| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
techzer0
IDLE GUNS
   |
Posted - 2007.11.29 02:38:00 -
[1]
Edited by: techzer0 on 29/11/2007 02:39:00
Hmm... this is why we love Amarr players, they're the first to post "OMG CCP YOU SUCK". And it takes 2 seconds to reload crystals vs 10 seconds to reload guns to change range, oh no?
No ships I fly got a boost (oh I can't launch 5 heavy drones from a myrm anymore) I think I should start another thread.
____________________
Hi. I'm not an alt :) |
techzer0
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 02:57:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Princess Xenia
Originally by: techzer0
Edited by: techzer0 on 29/11/2007 02:39:00
Hmm... this is why we love Amarr players, they're the first to post "OMG CCP YOU SUCK". And it takes 2 seconds to reload crystals vs 10 seconds to reload guns to change range, oh no?
No ships I fly got a boost (oh I can't launch 5 heavy drones from a myrm anymore) I think I should start another thread.
OMG!!!
Ignorant: "it takes 2 seconds to reload crystals vs 10 seconds to reload guns to change range"
Have you asked why Amarr has to constantly change ammo??? Is 2 sec reload working as expected when using t2 ammo??? Do you fly Amarr to counter-post me??? Did you also forget to mention the all-mighty-ultimate Amarr's 'UNLIMITED' cheap t1 ammo argument???
Selfish: "can't launch 5 heavy drones from a myrm anymore"
Its called balancing... LOL.. actually I am amazed CCP did not "balance" Amarr ship further... oh guess what they cant do it anymore since they are already gimped to hell!!!!
Oh wait.... THE 'OVER-powered' turret disruptor balancing????? (LOL... it's actually an AMARR BUFF... WHY???????? because Amarr turrets are MOST affected by TD... so 'balancing' TD helps amarr... THE IRONY!!!!!
I play with amarr players all of the time, I spent 4 hours in gang on the test server with 4 abaddon pilots who never complained once last night about any new changes... and we cleared out the BS arena several times, just for the heck of it.
Btw... it's amarr ships that get bonuses for tracking disruption (the sentinel, arbitrator and t2 variants?)
The 5 heavies bit, that was sarcasm... I don't use heavies in myrm as it is, so no change really. I just get prettier graphics. Why must every patch contain a change for a specific race?
____________________
Hi. I'm not an alt :) |
techzer0
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 03:06:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Chainsaw Plankton
you were expecting?
The nerf-abaddon speaks
____________________
Hi. I'm not an alt :) |
techzer0
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 03:29:00 -
[4]
Less caffeine please. I will stop being somewhat constructive and fail to remember this thread exists.
Troll
____________________
Hi. I'm not an alt :) |
techzer0
IDLE GUNS
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 10:27:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Aeaus
*shrug* The fact that they have good ships is all I'm really concerned about, I'm happy with what I'm trained and really, wouldn't want to change anything :)
Amarr need a look at some of their weaker ships, but not these everything and the kitchen sink proposed changes (the only really good one is being the only race to do EM damage).
Almost true... any minmatar pilot and any missile user will tell you that you're wrong about being the only EM damage dealer.
To the guy that said loldps for the vengeance... yeah, it's a rocket ship... maybe if it had the option of standard missiles like a hawk does it's pretty comparable.
____________________
Hi. I'm not an alt :) |
| |
|