Originally by: Zenst

---

Originally by: Ur235

---

Originally by: New ones

---

Local in tpar is now @ 270,
Gm's have LOCKED down the system, so pepole cant logg in or jump in.
this is some kinda new "feature"

---

Typically the GM's are interfering with the battles of the players again. sucks tbh they ahve no right to interfear with our battls

---

LOL, when you preannounce a huge fleet fight and they make sure the nodes are playable, people moan. When you get a laggy fleet fight with lots in local and people unable to enter the system and node good as dead to all even ingame, you cry for a GM to sort it. Nodes have there finite limits by design and all a GM could possibly do is to limit the numbers like a tap and prevent it overfilling.


That said, any updates on what transpired. Or do I now have to read 15 other threads taking the 13th posts from each and the last word from each to get any form of constructive statement of events.

---

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

Originally by: Franga

---

Sorry, that was very personal

---

Yes it was, also quite old. Perhaps I should create some new material for the trolls.

---

Originally by: Rachel Vend

---

... with 100% reliability in most cases ...

---

Originally by: Riddlock

---

All i hope is good fights , good fights that other certain enemies that are spamming CAOD are not able to give us.

---

Originally by: Ur235

---

Originally by: New ones

---

Local in tpar is now @ 270,
Gm's have LOCKED down the system, so pepole cant logg in or jump in.
this is some kinda new "feature"

---

Typically the GM's are interfering with the battles of the players again. sucks tbh they ahve no right to interfear with our battls

---

Originally by: Don Z0LA

---

Originally by: Pesadel0

---

Originally by: Don Z0LA

---

Originally by: Mitch Taylor

---

'if' they get a fight, mc will prob come away with the bloody nose. I think their 'conquering' of the north has given them false confidence. Not one of the northern alliances they 'crushed' were competent.

Mitch

---

completely different from Xelas which was too much competent and thats why they had to go. Bob just couldnt stand someone better then them around. Get real, you are not in position (you are not competent) to comment anyones alliance after being one of leading roles in Xelas...

---

If mitch is a little biased so are you zola,and what alliances were you in charge to call him uninformed?What alliances did you form,build and destroyed in the present ?

If anything if bob goes to PB the servers are going to suffer badlly and noone will get a good figth.

---

Hi. I was in charge of FA on peak of its power, when it was strongest alliance. not solo in charge ofc but member of HQ. I (we) literally killed CFS. they are only alliance they was really killed in less then a month or so, all others slowly died affected by many factors and in longer time, while CFS was raped. Also had plenty of wars with others before i quit alliance stuff. Even now when im long time "officially" gone from eve politics im pretty sure i have more influence on it then Xelas had ever. warning epeening incoming - im known by many people in this game, be it pirates, alliance guys, industrialists etc, i have friends in plenty alliances and alts in even more. therefore young padawan, inform yourself before going to blindly defend someone ;).

---

Originally by: Marko Zhang

---

metal guy when molle finds out your posting in caod instead of fighting
you're going to get a spanking.

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

The game mechanics are at fault. CCP needs to change its philosophy of how sovereignty is held, that's the only way.

I had an idea of special sovereignty POSes with generators powering them in neighboring systems, not the core system. In order to destroy a sovereignty POS, all generators would need to be held to 10%-20% armor, spreading out a fight to say, sovereignty 4 = 4 generators in 4 neighboring systems. This way the fights are spread out over multiple systems and there's no POS spamming going on all the time, because regular POSes do not hold sovereignty, only Special POSes do and only 1 can be placed in system at a time.

Something like that would change the game mechanics and possibly make this game more enjoyable, but at the very least it might make it playable. Until then, well, enjoy paying your subscription while CCP laughs at all of us all the way to the bank.

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

The game mechanics are at fault. CCP needs to change its philosophy of how sovereignty is held, that's the only way.

I had an idea of special sovereignty POSes with generators powering them in neighboring systems, not the core system. In order to destroy a sovereignty POS, all generators would need to be held to 10%-20% armor, spreading out a fight to say, sovereignty 4 = 4 generators in 4 neighboring systems. This way the fights are spread out over multiple systems and there's no POS spamming going on all the time, because regular POSes do not hold sovereignty, only Special POSes do and only 1 can be placed in system at a time.

Something like that would change the game mechanics and possibly make this game more enjoyable, but at the very least it might make it playable. Until then, well, enjoy paying your subscription while CCP laughs at all of us all the way to the bank.

'We see nothing in our logs....bla,bla,bla' You would think that after more then five years in business, CCP would create some kind of log program that would actually show them what the problems are. Quite pathetic, actually, that they can be in programming business and don't even recognize or have tools to analyze what are the problems within their own game. Sure does not make me think that they will solve anything any time soon.

---

Originally by: Larry Wong

---

sorry i'm going to see that will smith movie about vampires and it's probably based very very loosely on a twilight zone episode but i'm gonna see it anyway

---

Originally by: Dungar Loghoth

---

Criticize us all you want BoB, at least we've never had an alliance mail telling us to nano our ships "out the wazzoo".

---

Originally by: Darklin Eldaris

---

Edited by: Darklin Eldaris on 21/12/2007 14:18:33

Originally by: Dungar Loghoth

---

Criticize us all you want BoB, at least we've never had an alliance mail telling us to nano our ships "out the wazzoo".

---

No, you guys had to settle for the: "Bring as many ships as you can, bring ibis's if you have to. Whatever it takes to lag out the system," alliance mail.

Pwned yourself in the face here.

I'll break it down for you.

List of alliances who do not have a high horse on which to sit and talk **** from:

#1 Goonswarm

---

Originally by: Local Her0

---

Originally by: Darklin Eldaris

---

Edited by: Darklin Eldaris on 21/12/2007 14:18:33

Originally by: Dungar Loghoth

---

Criticize us all you want BoB, at least we've never had an alliance mail telling us to nano our ships "out the wazzoo".

---

No, you guys had to settle for the: "Bring as many ships as you can, bring ibis's if you have to. Whatever it takes to lag out the system," alliance mail.

Pwned yourself in the face here.

I'll break it down for you.

List of alliances who do not have a high horse on which to sit and talk **** from:

#1 Goonswarm

---

how does it feel to lose so many regions to goonswarm?

---

Originally by: Zell

---

Originally by: Local Her0

---

Originally by: Darklin Eldaris

---

Edited by: Darklin Eldaris on 21/12/2007 14:18:33

Originally by: Dungar Loghoth

---

Criticize us all you want BoB, at least we've never had an alliance mail telling us to nano our ships "out the wazzoo".

---

No, you guys had to settle for the: "Bring as many ships as you can, bring ibis's if you have to. Whatever it takes to lag out the system," alliance mail.

Pwned yourself in the face here.

I'll break it down for you.

List of alliances who do not have a high horse on which to sit and talk **** from:

#1 Goonswarm

---

how does it feel to lose so many regions to goonswarm?

---

How does goonswarm feel to be the pet monkey boys of RA?

---

Originally by: Ricdic

---

Ezoran is a dirty troll.
Ezoran has been repoted to mods for trolling on this and many other threads
As trolling continues Ezoran will continue to be reported
If Ezoran persists then

Originally by: Darklin Eldaris

---

Edited by: Darklin Eldaris on 21/12/2007 14:18:33

Originally by: Dungar Loghoth

---

Criticize us all you want BoB, at least we've never had an alliance mail telling us to nano our ships "out the wazzoo".

---

No, you guys had to settle for the: "Bring as many ships as you can, bring ibis's if you have to. Whatever it takes to lag out the system," alliance mail.

Pwned yourself in the face here.

I'll break it down for you.

List of alliances who do not have a high horse on which to sit and talk **** from:

#1 Goonswarm

---

Originally by: Malcore Trisus

---

Originally by: Kyoi

---

The first rule of Pandemic Legion is you must Polycarb every ship

The second rule of Pandemic Legion is you must fit an MWD on every ship

The third rule of Pandemic Legion is every ship must have Overdrive Injector II's

The fourth rule of Pandemic Legion is to pretend you are not a nanofag

---

Dont forget Istabs.

---

Originally by: Zell

---

How does goonswarm feel to be the pet monkey boys of RA?

---

Originally by: Cvuos

---

Someone should make a thread about reinforced nodes. I've never heard any official explanation about it and still believe it's a myth. CCP doesn't need to make any system in game handle that kind of load at any given time, but being able to selectively increase horsepower in a specific area with due warning (1 downtime in advance is no prob) from players would be fantastic.

No really big battles happen unannounced anyway.

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

Nothing, absolutely nothing will make this game playable when the design favors the blob. People will just keeping bringing more and more people, unless the designers discourage blobbing thru redesigning the game mechanics. Anyone thinking that better technology or reinforcing nodes or any other miracle to speed will change that is just fooling themselves. Then again, we are talking about CCP here. They donÆt see any problems in their logs. It must be all of our PCs.

---

Originally by: shaerc

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

Nothing, absolutely nothing will make this game playable when the design favors the blob. People will just keeping bringing more and more people, unless the designers discourage blobbing thru redesigning the game mechanics. Anyone thinking that better technology or reinforcing nodes or any other miracle to speed will change that is just fooling themselves. Then again, we are talking about CCP here. They donÆt see any problems in their logs. It must be all of our PCs.

---

Agreed.

One thing which has increased the blob factor a lot is Warp to 0.

It's now vastly both easier and quicker to move fleets around. It's extremely easy to move over several regions, with many alliances congregating to attack a target.

Obviously warp to 0 has upsides too, but its an example of how game mechanics can change alliances.

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

Edited by: Metal Dude on 22/12/2007 02:49:51

Originally by: Cvuos

---

Someone should make a thread about reinforced nodes. I've never heard any official explanation about it and still believe it's a myth. CCP doesn't need to make any system in game handle that kind of load at any given time, but being able to selectively increase horsepower in a specific area with due warning (1 downtime in advance is no prob) from players would be fantastic.

No really big battles happen unannounced anyway.

---

Nothing, absolutely nothing will make this game playable when the design favors the blob. People will just keep bringing more and more people, unless the designers discourage blobbing thru redesigning the game mechanics. Anyone thinking that better technology or reinforcing nodes or any other miracle to speed will change that is just fooling themselves. Then again, we are talking about CCP here. They donÆt see any problems in their logs. It must be all of our PCs.

---

Originally by: Moon Kitten

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

Edited by: Metal Dude on 22/12/2007 02:49:51

Originally by: Cvuos

---

Someone should make a thread about reinforced nodes. I've never heard any official explanation about it and still believe it's a myth. CCP doesn't need to make any system in game handle that kind of load at any given time, but being able to selectively increase horsepower in a specific area with due warning (1 downtime in advance is no prob) from players would be fantastic.

No really big battles happen unannounced anyway.

---

Nothing, absolutely nothing will make this game playable when the design favors the blob. People will just keep bringing more and more people, unless the designers discourage blobbing thru redesigning the game mechanics. Anyone thinking that better technology or reinforcing nodes or any other miracle to speed will change that is just fooling themselves. Then again, we are talking about CCP here. They donÆt see any problems in their logs. It must be all of our PCs.

---

How about a 1v1 duel for delve?

---

Originally by: True Sebiestor

---

Originally by: shaerc

---

Originally by: Metal Dude

---

Nothing, absolutely nothing will make this game playable when the design favors the blob. People will just keeping bringing more and more people, unless the designers discourage blobbing thru redesigning the game mechanics. Anyone thinking that better technology or reinforcing nodes or any other miracle to speed will change that is just fooling themselves. Then again, we are talking about CCP here. They donÆt see any problems in their logs. It must be all of our PCs.

---

Agreed.

One thing which has increased the blob factor a lot is Warp to 0.

It's now vastly both easier and quicker to move fleets around. It's extremely easy to move over several regions, with many alliances congregating to attack a target.

Obviously warp to 0 has upsides too, but its an example of how game mechanics can change alliances.

---

Are you prefer swarm of bookmarks ??

---