, but takes ages with crappy DPS.
No offense taken. I'm coming back after a LONG hiatus. I was familiar with sleepers from my previous playtime, but was in a wh that benefited armor tanking. Couple the hiatus, and not knowing possible passive drake changes, with not really being much of a shield tanker period, well my ignorance was monumental.
|
OmegaMahn
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Photon Scattering Field I
Y-S8 Hydrocarbon Afterburners
Sorry - but I thought passive tank was no Cap needed - Invulnerability Field II requires cap, or do I misunderstand passive |
Caldari Citizen 786478786
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 23:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
OmegaMahn wrote:Sorry - but I thought passive tank was no Cap needed - Invulnerability Field II requires cap, or do I misunderstand passive
In this context, yes, you do misunderstand. But, it is a common misconception at least that the inclusion of Invulns or Active Hardeners in a fit makes it active-tanked. If it has a Shield Booster or Armor Repairer it is active-tanked. If it does not have either of those, it is passive-tanked. |
mxzf
Shovel Bros
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 00:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Caldari Citizen 786478786 wrote:OmegaMahn wrote:Sorry - but I thought passive tank was no Cap needed - Invulnerability Field II requires cap, or do I misunderstand passive In this context, yes, you do misunderstand. But, it is a common misconception at least that the inclusion of Invulns or Active Hardeners in a fit makes it active-tanked. If it has a Shield Booster or Armor Repairer it is active-tanked. If it does not have either of those, it is passive-tanked.
This.
As long as you're not stacking SPRs, you have plenty of cap to run hardeners just fine. It's not a 'true passive' tank, which involves lots of SPRs and resist amps but is good for little more than tanking, but it's passive in that it's tanking via resists and buffer and regen (instead of a repper/booster). Using hardeners with passive shield tanks is kinda SOP in most situations, there are very few ships that benefit from going totally pure passive tank, since it leaves the fit lacking on DPS. |
Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity
Narwhals Ate My Duck
116
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 01:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
I can't believe there are still people around who don't know how to fit a drake....
It's not like you can accidentally armour tank it or put lasers on it  |
Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
Important Internet Spaceship League
80
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 15:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:It's not like you can accidentally armour tank it
Has been done before - Even with success... |
Sardon Darkstar
Tears of Redemption
NEM3SIS.
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 17:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
What? No lasers on a Drake?  |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |