EVE Search - mara sucks

All Channels

Ships and Modules

mara sucks

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Anita Blonde	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:10:00 - [1] so everyone agrees finally that mara sucks and needs rethink ?
jbob2000 Gallente KIA Corp KIA Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:12:00 - [2] uhh... what? ________________________________
Bager Gray Gallente COBRA INC Brutally Clever Empire	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:14:00 - [3] ?? Are you speaking of Amar?? If so... I say maybe. I like me amar ships.
Anita Blonde	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:15:00 - [4] I mean marauders in general as a stupid pointless ship class
Liang Nuren The Avalon Foundation Knights Of Syndicate	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:19:00 - [5] I thought you meant the system Mara... the one without stations and has lots of belts. Great system. I like it alot. -Liang -- Originally by: "QProQ" When they said to put 'stabs on your 'cane, they meant GYROSTABS!
Corphus The NewOrder	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:37:00 - [6] Originally by: Anita Blonde I mean marauders in general as a stupid pointless ship class they look good in eft. but in reality they are overpriced and are not worth the investment if i can buy a carrier for the same amout of cash.
Sekh Ondaari	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:39:00 - [7] Originally by: Corphus Originally by: Anita Blonde I mean marauders in general as a stupid pointless ship class they look good in eft. but in reality they are overpriced and are not worth the investment if i can buy a carrier for the same amout of cash. Funny, carriers and marauders seem to have WIDELY seperate roles? Not sure how you run your lvl 4's in that carrier of yours?
Iinaara Ero Guro VENOM Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.28 22:50:00 - [8] Originally by: Sekh Ondaari Funny, carriers and marauders seem to have WIDELY separate roles? Not sure how you run your lvl 4's in that carrier of yours? QFT. Honestly, poster, if you use the Marauders for their intended use (and by that I am judging by the bonuses they receive) they should perform admirably. If, however, you are under-experienced, and trying to use them for pvp or something, I would bet you'd come on here to whine about it failing miserably and being 'in general... a stupid pointless ship class.' __________________________________________________ I reject your reality and supplement it with my own!
Eardianm Darkness Inc. Blood Blind	Posted - 2007.12.28 23:00:00 - [9] Originally by: Liang Nuren I thought you meant the system Mara... the one without stations and has lots of belts. Great system. I like it alot. -Liang Excellent mining and deadspace complex probing opportunites there! So come on in, the water is warm! --------------
Sirius Problem Darkness Inc. Blood Blind	Posted - 2007.12.29 00:08:00 - [10] Originally by: Eardianm Excellent mining and deadspace complex probing opportunites there! Aren't you supposed to be a pirate? ---- I am Super Cool
Eardianm Darkness Inc. Blood Blind	Posted - 2007.12.29 00:27:00 - [11] Originally by: Sirius Problem Originally by: Eardianm Excellent mining and deadspace complex probing opportunites there! Aren't you supposed to be a pirate? Only when I have time to play --------------
Karyuudo Tydraad Caldari Whiskey Pete's Drycleaning Services The Acquisition	Posted - 2007.12.29 01:09:00 - [12] Originally by: Corphus Originally by: Anita Blonde I mean marauders in general as a stupid pointless ship class they look good in eft. but in reality they are overpriced and are not worth the investment if i can buy a carrier for the same amout of cash. I think we all know what this means. Nerf Carriers!
James Lyrus Lyrus Associates Enuma Elish.	Posted - 2007.12.29 01:22:00 - [13] No. Golem's a lovely L4 missionboat. -- Crane needs more grid 249km locking? GMP and TNP
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2007.12.29 02:27:00 - [14] tbh the silenced carbine is totally overused and noob material, the reflex sighted m16 on the other hand is a beast--higher base damage and more reliable in open air maps like Bog and Ambush ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
Sylek Amarr Section Five Cosa Nostra.	Posted - 2007.12.29 08:41:00 - [15] Originally by: Erotic Irony tbh the silenced carbine is totally overused and noob material, the reflex sighted m16 on the other hand is a beast--higher base damage and more reliable in open air maps like Bog and Ambush M16 is just general crap all around, I don't even know how you can say that. Carbine is much better, be it silenced or whatever. It may be overused, but that's just because it's the best. If you want something that's reliable in open air maps go for an AK. __________________ My released videos: Bloodlust 3, Bloodlust 2 Redux
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2007.12.29 09:06:00 - [16] Originally by: Sylek Originally by: Erotic Irony tbh the silenced carbine is totally overused and noob material, the reflex sighted m16 on the other hand is a beast--higher base damage and more reliable in open air maps like Bog and Ambush M16 is just general crap all around, I don't even know how you can say that. Carbine is much better, be it silenced or whatever. It may be overused, but that's just because it's the best. If you want something that's reliable in open air maps go for an AK. The AK is terrible weapon as well--much better smgs for close range and assault/snipers for the long range and with less recoil. More to the point, it takes a single burst of m16 to drop a player in hardcore, even with juggernaut, on top of that m16 has higher accuracy, damage, and fire rate. Perk II has to be jammer in HC S&D, no exceptions, so stopping power isn't realistic. When clearing S&D bunker sites in countdown for example, the m16 is much preferred in my book. On standard deathmatch FFA where hopping and grenade spam is the norm, sure--on hardcore and tactical servers however, the m16 is king. Indeed, the automatic has the illusion of being better but it has the same 60 rounds as the m16--given how weak your damage is this is another hindrance. ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
me bored	Posted - 2007.12.29 10:02:00 - [17] Originally by: Liang Nuren I thought you meant the system Mara... the one without stations and has lots of belts. Great system. I like it alot. -Liang It was better when I was the only pirate there.
Riho Northen Breeze	Posted - 2007.12.29 10:10:00 - [18] marauders are nice.... they are good at PvE.... tho in PvP id rather use a faction bs than a marauder tbh ---------------------------------- Seems that there's a new game that seems to be very popular whit whiners these days. Its called EFT Online. dont listen those people.. as they dont have a clue
Dreadpilot Roberts Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.12.29 10:26:00 - [19] Mara sucks Passari is way better and only one jump away , or Tama a few jumps out, but locals are becoming a nuissance there with their Pos spamming. I'm sorry, did I say u could speak ?
Cpt Branko The Bloody Red	Posted - 2007.12.29 10:27:00 - [20] Unfortunately, there's no low-sec route from Tama to Mara. Rifters!
Lookatme I'manAlt	Posted - 2007.12.29 10:35:00 - [21] Originally by: Erotic Irony Originally by: Sylek Originally by: Erotic Irony tbh the silenced carbine is totally overused and noob material, the reflex sighted m16 on the other hand is a beast--higher base damage and more reliable in open air maps like Bog and Ambush M16 is just general crap all around, I don't even know how you can say that. Carbine is much better, be it silenced or whatever. It may be overused, but that's just because it's the best. If you want something that's reliable in open air maps go for an AK. The AK is terrible weapon as well--much better smgs for close range and assault/snipers for the long range and with less recoil. More to the point, it takes a single burst of m16 to drop a player in hardcore, even with juggernaut, on top of that m16 has higher accuracy, damage, and fire rate. Perk II has to be jammer in HC S&D, no exceptions, so stopping power isn't realistic. When clearing S&D bunker sites in countdown for example, the m16 is much preferred in my book. On standard deathmatch FFA where hopping and grenade spam is the norm, sure--on hardcore and tactical servers however, the m16 is king. Indeed, the automatic has the illusion of being better but it has the same 60 rounds as the m16--given how weak your damage is this is another hindrance. I much prefer the G36. Slightly more accurate making those beautiful headshots from half-way across the open maps, but tbh i'll take the M40 on any map with some open spaces and cover. [center][/c enter]
Katanaha Gallente Infinitus Odium The Church.	Posted - 2007.12.29 14:06:00 - [22] lol i preffer the .50 cal over the rifles nice and accurate high damage ( 1 shot - yes i am an lame camper ) And yes the G36C is an nice rifle indeed it shoots over open terrain with the RDS ( red dot sight ) headshot after headshot. but like mentioned before on S&D hardcore i preffer the M16 RDS over everything with increased hip accuracy and uav jammer + 3x nade perk. _______________________ Please CCP pimp my sig! orly?!
Pinky Denmark The Cursed Navy	Posted - 2007.12.29 17:41:00 - [23] I like to play Medic with the Enfield L95... Not many BF2 players appreciate that rifle - I'm a nice guy!! But hook me up with some pew pew, because I'm really bored...
Corphus The NewOrder	Posted - 2008.01.01 16:28:00 - [24] Originally by: Sekh Ondaari Originally by: Corphus Originally by: Anita Blonde I mean marauders in general as a stupid pointless ship class they look good in eft. but in reality they are overpriced and are not worth the investment if i can buy a carrier for the same amout of cash. Funny, carriers and marauders seem to have WIDELY seperate roles? Not sure how you run your lvl 4's in that carrier of yours? i run lvl4's in my myrm. and i can afford 8 fully TII fitted and rigged mission myrms for the same price of one marauder. see, this is my point.
Mal Plox Keepers of Balance Legion of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2008.01.01 16:37:00 - [25] Originally by: Pinky Denmark I like to play Medic with the Enfield L95... Not many BF2 players appreciate that rifle I love that weapon! Hek, teh only reason i played medic was for that rifle! ;) --- And no, Internet isn't broken! Well, it is... but not in the way you think of it.
DARTHxFREE Aliastra	Posted - 2008.01.01 23:17:00 - [26] I would never sacrafice Style for lame-ness AGOC scoped Scorpion or Silenced UZI /join Cheeze & Whine Club
Atsuko Ratu Caldari VSP Corp.	Posted - 2008.01.01 23:19:00 - [27] Originally by: Liang Nuren I thought you meant the system Mara... the one without stations and has lots of belts. Great system. I like it alot. -Liang Was the first system I ever pirated in. Sniff, good times...
DARTHxFREE Aliastra	Posted - 2008.01.01 23:20:00 - [28] Edited by: DARTHxFREE on 01/01/2008 23:20:23 doubleu post /join Cheeze & Whine Club
Thorek Ironbrow Ironbrow Industries Co. Empire Research	Posted - 2008.01.01 23:23:00 - [29] Originally by: Lookatme I'manAlt Originally by: Erotic Irony Originally by: Sylek Originally by: Erotic Irony tbh the silenced carbine is totally overused and noob material, the reflex sighted m16 on the other hand is a beast--higher base damage and more reliable in open air maps like Bog and Ambush M16 is just general crap all around, I don't even know how you can say that. Carbine is much better, be it silenced or whatever. It may be overused, but that's just because it's the best. If you want something that's reliable in open air maps go for an AK. The AK is terrible weapon as well--much better smgs for close range and assault/snipers for the long range and with less recoil. More to the point, it takes a single burst of m16 to drop a player in hardcore, even with juggernaut, on top of that m16 has higher accuracy, damage, and fire rate. Perk II has to be jammer in HC S&D, no exceptions, so stopping power isn't realistic. When clearing S&D bunker sites in countdown for example, the m16 is much preferred in my book. On standard deathmatch FFA where hopping and grenade spam is the norm, sure--on hardcore and tactical servers however, the m16 is king. Indeed, the automatic has the illusion of being better but it has the same 60 rounds as the m16--given how weak your damage is this is another hindrance. I much prefer the G36. Slightly more accurate making those beautiful headshots from half-way across the open maps, but tbh i'll take the M40 on any map with some open spaces and cover. Freak all of that, if you're a real man, you'd take a M134. The highest ROF, amazing damage out put, and mounted on a Black Hawk, there is no recoil, only the helicopter swaying. But with that many bullets in the air, you just got to spray and pray, and God knows you hit everything. _____________________________ Thorek Ironbrow of Ironbrow Industries Co. Part of the Empire Research Alliance Look us up in Nomaa or Itamo to join!

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.