| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tjemjak
Hendrix Angels Fabricated Confabulations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 06:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey,
i would like to collect some ideas on a Flagship for high/lowsec warfare with 5-10 man fleets.
Everything, hull, fitting and how the support fleet should look like can be a matter of discussion.
Overall budget is 5-6 bil which should also cover cost for implants if suggested.
Thx,
TJ |

Alara IonStorm
1528
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 06:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Umm Flagship is not a term we use... for anything really.
Do you mean a Command Ship fitting Gang Links or a Capital Ship like a Carrier or just a survivable heavy tanked ship that is hard to remove from the field.
It would also help to know the general make up of the gang, is it all Battleships, or Shield Battlecruisers, or HAC's or Frigs or a mixed fleet. Does your Gang plan to Camp or does it need Mobility, is it close range long range.
Also we don't really know what you can fly. |

Tjemjak
Hendrix Angels Fabricated Confabulations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 06:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Umm Flagship is not a term we use... for anything really.
Do you mean a Command Ship fitting Gang Links or a Capital Ship like a Carrier or just a survivable heavy tanked ship that is hard to remove from the field.
It would also help to know the general make up of the gang, is it all Battleships, or Shield Battlecruisers, or HAC's or Frigs or a mixed fleet. Does your Gang plan to Camp or does it need Mobility, is it close range long range.
Also we don't really know what you can fly.
term was used in AT e.g. and should be well known.
yea i agree. command ship is such different. not carrier, since its for low and high sec warfare. I dont want to give any restrictions really since fitting can be changed, and the fleet around it aswell ofc. However, lts say close range. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
752
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 06:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
This was the flagship of the Parsec Flux fleet for a long time:
[Basilisk, Solo Basilisk] Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I
10MN Afterburner II Pith B-Type Large Shield Booster Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Cap Recharger II
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Improved Cloaking Device II
Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II
Hornet EC-300 x5
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Alara IonStorm
1528
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 07:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tjemjak wrote: term was used in AT e.g. and should be well known.
However, lts say close range.
So according to massively it just means faction fit Battleship in Tourney Speak. 
If I were to take my pic I would say go with a Slaved or LG Slaved Vindicator then for a close range fleet with a Faction Web and Faction Dmg Mods.
That should be within your Budget. |

Tjemjak
Hendrix Angels Fabricated Confabulations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 07:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Tjemjak wrote: term was used in AT e.g. and should be well known.
However, lts say close range.
So according to massively it just means faction fit Battleship in Tourney Speak.  If I were to take my pic I would say go with a Slaved or LG Slaved Vindicator then for a close range fleet with a Faction Web and Faction Dmg Mods. That should be within your Budget.
yea, nice call. that was what i did come up with.
what about bhaalgorn? |

Jude Lloyd
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
317
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 08:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Opux Luxury Yacht should do the trick. Heretic Army CEO Host of Frigfry Fridays http://judelloyd.blog.com/ -á |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Damnation or Vulture depending on your fleet comp. Or maybe a Claymore, all can fit stupid tanks, the Claymore has the worst buffer sadly due to loosing out on the resist bonus, but if you need a useful Flagship there the way to go IMO. Slaved vindi if you just want a big DPS bringing brick but CS are more beneficial assuming a gang of around 10+ in size. And certainly not some ******** Basi that wants to be a Scimitar.
Edit; loving the EM resist on the Basi by the way, I'm sure your glad EM ammo isn't widely used... |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
753
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
That Basi saw way more fights than your character has total kills. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
That may well be the case. Still don't see the point, it's not gonna tank much even assuming you manage perfect range control, which in the days of 100k web/point is difficult the thing wil die horribly to anything that has greater range than your shield reps which is if i remember, about 80k or less.
Feel free to enlighten me to the point of it. |

Wyte Ragnarok
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tjemjak wrote: term was used in AT e.g. and should be well known.
Low sec =/= Alliance Tournament.
I hope your 6 billion isk backside gets hot dropped by PL.
Liang Nuren wrote:Ed: For that matter, I got more kills last month than you have lifetime kills.  Yes. But you realise you're talking to CVA. I mean really... It's CVA. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
753
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Wyte Ragnarok wrote:Yes. But you realise you're talking to CVA. I mean really... It's CVA.
 Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Wyte Ragnarok wrote:Yes. But you realise you're talking to CVA. I mean really... It's CVA. 
Sorry I forgot blobbing horribly fit Drakes and killing solo Rifters with 2 T2 frigs is "leet Pvp", if you enliten me to the purpose of the Basi I will happily accept it as read. |

Wyte Ragnarok
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:54:00 -
[14] - Quote
Oh I wasn't referring to the Basi. More the fact that Liang gets more kills in a month than you do in a lifetime.
Where did I mention anything about blobs?
Although. Now you mention it. You have a point. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 09:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Meh, don't get a whole lot of play time, and yes we blob things, primarily because we fight blobs of equal or larger size, way the world works. I Genuinely don't care about all this KB crap, just don't really see the point in the Basi its an honest question.
Oh and I'd like to see how long it takes you to solo a TCU :P |

I Legionnaire
The Phoenix Program
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 10:12:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bhaalgorn backed up by a cap-feeding Guardian. |

Sicex
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 10:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Wouldn't it be cool if we had flagships though? Not super weapon-ships but truly ornate or indomitable ships representing a racial supremacy. The titans are a weapon.. a null-sec weapon at that, but what if we had parade style weapons platforms that could traverse all space?
To add further balance, make them PVP Tournament prizes or some other sort of limited release mechanism... non-buildable but not invisible. Maybe the racial Navy rebuilds them for free when lost?...
Flagships, mang.... |

Tjemjak
Hendrix Angels Fabricated Confabulations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 10:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Wyte Ragnarok - just week. |

Wyte Ragnarok
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 10:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tjemjak wrote:Wyte Ragnarok - just week. One week or two?
Edit: On a more serious note though. Just grab a ship. Why spend 6 bill on something you'll take into low sec? If you're looking for a high sec flagship for your war parade then fine. A Slaved Vindicator or Slaved Damnation would be best. Either way, Slave it and get a couple of Guardian pilots to back you up. It would be awesome. I confess. |

madsamo
HyberNation.
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 13:12:00 -
[20] - Quote
Heavy Interdictor or command ships can both fit ridiculous tanks and do some decent dps. You WILL be primairied with either one though |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
307
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 15:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Tjemjak wrote: term was used in AT e.g. and should be well known.
However, lts say close range.
So according to massively it just means faction fit Battleship in Tourney Speak.  If I were to take my pic I would say go with a Slaved or LG Slaved Vindicator then for a close range fleet with a Faction Web and Faction Dmg Mods. That should be within your Budget. For some people slaved faction battleships make up the majority of their fleet. |

Lunkwill Khashour
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 15:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
You find 'flagships' in wormholes. The limited mass allowance and lack of supercaps, combined with the riches found within, leads to highly pimped and relative rare battleships. You'll find fleets with a single bhaalgorn worth 5bil in there.
OTOH, there are highly pimped ships in the game like to imperial apocalypse, the tribal issue tempest etc. They could be considered flagships aswell and are irreplaceable. |

Katalci
D.I.R.T
21
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 05:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
If you mean a good boat for the FC to fly, then use a fleet command ship, t3, or something cloaky. Stick a probe launcher and cyno on it, too.
If that's not what you mean, then why do you only have one "flagship" instead of an entire fleet of them?
madsamo wrote:Heavy Interdictor or command ships can both fit ridiculous tanks and do some decent dps. You WILL be primairied with either one though Who in their right mind primaries a Damnation? |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
754
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 05:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Wyte Ragnarok wrote:Yes. But you realise you're talking to CVA. I mean really... It's CVA.  Sorry I forgot blobbing horribly fit Drakes and killing solo Rifters with 2 T2 frigs is "leet Pvp", if you enliten me to the purpose of the Basi I will happily accept it as read.
The Basi was used to engage under sentry fire when we were overwhelmingly outnumbered by the locals. Things like taking a BC gang into faction BS fleets and cap fleets while taking sentries ourselves. That's why the extra reps and extra local tank are so much more important than what you can get out of a Scim.
The cloak helps get fights too - you'd be amazed how often 10 man BS fleets from well known PVP corps/alliances will refuse to engage 4 BCs and a solo Basi. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 06:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Killboard stats are ******* awesome. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
754
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 06:10:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Killboard stats are ******* awesome.
The worst thing about KB stats is that they encourage people to be **** - playing for the KM or playing to avoid the lossmail. Risk averse PVP is not fun PVP. On the flip side, they all tell their own story - and years later you can look back and be like "lol, man remember that Domi we nailed with a couple frigates?"
-Liang
Ed: And besides, I don't rely solely on my KB stats. But you should know that. ;-) AND YES I STILL HATE YOU. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

To mare
Advanced Technology
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 08:05:00 -
[27] - Quote
Bhaalgorn full neuts with some faction webs and all the tank that your money can buy, pimp eanm, slaves, maybe T2 trimark. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 08:10:00 -
[28] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: Ed: And besides, I don't rely solely on my KB stats. But you should know that. ;-) AND YES I STILL HATE YOU.
You could have just said, "i engage dudes who don't fire EM under sentries and need to active tank as a result" instead of "lol you have no kills." |

Elistea
G U N G N I R Y G G D R A S I L
53
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 08:52:00 -
[29] - Quote
Simple answer. Bhaalgorn.
Most precious asset to any fleet. |

GenesisMike
University of Asshattery Asshat Vendetta
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 08:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
As others have said already a Flagship is whatever you want it to be. Flagships are generally the ship flying the "flag" of the commander or as some people have come to view it as the "Bismark" of their fleet. In reading your post it looks as if you are trying to find a ship which to anchor a fleet around. I like flying the Bhaalgorn as others have stated, for a small group you can go cookie cutter fit's but make sure it has a strong tank. Faction BS's often draw attention. Fit it to the needs of your group, if you have plenty of DPS go for a rack of Neuts and kill any cap in sight. If you are flying with a smaller group (please always have logi with a Bhaal if you ever take it out) go with the standard 4 MPII's and 3 Neuts, again LOTS of tank since with good skills and implants I run 800+ DPS with one INHS and drones.
I agree with others though regarding KB stats and such, even a Bhaalgorn fitted with Faction/Officer mods can burn quickly if you get blobbed so be prepared to pod home if you take it out.
Have fun whichever ship you take out. Hope this helps.
Message me in game for a fit if you want. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
755
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 16:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Liang Nuren wrote: Ed: And besides, I don't rely solely on my KB stats. But you should know that. ;-) AND YES I STILL HATE YOU.
You could have just said, "i engage dudes who don't fire EM under sentries and need to active tank as a result" instead of "lol you have no kills."
Look how ******* stupid you still are. You can still tank 600 DPS raw EM damage with a 90m sig radius. Its not exactly hard to do a bit of sig tanking along with that extremely impressive EM tank. Yeah sure, its not up to the 2500 DPS tank that you might expect when tanking a Vindicator, but its still a significantly better raw tank than a Myrm puts out.
And besides, I don't tell you that you have no kills. I tell you that you're a ******* moron talking about an area of the game you self admittedly have no experience with.
Fuckwit.
-Liang
Ed: And also, I engaged no matter who was on the field. But I don't expect someone like you to understand that. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

shal ri
Zanzibar Land
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Meh, don't get a whole lot of play time, and yes we blob things, primarily because we fight blobs of equal or larger size, way the world works. I Genuinely don't care about all this KB crap, just don't really see the point in the Basi its an honest question. Oh and I'd like to see how long it takes you to solo a TCU :P
roflmfao i live in the same area as cva. u dont fight gang the same size as u.ever. nor do u fight gangs bigger then u. ever. u just fail bait, hot drop. i only had 1 fight just 1 where a cva baddon died solo. heres the real funny part tho. do u guys every aggro first? nope. even if the said target is red and has gate guns on a high sec gate with ur bait cyno drake sat there doin **** all.
i bet Liang could solo u in a basi thats how bad cva is at pvp. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:And besides, I don't tell you that you have no kills. I tell you that you're a ******* moron talking about an area of the game you self admittedly have no experience with.
What?
Clearly not angry at all.
Quote:Ed: And also, I engaged no matter who was on the field. But I don't expect someone like you to understand that.
lol, you don't know me very well.
At any rate, Heretics are free at any point to come try to kill us in Venal v0v |

Batelle
HOMELE55
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote: Meh, don't get a whole lot of play time, and yes we blob things, primarily because we fight blobs of equal or larger size, way the world works.
Blobs like our 5-man gatecamps in R3? 
Quote:Oh and I'd like to see how long it takes you to solo a TCU :P
who would ever want to do that? |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
755
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mfume Apocal wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:And besides, I don't tell you that you have no kills. I tell you that you're a ******* moron talking about an area of the game you self admittedly have no experience with. What?
This entire argument centers around your ******** assertions relating to an area of the game that you by your own admission have no experience with. I know that you tried to play it off as "low suck bears" but the reality is that you simply don't do the solo logi thing. And I don't even have to read your assertions on how solo logi work goes down to know that... you ******* said so yourself.
No, you may fly logis but its only as part of a WTFBlob. So kindly STFU about anything related to logis in small gangs - you clearly have no experience with it.
Quote:Clearly not angry at all.
I thought I started the conversation with "And yes, I still ******* hate you". I meant it.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Cambarus
Socially Awkward Pancreas
123
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Mfume Apocal wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:And besides, I don't tell you that you have no kills. I tell you that you're a ******* moron talking about an area of the game you self admittedly have no experience with. What? This entire argument centers around your ******** assertions relating to an area of the game that you by your own admission have no experience with. I know that you tried to play it off as "low suck bears" but the reality is that you simply don't do the solo logi thing. And I don't even have to read your assertions on how solo logi work goes down to know that... you ******* said so yourself. No, you may fly logis but its only as part of a WTFBlob. So kindly STFU about anything related to logis in small gangs - you clearly have no experience with it. Quote:Clearly not angry at all. I thought I started the conversation with "And yes, I still ******* hate you". I meant it. -Liang Not gonna lie, it makes me giggle a little to see liang so pissed off. Logis are kind of a sore spot with him  |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 17:53:00 -
[37] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:No, you may fly logis but its only as part of a WTFBlob. So kindly STFU about anything related to logis in small gangs - you clearly have no experience with it.
l0l
Quote:I thought I started the conversation with "And yes, I still ******* hate you". I meant it.
hey man, im not hard to find and i play eve the same time as you. you should come show me how i dont solo logi and how active tanked ABing basi w/ no eccm is a good fit that ends well. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
755
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 20:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:Not gonna lie, it makes me giggle a little to see liang so pissed off. Logis are kind of a sore spot with him 
Its more that you two are ******* retards that love to speak authoritatively about areas of the game that you have literally no experience with.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 20:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
Wow this is still going, would like to know how that Basi tanks very much sentry fire, being Sig doesnt come into the equation when it comes to gate guns, but hey I dont fight much in low sec, still dont see a great deal of point as it has awful cap life, a meh tank, less EM resists than a buffer fit cane etc etc and could get alphaed by a couple of Nados with RF EMP.
But as I say, it obviously has a purpose since you give it such wild acclaim, but as the man rightfully said;
"I need to tank sentry fire in short bursts while being able to be hidden to look engagable" would have been far better than you first response which was essentially "lol my char haz more kills than you char, this fit works" |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
755
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 20:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Wow this is still going, would like to know how that Basi tanks very much sentry fire, being Sig doesnt come into the equation when it comes to gate guns, but hey I dont fight much in low sec, still dont see a great deal of point as it has awful cap life, a meh tank, less EM resists than a buffer fit cane etc etc and could get alphaed by a couple of Nados with RF EMP.
But as I say, it obviously has a purpose since you give it such wild acclaim, but as the man rightfully said;
"I need to tank sentry fire in short bursts while being able to be hidden to look engagable" would have been far better than you first response which was essentially "lol my char haz more kills than you char, this fit works"
The Basi only has a "meh tank and capacitor" when you compare it to capital ships. Really, I'm not even sure WTF you are talking about. As to how it tanked sentry fire: it rocked a 600 DPS on its weakest resists, where sentries put out ~352 DPS total - the bulk of which is actually on the highest resists. There's no "tanking for short bursts". I mean seriously, I tanked sentries + mixed capital + BS fleets more than once with it. -_-
As to Minnie ships running EMP - they've always existed and I never really had much problem with them, even when tanking sentry fire myself. Furthermore, the Tornado is actually a terrible ship to bring up because its pretty easy to sig tank.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Mike AntHunt
Ninja's in the Night
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 20:50:00 -
[41] - Quote
As far as a "Flagship", it really depends but a command ship is always a good choice. If you want something with a lot of tank and DPS, a BS isnt a bad option and cheaper than going t2 cruiser/battlecruiser route. If you don't mind the cost, a Heavy interdictor, command ship, or Faction Battleship (pirate) would be really good. A lot of fleets I've seen had a Faction/deadspace bhaalgorn with neuts and double webs. Just keep in mind that a ship like that will need to be fed capacitor from a logistics ship or another Battleship that has two dedicated transfers. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 22:10:00 -
[42] - Quote
Not sure where your getting your numbers from, i dont get nearly that much assuming all V, or are we talking Tengu Boost/Drugs/Slaves, even so, the cap lasts like 30 seconds with all reps on, just dont see why its better than a scimi, or a pair of Basis
Edit, Crystals, I am le tired |

shal ri
Zanzibar Land
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 22:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Not sure where your getting your numbers from, i dont get nearly that much assuming all V, or are we talking Tengu Boost/Drugs/Slaves, even so, the cap lasts like 30 seconds with all reps on, just dont see why its better than a scimi, or a pair of Basis
Edit, Crystals, I am le tired
lmao u really dont know much do you. u talk like theres only 1 type of fit u can use for a basi. different fits mean different outcomes in terms of use for a ship. learn something. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
756
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 22:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Not sure where your getting your numbers from, i dont get nearly that much assuming all V, or are we talking Tengu Boost/Drugs/Slaves, even so, the cap lasts like 30 seconds with all reps on, just dont see why its better than a scimi, or a pair of Basis
Edit, Crystals, I am le tired
You can't run 5 RRs + local tank. You can flat out run your local tank, and usually you can get 2-3 RRs going on your mates. The cap on its actually pretty good - way better than the Scim video I linked (which was actually being hit by 5 neuts). Really though, if you're running your logi's tank flat out and still have to be repping your mates, you're probably way outgunned to start with. (These are the best fights, btw).
Anyway, its better than a Scim because: - Despite the fact its relatively "weak" against EM damage, it actually tanks way better than a Scim in most common situations. - It has 5 RRs - it simply puts out more RR. - It has a cloak, which means you're able to get fights. Like I said, you'd be amazed how often 10 man BS gangs avoid engaging 4 BCs and a solo Basi. - Its not super fast, but its fast enough for almost all engagements. You'll start having real problems when everyone is running around in Cynabals, but that's just a case of your side not shaping the engagement correctly.
-Liang
Ed: Also, note that a similar Scimitar has the same restriction on running local tank + RR. It tanks better against EM damage, but the resist profile is pretty **** so it actually tanks worse in most common situations. Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 23:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
I can see it working fairly well sometimes, just getting raped by anybody that brought a Recon, with the possible exception of the Curse/Pilgrim which should really die before they get within neut range (40k if memory serves).
Just feel like a Scimi which although being unable to tank gate guns would fair better in the Range control/speed factor, which is one of the best defences for logi tbh (speed and range)
And to the man up there of course there are various Basi fits and of course my comments only apply to this one, being its the one I'm discussing.
(Oh and Liang I dont dislike you honestly :P)
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
756
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 23:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:I can see it working fairly well sometimes, just getting raped by anybody that brought a Recon, with the possible exception of the Curse/Pilgrim which should really die before they get within neut range (40k if memory serves).
Just feel like a Scimi which although being unable to tank gate guns would fair better in the Range control/speed factor, which is one of the best defences for logi tbh (speed and range)
And to the man up there of course there are various Basi fits and of course my comments only apply to this one, being its the one I'm discussing.
(Oh and Liang I dont dislike you honestly :P)
Comments: - The Curse isn't that big of a deal (see linked scim video. It has a named booster and T1 rigs and was facing 66% more neuting power than a curse represents) - The Arazu isn't that big of a deal because most engagements happen hugged up against a gate anyway. - The Falcon (and ECM drones) fucks everyone. Most of the time our fleets lasted long enough to drive the Falcon off the field. We very rarely lost friendlies, but when we did it was usually to overwhelming damage or ECM. - Being unable to tank sentry guns means that your logi is worthless after 15 seconds into any fight. That's... just not acceptable if your idea of PVP is any more than ganking haulers on a gate. Note that its trivial to get a Scim to tank sentries as well (and in fact, in the video linked I was tanking sentries + domi with 5 neuts on me). - Range/Speed is alright but really if your fleet is aware of its limitations its generally easy enough to contain the fight in the 140km diameter sphere you can affect. - The Scim is just flat inferior in every way except for range control. Afterall, its fast enough, sports a superior tank, reps more, and sports a cloak so you can actually get fights.
-Liang
Ed: Justification. Also, I don't mind people questioning the fit - or me. I don't mind discussing logi fits with people who actually fly logis - especially if they run in low sec or run solo logis. I just draw the line at the **** those two fuckwits pulled last time we "sparred". Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Robertson Nolen
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 02:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:I can see it working fairly well sometimes, just getting raped by anybody that brought a Recon, with the possible exception of the Curse/Pilgrim which should really die before they get within neut range (40k if memory serves).
Just feel like a Scimi which although being unable to tank gate guns would fair better in the Range control/speed factor, which is one of the best defences for logi tbh (speed and range)
And to the man up there of course there are various Basi fits and of course my comments only apply to this one, being its the one I'm discussing.
(Oh and Liang I dont dislike you honestly :P)
Seriously you guys need to put a ****** filter into who you invite into your fleets. This **** is the best loot I have ever received.
On the topic of the thread, why is there no love for the Vulture. They aren't that crappy |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 10:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
How do you find it deals with LR Webbing from Huginns/Rapiers being it would destroy there sig tank entirely with the Reduced speed/painting.
Oh and Dat Guardian 0.o
Edit; Gate guns are something I have little experience with tanking in Logis, I generally use 1600 plated canes for agressing in low sec, I also discovered you cant Sig tank gate guns, much to my Crusaders demise... |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 10:42:00 -
[49] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:How do you find it deals with LR Webbing from Huginns/Rapiers being it would destroy there sig tank entirely with the Reduced speed/painting.
Oh and Dat Guardian 0.o
They literally weren't noticeable from my perspective. You're talking about the ship like it lacks tank in some way - yet the reality of the situation is that it has a dual rep Myrm tank on its only low resist when sitting totally still. I'm not totally sure about volley bleedthrough, but the raw tank numbers indicate the ship should be able to straight up face tank an overheated Vindicator. The only time I had to tank a Vindi + Hype + Sentries + Hurricane/Cyclone + other ****, I didn't have any trouble.
Also, the Guardian kinda sucks at the solo logi role - or at least I haven't found a way to abuse it and get similar results.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 10:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
Guardian needs to be in groups to be effective, its sig tank combined with EHP is nice, like 65+ EHP with legion bonus and around 65M Sig Rad with Loki bonus is pretty damn fine. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:02:00 -
[51] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Guardian needs to be in groups to be effective, its sig tank combined with EHP is nice, like 65+ EHP with legion bonus and around 65M Sig Rad with Loki bonus is pretty damn fine.
Apparently the Onieros no longer sucks though.
I dunno, I'd say both the Ony and the Scim still suck. The Scim sucks because its just utterly outclassed by the Basi (even in the one niche where you would REALLY expect it to succeed) and the Ony sucks because the Guardian just works better for the blob warfare that you normally see armor rolling in. I blame the tracking link bonus, but I understand its really popular for people who need to shave another 15 seconds off their next Incursion NCO.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
Im a big fan of the Scimi in big groups, requires less interdependancy and works better than an MWD basi for fast moving fleets IMO. The Oneiros I have seen around a bit recently, has the same EHP/Sig adavantages of the Guardian but I've not seen it in any major engagements so I cant really judge it as yet. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
And have you considered swapping the second invul out for a Photon Scat, less cap usage an a better overall resist profile.
Being that EM damage is so prevalent. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
The Basi is most certainly slower than the Scim, but as long as its fast enough its not that big of a deal. Of course, definitions of fast enough vary widely, but considering I normally run with an AB I don't think I'm overly concerned about just how fast I'm going.
As to the Basi having an interdependency problem: I've honestly got to say thats pure hogwash. The Basi fit I posted, if nothing else, should utterly disabuse you of that notion.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:19:00 -
[55] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:And have you considered swapping the second invul out for a Photon Scat, less cap usage an a better overall resist profile.
Being that EM damage is so prevalent.
Your core mistake is thinking EM damage is common.
It isn't.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:26:00 -
[56] - Quote
Most Minnie ships pack Barrage/RF EMP in my experience, them being rather common.
Saying that I have found myself using hail recently 0.o
And jeeze, I just noticed that Basi runs all 5 reps stable assuming no local tank, thats actually pretty damn Impressive... |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
I tend to find that far more canes run Barrage or PP than EMP, and I don't really worry about it overly much until they get on top of me and try to do the dual web no-tank thing - at which point they're promptly nuked down by my gang mates. Its not like its a contest of me just sitting there face tanking entire fleets - if someone gave me trouble, I let the guys know and they went down fast.
Also, yes, it runs 5 RRs totally cap stable. You can actually pulse your local tank for a while too, or you can run the local tank flat out and still put out 2-3 RRs worth of repping. You'll eventually cap out but coming back from even being totally capped out is surprisingly quick.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:40:00 -
[58] - Quote
In that case I approve, Scimis are still better looking, but yeah, I think I approve of that one.
You run any kind of drugs/implants with it??
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:45:00 -
[59] - Quote
Blue pill and mindflood both look really snazzy, but I get really skittish about side effects. Anything that negatively affects EHP, reps, or cap is just off limits IMO. That leaves you looking at synth, which I didn't feel added a lot to the ship. For implants, I ran with a HG crystal set and 5% cap implants. I think I filled the rest of the implant slots out with mobility stuff.
Anyway, it was a hella fun ride while it lasted... just a shame that Heretics don't do that kind of fleet. Then again, Heretics is pretty static so being known for fielding logis would make the PVP dry up real fast. Meh.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kinda thought the HG Crystals would come into it, I run Blue Pill/Mindflood cyclone sometimes, the side effects arent too much of an issue because its not an expensive lost, I keep em in the Hold of my carrier too, for emergencies.
Do you find difficutlies with arty or other high alpha weapons its Buffer aint huge and a good shot from a couple of Nados or even a Cane or two could Strip the shields straight off it. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
757
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:52:00 -
[61] - Quote
I lost a similarly fit Scimitar to an arty Maelstrom once - but to be fair I was already at half shields by the time he locked me up. I was busy playing station games and didn't have the necessary transversal to make him miss. IMO it was more of a derp on my part than it being a particularly good counter to the fit on an open battlefield... but its definitely something to keep an eye out for.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 11:56:00 -
[62] - Quote
Liang has derps, shock horror :P
Wow, we mega Delayed this thread, TLDR;
Mega Uber Shiny Slaved Faction BS
Carrier Maybe if you feel brave enough (may incur the wrath of the Hotdrop)
I would say Vulture/Damnation depending on fleet comp, or maybe a Claymore for the pure sexy factor. |

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 15:31:00 -
[63] - Quote
I would pick up a cheap Navy Scorpion, Fleet Typhoon or Navy Armageddon. Fit them with mostly T2 but maybe a few cheap faction mods to increase survivability... Jump in as bait and make sure you have some good backup. If you have as much isk you say you can repeat this a lot even if you get blobbed once or twice.
If you really insisted on something hugely expensive just get something that offers more than pure dps. Vindicator and Bhaalgorn are all capable of dps, tank and some good utility for a fleet and besides a few faction eanm's, a faction web and maybe a few faction neuts they don't really require a lot of faction modules to work.
With a good set of implants you will actually feel you are getting something for your isk... |

axxeessee
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 22:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:Guardian needs to be in groups to be effective, its sig tank combined with EHP is nice, like 65+ EHP with legion bonus and around 65M Sig Rad with Loki bonus is pretty damn fine.
Apparently the Onieros no longer sucks though. I dunno, I'd say both the Ony and the Scim still suck. The Scim sucks because its just utterly outclassed by the Basi (even in the one niche where you would REALLY expect it to succeed) and the Ony sucks because the Guardian just works better for the blob warfare that you normally see armor rolling in. I blame the tracking link bonus, but I understand its really popular for people who need to shave another 15 seconds off their next Incursion NCO. -Liang
The Scimis real purpose/niche is nanofleets.
Try to bring a Basi to a nanofleet and youll understand why youre a straight up ******.
Of course the basi is better for gatecamping in lowsec like the little wussy that you are. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
759
|
Posted - 2012.02.07 22:55:00 -
[65] - Quote
axxeessee wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:Guardian needs to be in groups to be effective, its sig tank combined with EHP is nice, like 65+ EHP with legion bonus and around 65M Sig Rad with Loki bonus is pretty damn fine.
Apparently the Onieros no longer sucks though. I dunno, I'd say both the Ony and the Scim still suck. The Scim sucks because its just utterly outclassed by the Basi (even in the one niche where you would REALLY expect it to succeed) and the Ony sucks because the Guardian just works better for the blob warfare that you normally see armor rolling in. I blame the tracking link bonus, but I understand its really popular for people who need to shave another 15 seconds off their next Incursion NCO. -Liang The Scimis real purpose/niche is nanofleets. Try to bring a Basi to a nanofleet and youll understand why youre a straight up ******. Of course the basi is better for gatecamping in lowsec like the little wussy that you are.
Comments: - Why yes, I do believe I've said that the Scim is superior if your entire fleet is in Cynabals and they have no idea how to stay in the 140km diameter sphere you can affect.  - I don't gate camp, and really nobody in the "late night crew" does.
-Linag Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Cambarus
Socially Awkward Pancreas
124
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 02:42:00 -
[66] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Comments: - Why yes, I do believe I've said that the Scim is superior if your entire fleet is in Cynabals and they have no idea how to stay in the 140km diameter sphere you can affect.  - I don't gate camp, and really nobody in the "late night crew" does. -Linag TBH that sounds a lot like something you would say, being a solo logi pilot who likes to fly in small gangs. As gangs get bigger, and people spread out more, and logis tend to like flying away from the guys trying to shoot them, it is quite easy for someone to slip out of the 70km range mark.
Also since I'm sure you've flown logis enough to know that you should pretty much never be closer to the opposing fleet than the guys doing the actual shooting, so I'm definitely going to have to call you out on using the diameter to refer to your range to make the number bigger 
Also calling you out on pretending cynabals are the only things that can outrun a basi. Hell A basi with one nano moves slower than a zealot with the plates removed. Any sort of nano gang will have the basi lagging behind, and while this may not seem like much of a hindrance at the gang sizes in which you operate, on a larger scale it can get annoying, fast.
The scimi is ~40% faster than the basi (before getting into the extra lows and the potential for more nanos). If you can't see why that would be useful then fine, don't use it, but stop acting like things always work the way they do in your small lowsec gangs. 4 people staying in range of 1 logi is easy, 100 staying in range of 20 separate logis is less so. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
761
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 03:46:00 -
[67] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:TBH that sounds a lot like something you would say, being a solo logi pilot who likes to fly in small gangs. As gangs get bigger, and people spread out more, and logis tend to like flying away from the guys trying to shoot them, it is quite easy for someone to slip out of the 70km range mark. Also since I'm sure you've flown logis enough to know that you should pretty much never be closer to the opposing fleet than the guys doing the actual shooting, so I'm definitely going to have to call you out on using the diameter to refer to your range to make the number bigger  Also calling you out on pretending cynabals are the only things that can outrun a basi. Hell A basi with one nano moves slower than a zealot with the plates removed. Any sort of nano gang will have the basi lagging behind, and while this may not seem like much of a hindrance at the gang sizes in which you operate, on a larger scale it can get annoying, fast.
Ok, here's the deal: you stop "calling me out" about areas of the game you literally nothing about and I won't "call you out" on areas of the game I know literally nothing about. If the engagement happens on a gate, I will be on that gate - regardless of if the entire enemy fleet is there. If it happens at a belt I'll dangle my Basi right in someone's face if that means they stay still long enough for someone to land a tackle on them.
Small gang PVP is utterly different than the kind of **** you're used to.
Really, its not about outrunning the Basi - its about how large the "effective battlefield" is. When everyone's going 1500 m/s it takes a lot longer to cross that 70-140km than it does if everyone's rolling along at 5km/s. Another neat trick that you can take advantage of is on-grid warping, which works most of the time that your gang really gets spread out. The reason I keep falling back to the Cynabal is because: A) The Vagabond is obsolete. B) The Cynabal is the most common nano cruiser C) The Basi works fine with nano canes and most nano HACs
Quote: The scimi is ~40% faster than the basi (before getting into the extra lows and the potential for more nanos). If you can't see why that would be useful then fine, don't use it, but stop acting like things always work the way they do in your small lowsec gangs. 4 people staying in range of 1 logi is easy, 100 staying in range of 20 separate logis is less so.
Comments: - I haven't said anything about active tanking a logi in a 100+ man fleet. In fact, I'd say that's pretty pants on head stupid - though its not something I do so I may be wrong. (I doubt it). And considering the entire discussion has centered around small gangs (Definitely < 20) it seems like talking about 120+ man fleets is just throwing **** against a wall to see if it sticks. - I have talked about running the Basi against 10-15 man gangs successfully. Which is a damn sight more than the "4" you keep claiming. Remember, its not just about how big your gang is, but also the one you're facing. - You keep throwing that "low sec" bullshit out there and fail to realize (despite me telling you repeatedly) that the I used it in low sec as well as wormhole space and even 0.0. The mechanics that make the Basi superior to the Scim extend across pretty much all small gangs. - Yes, the Scimitar is faster. However, if you rig it up to the point that you can actually keep up with all those nano HACs that you keep talking about, your ability to rep is total ****. I know - I used to run those fits.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 09:49:00 -
[68] - Quote
I leave for a night and look what happens :P
Liang likes the Basi, I can see why, it reps well and tanks well.
Other people like the Scimi because its fast, which is a virtue all of its own, they both have there strengths and weaknesses.
In larger nano fleets the Scimi is generally accepted as better due to the nature of fast moving nano warfare.
The Guardian is similar to the Basi but its popular because armour ships are slower than shield ships, so there speed and interdependancy are less of an issue, the Basi is less popular because interdependancy and sluggishness are incompatable with the general layouts of shield gangs (Speed and Gank).
Lets just agree to disagree here gents/ladies, before we delay this thread any further. |

Alara IonStorm
1544
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 10:20:00 -
[69] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote: Lets just agree to disagree here gents/ladies, before we delay this thread any further.
I have been on this forum for 3 Years and have never seen this statement...
What does it mean? Are we Agreeing to Argue more? Is this some sort of low blow that works on the meta level?
I have never seen this type of response. It almost seems like you are trying to make some kind of peace or mutual understanding here...
As I said I just don't get it? |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 10:32:00 -
[70] - Quote
Mutual understanding and respesct is something never seen on this forum before but lets give it a go this once, see what its like. |

Versuvius Marii
Browncoats of Persephone Ironworks Coalition
35
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 13:07:00 -
[71] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:just don't really see the point in the Basi its an honest question. Confirming CVA have no use for Logistics. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 13:18:00 -
[72] - Quote
Versuvius Marii wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:just don't really see the point in the Basi its an honest question. Confirming CVA have no use for Logistics.
Confirming we don't make heavy use of Guardians |

Cambarus
Socially Awkward Pancreas
124
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 17:44:00 -
[73] - Quote
Forums ate my page long reply :(
TL;DR: -Never said anything about active tanking in large fleets. -As fleet sizes go up, the importance of applying your reps becomes more important than the amount of reps applied (see: blasters in large fleets) -Most of the game thinks the scimi is a good ship (see ships most flown in pvp) There was probably more, but **** these forums. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
764
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 18:19:00 -
[74] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:Forums ate my page long reply :(
TL;DR: -Never said anything about active tanking in large fleets. -As fleet sizes go up, the importance of applying your reps becomes more important than the amount of reps applied (see: blasters in large fleets) -Most of the game thinks the scimi is a good ship (see ships most flown in pvp) There was probably more, but **** these forums.
Comments: - The entire conversation is around 5-20 man fleets. You bringing up 120+ man fleets is you bringing up 120 man fleets without any context to the conversation. Congratulations for muddying the conversation for no ******* reason. - Yay, more talk about huge fleets. I've found that getting reps there faster isn't very useful if you don't have enough reps - but that's a natural effect of running in "small gangs" (which you apparently classify as less than 120-150 man?) - Most of the game believes lots of **** that's just wrong - but the reality of the situation is that most of the game doesn't have experience running logis. And furthermore, most of the game doesn't have experience running the sole logi in a small gang (regardless of system sec). Thus - really, most of the game is working off of folk wisdom that's never been challenged. - I can at least agree with that. **** these forums.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Cambarus
Socially Awkward Pancreas
124
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 18:45:00 -
[75] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Cambarus wrote:Forums ate my page long reply :(
TL;DR: -Never said anything about active tanking in large fleets. -As fleet sizes go up, the importance of applying your reps becomes more important than the amount of reps applied (see: blasters in large fleets) -Most of the game thinks the scimi is a good ship (see ships most flown in pvp) There was probably more, but **** these forums. Comments: - The entire conversation is around 5-20 man fleets. You bringing up 120+ man fleets is you bringing up 120 man fleets without any context to the conversation. Congratulations for muddying the conversation for no ******* reason. - Yay, more talk about huge fleets. I've found that getting reps there faster isn't very useful if you don't have enough reps - but that's a natural effect of running in "small gangs" (which you apparently classify as less than 120-150 man?) - Most of the game believes lots of **** that's just wrong - but the reality of the situation is that most of the game doesn't have experience running logis. And furthermore, most of the game doesn't have experience running the sole logi in a small gang (regardless of system sec). Thus - really, most of the game is working off of folk wisdom that's never been challenged. - I can at least agree with that. **** these forums. -Liang I kinda prefer this condensed way of posting, might have to do it more often :D Comments of my own: -I don't really consider 5 man gangs to be fleets -I never said that anything smaller than 120 counts as small, stop putting words in my mouth. (for the record I'd say about 20 and under counts as small for the purposes of debate, though I myself would define it as 10 or less) -When the basis of the claim that most of the game thinks scimis are fine is the sheer number of people flying them, your argument that this is because they have no experience flying the ships that they're flying loses a fair bit of its validity. |

Valoche Mrehl
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 19:07:00 -
[76] - Quote
Stop arguing with Liang. It's pointless.
Clearly (s)he's been blessed with insight by MOTHER AMAMAKE. Making comments in contrast to Liang's is just ignorant.
"we play at the same time... come kill me... blah blah blah" "scimis are faster so better... blah blah blah"
It's all BALDERDASH!
You fight in Amamake or it's just practice. You use solo-basi's in small gangs or you're a newb-plebian-sheep-boy.
Small gangs are defined as <20. This **** is in Merriam-webster AND Oxford. Don't be so ignorant
RESPECT LIANG! RESPECT HERETICS! RESPECT MOTHER AMAMAKE!  |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
764
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 19:21:00 -
[77] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:I kinda prefer this condensed way of posting, might have to do it more often :D
There's a reason I switched to it. It saves me time and you don't lose too much in translation. The real problem comes across in you appearing really "cold fish" and kinda like a **** for enumerating points about why someone's an idiot.
Quote: Comments of my own: -I don't really consider 5 man gangs to be fleets -I never said that anything smaller than 120 counts as small, stop putting words in my mouth. (for the record I'd say about 20 and under counts as small for the purposes of debate, though I myself would define it as 10 or less) -When the basis of the claim that most of the game thinks scimis are fine is the sheer number of people flying them, your argument that this is because they have no experience flying the ships that they're flying loses a fair bit of its validity.
Ok, well obviously the discussion revolves around "small gangs". Any commentary regarding 120 man nano gangs (seriously, wtf?) is at best off topic and muddying the water unnecessarily. Are you done talking about blobs yet?
As to the meat of the point, the graph looks something like this:
(Group A) LOTS OF PEOPLE -> (Group B) Some people fly logis sometimes (this is you) -> (Group C) Even fewer people fly logis in small gangs -> (Group D) Almost nobody flies solo logis in small gangs (this is me)
My points: - Group A sometimes interfaces with Group B who got their opinions years ago from Group C. Most people in Group A and Group B (and most of group C) don't even believe that Group D exists. - Most people (in all groups) believe that the Basilisk requires a cap buddy and is "too interdependent" to ever operate in Group D. However, the Basi reps more, tanks more, is fast enough, and has superior utility (6th high). It additionally does not require a cap buddy.
The overall effect? Everyone flies Scims out of ignorance.
-Liang
Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Ireland VonVicious
Gurista Saints Assassin Confederacy
32
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 21:13:00 -
[78] - Quote
My three favorite options:
Rattlesnake: Good for shield fleets as a support ship. Has huge health can put on a rr/neut and still put out some dps or any other kind of drone EW based on the fight. Unmatched versatility.
Field command ship: The name says it all. get a warefare link, dps, tank and last the fight.
Bhalgore: Good for armor fleets. Neuts,dps,health/tank. It has some versatility but is still more direct combat focused then a RS.
If those don't work for you just grab any high health / high dps ship. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
54
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 23:52:00 -
[79] - Quote
Wow, we really can't drop the issue I succinctly summed up already.
Le sigh. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
766
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 00:24:00 -
[80] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Wow, we really can't drop the issue I succinctly summed up already.
Le sigh.
This debate has been going for a year. He's just as stupid now as he was then - except then he had the advantage of being simply ignorant and bullheaded.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:48:00 -
[81] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:Wow, we really can't drop the issue I succinctly summed up already.
Le sigh. This debate has been going for a year. He's just as stupid now as he was then - except then he had the advantage of being simply ignorant and bullheaded. -Liang
I loled, not best friends then.
Personally I think the Basi fit Liang put up, after some explanation of its purpose, is an interesting twist.
Its all opinion and conjecture because theres a million different factors as everybody well knows, everything has a purpose, I mean jeeze, we used an Onieros last night, and it worked. |

axxeessee
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:09:00 -
[82] - Quote
Love how Liang keeps trashing people because they ''dont know areas of the game as much as he does'', yet he clearly never left a gate with his logi and doesnt come close to having a clue how a nano-gang works.
A nanogang can often pull out fights going on ranges of multiple hundred KM, your basi will obviously be very useful for this right ?
Face the truth, the only thing that fit is good for is baiting fights ''oh look i have no logi --- suddenly decloak'' and fighting stuff you know you can smash close to a gate.
Bringing a Basi to a real nanogang is pure suicide, the gang will drop away and your basi will get popped on gate OR youll try to follow them and cap out in a second.
Scimmy is a billion times better then Basi for any nano-fleet, period. Basi is great for two things, big gangs where you have multiple basis (higher reps), or being a ****** in amamake. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
774
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:18:00 -
[83] - Quote
axxeessee wrote:Love how Liang keeps trashing people because they ''dont know areas of the game as much as he does'', yet he clearly never left a gate with his logi and doesnt come close to having a clue how a nano-gang works.
A nanogang can often pull out fights going on ranges of multiple hundred KM, your basi will obviously be very useful for this right ?
Face the truth, the only thing that fit is good for is baiting fights ''oh look i have no logi --- suddenly decloak'' and fighting stuff you know you can smash close to a gate.
Bringing a Basi to a real nanogang is pure suicide, the gang will drop away and your basi will get popped on gate OR youll try to follow them and cap out in a second.
Scimmy is a billion times better then Basi for any nano-fleet, period. Basi is great for two things, big gangs where you have multiple basis (higher reps), or being a ****** in amamake.
A few comments: - I've repeatedly stated that the only time a Scim is better than a Basi is when you're chasing Cynabals that are hell bent on running all over the battlefield. - I've repeatedly seen 10 man BS fleets refuse to engage a 4 BC + Basi fleet even when the 4 BCs were taking sentry fire. They're much more willing to engage 10 BS vs 4 BC though... so yes, the ability to disguise yourself is acutally kinda important if you want to get fights. - In the time period I'm discussing, I was still the CEO of Parsec Flux. We lived in a WH and roamed whereever our WH took us to that day. One day we'd be in Molden Heath and the next in Aridia, then Fountain and the Great Wildlands. - I put out quite a few PVP videos these days, and claiming I don't know anything about nano fleets is pretty hilarious given we run at least one nano fleet in every one of the videos. ;-)
Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid. :)
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

axxeessee
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:axxeessee wrote:Love how Liang keeps trashing people because they ''dont know areas of the game as much as he does'', yet he clearly never left a gate with his logi and doesnt come close to having a clue how a nano-gang works.
A nanogang can often pull out fights going on ranges of multiple hundred KM, your basi will obviously be very useful for this right ?
Face the truth, the only thing that fit is good for is baiting fights ''oh look i have no logi --- suddenly decloak'' and fighting stuff you know you can smash close to a gate.
Bringing a Basi to a real nanogang is pure suicide, the gang will drop away and your basi will get popped on gate OR youll try to follow them and cap out in a second.
Scimmy is a billion times better then Basi for any nano-fleet, period. Basi is great for two things, big gangs where you have multiple basis (higher reps), or being a ****** in amamake. A few comments: - I've repeatedly stated that the only time a Scim is better than a Basi is when you're chasing Cynabals that are hell bent on running all over the battlefield. - I've repeatedly seen 10 man BS fleets refuse to engage a 4 BC + Basi fleet even when the 4 BCs were taking sentry fire. They're much more willing to engage 10 BS vs 4 BC though... so yes, the ability to disguise yourself is acutally kinda important if you want to get fights. - In the time period I'm discussing, I was still the CEO of Parsec Flux. We lived in a WH and roamed whereever our WH took us to that day. One day we'd be in Molden Heath and the next in Aridia, then Fountain and the Great Wildlands. - I put out quite a few PVP videos these days, and claiming I don't know anything about nano fleets is pretty hilarious given we run at least one nano fleet in every one of the videos. ;-) Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid. :) -Liang
Yet your posts keep on proving to everyone that you havent got close to any clue what a real nanofleet is. There is no way in hell a basi will keep up with any kind of well executed nanocane or nanodrake gang, sitting on a gate is just not an option if you have any clue of what you are doing since nanofleets often have to pull out 200k to 300k range and drag it out, the basi just cannot do that.
In a nanofleet you need your fleet to be in between your logi and the ennemy, as such you need a ship able to keep up, only the scimmy can do that, and im not even talking about chasing after cynabals or anything, im clearly only talking about burn offs where the ennemy tackle is thrown at you and you dispatch it.
Im sure the ability to bait people is very important in getting fights, its still baiting, and I dont see how it is in any way an argument to prove that basis are better then scimmies, I can slap a cloak on my scimmy too.
The fact you roamed around Eve and produced PVP videos isnt going to change my opinion, you clearly have no ******* clue what a nanofleet does if your idea of an optimal nanofleet logi is a basi staying on 0 of the gate while the fleet tries to stay within 70k.
tldr : never said your fit is bad, but the scimmy HAS an important place in the game which you clearly dont understand
|

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
775
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:40:00 -
[85] - Quote
axxeessee wrote: Yet your posts keep on proving to everyone that you havent got close to any clue what a real nanofleet is. There is no way in hell a basi will keep up with any kind of well executed nanocane or nanodrake gang, sitting on a gate is just not an option if you have any clue of what you are doing since nanofleets often have to pull out 200k to 300k range and drag it out, the basi just cannot do that.
What this tells me is that your fleet mates are **** at shaping a battlefield. If its the nano ships goal to stay within range of a basi, they can do it. Furthermore, you'd be amazed at how often you can make use of on-grid warping to keep reps flowing to people even hundreds of km apart - or to regroup your fleet and gank someone that you pulled away from their fleet mates.
At any rate, I've repeatedly stated that the Scimitar is superior for this kind of fleet - though it does so at an extremely heavy cost to cap and RR amount. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
Quote: Im sure the ability to bait people is very important in getting fights, its still baiting, and I dont see how it is in any way an argument to prove that basis are better then scimmies, I can slap a cloak on my scimmy too.
You can slap a cloak on your Scim, but now you have at best 3 RR to the Basi's 5 RR. Now you're jumping into an enemy for a close range brawl and the one Basi is worth almost two scimitars. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
Quote: The fact you roamed around Eve and produced PVP videos isnt going to change my opinion, you clearly have no ******* clue what a nanofleet does if your idea of an optimal nanofleet logi is a basi staying on 0 of the gate while the fleet tries to stay within 70k.
You're putting words in my mouth because you don't understand what I'm saying. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
Quote:tldr : never said your fit is bad, but the scimmy HAS an important place in the game which you clearly dont understand
No... you just don't know how to read. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Orcirk
The Baros Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 01:19:00 -
[86] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:axxeessee wrote: Yet your posts keep on proving to everyone that you havent got close to any clue what a real nanofleet is. There is no way in hell a basi will keep up with any kind of well executed nanocane or nanodrake gang, sitting on a gate is just not an option if you have any clue of what you are doing since nanofleets often have to pull out 200k to 300k range and drag it out, the basi just cannot do that.
What this tells me is that your fleet mates are **** at shaping a battlefield. If its the nano ships goal to stay within range of a basi, they can do it. Furthermore, you'd be amazed at how often you can make use of on-grid warping to keep reps flowing to people even hundreds of km apart - or to regroup your fleet and gank someone that you pulled away from their fleet mates. The nano ships goal is to stay in range of the PRIMARY. It falls to the LOGI to make sure the fleet members stay in range of reps.
Also, you're not a very good liar:
Liang Nuren wrote: At any rate, I've repeatedly stated that the Scimitar is superior for this kind of fleet - though it does so at an extremely heavy cost to cap and RR amount. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
Liang Nuren wrote: - I've repeatedly stated that the only time a Scim is better than a Basi is when you're chasing Cynabals that are hell bent on running all over the battlefield.
Liang Nuren wrote: A) The Vagabond is obsolete. B) The Cynabal is the most common nano cruiser C) The Basi works fine with nano canes and most nano HACs
Since I can't put any more quotes in this post:
You're putting words in my mouth because you don't understand what I'm saying. Basically: you're pretty ******* stupid.
-Liang
You said that the scimi is only useful for fleets of cynabals, and not for any other sort of nano gang. You DID say that it was the fleets job to stay within range of the logi, rather than the other way around. axe told you that you're completely wrong, and now you're telling him that he's putting words in your mouth. |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
775
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 03:41:00 -
[87] - Quote
Orcirk wrote:The nano ships goal is to stay in range of the PRIMARY. It falls to the LOGI to make sure the fleet members stay in range of reps.
You cannot possibly justify this logic. The way nano fleets roll (even as Axxe puts it), the fleet will basically be scattering and trying to split the much larger blob apart. There's literally no way you can require the logi to be repping people hundreds of km apart. I'm watching some fraps of some of our more recent (logiless) nano gangs and there's people anywhere from 50-500km from me. You cannot fault a logi pilot for failing to rep two people taking damage so far apart.
That's not to excuse a logi pilot that hangs out at the very edge of the fight and can't rep anyone on the other half of the field... but then again I think its been pretty clear that's not what I've been talking about. Generally speaking, if your nano fleet is half way competent they can shape the battlefield and stay anywhere within a 70km sphere of your logi ship - especially if your logi ship is located at the heart of the fight. And ultimately, that's the way you're going to get reps on everyone no matter where they are on the battlefield.
On the flip side, if you've got 4-5 Scimitars covering a 20-30 man nano fleet, you could reasonably expect them to be able to rep along the periphery of a fight. But thats not what I've been talking about, now is it?
Quote:Also, you're not a very good liar: Quote:C) The Basi works fine with nano canes and most nano HACs ... You said that the scimi is only useful for fleets of cynabals, and not for any other sort of nano gang. You DID say that it was the fleets job to stay within range of the logi, rather than the other way around. axe told you that you're completely wrong, and now you're telling him that he's putting words in your mouth.
The Basi does work fine with slower nano HACs, and I've made pretty extensive use of it with Vagacanes, Nano Bingers, Nano Drakes, NOmens, Phantasms, Nano Deimos, and a whole host of other ships. It all boils down to your fleet knowing where the fight is and not wholesale running from it.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Orcirk
The Baros Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 04:26:00 -
[88] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:
You cannot possibly justify this logic. The way nano fleets roll (even as Axxe puts it), the fleet will basically be scattering and trying to split the much larger blob apart. There's literally no way you can require the logi to be repping people hundreds of km apart. I'm watching some fraps of some of our more recent (logiless) nano gangs and there's people anywhere from 50-500km from me. You cannot fault a logi pilot for failing to rep two people taking damage so far apart.
By that logic why even bring a logi in the first place? Of COURSE you can't rep targets that are 500km apart, but the exact distance between targets where you CAN rep them goes up as the speed of your own ship increases. If you and I are in logis in a nano fleet and you bring a basi and I bring a scimi, there will be far more people onto whom I can get my reps before they die than you. THAT is the advantage offered by better speeds.
Liang Nuren wrote:The Basi does work fine with slower nano HACs, and I've made pretty extensive use of it with Vagacanes, Nano Bingers, Nano Drakes, NOmens, Phantasms, Nano Deimos, and a whole host of other ships. It all boils down to your fleet knowing where the fight is and not wholesale running from it. -Liang But you admit that the scimi is better? |

Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 05:10:00 -
[89] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Most Minnie ships pack Barrage/RF EMP in my experience, them being rather common.
Saying that I have found myself using hail recently 0.o
And jeeze, I just noticed that Basi runs all 5 reps stable assuming no local tank, thats actually pretty damn Impressive...
All but one of the ships I fly are minnie. I typically run PP as a default ammo due to common resist profiles and where pilots choose to patch resist holes. Barrage stays standardly loaded in many, but not all, AB kiting ships. I carry EMP and Fusion as backups, but tbh, I use fusion more than EMP too. Some ships I carry Dep Uranium as an insurance policy (for the tracking bonus), but only DU gets used less than EMP in my engagements.
This is because with so many ships have EM holes, even mediocre pilots patch the EM hole. This makes therm the resist hole. Then for the other ships that have high EM resists and their pilots think they're boss: they just take up the therm again. PP also has a tendency to do well against some armor ships too with that nice splash of kin that comes with projectile ammo. For all around damage type, PP tends to be consistently the best for minnies.
One of the bloggers (Wensley maybe?) actually did a very nice blog on how PP was typically best ammo to load by default. People that didn't know this read the blog, PP became more popular over the next few months as word spread.
On a side note, this seems to be hybrids dirty little secret: although they are restricted in damage type, they tend to be set up with the best all around damage types anyway. People never say anything about this when they cry about projectiles  I scam on my main |

Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
776
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 05:49:00 -
[90] - Quote
Orcirk wrote: By that logic why even bring a logi in the first place? Of COURSE you can't rep targets that are 500km apart, but the exact distance between targets where you CAN rep them goes up as the speed of your own ship increases. If you and I are in logis in a nano fleet and you bring a basi and I bring a scimi, there will be far more people onto whom I can get my reps before they die than you. THAT is the advantage offered by better speeds.
No, not really. Staying at the center of the fight means that I'll be able to instantly bring five RRs to bear on anyone in the fight. You're going to struggle to bring three RRs to bear on anyone on your half of the field. That's why the Basi is better.
Quote:Liang Nuren wrote:The Basi does work fine with slower nano HACs, and I've made pretty extensive use of it with Vagacanes, Nano Bingers, Nano Drakes, NOmens, Phantasms, Nano Deimos, and a whole host of other ships. It all boils down to your fleet knowing where the fight is and not wholesale running from it. -Liang But you admit that the scimi is better?
No, the Basi is better in almost all situations - though certain nano gangs (such as my "cynabal fleet") are better with a Scim than a Basi. Mostly because they're busy running away from the fight instead of partaking in it.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
59
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:11:00 -
[91] - Quote
Although I dislike all this insult throwing I will say one thing, in fleets, Basis, as with Guardians tend to fly 4/2, due to not everybody being Logi V, and 4/2 being a lot more forgiving when ECM/Neuting/Myriad other types of pressure are inevitably put on Logistics during a fleet fight.
So no, your basilisk will not be putting out 5 reps, it will be 4 max, possibly 3 if it needs an MWD.
TLDR, Basis and Scimis both normally fit 4 reps, unless MWD fitted in which case its 3, and no idea about Basis, because I have never seen an MWD Basi. |

axxeessee
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 22:32:00 -
[92] - Quote
Once again Liang you prove to everyone that not only do you have no idea how a proper nano-fleet is ran, have no idea what speed a proper nanofleet can achieve, and in the end you try to cover it up with lies and or logical fallacies.
A nanofleet needs to spread out a battlefield, yes, you are correct, what you are wrong though, and what usually distinguishes competent nanofleets from retards flying nanocanes, is that a competent nanofleet needs to stay as a single coherent pack, that means to burn in the same direction while keeping enough range to apply dps to primaries but not being too close as to get easily tackled. As ennemy tackle and recons is thrown in, this usually means burning in a coherent unit for hunderds of kilometers, and sometimes switching aligns as the ennemy starts to get warpins.
With that in mind, the only logi in the game that is remotely able to do this job is the scimitar, its the only ship which possesses the speed and the cap to follow a good nanogang. If you have people that are 300k away from you in a nanogang, then you are either a horribly incompetent pilot, or that person 300k off is, a nanogang should always stick together while spreading a battlefield, and as such the logistics should ALWAYS be in rep range (while mainting a safe range from the ennemy DPS).
Leaving a Basi on a gate is completely ******** with a nanogang, the ennemy will chase your ships off slowly, and your basi will stay stranded on gate and get popped.
Of course, this whole scenario is based around true nanogang, which are usually employed as small units of 5-10 or so people, and which can go on against huge blobs because of their ability to never die if flown correctly.
Now defending yourself by saying I put words in your mouth was rather clever, but it appears clearly for that topic that youve said both that scimmys are only good with cynabal gangs, which is awefully wrong, since nanocane and nanodrake gangs will go over 2k/s (speed the basi cant follow with, especially since your logi should be FASTER) and the fact it doesnt come close to have the cap stability required (Boosters are nice, but when youre fighting 10 vs 100 and the fight lasts for 30 min to 1hour, it doesnt even come close to being acceptable)
You also clearly stated that you believed a basi was superior to a scimmy even in its niche role (I quoted you on this earlier), so Im pretty sure im not putting any words in your mouth, youre just trying to find an easy way out to an argument youve already lost.
Also you can tell me Im stupid as much as you like, the fact is you should just stop commenting already since youve clearly made a fool of yourself. |

Liang Nuren
Perkone Caldari State
780
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 00:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Although I dislike all this insult throwing I will say one thing, in fleets, Basis, as with Guardians tend to fly 4/2, due to not everybody being Logi V, and 4/2 being a lot more forgiving when ECM/Neuting/Myriad other types of pressure are inevitably put on Logistics during a fleet fight.
So no, your basilisk will not be putting out 5 reps, it will be 4 max, possibly 3 if it needs an MWD.
TLDR, Basis and Scimis both normally fit 4 reps, unless MWD fitted in which case its 3, and no idea about Basis, because I have never seen an MWD Basi.
I can't speak for the general "large fleet" Basi that people will run, but every multi basi fleet we've run in NOSA / Parsec has been 5/1s. Then again, I am extremely out of touch with blob warfare that by nature has to work with the lowest common denominator. Even still, from strict forum lurkage I'd say that the "standard fits" for 4 RR / 2 ET Basis and 3 RR / 1 Utility (whoring) Scims.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Perkone Caldari State
780
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 00:31:00 -
[94] - Quote
axxeessee wrote:Once again Liang you prove to everyone that not only do you have no idea how a proper nano-fleet is ran, have no idea what speed a proper nanofleet can achieve, and in the end you try to cover it up with lies and or logical fallacies.
A nanofleet needs to spread out a battlefield, yes, you are correct, what you are wrong though, and what usually distinguishes competent nanofleets from retards flying nanocanes, is that a competent nanofleet needs to stay as a single coherent pack, that means to burn in the same direction while keeping enough range to apply dps to primaries but not being too close as to get easily tackled. As ennemy tackle and recons is thrown in, this usually means burning in a coherent unit for hunderds of kilometers, and sometimes switching aligns as the ennemy starts to get warpins.
With that in mind, the only logi in the game that is remotely able to do this job is the scimitar, its the only ship which possesses the speed and the cap to follow a good nanogang. If you have people that are 300k away from you in a nanogang, then you are either a horribly incompetent pilot, or that person 300k off is, a nanogang should always stick together while spreading a battlefield, and as such the logistics should ALWAYS be in rep range (while mainting a safe range from the ennemy DPS).
You seem to be of the opinion that I don't think the Scim is good at that kind of combat. I don't know where you got that opinion, except perhaps the inability to read. One of the reasons I said you'd want to use a Scim is if your fleet is hell bent on running away from the fight itself. (I don't actually know if that particular quote was in this thread or not... it may have been).
That said, I don't often see that level of coordination from nano fleets even from fairly reputable groups like PODLA, GENOS, R&K, and PL.
Quote: Leaving a Basi on a gate is completely ******** with a nanogang, the ennemy will chase your ships off slowly, and your basi will stay stranded on gate and get popped.
Of course, this whole scenario is based around true nanogang, which are usually employed as small units of 5-10 or so people, and which can go on against huge blobs because of their ability to never die if flown correctly.
Good for you if your idea of satisfying PVP is to run away from a fleet and kill the occasional interceptor who lets his transversal get too low. Yay. I prefer to mix it up with the fleet itself and actually score kills.
Quote: Boosters are nice, but when youre fighting 10 vs 100 and the fight lasts for 30 min to 1hour, it doesnt even come close to being acceptable)
Are you referring to shield boosters or cap boosters? If cap boosters, I agree and if you bothered to look at my suggestion you'd know that. If its shield boosters... why bother bringing a logi in the first place? You're just gonna be driven off the field (either by their DPS or the sentry guns) in the first minute of the fight anyway.
Quote: You also clearly stated that you believed a basi was superior to a scimmy even in its niche role (I quoted you on this earlier), so Im pretty sure im not putting any words in your mouth, youre just trying to find an easy way out to an argument youve already lost.
The role in question is solo logi in a small gang. Not nano logi. I did say that the Basi is often fast enough unless your fleet is hell bent on running away from you though.
Quote:Also you can tell me Im stupid as much as you like, the fact is you should just stop commenting already since youve clearly made a fool of yourself.
Not really. I've spent a really significant amount of time being a solo logi and I actually do know what I'm talking about in that area. You OTOH keep making assertions that are pretty much only relevant to 0.0 blob warfare. IDGAF about that ****.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127 Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Tjemjak
Hendrix Angels Fabricated Confabulations
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 08:47:00 -
[95] - Quote
is it so hard for you guys to stay on topic?? crap that ****, all of you, we are not interested in that! |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
59
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 09:31:00 -
[96] - Quote
Yeah, thread succesfully derialed, and MWD Scimis have a Util high due to PG/Cap issues.
Basis and Guardians are always 4/2 in fleets due to, as I said, Neuting/ECCM/Logies dieing so redundancy is required.
I have never seen a functional MWD Basi, ever.
Basis can't keep up with shield canes, also fact.
Good flagships, Command Ships - Damnation, Vulture, Claymore.
Thread closed, move on, job done. |

Mfume Apocal
Origin. Black Legion.
296
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 09:55:00 -
[97] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:I have never seen a functional MWD Basi, ever.
[Basilisk, MWD Std (42) Basilisk] Gravimetric Backup Array II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive ECCM - Gravimetric II Photon Scattering Field II Large Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II
Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large S95a Partial Shield Transporter Large 'Regard' Power Projector Large 'Regard' Power Projector
Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Quote:Basis can't keep up with shield canes, also fact.
Basi above does 1481m/s, shield Cane (w/ 1 nano) does 1434m/s. |

Danny John-Peter
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
59
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 10:15:00 -
[98] - Quote
Problem with that is getting drawn out, but with some decent coordination that could work.
I never said it wasnt possible, I just said I'd never seen it done. |

equincu ocha
The Tuskers
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 19:53:00 -
[99] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:axxeessee wrote:Once again Liang you prove to everyone that not only do you have no idea how a proper nano-fleet is ran, have no idea what speed a proper nanofleet can achieve, and in the end you try to cover it up with lies and or logical fallacies.
A nanofleet needs to spread out a battlefield, yes, you are correct, what you are wrong though, and what usually distinguishes competent nanofleets from retards flying nanocanes, is that a competent nanofleet needs to stay as a single coherent pack, that means to burn in the same direction while keeping enough range to apply dps to primaries but not being too close as to get easily tackled. As ennemy tackle and recons is thrown in, this usually means burning in a coherent unit for hunderds of kilometers, and sometimes switching aligns as the ennemy starts to get warpins.
You seem to be of the opinion that I don't think the Scim is good at that kind of combat. I don't know where you got that opinion, except perhaps the inability to read. One of the reasons I said you'd want to use a Scim is if your fleet is hell bent on running away from the fight itself. (I don't actually know if that particular quote was in this thread or not... it may have been). That said, I don't often see that level of coordination from nano fleets even from fairly reputable groups like PODLA, GENOS, R&K, and PL. You guys do know you are talking about two completely different types of gangs... right ?
Axx is talking about a kiting gang/fleet, and Liang is talking about a nano gang
Kiting gangs depend more on a good FC tan individual pilot skill, generally everyone aligns to a specific celestial object while pulling range on the targets, and yes it's a good idea to have your logi out in front of your gang. These gangs scale up very easy. due to the fact that you only really need a good FC, the rest just need to follow orders.
Nano gangs depend on individual pilot skill and communication than a single FC, every pilot must be fully aware of the battlefield (where the enemies and your gangs mates are) and know how to manually pilot, There is no set position on the battlefield for logi due to the nature of dynamic battlefield. Imho Nano gangs are the most difficult gangs to fly in all of EVE, and they don't seem to scale up very easily due to the skill needed for each pilot.
I know most people call both types 'Nano gangs', but just because the ships in the gang are fast doesn't make it a 'nano gang'. Baby seal walked into a club |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |