| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:34:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:40:13 Heck i might be late on the news but DO I SEE THAT 5% BONUS TO TURRET DAMAGE????                
ITT DISCUSS YOUR HAPPINESS!!!!
Paladin
* Hull: Apocalypse / Carthum Conglomerate * Slots: 7/4/7, 4 turrets * Fitting: 500tf, 13,500mw * Drones: 75Mbit/s bandwidth, 75m3 dronebay * Sensors: 12pt radar, 10 target locks * Propulsion: 125m/s, 110,000,000kg * Tech II resistance bonus: 25% explosive, 12.5% kinetic
Bonuses:
* 5% bonus to capacitor capacity per Amarr BS level * 2% bonus to stasis webifier velocity factor per Amarr BS level * 7.5% bonus to armor repair amount per Marauder level * 5% bonus to large energy turret damage per Marauder level * Role bonus: 100% bonus to large energy turret damage * Role bonus: 100% bonus to range and velocity of tractor beams
EDIT: DIVERSITY FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111 LULZ KK
|

Leviathani Darkri
Fatalix Inc. THORN Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:42:00 -
[2]
Perhaps you should consider decaf...
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:43:00 -
[3]
OH MAH GOD!!~! WTF ANNOYING????!?!?!?!?!?
FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111111111111111111111111 LULZ KK
Idiot, post properly.
And I actually preferred the tracking bonus, because tracking = more dps in my mind.   ============================================
|

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:43:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:44:28 Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:43:47
Originally by: Leviathani Darkri Perhaps you should consider decaf...
Hm.... LULZ TIS THE GREAT QUAFE!!!!!
But seriously, am I uber late or something ^^
Edit: Nifty, DPS means DAMAGE per second. KTHXBYE
Edit 2: 109 views after 5 minutes of posting. I think I made my point with the title 
|

Lt Angus
Caldari the united
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:46:00 -
[5]
and not tracking = 0 dps
Shhhh, Im hunting Badgers |

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:46:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Lt Angus and not tracking = 0 dps
hahaha Man I know right? After all, webbing dosent do anything for tracking 
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:47:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Chaplain Havok Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:44:28 Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:43:47
Originally by: Leviathani Darkri Perhaps you should consider decaf...
Hm.... LULZ TIS THE GREAT QUAFE!!!!!
But seriously, am I uber late or something ^^
Edit: Nifty, DPS means DAMAGE per second. KTHXBYE
Edit 2: 109 views after 5 minutes of posting. I think I made my point with the title 
More Tracking = More DPS because you hit more.
It may not look that way on quickfit, or to all you newbies obsessd with "lol omg wtf DPS", but to people like myself who have been playing for a long time, I'll take the tracking bonus over the damage. ESPECIALLY in this nano era we live in.   ============================================
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:48:00 -
[8]
We need a special forum for special people. Somewhere that isn't here. -
I wish I was a three foot female doll with a watering can and heterochromatic eyes. |

Cadiz
Caldari No Quarter. Vae Victis.
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:48:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Cadiz on 25/11/2007 20:49:04
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Originally by: Lt Angus and not tracking = 0 dps
hahaha Man I know right? After all, webbing dosent do anything for tracking 
Better tracking relative to your target translates into better hit quality, which means better "real world" DPS. It's not just a matter of hitting or not hitting - it means a better chance of landing good hits instead of barely/glancing ones. It doesn't show up in your raw DPS calculations, but it's there.
Haha, snap, N1fty and I basically said the same thing.  ------ Director, No Quarter "There is no problem that cannot be solved by the judicious application of violence." |

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:49:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Originally by: Lt Angus and not tracking = 0 dps
hahaha Man I know right? After all, webbing dosent do anything for tracking 
That was him saying that if you cant track, you cant hit.
WTS: Clue.   ============================================
|

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:53:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:54:30 Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:53:36
Originally by: N1fty
Originally by: Chaplain Havok Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:44:28 Edited by: Chaplain Havok on 25/11/2007 20:43:47
Originally by: Leviathani Darkri Perhaps you should consider decaf...
Hm.... LULZ TIS THE GREAT QUAFE!!!!!
But seriously, am I uber late or something ^^
Edit: Nifty, DPS means DAMAGE per second. KTHXBYE
Edit 2: 109 views after 5 minutes of posting. I think I made my point with the title 
More Tracking = More DPS because you hit more.
It may not look that way on quickfit, or to all you newbies obsessd with "lol omg wtf DPS", but to people like myself who have been playing for a long time, I'll take the tracking bonus over the damage. ESPECIALLY in this nano era we live in.
Perhaps, but unless you're in a scenario where you need that tracking bonus (which i think is a lot less than say.. a damage bonus), you'll be gimped to hell. Especially in a Paladin vs any other marauder/bs or any ship that dosent nano outside of web range scenario.
EDIT 237 views... time to experiment. If i change the title, will the # of views decrease or increase?
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:54:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Perhaps, but unless you're in a scenario where you need that tracking bonus, you'll be gimped to hell. Especially in a Paladin vs any other marauder/bs or any ship that dosent nano outside of web range scenario.
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.   ============================================
|

Mister Xerox
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:56:00 -
[13]
You rendered your argument moot.
At Marauder V that's 125% damage bonus for large energy turrets. That's some pretty heavy damage output, even if it is only for 4 turrets.
|

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:56:00 -
[14]
Originally by: N1fty
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Perhaps, but unless you're in a scenario where you need that tracking bonus, you'll be gimped to hell. Especially in a Paladin vs any other marauder/bs or any ship that dosent nano outside of web range scenario.
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.
Quality? That shouldnt be affected at all. http://www.eve-online.com/guide/en/g25.asp Its the % chance to hit that changes however now this boils down to, is hitting less but more dps better or hitting more but less dps better? Quite frankly, I'd want hit less and more dps becasue then you have both scenario covered. One where you go head to head and the other where you try to catch someone whos orbiting.
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 20:58:00 -
[15]
Edited by: N1fty on 25/11/2007 20:58:27
Originally by: Mister Xerox You rendered your argument moot.
At Marauder V that's 125% damage bonus for large energy turrets. That's some pretty heavy damage output, even if it is only for 4 turrets.
Yeah its awesome damage, especially if you are missing the whole time.
I'll take the 137.5% bonus to tracking thanks. I'll actually hit something.
EDIT: and its well known the above guide is merely a GUIDE.   ============================================
|

Chaplain Havok
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:01:00 -
[16]
So would you say that since it is a "guide", it does not actually define how tracking works?
|

Bentula
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:02:00 -
[17]
Originally by: N1fty
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.
Ehrm no. Lasers already have good tracking at their optimal ranges, and way below its optimal this ship has a very powerful webbing bonus. So no, extra damage > extra tracking past a certain amount of tracking. And your amount of normal, wrecking or scratching hits is not affected by tracking much, only clear misses are.
|

N1fty
Amarr Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:07:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Bentula
Originally by: N1fty
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.
Ehrm no. Lasers already have good tracking at their optimal ranges, and way below its optimal this ship has a very powerful webbing bonus. So no, extra damage > extra tracking past a certain amount of tracking. And your amount of normal, wrecking or scratching hits is not affected by tracking much, only clear misses are.
The fact that you have DPS on only 4 guns instead of across 7 means that a miss is a LOT more costly in terms of DPS.
And I think you underestimate the effect of tracking on your DPS.   ============================================
|

Kristoffer
Amarr Blackguard Brigade Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:09:00 -
[19]
Get a tackler or a huginn.
|

Freddy Kuger
Snakes in a Pod.
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:16:00 -
[20]
Nifty's right, everyone else is wrong
/end thread
|

Shardrael
Caldari AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:16:00 -
[21]
Originally by: N1fty
Originally by: Bentula
Originally by: N1fty
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.
Ehrm no. Lasers already have good tracking at their optimal ranges, and way below its optimal this ship has a very powerful webbing bonus. So no, extra damage > extra tracking past a certain amount of tracking. And your amount of normal, wrecking or scratching hits is not affected by tracking much, only clear misses are.
The fact that you have DPS on only 4 guns instead of across 7 means that a miss is a LOT more costly in terms of DPS.
And I think you underestimate the effect of tracking on your DPS.
the same logic works in reverse, that a hit is that much better especially wreckings, so using that for your logic is kind of pointless.
|

Grapez
Advanced Security And Asset Protection
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:19:00 -
[22]
Is there any definitive answer on how tracking affects hit quality? I've often wondered about the damage/tracking trade off when equiping mods, so it'd be nice if someone who know the ins and outs of Eve could reply.
|

itasteofcheese
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:20:00 -
[23]
Edited by: itasteofcheese on 25/11/2007 21:20:17 you do realise that with the bonus it gets the same dps as an abbadon, and an abbadon is cheeper too :)
|

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:24:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Crumplecorn We need a special forum for special people. Somewhere that isn't here.

Originally by: Death Kill Go travel or live in the rainforest if neccesary, just dont turn to religion as its a cul de sac.
|

Alpine 69
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:34:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Crumplecorn We need a special forum for special people. Somewhere that isn't here.
A++ Would read again.
Sweet love for the ones that mod my sig <3  From her? You're on. -Rauth |

Kiviar
Caldari Vice-Presidential Action Rangers
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 21:40:00 -
[26]
Originally by: itasteofcheese Edited by: itasteofcheese on 25/11/2007 21:20:17 you do realise that with the bonus it gets the same dps as an abbadon, and an abbadon is cheeper too :)
An Abaddon can't fit 3 neuts along with its 8 turrets. ---
Forums are what? |

Lithalnas
Amarr Headcrabs
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 22:06:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Kiviar
Originally by: itasteofcheese Edited by: itasteofcheese on 25/11/2007 21:20:17 you do realise that with the bonus it gets the same dps as an abbadon, and an abbadon is cheeper too :)
An Abaddon can't fit 3 neuts along with its 8 turrets.
apparently with the grid/cpu of the pallidin, neither can it. -------------
fixed for greater eve content |

KarGard
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 22:30:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Lithalnas
Originally by: Kiviar
Originally by: itasteofcheese Edited by: itasteofcheese on 25/11/2007 21:20:17 you do realise that with the bonus it gets the same dps as an abbadon, and an abbadon is cheeper too :)
An Abaddon can't fit 3 neuts along with its 8 turrets.
apparently with the grid/cpu of the pallidin, neither can it.
That would be wrong.
|

Drykor
Minmatar Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 23:02:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Originally by: N1fty
Originally by: Chaplain Havok
Perhaps, but unless you're in a scenario where you need that tracking bonus, you'll be gimped to hell. Especially in a Paladin vs any other marauder/bs or any ship that dosent nano outside of web range scenario.
As said above it affects your QUALITY of hits. Just because you got a hit doesnt mean you got as much damage as you could have done if you had better tracking.
Put down your DPS calculator and THINK.
Quality? That shouldnt be affected at all. http://www.eve-online.com/guide/en/g25.asp Its the % chance to hit that changes however now this boils down to, is hitting less but more dps better or hitting more but less dps better? Quite frankly, I'd want hit less and more dps becasue then you have both scenario covered. One where you go head to head and the other where you try to catch someone whos orbiting.
That guide is wrong. check this thread: http://www.scrapheap-challenge.com/viewtopic.php?t=4845&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=hit+quality+formula&start=0&sid=3cc38b943c902b1e59b40728ff1fe1bd
There's also a link in the first post there.
And then there's some experiment that Farjung did once, should be searchable here.
|

Stakhanov
The Good Fellas
|
Posted - 2007.11.25 23:13:00 -
[30]
What a thread. 
Maybe the damage bonus was implemented because it works best along with the web bonus ? Durrrrr.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |