|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
140

|
Posted - 2011.09.16 11:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Some comments from CCP Guard are in this post.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
140

|
Posted - 2011.09.16 11:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:OMG OMG OMG - after MONTHS of asking, a dev finally posted in this thread... Now, we just need the info on FW vs a link to CCP Guard's post that they are still working on the details and the FW community might start to be a little happier 
Some more updates from CCP Manifest. Still not the solid information everyone is craving, but it should give some insight into the process, at the very least. CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
140

|
Posted - 2011.09.16 12:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:
Well, I will be the first to acknowledge the responses, but I will also say that I hope the FW will continue to make their feelings known and make noise as we do want the attention given to FW that it deserves.
Bring on the results of the planning sessions so we know if we should be justly upset or happy...
A fair and very valid point. All I would personally ask is to keep the feedback in a civil and constructive vein.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
173

|
Posted - 2011.09.16 12:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:CCP Spitfire wrote:Har Harrison wrote:
Well, I will be the first to acknowledge the responses, but I will also say that I hope the FW will continue to make their feelings known and make noise as we do want the attention given to FW that it deserves.
Bring on the results of the planning sessions so we know if we should be justly upset or happy...
A fair and very valid point. All I would personally ask is to keep the feedback in a civil and constructive vein. Would it be too much to ask that FW can have input in the same way that Soundwave has asked for input into 0.0???
No, not too much. I will ask Soundwave if we can organize something along those lines, but I personally think it would be good to have a solid basis for discussion first (similar to the "0.0 design goals" blogs that started the discussion), and that would take time.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
173

|
Posted - 2011.09.20 12:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Next fanfest! FW panel in the main hall with all the devs! Hell make FW the theme of the fanfest with different corners and missions and plexes (bars) for every faction. YEAH BEER!
I can't promise a wholly FW-themed Fanfest, but it would be reasonable to assume the presence of beer, yes. 
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
340

|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:Bengal Bob wrote:Har Harrison wrote:Bengal Bob wrote:Still waiting for patch notes - dev blog would be nice even though it is just words not action. Winter is coming - need a dev blog CCP!!! This needs a BUMP - any word on the FW improvements CCP???
Just wanted to pop in quickly and say that we haven't forgotten about this thread. Can't give any ETA on the solid news right now but we'll keep you up to date with any developments.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
357

|
Posted - 2011.10.25 08:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Welcome to the discussion, Sim!! I wanted to take a moment and point out to yourself and others that repeating ideas is just fine. The stronger message we send that there is a concrete and generally agreed-upon list of fixes that are doable for Winter Expansion, the better. I'd be more than happy if another dozen FW pilots all jumped on and spoke their minds too, the fixes that keep overlapping should be the ones CCP is taking notes on and hopefully implementing in some fashion.
All we can do is keep speaking our minds, especially if our ideas overlap. Hopefully a CCP representative can confirm or deny soon whether FW iterations are indeed in the pipeline for FW. All we've heard so far is "we're listening", We need to hear "we're acting upon this". (or acting upon SOMETHING.)
That's the plan, yes. CCP Soundwave has been posting some ideas in this thread; there are some good solutions that can be implemented further down the road, but right now we are focusing on the fixes that can make its way into the winter expansion. It would be great if we could keep the discussion of these ideas in that thread, though, just to make tracking suggestions and providing feedback a bit easier.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|

CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
358

|
Posted - 2011.10.25 16:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rodj Blake wrote:CCP Spitfire wrote:CCP Soundwave has been posting some ideas in this thread I'm sorry Spitfire, but wanting to remove faction NPCs from high-sec does not count as "some ideas"
Fair enough, not going to argue with that. I'll ask the development team to post some more information (if they are ready to share it at this point, of course); but in the meantime it would be great if the bulk of the discussion could be kept in one thread -- if only for the sake of convenience.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|
|
|