| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jolo
   |
Posted - 2004.03.10 01:16:00 -
[1]
When can we expect a way to stop people in newb corps from flying kestrals, blowing up a ship, and having thier friends scoop the cargo.
It's like watching a guy on the street shoot someone, then the cops sit and watch his friends steal the dead guys wallet and pants and socks.
Perhaps a per PILOT war system. So we can fight with one guy if he causes trouble.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.10 05:47:00 -
[2]
Your corp has an Anti-Pants policy too? I thought we were unique....
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.10 05:49:00 -
[3]
BTW the reason I am posting all this is because we have a member in our corp who only does research and marketing... We lost that char to one of these attacks. Along with 5 implants, 10 Tech II things and a clone (hint implants). This was in a 1.0 system. All he could do is watch the friends pick up the loot and corpse.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.10 09:02:00 -
[4]
HAhah. Good one. Is it REALLY too much to ask for like 5 out of 500 systems to be completly safe? I think having 1% eve safe is an acceptable thing to want. Give me a break sally. I hope you were joking...It's not like you can mine in any 1.0 system anyway.
For the rest of us, I think it's ok to not be completly safe in the other 99%. When you see those percentages, don't you feel pretty lame saying "it's stupid to make 1.0 comepletly safe"
I think my idea has nothing to do with AFK <insert task here>, but We've had problems where people attack us and the person is all for war, but the corp doesn't want to fight us. It always ends in a surrender and no fighting (that's no good!). If we could declare war on a certain person, we could fight a little here and there and possibly trash newb corp hiding griefer.
BTW, I appreciate input on the matter. Please make it contructive. I don't appreciate poitnless comments that do nothing but cut others down.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.10 10:11:00 -
[5]
 Quote:
Sorry Jolo, but due to the ultra-consent PvP nature of EVE I can't see how 1.0 is different to 0.0. Your friend was just lazy and AFK, otherwise he wouldn't be killed.
And he though that 1.0 is 100% safe, which was never the case.
why dont you ask him. a kestral with 4 cruise missles can get you pretty quick. Before he could warp out, his ship and pod were gone. Oh course the kestel was nuked, but buddies sat and laughed.
And that is wierd saying 0.0 is the same as 1.0. Why have security at all??
Your argument Sally that all systems are dangerous. This is where I disagree. There has to be a Safe place. 100% safe. Even if it's 1% or less of EVE. That's cool with me. I don't see the need for there to be 100% UNSAFE. There's no reasoning behind it.
And bellieve me. If we could declare war, we would. We have no problem with that.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.10 10:41:00 -
[6]
He was updated. But he didn't NEED ESCORTING. He was pod killed in Yulai. And does all his work in Yulai. He should be able to fly in a space suit and be safe. He never flies in anything but 1.0.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.11 01:30:00 -
[7]
Spend some time in 1.0 and you will soon realize a few things.
1) You get scanned and targeted all the time.
2) Sometimes you even get fired on.
3) It's a pain in the butt to have to sit there and think "Is this newb packing cruises or light missles, are his buddies going to loot my stuff?"
The whole point was to show that it's dumb, the cops will waste a ship for attacking, but watch his buddies loot my stuff.
I agree with the weapons thing.
Either let us self regulate, with per person wars, or turn off weapons in 1.0.
I Don't understand why people are even arguing that 1.0 shouldn't be 100% safe. I think you people jsut like to argue for the sake of arguing.
you aren't happy enough with killing people in 99% of the universe, you have to make 100%. *shrugs*
Seems silly to me. I'm happy with 99% being pretty unsafe. I guess I'm just stupid.
---------------------------------------
|
Jolo
|
Posted - 2004.03.11 17:30:00 -
[8]
What if in 1.0, you cannot fire a weapon at all, unless the target is at war with you or has -5.0 or more. Sounds like a very complex addition indeed...dounbt it will ever happen.
Once again i'd like to ask, why people are even arguing agasint having like 4 systems total in eve that are 100% safe. I don't see the problem. I notice most of the posters arguing the matter are honest pirates. I know you guys never camp Luminaire! Nor do you want to.. So do you care?
BTW, I appreciate all the comments. It's been pretty civil so far. Which should be applauded.
---------------------------------------
|
| |
|