| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Bathsalts FaceEater
TekStorm Enterprise
SkyTek Security
2
   |
Posted - 2012.11.16 17:56:00 -
[91] - Quote
Couldn't help but notice that the highsec radar site "Local (pirate) Shattered Life-Support Unit" on the web based signature guide is misspelled in a... dirty minded way. 
Otherwise GREAT guide!!!!! I am very impressed and most appreciative.
Fava Beans..... -Hannibal |
Kenneth O'Hara
Bareback Pornstars
Fade 2 Black
6993
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 19:33:00 -
[92] - Quote
bump
Stick around. I'm full of bad ideas. ~Isaac Clarke
*Bait* with your altGäó
*Bacon* with your mainGäó |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
5472
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 03:38:00 -
[93] - Quote
Giving this thread some well deserved recognition with a friendly little bump and +1 like for the OP.
By the way, thanks for the special mention.
DMC |
Orlacc
257
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 05:01:00 -
[94] - Quote
Since you necroed...
I agree. Been a big help! swiftandbitter on my bookmarks bar! |
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
1224
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 18:17:00 -
[95] - Quote
This is a public service announcement to let you know that all Deep Space Probes will be removed from game with the Odyssey expansion on Tuesday 4 June 2013.
Please direct any comments on this matter to the following thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=233600 |
blink alt
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.05.08 22:01:00 -
[96] - Quote
Well it turns out for site probing the death to the DSP is actually a good thing. With the new scanner you get to know which planet the sig is at and the band that sig is part of without having to use a DSP at all. So in essence everyone got the DSP mechanic for free and automatically |
Tauranon
Weeesearch
167
|
Posted - 2013.05.10 01:46:00 -
[97] - Quote
blink alt wrote:Well it turns out for site probing the death to the DSP is actually a good thing. With the new scanner you get to know which planet the sig is at and the band that sig is part of without having to use a DSP at all. So in essence everyone got the DSP mechanic for free and automatically
Except that the default pattern has huge holes where it will miss sigs, and resizing the probes stuffs up the UI, and rescaling the formation doesn't fix the pattern gaps, and now instead of having to adjust my probe box once per system, I now have to adjust my sweep which usually takes LONGER because its not the same for each system, and gives me comparitively poor and innaccurate results compared to a DSP. I trained DSPs to not have to do this! |
blink alt
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
38
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 02:06:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:
Except that the default pattern has huge holes where it will miss sigs, and resizing the probes stuffs up the UI, and rescaling the formation doesn't fix the pattern gaps, and now instead of having to adjust my probe box once per system, I now have to adjust my sweep which usually takes LONGER because its not the same for each system, and gives me comparitively poor and innaccurate results compared to a DSP. I trained DSPs to not have to do this!
You sound confused, you seem to imply that I was refering to the poopy spread formation of probes which will not be used by anyone because of the new sensor overlay. Here have a picture, http://gyazo.com/79ad48214c985c93c8a62337303414d4 |
Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings
Situation: Normal
1362
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 02:42:00 -
[99] - Quote
blink alt wrote:Tauranon wrote:
Except that the default pattern has huge holes where it will miss sigs, and resizing the probes stuffs up the UI, and rescaling the formation doesn't fix the pattern gaps, and now instead of having to adjust my probe box once per system, I now have to adjust my sweep which usually takes LONGER because its not the same for each system, and gives me comparitively poor and innaccurate results compared to a DSP. I trained DSPs to not have to do this!
You sound confused, you seem to imply that I was refering to the poopy spread formation of probes which will not be used by anyone because of the new sensor overlay. Here have a picture, http://gyazo.com/79ad48214c985c93c8a62337303414d4
Yes which is an extremely poor substitute for the DSP, which gives me a list, that I can take a screenshot of, or sort by signal strength.
Instead now its spin, mouse over, jot down number, spin, mouse over, jot down number o crap did i miss one, spin some more... |
Tauranon
Weeesearch
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.13 10:09:00 -
[100] - Quote
blink alt wrote:Tauranon wrote:
Except that the default pattern has huge holes where it will miss sigs, and resizing the probes stuffs up the UI, and rescaling the formation doesn't fix the pattern gaps, and now instead of having to adjust my probe box once per system, I now have to adjust my sweep which usually takes LONGER because its not the same for each system, and gives me comparitively poor and innaccurate results compared to a DSP. I trained DSPs to not have to do this!
You sound confused, you seem to imply that I was refering to the poopy spread formation of probes which will not be used by anyone because of the new sensor overlay. Here have a picture, http://gyazo.com/79ad48214c985c93c8a62337303414d4
DSP is a combat probe. ie the overlay only does half what a DSP does, doesn't put the info into the probing window, its not even on the map screen where probing is done, and tells me stuff in the wrong order, and requires me to spin my viewpoint around to find everything. I'm not interested in it till my ship is off the WH or gate and thus safe enough to consider PVE, so its initial scan and sticking stuff up is all visual clutter to me. Its also -effort- to get it to tell me there is nothing in system, and its -effort- to get it to tell me how many things are in system, and it doesn't tell me if there are other active hulls in system.
If I was to take an information design perspective on it, I would have to say that the designer got the timing and location of all the information almost entirely wrong with this. Even from a hunters perspective, if you came in to find someone in an anom, your scan will be filled with clutter from anoms that are out of d-scan range. 
|
Snapper Pumpkinpuss
The Opposite Sects
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 00:47:00 -
[101] - Quote
Asshats i pay on 2 acounts my kid made me play cause hes in the USMC so we can talk so i liked it its fun i make money scanning but pay cash for my accounts and now i have to play a f-ing game to get a radar site that i might get 7 mill out of ...thanks its hard enough i have aurthiritis never mind that i have to out hack an 18 year old and im a 53 year old fat guy ... wow level tha playing field ....i like the game but i dont want to play solve a puzzle **** ...i sometimes win raceing for the goodies ...and sometimes loose ... some days you get the bear and some days you dont ... so as in some days you dont you guys sometimes dont get whos paying the salaries of your company....ship changes no problem screw missles no problem you cant allways nerf **** sometimes you need to make it better |
Snapper Pumpkinpuss
The Opposite Sects
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 00:57:00 -
[102] - Quote
no really great idea ...if your mineing an assteriod if you incorrectly scan it you get nothign and your ship blows up....or if your makeing stuff industrial and you fail the blueprints the base blows up ...or if your PvP and you barley kill the guy you get concorded anyways or if your late with your trade shipment your char gets incarcerated for a month in a penal colony...unless of course he can answer a puzzle ...which of course theres never an answer too so hes inactive for 30 days ... some romainain jackass thought of this and you guys never change it if its a dumbass idea ....rethink this |
Mnemosyne Gloob
Acerbus Vindictum
Stealth Wear Inc.
101
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:19:00 -
[103] - Quote
What was i just reading? |
Nam Dnilb
Universal Frog
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:33:00 -
[104] - Quote
Mnemosyne Gloob wrote:What was i just reading?
The proper term is "gibberish". Yes, gibberish! |
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
1236
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 10:16:00 -
[105] - Quote
Hello world
There is a person, his name is HTC NecoSino, he told me awesome things, I updated the guide for Odyssey
Have a lovely day Gÿ+/ |
Takeda Tekitomura
Kruxwaffe
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 18:03:00 -
[106] - Quote
You updated it? Where? :) |
Space Wanderer
110
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 17:46:00 -
[107] - Quote
St Mio wrote:Hello world
There is a person, his name is HTC NecoSino, he told me awesome things, I updated the guide for Odyssey
Have a lovely day Gÿ+/
I think I know what he might have told you. Whoever thinks that your guide is useless doesn't know the first thing about scanning (although a little bit of work moe might be still required). However remember that at least some signature sizes have changed (I distinclty remmeber finding many signature size of 1% real, not just an approximation of 1.25%, on SISI), you might have to update your list. |
Mia Lang
Department of Planetary Services
SOLAR FEDERATION ALLIANCE
6
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 00:27:00 -
[108] - Quote
Mnemosyne Gloob wrote:What was i just reading?
hope his child is moar literate than he is. . . |
Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
1354
|
Posted - 2013.06.16 02:15:00 -
[109] - Quote
CCP Spitfire wrote:There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode
The irony is delicious here given the cluster**** that is exploration now... :-p
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |
A Man Divided
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 20:32:00 -
[110] - Quote
Hi, mind explaining how to use the new guide/updated tables/method for see the sig strength of the certain bands?
|
Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
1354
|
Posted - 2013.06.17 22:00:00 -
[111] - Quote
Mnemosyne Gloob wrote:What was i just reading?
Someone's teenager took the day off from school and got on Mommy's 'puter...
"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |
Zero Sum Gain
Star Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.18 04:09:00 -
[112] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Aethlyn wrote:An Excel Document? You should really try to put this either into an HTML page or post it as a PDF file. Not sure how trustworthy people consider classic (pre-2007) office file formats from strangers. It can't be done as PDF, and HTML might require skills or resources he doesn't have. As they say in the south, don't look a gift horse in the mouth. If your Office is patched properly there's little risk. As I said in the previous forums, awesome work and thanks for doing this.
Seems like you'd be more aware of the existence of scams and malware as an eve player. Not even specific to this thread.
This new learning amazes me sir Bedimere. Tell me again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquake. |
A Man Divided
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 00:22:00 -
[113] - Quote
St Mio wrote:Hello world
There is a person, his name is HTC NecoSino, he told me awesome things, I updated the guide for Odyssey
Have a lovely day Gÿ+/
Can you explain....please.......... |
Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings
Situation: Normal
1455
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 01:09:00 -
[114] - Quote
Snapper Pumpkinpuss wrote:Asshats i pay on 2 acounts my kid made me play cause hes in the USMC so we can talk so i liked it its fun i make money scanning but pay cash for my accounts and now i have to play a f-ing game to get a radar site that i might get 7 mill out of ...thanks its hard enough i have aurthiritis never mind that i have to out hack an 18 year old and im a 53 year old fat guy ... wow level tha playing field ....i like the game but i dont want to play solve a puzzle **** ...i sometimes win raceing for the goodies ...and sometimes loose ... some days you get the bear and some days you dont ... so as in some days you dont you guys sometimes dont get whos paying the salaries of your company....ship changes no problem screw missles no problem you cant allways nerf **** sometimes you need to make it better
Snapper Pumpkinpuss wrote:no really great idea ...if your mineing an assteriod if you incorrectly scan it you get nothign and your ship blows up....or if your makeing stuff industrial and you fail the blueprints the base blows up ...or if your PvP and you barley kill the guy you get concorded anyways or if your late with your trade shipment your char gets incarcerated for a month in a penal colony...unless of course he can answer a puzzle ...which of course theres never an answer too so hes inactive for 30 days ... some romainain jackass thought of this and you guys never change it if its a dumbass idea ....rethink this
So wait, you raised children? |
Mnemosyne Gloob
Acerbus Vindictum
Stealth Wear Inc.
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 01:16:00 -
[115] - Quote
A Man Divided wrote:St Mio wrote:Hello world
There is a person, his name is HTC NecoSino, he told me awesome things, I updated the guide for Odyssey
Have a lovely day Gÿ+/ Can you explain....please..........
WTB guide on getting isk - for free.
Anyway, there once were some pretty clever people, who after investigating why some signatures were harder to scan than others came up with an idea that signatures are actually 'banded together' in certain 'difficulties'. Much scanning and theorycrafting later it was figured out and it was also deemed useful to use the huge range of deep space scanner probes to mitigate the problem of deviation to 'filter' signatures. This was at first used in secrecy, but then made public. With the making it public, there appeared a trend to use this technique to only look for certain sites, and it spread. Soon many people were doing that.
I suppose CCP thought - rightfully in my opinion - that this is not an intended game feature and made some stuff happen, which they thought would make this phenomenon go away. But in their first release of the new 'scanner' a bug crept in, that in the distance column did not actually show the distance, but the disguised signature strength of a signature. Someone clever noticed this and made a thread/guide. CCP fixed this.
There are still (actually pretty easy) ways to look only for certain bands, but i am not of the kind to just relay this to anyone. So i suggest you go do some probing and maybe figure something out.
|
Tauranon
Weeesearch
180
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 01:23:00 -
[116] - Quote
A Man Divided wrote:Hi, mind explaining how to use the new guide/updated tables/method for see the sig strength of the certain bands?
Its less necessary because of the change to identifying sigs at 25% as combat or WH, and the default scanner sweep gives you some indication of which celestial clusters need checking, which dsps didn't. For me or my alt in a covops I can often identify any 0.1s as combat before I've finished warping to any reasonable distance gate, just by waving the default 4au box over each cluster.
you just have to learn what range on a 4au box for your skills to expect a 0.1 in. 0.025s for those hunting the best relic/datas are also pretty obvious.
I'd be suprised if I was slower on a 50 system sweep to identify all the 0.1 combats.
|
Lara Dantreb
Reisende des Schwarzschild Grenze
19
|
Posted - 2013.06.19 11:43:00 -
[117] - Quote
Thank you very much for this guide which is a must have !
----á-á Buying T2 ship bpos since 2005-á ---
--- -á-á-á-á-á-á BUT NOT ATM :)-á-á-á --- |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |