I do not endorse this product and or service.

Would you support Gay Bars as type of establishments if WiS was ever implemented fully?

We definitely need couple of those in this game. maybe more than a couple!

Is EVE really lacking attention in newspapers and tv shows for this to happen? Also dont tell Hilmar this idea, he will see other companies failing to do this well and only be inspired to make us all homos to show the impossible is possible.

How do you feel about wormhole mining and PI as it relates to Factional Warfare?

I am actually an advocate for LGBT rights in real life. I don't see why WiS bars would be heteronormative-exclusive.

Because we left Earth to find more resources and regrow, not to find more buttes and use them as pin cushions.

Plus the game is notorious for ganking. Societal issues with the love of pvp here could be a problem as well.

Also dont tell Hilmar this idea, he will see other companies failing to do this well and only be inspired to make us all homos to show the impossible is possible.

"Let's verify the mass stability of this wormhole."

The issue never had anything to do with reinforcement timers. You can believe it did all you want, and that's fine, but that does not make it true. I pulled that issue from a discussion about high security mechanics that people would like to see changed, and you are welcome to go verify that the discussion to which I am alluding actually happened in one of the many threads I made for the expressed purpose of soliciting the People for their opinions. People do not like the fact that a POS can be made permanently invulnerable to hostile action by its parent corporation cycling through alliances. I wish to resolve that issue.

If you have an issue you would like resolved, then feel free to express it.

We won't get anywhere by yelling "YOU'RE STUPID!".

On power blocs and equality:



Hypocrasy is now also officially on record.

Regarding Low Security Space

Oppose the introduction of interdiction bubbles to Low Sec, to preserve its unique gameplay;

Address the fact that Low Sec is divided into two classifications, 0.4, and 0.3 and below, with regards to anchorable structures at POS

With regards to the above, modify the anchoring requirements for starbase structures, particularly those involved in drug manufacturing, to be anchorable in all low security systems

IIRC 0.4 is now like 0.3

Actually I "dislike" what Goons represent, specifically in the way that they comically manipulate the gaming experiences of many and in the process favour themselves with change using underhanded tactics. Its this meta-element that is what I despise. As a paying player, I think I'm entitled to point this out and how infantile they are about it at the same time. And as a result not an influence I would like to see involved with the CSM, I think it deserves better representation.

As a long time low sec dweller, these things stick out to me:



PRESERVE IT'S UNIQUE GAMEPLAY!!! This is very important to me, other low sec dwellers, and CCP if they want to keep me sub'd. High sec changes seem solid as do null sec changes. Are you in support or opposition to bringing sov mechanics to NPC null and/or low sec? This is another (kinda) issue that would affect the unique gameplay of these regions. Personally, I think diversity and dimensionality in game design is what makes the game atttractive and exciting.


Um, NO.
Don't forget that you can assign fighters in 0.3, but not in 0.4. I have heard people pleased with this and wanting to change it in both directions. If you are going to address Low Sec classification differences, I think it's worth a look.

Drugs would be a great way to make low sec more profitable and possibly improve traffic/population, and for real: DRUGS!