Would you classify yourself more as "pro-walking in stations" or "anti-flying in space"?

Do you have specific plans for the can/wreck/aggression if elected?

I still don't understand why you sign your posts. These aren't memos.

Issler

someone convinced him it was a good idea

if only i didn't have this accursed goonwaffe tag i could convince him to do literally anything

someone convinced him it was a good idea

if only i didn't have this accursed goonwaffe tag i could convince him to do literally anything

Well, I'm a her and unlikely even if you didn't have the tag. You can go back and see from my first posts I've been signing my posts.

But, I'll tell you what, I'll ignore your tag, so give it your best shot!


Issler

Forsoothe! I did not know that women were allowed on this holonet channel.

Do you stick to single word ideas out of laziness or is it one of those "the more I say the more my inherent worthlessness will become obvious even to the dumbest of voters" things? Curious voter wanting to know :)

And the goon spam begins. I would suggest that the more the goons troll here the more I look like the best "anti-goon" candidate.

Issler

We'll have private forums on another site, regular online meetings based on the council schedules. I want to make it flexible enough to accomodate folks with time constraints. Basically folks with great ideas and passion for Eve but that can't be commit to the CSM because of the time requirements.

Issler

Is there a way to delete the spam in a candidacy thread? Would be nice to discuss and ask questions here without the usual childish Goon mudslinging.

Is there a way to delete the spam in a candidacy thread? Would be nice to discuss and ask questions here without the usual childish Goon mudslinging.

Just because you don't agree with our posts doesn't make them spam.

Space Pants Party would be more appropriate for you.

im a barbie girl! in a barbie world!

Riiiight, you aren't spamming . No way...

spamming

I bet they want to outlaw aggression mechanics entirely, stop suicide ganking, and make highsec a nursery for all the people who can't take the heat of regular highsec.

I don't think ambulation is enhancing the game play without pugilism skills and such! I do think that the players who appreciate the rich side of the game that has to do with ship building and all that it entails need a voice in CSM. That voice is the Voice of Reason. We don't want to nerf the PvP side and at the same time we don't wanna nerf our capabilities to provide rocking ships for those who love it. It's really quite "reason"able. Players pay money to participate in this game and if it sucks for those who want to excel at industrial enterprises there will be a lot less players paying to play. Simple. We need a Voice of Reason in the CSM to remind CCP of this fact. If the game is only geared towards Goons style of play, there will be a lot of quitters. So let's get Issler in there to represent the players who want to live in this space and have a decent chance of excelling. We don't complain about the low sec or null sec game mechanics when they give us an even chance. We just don't want either area to be nerfed to favor one or the other, and that is why we want Issler and The Voice Of Reason.

Industry is what gives you goonies the chance to have fun, who else makes you ships, ammo, modules if not those "irrational" miner and industrialists. Sure there are NPC corps but those OP SOB (excuses the language) should have been delt with long ago.

I support the voice of reason, because next to tears , industry makes this sanbox turn. If there was no industry, who else would you gank, explode, molest, etc..

You need industry as much as you need O-¦. Maybe not for the apparent reasons but if you think about it, you shall see, it does more than you originally would have thought.

Disclaimer: I have no idea if anything is true but I think it is. So -»\_(pâä)_/-»

Okay, thanks for the answer. If you want I would like to work on that council. Any terms of admission?


Is there a way to delete the spam in a candidacy thread? Would be nice to discuss and ask questions here without the usual childish Goon mudslinging.

Mining is on top of that list. And mining is the foundation of any industry.

And before anyone feels to be the smartass today: Yes, I know that there seems to come a lot of minerals from mission loot and drone compounds. But I hope that this problem is also covered by the Rational Party. To give miners back their profession and make it a more active and interesting profession, that should be the goals in my opinion.

I'm sure she can work out those things a bit.

But do we really need a "plan" what exactly we want to change? I understand that the CSM isn't about the CSM members to do the actual game designers job. The CSM members are there to give feedback to CCP about the current state of the game and the wishes of the community.

In the end, it's not about what Issler wants or a special idea, but a general idea of what players who voted her want to be adressed by CCP. She has to show CCP what our problems are and how we feel about different areas of the game and upcoming changes that might be discussed during the meetings. To sort out that problems we/Issler bring to CCPs attention is CCPs job, the job of the real game designers..

I don't think ambulation is enhancing the game play without pugilism skills and such! I do think that the players who appreciate the rich side of the game that has to do with ship building and all that it entails need a voice in CSM. That voice is the Voice of Reason. We don't want to nerf the PvP side and at the same time we don't wanna nerf our capabilities to provide rocking ships for those who love it. It's really quite "reason"able. Players pay money to participate in this game and if it sucks for those who want to excel at industrial enterprises there will be a lot less players paying to play. Simple. We need a Voice of Reason in the CSM to remind CCP of this fact. If the game is only geared towards Goons style of play, there will be a lot of quitters. So let's get Issler in there to represent the players who want to live in this space and have a decent chance of excelling. We don't complain about the low sec or null sec game mechanics when they give us an even chance. We just don't want either area to be nerfed to favor one or the other, and that is why we want Issler and The Voice Of Reason.

I don't think ambulation is enhancing the game play without pugilism skills and such! I do think that the players who appreciate the rich side of the game that has to do with ship building and all that it entails need a voice in CSM. That voice is the Voice of Reason. We don't want to nerf the PvP side and at the same time we don't wanna nerf our capabilities to provide rocking ships for those who love it. It's really quite "reason"able. Players pay money to participate in this game and if it sucks for those who want to excel at industrial enterprises there will be a lot less players paying to play. Simple. We need a Voice of Reason in the CSM to remind CCP of this fact. If the game is only geared towards Goons style of play, there will be a lot of quitters. So let's get Issler in there to represent the players who want to live in this space and have a decent chance of excelling. We don't complain about the low sec or null sec game mechanics when they give us an even chance. We just don't want either area to be nerfed to favor one or the other, and that is why we want Issler and The Voice Of Reason.