Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

'if' they get a fight, mc will prob come away with the bloody nose. I think their 'conquering' of the north has given them false confidence. Not one of the northern alliances they 'crushed' were competent.

Mitch

---

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

Originally by: Don Z0LA

---

words

---

xelas died a long time after dark moved on and the alliance that died was something quite different to the one we left.

---

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

Originally by: Orree

---

Edited by: Orree on 20/12/2007 17:02:46

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

Originally by: Don Z0LA

---

words

---

xelas died a long time after dark moved on and the alliance that died was something quite different to the one we left.

---

I disagree. It died the same way it was always going to die...when BoB support was removed.


...and Fallen Souls just...died...

---

Hi Oree,

My statement is based on the way MC moved through D2, IRON RZR during their push into the north. It is well documented that they did not defend competently against the hostiles attacking them.

It may have been quite different in the field but from an observers viewpoint they did appear to be slightly 'steamrolled'. So to my point, I think most of the eve community would agree that BOB even in its current situation is quite a lot more competent than the hostiles MC previously faced.

Personally I have worked with both BOB and MC and have people I would call friends in both. Should be interesting to see how this plays out, but as my post suggests my moneys on BOB.

As a leader that has tried to achieve something am I now not allowed to post my comments on the forums, or is that priveledge reserved for players that have never risked anything?

Your a good leader and have a successful alliance, dont let your positive view of Seleene and MC affect your view of my comments. Im sure he would not be offended by what I write, therefore neither should you.

Mitch

---

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

Originally by: Orree

---

Thanks and you're absolutely right. I have no problem with any of that. I have heard that you're a great guy and a good fleet commander. That is how I view you.

My problem is your conveniently leaving out the fact that alliances in which you have been a part of the leadership (if not the founding leader) have been every bit as pathetic, if not more so. I think "most of the EVE community would agree."

It seems to me that given this fact, it's probably best for you to not comment on the competency of others. That's just me, though. I can see it's different for you.

Naturally, since pointing these things out yourself doesn't really aid whatever position you're attempting to espouse, I'm just doing my part to help you out.

---

Agreed, this post is about the current drama fest that is MC vs BOB tho, I suppose I could work some kind of disclaimer re: my own failings into my sig tho ;P

Lets hug and be done with it :)

Mitch

---

Originally by: TWD

---

I've got a party going in my head.

---