| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
0
   |
Posted - 2012.02.09 19:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67950&find=unread
Will he accept the challenge or will he hide behind some bullshit?
I dont want to get a candidate that cant argue his point well before CCP. Maybe Kelduum cant debate well?
If he doesn't accept is a clear sign he is out of touch with us, the 99% percent.
His only campaing statement is that he has knowledge of the corp interface. Not the 99%! |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 08:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Silentbrick wrote:His only agenda is a better EVE for ALL of us.
This is the biggest bullshit i have every read.
Every candidate would sign that pledge!
Why does Kelduum avoid having stances on the issues?
Because he runs as EvE-U block candidate. He hopes that his name alone will bring him votes and fears to alianate voters by having stances on issues. He wants the EvE-U have a chair at the table of the grown-ups and I believe he wants to boost his ego.
Answer the questions kelduum:
Do you want to see more development time for WiS or is CCP right to abandon it?
Do you want to abolish non-consentual pvp?
What are the major areas you want to see developer-time dedicated to?
Do you support CCP in fighting against scammers?
Will you defend the rights of griefers and scammers?
Will you support decissions that are good for EvE but bad for you Corp?
Will you lobby for stuff that mainly benefits you and your corp, like special status for training corps?
Why should people vote for you and not one of the other Highsec candidates like Lyrs or Hans that have stances on the issues?
When did you stop abusing EvE-U for personal gain?
Why does the EvE-U still have a direct connection to Goons/CFC through the Graduates? Are you a 0.0 shill?
Why should we vote for you when even your own people (poetic) dont like you?
Why do you suggest structureshoots in highsec? Isn't the good thing about highsec you dont have to grind structure? How would it help small corps that get deced? Isn't it a mechanic tailored to your needs only?
Would you support an Wardec mechanic that makes wars less expensive if you fight a bigger foe and more expensive if you fight a smaller (relative to your own size)?
Who would you like to take the other 13 seats on the CSM?
|
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 06:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Why should we believe you when you say your are for non consensual PVP and still use a 19 Corp strong dec-shield-ally to protect yourself from pesky people who want to noncon-pvp with you? arent you preaching one thing and doing another?
Also doesnt your proposal for a structure gind directly benefit one of the largest (memberwise) highsec alliances? Why do you want to introduce nullsec elements into highsec? Should a allianc who doesnt like to get wardeced just go into low/null and provide their own security? |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 15:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
Juicy Chanlin wrote:testobjekt wrote:Why should we believe you when you say your are for non consensual PVP and still use a 19 Corp strong dec-shield-ally to protect yourself from pesky people who want to noncon-pvp with you? arent you preaching one thing and doing another?
Also doesnt your proposal for a structure gind directly benefit one of the largest (memberwise) highsec alliances? Why do you want to introduce nullsec elements into highsec? Should a allianc who doesnt like to get wardeced just go into low/null and provide their own security? The Dec shield is a perfectly legitimate use of the games mechanics. You have to understand also, that unlike other corporations, the uni has strict rules for wartime conduct. For example. Uni doesn't use out of corp reppers, which, before the changes made them shootable, were basically untouchable, and many corporations that decked the uni were using those. Along with playing docking games and a lot of the other BS that goes on during "war". Such as decing the uni and then hiding in a station the full war halfway accross the stars. All the decshield really does, is make sure that you don't get the disgruntled people just wardeccing for **** and giggles. The idea is that if you're willing to fork out the iskies for the wardec, then you'll be willing to actually show up and fight.
So you are just saying "you have to pay a prohibitiv amout of isk to wardec us" and if one wardecs you, you just turtle up to let them bleed isk? Sounds like creative use of game mechanics to dodge wardecs to me.
And you did not adress the 2nd part of my question |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 19:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
As I said earlier, Kelduums plattform is only "i'm a cool dude"+"i'm EvE-U ceo, i have lots of members that will vote for me no matter what" +"i want good stuff"+"i'm highsec"
if thats the candidate you want sure, vote for him.
He wants the CSM tag at his name to further the recruitment of EVE-U.
If he says EVE-U is a 100% legit organisation i challenge him to publish a full corp api key to proof this! if he does not comply we know he has something to hide and the "university" is not legit!
But if you consider the structure of Highsec, with lots of small/medium corps, you dont want to vote for him. He will support fixes for big corp issues (because that are the issues he notices everyday) and will be in favor of stuff that benefits HIS playstyle.
Is he the anti Mittani guy? hell no. He probably will either be marginalized by the 0.0 candidates, or they will use him for stuff they want to (corp/alliance interface).
Vote for people like Issler Dainze (industrialists) Hans Jagerblitze/ Alkseyev Karrde. This are people who UNDERSTAND your issues far better then Kelduum probably ever will. |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 16:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kelduum make the api key public for full disclosure! |
| |
|