EVE Search - Whats the deal with amarr laser cap reduction bonus?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Whats the deal with amarr laser cap reduction bonus?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Uninvited Guests Cult of War	Posted - 2007.12.11 20:52:00 - [1] Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? --------------------------------------------- [Video]The Inquisition I - Swift Justice
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.11 20:58:00 - [2] Well, I think it has to do with the fact that a very long time ago, CCP claimed that Laser had a built in damage bonus. Because of this built in damage bonus, Lasers should be roughly equal to ACs and Blasters with their racial bonuses applied (RoF or Dmg). Now in order to pay for this built-in damage bonus, lasers are supposed to be capacitor hogging beast, making them not-viable to fit on other ships (along with fitting), and amarr ships get a reduction to capacitor need. To put it another way, you could switch around the bonuses by subtracting 25% dmg and 50% cap use from lasers, and then change the bonus on amarrian boats to +5% dmg per lvl. Same end result, deferent method of getting there. This brings up the question, do lasers have a built in damage bonus? I think it is pretty clear that they do not. IF you change around the bonuses like I mentioned to do, you will see that lasers are sub-par to racial counterparts in nearly every-signle-way while requiring the most cap and most fitting. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
Chaplain Veritas Amarr The Aduro Protocol The Fifth Race	Posted - 2007.12.11 20:59:00 - [3] Edited by: Chaplain Veritas on 11/12/2007 21:01:31 yeah it's been said many a time, the cap use reduction bonus is one of the things gimping amarr, and is also part of the "lasers are the real problem" side of the arguement. abaddon performs on par with other good BS's but is shackled to heavy charge poppin'. imho if there were a built in cap reduction on lasers (making it so i didn't have to go replenish my cap charge supply so often in the abby) and swapped out cap use bonuses for REAL bonuses that would go a LONG way to helping amarr ships out. let's face it, why does the Apoc suck so bad except for endurance mission running? look at it's bonuses ffs. and why do amarr ships coughkhanidcough that don't use lasers rock in general? like shin said, lasers are a relic of an old paradigm that doesn't seem to be in play anymore. ____________________________ the eyes are the groin of the face - dwight shrute yes ccp, it is time
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Uninvited Guests Cult of War	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:05:00 - [4] Originally by: shinsushi Well, I think it has to do with the fact that a very long time ago, CCP claimed that Laser had a built in damage bonus. Because of this built in damage bonus, Lasers should be roughly equal to ACs and Blasters with their racial bonuses applied (RoF or Dmg). Now in order to pay for this built-in damage bonus, lasers are supposed to be capacitor hogging beast, making them not-viable to fit on other ships (along with fitting), and amarr ships get a reduction to capacitor need. To put it another way, you could switch around the bonuses by subtracting 25% dmg and 50% cap use from lasers, and then change the bonus on amarrian boats to +5% dmg per lvl. Same end result, deferent method of getting there. This brings up the question, do lasers have a built in damage bonus? I think it is pretty clear that they do not. IF you change around the bonuses like I mentioned to do, you will see that lasers are sub-par to racial counterparts in nearly every-signle-way while requiring the most cap and most fitting. The problem is ccp has dug a deep ****hole and are sinking deeper and deeper. Instead of fixing the core problem, ie fixing lasers, they are overpowering the new ships (like abaddon) so they can perform on par with other races. What this does is, when the day comes when they have to face the fact that the old ships need fixing theyll have to nerf the new ships or theyll be overpowered if they only fix lasers. Its stupid. They should have fixed lasers a long time ago. Now their work is getting harder and harder. --------------------------------------------- [Video]The Inquisition I - Swift Justice
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:17:00 - [5] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: shinsushi Well, I think it has to do with the fact that a very long time ago, CCP claimed that Laser had a built in damage bonus. Because of this built in damage bonus, Lasers should be roughly equal to ACs and Blasters with their racial bonuses applied (RoF or Dmg). Now in order to pay for this built-in damage bonus, lasers are supposed to be capacitor hogging beast, making them not-viable to fit on other ships (along with fitting), and amarr ships get a reduction to capacitor need. To put it another way, you could switch around the bonuses by subtracting 25% dmg and 50% cap use from lasers, and then change the bonus on amarrian boats to +5% dmg per lvl. Same end result, deferent method of getting there. This brings up the question, do lasers have a built in damage bonus? I think it is pretty clear that they do not. IF you change around the bonuses like I mentioned to do, you will see that lasers are sub-par to racial counterparts in nearly every-signle-way while requiring the most cap and most fitting. The problem is ccp has dug a deep ****hole and are sinking deeper and deeper. Instead of fixing the core problem, ie fixing lasers, they are overpowering the new ships (like abaddon) so they can perform on par with other races. What this does is, when the day comes when they have to face the fact that the old ships need fixing theyll have to nerf the new ships or theyll be overpowered if they only fix lasers. Its stupid. They should have fixed lasers a long time ago. Now their work is getting harder and harder. I agree. The biggest issue at play here is the Armageddon. It has and always be miles above the apoc. Because of the vast difference in those two ships, lasers couldn't find a happy middleground without being OMGWTFoverpowered or LOL on one ship or the other. Then the HArbinger and Abaddon came into play and just added to the crap pile. I think the harb and abaddon would be easy adjustments, but the geddon isn't. It might just be easier at this point to scrap the Useless -10% cap/level bonus. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
Enjackah Prophets Of a Damned Universe	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:18:00 - [6] I love these threads... no really I do... honestly... The Abaddon's capacitor capacity makes up for the lack of a laser cap use bonus, while the Armageddons really needs that bonus due to it's high rate of fire and smaller cap size. Abaddon base cap: 6375 Armageddon base cap: 5313 -- The universe sleeps and slumbers, led abound by the sounds of peace and safety... when around the corner comes destruction.
Madla Mafia The Dead Man's Hand	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:20:00 - [7] Edited by: Madla Mafia on 11/12/2007 21:20:52 Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amarr - getting screwed since 2005.
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Uninvited Guests Cult of War	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:25:00 - [8] Originally by: Enjackah I love these threads... no really I do... honestly... The Abaddon's capacitor capacity makes up for the lack of a laser cap use bonus, while the Armageddons really needs that bonus due to it's high rate of fire and smaller cap size. Abaddon base cap: 6375 Armageddon base cap: 5313 Uhm youre forgetting that abaddon has 8 turrets and geddon 7 and alot of other things. You cant just compare cap size lol. You know a geddon runs out of cap after 6mins of firing megapulses, abaddon after 3mins. You know how long a megathron can fire neutron blaster IIs? 27min. Yeah lasers are borked, cap ship bonus is a lie and add omni tank crap to it and you know our weapon system sucks badly. You know it, I know it, vegetable-lasagne knows it. mkay? --------------------------------------------- [Video]The Inquisition I - Swift Justice
Bruce Deorum Minmatar Mythos Corp RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:40:00 - [9] The cap usage bonus is makes real sense only for the Geddon which has also the RoF bonus. Without it it would be broken IMHO and ppl will lose more than they would gain by training up to BS V. Energy turrets are so demanding to fit, that this alone prevents ppl from using them. Actually no-one would use large energy turrets as part of a good dmg dealing BS, cause the get more than usable bonuses for their own weapon systems for less fitting req. The "no need for reloading" argument is nice - considering prolonged fights, but wait: an Abaddon with 4x Tach II + 2x HS will cap out in 2.5 minutes and after that...it takes ages to recharge, while a Mega will practically never cap out just by firing its 425 IIs. Yes, the Abby out-dps the Mega, but buffer tank resistances are USUALLY way better against the EM+thermal combination compared to the Expl+Kin ones. Also the 40 charges each 425 contains will last for ~224secs ~ 4minutes given a top RoF of 5.6sec with 2x Mag stabs II. So before both ships cap out, the Mega will take the dmg lead, since after the 2.5 minutes barrier, the Abby can perma-fire just 2x Tachyons Now add a MWD to both, and... I am he, the bornless one
Deschenus Maximus Amarr Digital Fury Corporation Digital Renegades	Posted - 2007.12.11 21:47:00 - [10] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? Yes and no. Abaddon works because of its resist bonus. However, making it work with Tachs or any form of long range weaponry is a PITA because the cap reduc bonus is missing. D-F-C recruitment closed
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.11 23:00:00 - [11] Originally by: Enjackah I love these threads... no really I do... honestly... The Abaddon's capacitor capacity makes up for the lack of a laser cap use bonus, while the Armageddons really needs that bonus due to it's high rate of fire and smaller cap size. Abaddon base cap: 6375 Armageddon base cap: 5313 So... lets run down the pros and cons of lasers vs other turrets.. Pulse Lasers Pros: Best Optimal Range Ammo reload/change Cons: Worst Cap use Lowest Effective Dmg to the majority of ships Lowest Raw tracking Lowest fall-off(nessecitating more ammo changing) Worst fitting Worst downsizing options Blasters Pros: Highest Raw damage highest Raw tracking Highest Effective Damage Cons: Shortest range Lowest effective tracking ACs Pros: Selectable damage types No cap use Easiest Fitting Highest effective tracking Best fall-off range Cons: Operates fully in fall-off Worst Raw damage Now if you take out everything thats middle of the line (middle raw dmg/tracking/fitting/ect..), you can see thats ACs> Blasters > Pulses in a very easy way. What makes it worse is that amarrian laser boats live and die by their lasers. They are not versatile, they do not actively tank, and they are not fast. The buffer tank in hopes that lasers do their job. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
Surreptitious Privateers Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.11 23:15:00 - [12] You get my vote for best forum poster. This and the ECM/TD ones are great. Keep pointing out CCP's ineptitude, love it. Syrup
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Dark-Rising Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2007.12.12 01:48:00 - [13] Originally by: Surreptitious You get my vote for best forum poster. This and the ECM/TD ones are great. Keep pointing out CCP's ineptitude, love it. Syrup Good to hear. Everyone else hates me. --------------------------------------------- [Video]The Inquisition I - Swift Justice
Durente Galaica Amarr Fortunate Few	Posted - 2007.12.12 02:48:00 - [14] If my lasers did more than 2 damage types that would be the greatest boost Amarr has ever seen. Imagine what it must feel like to swap out damage types to probe an enemy for weaknesses. I cannot tell you what it would be like, but I imagine to to be glorious.
MysteriousJade	Posted - 2007.12.12 02:50:00 - [15] Originally by: Bruce Deorum Edited by: Bruce Deorum on 11/12/2007 21:59:50 The cap usage bonus is makes real sense only for the Geddon which has also the RoF bonus. Without it it would be broken IMHO and ppl will lose more than they would gain by training up to BS V. Energy turrets are so demanding to fit, that this alone prevents ppl from using them. Actually no-one would use large energy turrets as part of a good dmg dealing BS, cause the get more than usable bonuses for their own weapon systems for less fitting req. The "no need for reloading" argument is nice - considering prolonged fights, but wait: an Abaddon with 7x Tach II + 2x HS will cap out in 2.5 minutes and after that...it takes ages to recharge, while a Mega will practically never cap out just by firing its 425 IIs. Yes, the Abby out-dps the Mega, but buffer tank resistances are USUALLY way better against the EM+thermal combination compared to the Expl+Kin ones. Also the 40 charges each 425 contains will last for ~224secs ~ 4minutes given a top RoF of 5.6sec with 2x Mag stabs II. So before both ships cap out, the Mega will take the dmg lead, since after the 2.5 minutes barrier, the Abby can perma-fire just 2x Tachyons Now add a MWD to both, and... you hit the balls, nothing to add
Riho Northen Breeze	Posted - 2007.12.12 06:33:00 - [16] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? abaddon can TANK and do uber dmg... lol since when ? it can do SICK ammouts of dps and be a buffer or TANK and do allmost no dmg. plate setups arent really tank :P and if you try and fit 8x mega pulse + 2x rep tank... you need 3-4 injectors to keep it going :P some ppl fit 2 injectors allready on a plate fit. so.. no the cap bonus is not out of place on some ships. would be funney if the took away geddons bonus and added dmg. that ship would be out of cap in 5 volleys i guess. ---------------------------------- Seems that there's a new game that seems to be very popular whit whiners these days. Its called EFT Online. dont listen those people.. as they dont have a clue
Rialtor Amarr Yarrrateers	Posted - 2007.12.12 06:40:00 - [17] Originally by: Riho Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? abaddon can TANK and do uber dmg... lol since when ? it can do SICK ammouts of dps and be a buffer or TANK and do allmost no dmg. plate setups arent really tank :P and if you try and fit 8x mega pulse + 2x rep tank... you need 3-4 injectors to keep it going :P some ppl fit 2 injectors allready on a plate fit. so.. no the cap bonus is not out of place on some ships. would be funney if the took away geddons bonus and added dmg. that ship would be out of cap in 5 volleys i guess. Perhaps but a geddon without the 10% bonus and a dmg and rof bonus would be a laser ship I'd love to fly :). The amount of carnage it could put out would be a site to see while it has cap. ---- sig ---- Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world... Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
Julio Torres Chosen Path	Posted - 2007.12.12 08:00:00 - [18] For fleet tasks, the Abaddon is worthless thanks to its lack of cap reduction bonus. Fit it with 7x T2 Tach and the cap may last over a minute. (But the Apoc really shines in this role)
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.12 09:21:00 - [19] Originally by: Durente Galaica If my lasers did more than 2 damage types that would be the greatest boost Amarr has ever seen. Imagine what it must feel like to swap out damage types to probe an enemy for weaknesses. I cannot tell you what it would be like, but I imagine to to be glorious. Wouldn't it? I would rather see EM as an acceptable trade-off aswell, rather than the bane of all laser ships too. For what possible reason are amarr laser ships nerfed so hard? Really, maybe some CCP member found an Amarrian in bed with his wife or something. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
me bored	Posted - 2007.12.12 09:29:00 - [20] I gather that lasers used to be so powerful that every race started using them and ccp increased their cap usage and created the amarr bonus as a reaction. I wasn't around at the time though and may be talking out of my ass.
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.12 09:34:00 - [21] Originally by: me bored I gather that lasers used to be so powerful that every race started using them and ccp increased their cap usage and created the amarr bonus as a reaction. I wasn't around at the time though and may be talking out of my ass. Non-stacking nerfed, oh and radio used to be pretty damn good too. Geddons used to melt ships on approach. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.12 10:09:00 - [22] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? Replacing the bonus with a good bonus and halving cap use all round soundes good, some ships that have proven to be quite okay, like the arma and harby only need a sucky bonus, the kings of crap like the apoc and omen, maller and prop needs a kick ass bonus. It's great being Amarr isn't it. Support the introduction of Blaze M crystals for Amarr!
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.12 10:11:00 - [23] Originally by: me bored I gather that lasers used to be so powerful that every race started using them and ccp increased their cap usage and created the amarr bonus as a reaction. I wasn't around at the time though and may be talking out of my ass. Actually just about right, exept the amarr bonus have been here forever, and they just nerfed the lasers in general, the cap use have been unchanged. It's great being Amarr isn't it. Support the introduction of Blaze M crystals for Amarr!
mallina Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2007.12.12 11:04:00 - [24] Wow Lyria, you never give up do you? Using your alt shinsushi to agree with you all the time dosen't do you any favours, either, though it's pretty funny when you think about it. Saying that "Abaddon is best cause some people and/or EFT said so so all amarr ships should be like it" (which is essentially what you said) makes little logical sense and is based entirely on your opinion or skewed facts, not that anything that you ever spewed out wasn't. Personally, I don't like the Abaddon because it dosen't have a Laser Cap Use bonus, among other things. It's a good fleet ship, but with such a small cargobay for Boosters (less than the Geddon, in fact) it's effective combat time is really rather short-lived. ---
Joie Mains Vindicator A Team	Posted - 2007.12.12 11:14:00 - [25] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? cos all tier3 bs got wery not tipical bonuses to there races
Paulo Damarr	Posted - 2007.12.12 11:21:00 - [26] @ Lyria Skydancer How many different whine threads are you going to start? 3 different topics on the first 2 pages so far. why dont you save some time and just post a thread saying "EVE sucks and everything needs nerfing" instead of doing it one perceived issue at a time. --------------------------------------- Output folder: C:\Program Files\CCP\EVE Delete file: \boot.ini Extract: boot.ini... 100%
Enjackah Prophets Of a Damned Universe	Posted - 2007.12.12 19:01:00 - [27] Please keep making these threads. It makes people think Amarr sucks. We will keep burning through both your shield tanks and armor tanks as EM is always your lowest resist. Thank you. -- The universe sleeps and slumbers, led abound by the sounds of peace and safety... when around the corner comes destruction.
shinsushi	Posted - 2007.12.12 19:53:00 - [28] Originally by: mallina Wow Lyria, you never give up do you? Using your alt shinsushi to agree with you all the time dosen't do you any favours, either, though it's pretty funny when you think about it. Saying that "Abaddon is best cause some people and/or EFT said so so all amarr ships should be like it" (which is essentially what you said) makes little logical sense and is based entirely on your opinion or skewed facts, not that anything that you ever spewed out wasn't. Personally, I don't like the Abaddon because it dosen't have a Laser Cap Use bonus, among other things. It's a good fleet ship, but with such a small cargobay for Boosters (less than the Geddon, in fact) it's effective combat time is really rather short-lived. I am not Lyria's alt, its pretty obvious that we have differing views on many things and dissimilar writing styles. Also, Lyria is quite a bit nicer than I am. No, the abaddon is considered better than the geddon due to a much large HP buffer and more turret DPS, along with much more fitting room. Of course if your sitting there trying to tank gate-guns that might be a different story, but then agains who really cares about ganking noobs @ gates? An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
Karyuudo Tydraad Caldari Whiskey Pete's Drycleaning Services The Acquisition	Posted - 2007.12.12 20:10:00 - [29] Originally by: Riho Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:57 Edited by: Lyria Skydancer on 11/12/2007 20:52:43 Lets look at the abaddon. Its clearly one of our best ships. It has good damage and a mean tank. Isnt it odd that abaddon works at tanking and ganking eventhough the cap reduction bonus is missing on this ship? How can one not come to the conclusion that this bonus, typically seen on amarr ships, is not a faked bonus? Doesnt this show that we actually are being cheated of one real bonus? abaddon can TANK and do uber dmg... lol since when ? it can do SICK ammouts of dps and be a buffer or TANK and do allmost no dmg. plate setups arent really tank :P and if you try and fit 8x mega pulse + 2x rep tank... you need 3-4 injectors to keep it going :P some ppl fit 2 injectors allready on a plate fit. so.. no the cap bonus is not out of place on some ships. would be funney if the took away geddons bonus and added dmg. that ship would be out of cap in 5 volleys i guess. Autoabaddon! \O_o/ Like an autoapoc but with one less useless bonus and 25% armor resists. Or the automaller. Or the autoprophecy. Etc. Cross training Minmatar was the best thing I ever did. And plate setups quite certainly are tank. Take a rep abaddon and a plated abaddon into combat and see which one lasts longer under sustained high dps fire. It's just a different kind of tank. Also, this thread is new information that I'm reading for the first time!
Ulstan	Posted - 2007.12.12 20:35:00 - [30] Quote: Caldari: the logical step in the gun-boat line Merlin-Moa-Ferox-Rokh Actually, it's the first step in the gunboat line that doesn't suck. Lyria: Amarr have problems, but don't you think you'd do better by making a well thought out comprehensive thread? Spamming the forums with whine threads (5th one I've read today, I think?) isn't going to get you far.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.