EVE Search - Why cant people learn..

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Why cant people learn..

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 22:52:00 - [1] Originally by: Lothros Andastar Its not CCPs fault its M$ i mean ffs why does it let other software edit system files? This is the stupidest thing I've read all day. It's not the driver's fault for being in a wreck. It's the car manufacturer's for letting us drive the car anywhere we want. Shockingly stupid doesn't begin to qualify the above quote.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 22:55:00 - [2] I'd like the OP to explain what kind of company releases a product that people should EXPECT to be broken when it is first released. Please, enlighten me.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:01:00 - [3] Edited by: Elenath on 06/12/2007 23:01:06 Originally by: Dr Paithos Originally by: Elenath I'd like the OP to explain what kind of company releases a product that people should EXPECT to be broken when it is first released. Please, enlighten me. A computer software company ^_^ You do realize that many companies release software that are free of critical bugs, correct? Imagine what console software companies would still be in business if they released finalized software on hardcopy that crashed systems. The convenience of updating has made companies like CCP lazy. This is not the first time CCP has released an update that ruined an OS. That people have to learn to expect CCP not to do a proper job tells me enough.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:07:00 - [4] Originally by: Dr Paithos Console games still ship with many bugs. They tend to be rarer than in PC software as people are less tolerant, and systems are standardised. Many console games are still patched via e.g. X-Box Live. I didn't say they didn't ship with bugs. Read again. I said, 'free of critical bugs'. For ages console software companies didn't have the chance to 'patch', and at the time the software and programming was complex for the time. They somehow managed though. Didn't they? Apologetics doesn't fly with me. Originally by: Dr Paithos This problemn in particular is a pretty major error on CCP's part too, though. Bingo.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:09:00 - [5] Originally by: Kerfira CCP should of.c. have tested their patch a lot better. Understatement of the year. I still love watching all the CCP fanbois (and the MS haters) try to blame MS for this ABSOLUTELY STUPID MISTAKE on CCP's part. So yes, anyone blaming MS for CCP's mistake still qualifies as the stupidest thing I've read all day.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:41:00 - [6] Originally by: Admiral Pelleon Originally by: Kerfira Originally by: Elenath So yes, anyone blaming MS for CCP's mistake still qualifies as the stupidest thing I've read all day. Actually, I'd say your biased views are a strong contender for that title! Black/white usually aren't. CCP should have tested better! Microsoft should have made a proper OS! You focusing on one company's mistake and completely ignoring the other company isn't a fair evaluation. I wonder who you work for What? I blame the smacktard in CCP who named a useless file "boot.ini" in the first place. That makes far too much sense. Why not jump on the fanboi bandwagon along with everyone else and just keep apologizing for CCP's massive lack of customer consideration and quality assurance? Probably because you have a brain and pay for your own account.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:44:00 - [7] Originally by: Kerfira Originally by: Elenath You do realize that many companies release software that are free of critical bugs, correct? The answer to that question is (on a worldwide scale): Approximately ZERO! What world do you live in? I have purchased software for well over 20 years and have countless games and programs that were released that were free of critical bugs. Stop being a moron.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:45:00 - [8] Originally by: Space Runt a company that releases bugged software.. hmmm. lets think oh yeah MICROSOFT!!!!!!!! 98 XP VISTA?? all these had CRITICAL bugs, hell Vista is famed for being the best operating system for working with NOTHING!!!! oh and their hardware isn't much better, any 360 owners with 3 red lights can confirm this The irony in your statement is that Vista actually SAVED some people from CCP's screw-up this time around. Looks like you're WRONG.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:55:00 - [9] Originally by: Kerfira Originally by: Elenath Stop being a moron. ...said the Moron The matter of the fact is, that a PROPER OS wouldn't have allowed ANY application to let a simple mistake like this screw up the system. Linux wouldn't! MacOS wouldn't! Vista is not safe against bugs like this either even if you try to say so. It just happened not to be affected by this one because it didn't have that particular file. Unfortunately, Vista has essentially the same design fault as XP, since applications install either with super-user credentials, or can elevate themselves to that level. Microsoft is just as much to blame as CCP, since they are the ones who've released a platform which is not immune to these kinds of user errors. Your Microsoft fanboi'ism is funny, and my guess is a lot of people are amused at your selective blame-casting. I know I am You, sir, are more of a moron than I thought. As post #23 in this thread states (which is also accurate) any OS in admin mode will allow modifications to files. Stop lying. Your apologetics for CCP make you look like a fool. Your irrational hate for MS (and your lying about their OS) makes you look childish.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.06 23:56:00 - [10] Originally by: Admiral Pelleon Originally by: Kerfira Originally by: Elenath Stop being a moron. ...said the Moron The matter of the fact is, that a PROPER OS wouldn't have allowed ANY application to let a simple mistake like this screw up the system. Linux wouldn't! MacOS wouldn't! Vista is not safe against bugs like this either even if you try to say so. It just happened not to be affected by this one because it didn't have that particular file. Unfortunately, Vista has essentially the same design fault as XP, since applications install either with super-user credentials, or can elevate themselves to that level. Microsoft is just as much to blame as CCP, since they are the ones who've released a platform which is not immune to these kinds of user errors. Your Microsoft fanboi'ism is funny, and my guess is a lot of people are amused at your selective blame-casting. I know I am And your point is? Regardless of the OS's permissions, CCP had no business changing that file. Bingo. Again. Kerifra wrong. Again.
Elenath Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2007.12.07 00:03:00 - [11] Originally by: Kerfira Originally by: Elenath As post #23 in this thread states (which is also accurate) any OS in admin mode will allow modifications to files. Look at the post above Difference is, MS OS has admin access as the ONLY option. Other OS can be made (and usually is by default) secure against this kind of mistake. Stop lying. Your apologetics for Microsoft make you look like a fool. Your irrational hate for CCP (and your lying about their mistake) makes you look childish. What the Hell are you talking about? When is the last time you used Windows? Not to mention, this doesn't even address how WRONG you are about Mac, Linux, etc. You are either stupid, or lying. Look at the other responses to this thread to see how lost you are.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.