|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Treelox
Amarr
Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
   |
Posted - 2008.01.10 02:54:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Treelox on 10/01/2008 02:55:10
 Originally by: Kyrial Tidolfas
Originally by: Shadarle
LOL. You've got to be kidding. Your IPO WILL be judged by how you conduct yourself. If you come off as someone who is rash and untrustworthy people will not care if you have the best plan in the world, you'll get nothing.
A person's character is by far the most important thing in deciding if an investment is worthwhile. I would invest billions in someone I thought was trustworthy and a good person but didn't have a good plan and not a penny in a stupid/rude/arrogant/annoying person who seemed to have the best plan in the history of EVE IPO's.
much like how you invested in riethe no doubt. did you think he was a good and trustworthy character?
Lol you are just digging your hole even deeper, I am 99.99% sure that Shad did not invest in Riethe. For that matter neither did I.
---edit
fixed broken quotes.
--
|
Treelox
Amarr
Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 03:37:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kyrial Tidolfas
Why am i digging my hole bigger?? is it because i am offending the mighty shadarle, the tsar of this forum?
so me challenging shadarle's statement about how using character to judge an investment is flawed, is digging myself a bigger hole??
why is that so? either because i am wrong? which i doubt. or i am arguing against the wrong person.
or it is my method and style of rhetoric i used?
i think its a combination of both my style, which one could say reflect my personality, the thing most likely under fire here and the fact that i am "nobody" challenging the mighty "regular" and people who are just passing by are happy to assume shadarle words are wise and don't look at whatI say and what he says based on their merits.
Nothing wrong with challenging the "establishment". It is the manner that I and I would guess many others percieve in which you are doing it.
I guess that means then that it would have fit under your "method and style of rhetoric i used" concept. IMO there is nothing wrong with your "method and style of rhetoric", what is wrong is you lack the tact to know when to properly and effectively apply it.
I hope you have enjoyed this little bit of feedback, cause I know I have. Seriously before responding ponder what I wrote here, or dont and continue to rub the cats fur the wrong way.
--
|
Treelox
Amarr
Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.01.10 05:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ricdic
hehe easier said than done. When it happened I removed everyone's roles from C-R-A so people couldn't even take their own goods out of the hangars 
I then went back through and resecured everything to make sure there were no loopholes or parts I had missed.
TBH when your running a corp of more than a couple indivduals, its always good to run a security audit every few months.
--
|
|
|
| |
|