| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
SigmaPi
Valkyr Industries
Late Night Alliance
3
   |
Posted - 2012.02.19 21:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hans for president! I mean... wait, what?
I've read a lot of your reasoning behind lowsec (and fw in particular) being a testbed for new nullsec mechanics. I agree almost entirely, but I do want to hear what (if any in particular) plans you have to really give strong value to fw plexing and things of this nature. I'm sure I've read a few fairly specific ideas you've had and also plenty of others speaking for you, but I'd really like some detail about how you see it being fixed. In that vein, do you think FW should have a "sov-style" system where the capture and holding of a system actually holds a significant value to the militias? or are the ideas more cosmetic and 'meaningless' (not meant as insulting)?
It's obviously a big balancing game of making FW meaningful to those playing, but not so glorious as to invite all those blobby nullsec pubbie alliances to stick their noses where they are not needed. I don't in particular have a great idea in mind, but I'd really love to hear any more details you have in mind for the system. I've been in FW to one extent or another for the past 3 years (and was a nullsec resident for the previous 2), and the last thing I want to see is the overwhelming odds of nullsec being thrust on the fairly low-key and independent groups in lowsec.
Anyways, a hundred words to say very little... I want you to spill more details! Get with it!!  |
SigmaPi
Valkyr Industries
Late Night Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 02:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Very nice, Mr. Hans! +1 (or more  )
I agree with you on every single point, however: it may be totally academic, but I would like to hear your views (for or against) system modification in relation to FW (like IHUBlite?). One of the more 'frustrating' things of the whole area is the perceived effort for perceived gain. Don't get me wrong, I love PVP and consider that its own reward, but if a faction wants to put in the effort to 'upgrade' a system from simply a staging area to a stronghold, should they have the tools to allow for this? I'm sure this is it's own can of worms and may not even be pertinent for this thread (and if not, feel free to ignore), but my creativity and imagination have taken the best of me.
I think FW and EVE have so much to offer the more casual gamer, but I think they can also benefit from commitment as well! If you have any ideas on a more fanciful future, I'd love to hear them!
<3 Hans! |
SigmaPi
Valkyr Industries
Late Night Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 21:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote:I keep reviewing the forum threads of the leading candidates and Hans continues to stand out.
Hans it would be good to have a sane solid voice for the majority of players on the CSM. Hans you will be a new face on the CSM actually trying to improve gameplay by getting CCP to fix the block headed things that frustrate older players and drive newer ones from the game.
Hans you know not everyone wants to be in a huge power block in null sec.
Hans do you think FW could allow many of the huge battle features CCP loves without the petty dictatorships of Null sec sov?
For example: Players could login find a massive battle going on join in and not have to wait for some major corp in sov to invade another to engage in a large scale combat scenario. We could improve our skills facing other players who fight for the other side, real pew pew on a large scale available to everyone!
Power To The Players!
Kinda like this fight? |
SigmaPi
Valkyr Industries
Late Night Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 01:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ersteen Hofs wrote:What are you congratulating with? He is not even going to Iceland (unless 2 of top 7 fail to attend for some reason but then we also get the AAA guy).
You must have a low IQ. |
| |
|