Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
640
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Please support my candidacy by clicking the like button up here ------------------------------------^ Over the last year, I have been one of the hardest working members of CSM 6 (Trebor says so here). My main focus has been on representing wormhole residents, but I also have been contributing to discussions on topics like ship balancing, microtransactions and all the rest of the topics we discuss with CCP (see this wiki page)
Accomplishments as a CSM 6 member
While ultimately it is CCP that actually does the work, I did push hard on several specific features and bug fixes. The main one is Corporation Bookmarks. CCP has long wanted to get them done, but I think that continued pressure from me and the other CSM members pushed their priority up significantly. I brought up CPU usage on capital shield transporters, which was fixed in Crucible. I had significant input on POS fuel blocks, POCOs, pods on killmails, the Tier 3 BCs and several other topics.
I also read and respond to all the EVE Mails and conversations I get, and pass on feedback to CCP. I spend a lot of time on the forums, including the EVE official forums, Failheap Challenge, and Kugu (which I requested CCP unblock).
What still needs to be done
Firstly, I haven't gotten everything done yet. While we do have corp bookmarks, POS life is still difficult and we still get our own special "features" (aka bugs) after every patch. For example, we have the wormhole mass bug mentioned in this thread.
Secondly, the talk about the wormhole stabilizer (My blog post on the topic) just goes to prove that folks who live in w-space cannot see having a CSM rep as just a nice to have, but it is an absolute requirement. Without someone to speak up, CCP and other CSMs might ruin everything we have all worked so long and hard for.
Thirdly, this year will really matter. This is the time CCP will be fixing all the broken stuff and starting to look at designs for longer term fixes, and I expect that POSes may show up on that list (later in the year). CCP is doing a ton of ship balancing at long last, and I love having input into that, especially since we certainly fit ships differently in w-space.
Who I am in game
I started playing EVE in 2005. After a brief (2 month) stay in empire, I moved out to 0.0 space, in Tribute as part of the Forsaken Empire alliance. I did a bunch of stuff in 0.0, mostly PvP, but some POS management and industry stuff as well. I stuck with the same corp though a corp merger and a bunch of different alliances, most of which I don't even remember anymore. After a couple of years in 0.0, I basically got bored of 0.0 life and moved back to empire to try my hand at invention, which had just come out. I fairly quickly made a bunch of ISK, but eventually got bored and ended up taking a break from EVE for a year or so.
I came back to EVE shortly after the release of Apocrypha, in 2009. I had heard about the new wormhole content, and it sounded interesting to me. I joined a medium sized (at the time) wormhole corporation named Aperture Harmonics. Fairly soon after joining AHARM, I was made the US timezone director, and did a bunch of recruiting. AHARM was, and still is, a PvP corporation. We run sleeper sites in order to pay for new toys to kill stuff with. About 6 months after joining, I was made CEO, and ran the corp for a few months. Running a wormhole corporation was a lot of fun, but it does tend to burn folks out, and I took a short break from EVE in mid 2010. I came back just before our invasion of CCRES, which was the 2nd largest wormhole corp (behind us), and have been back ever since, though no longer as CEO.
Who I am IRL
My name is Josh Goldshlag, I am 34 years old, and live near Boston, MA. I am a computer programmer in my day job, and have previously worked in the game industry. My hobbies include cooking, photography and making my own maple syrup.
You can find a lot more details in my blog GÇô http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com I am on twitter as @two_step_eve If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here.
CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
640
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
(reserved) CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9166
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Let me be the first to say good luck. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
267
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
mmmmmm can I try some of the home made maple syrup? It sounds delicious. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |
Hamatitio
Aperture Harmonics K162
66
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
As a completely impartial player, I support Two Step for CSM. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
640
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
rodyas wrote:mmmmmm can I try some of the home made maple syrup? It sounds delicious.
Join AHARM, I offered some to corp members last year. (seriously) CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
267
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Well I can't join the corp, but hopefully they make pancakes next time ya do it. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1470
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Two Step was one of the hardest-working and most effective members of CSM6. He is a serious candidate who should be on any non-bloc voters "short list" of viable candidates. Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
640
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:42:00 -
[9] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Two Step was one of the hardest-working and most effective members of CSM6. He is a serious candidate who should be on any non-bloc voters "short list" of viable candidates.
Thanks Trebor! If you don't vote for me, vote for Trebor, he is awesome! CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9166
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
If it makes you feel any better, The Mittani seems like both Trebor and Two step. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
|
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
267
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lyris, what happens in iceland is suppose to stay in iceland. Otherwise CCP has to stop serving alchohol and doing the first thing that comes to mind. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |
space gator
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Two step was responsive and helpful during CSM6 when I pm'd him with concerns I had regarding the unique aspects of living in a wormhole in Eve Online.
Glad to see he's running again, +1. |
Tommock
Hard Knocks Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 01:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Wormholers unite, save our way of living from CCP and nullsec titan blobs.
+1 |
Ayeson
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
23
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 02:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tommock wrote:Wormholers unite, save our way of living from CCP and nullsec titan blobs.
+1
I, for one, Welcome our new nullsec overlords |
Lanalor
Lapse Of Sanity Exhale.
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 03:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
Good to see you running again Two Step.
I hope to see the W-space community rally behind you on this. We really need a representative who can smack CCP's hand and tell them when they are thinking of something ******** (WH stabilizing ships anyone?).
Best of Luck. |
Draco Llasa
Thundercats Initiative Mercenaries
146
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 03:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
I just wanted to add my 2 cents.. Two step was one of the hardest working CSM members on our team.. If you are in a wormhole group or non- bloc he is a worthy candidate to look at |
Joran Jackson
The Red Circle Inc.
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 04:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
Wormholers for Two Step. I was pleasantly surprised by the corp bookmarks. You'll get my vote. |
firewalker220
Aperture Harmonics K162
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 06:02:00 -
[18] - Quote
A handsome man that understands the motherf*****g darkside! (shameless californicatiin reference). Two works his butt off for what he genuinely thinks is best for this game and is more then willing to ask anyone what would make eve more enjoyable for them. You've got all my votes |
Steelworks II
Anarchist Dawn U N K N O W N
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 07:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
Best candidate for wormholers. |
sgtk
Aperture Harmonics K162
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 07:05:00 -
[20] - Quote
i support two step for csm helped bring about some great changes two thumbs up.... |
|
Calsys
Monks of War
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 07:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Steelworks II wrote:Best candidate for wormholers. +1
dont make nullsecs from wormholes! |
Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 08:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Got my votes.
|
M'arek Elan
Umbra Inceptio
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 08:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
This guy seems to be one of the hardest working members of CSM 6... and he's only an alternate. Just think of the things he could do if he was to become a full member of CSM 7!
Two thumbs up from me. |
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 09:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
Wow, that was 100+ quick "likes". Gratz. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |
dirtydebbs
Aperture Harmonics K162
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
only knowing him for a short time he is a very hungry man who wants to do better for the whole comunity and especialy for us wh guys +1 from me
|
Prometheus Exenthal
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
169
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
Two Step, you know your ****. Good luck! CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7 www.promsrage.com |
pierre arthos
Aperture Harmonics K162
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 10:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
Two Step has really put a lot of work into representing w-space players at the CSM. More importantly, he sees the bigger picture, and pushes for things that aren't great only for us, but for Eve in general. Go Two Step! |
unimatrix0030
Viperfleet Inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 11:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Supporting this candidate for CSM!
|
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
72
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 12:35:00 -
[29] - Quote
Exhale. alliance supports this candidate. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
793
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 12:44:00 -
[30] - Quote
Thanks for all the support guys!
If you are in a wormhole corp and want to chat (or have me chat with your corp), please drop me an eve-mail. I'd love to talk about what people want CCP to focus on next. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
|
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1495
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 14:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
Two step wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Two Step was one of the hardest-working and most effective members of CSM6. He is a serious candidate who should be on any non-bloc voters "short list" of viable candidates. Thanks Trebor! Don't vote for me, vote for Trebor, he is awesome!
FYP! Re-Elect Trebor to the CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism!
My CSM Blog |
Kai DeathCutter
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 15:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
+1 Two Step for CSM |
Andrea Griffin
109
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 16:16:00 -
[33] - Quote
It is important to have a wormhole candidate, especially since some of the other CSM members this year were utterly unaware that high-end ore could be mined inside of them. It's in the minutes from last year, I forget which one, but I think you could hear the sound of my head hitting my desk from miles away. W-Space needs at least one representative that actually knows how they work - Two-Step does. Plus, he has previous experience as a CSM member. It's not you guys who need to repair what has been broken, it's us. CCP Wrangler |
Trigalisk
The Red Circle Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 18:48:00 -
[34] - Quote
Plus one for Two step :) |
Asayanami Dei
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
141
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 19:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
You have my (and ADHC's) support :) good luck and make us proud! ^^
My youtube channel Video Thread |
ApexJB
Purdue Engineering and Technology Talocan United
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 19:41:00 -
[36] - Quote
Two Step has all 3 of my votes. |
Lan Staz
Aperture Harmonics K162
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 20:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Confirming Two step is a really good guy. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
876
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 21:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
In honor of my CSM run, AHARM decided to kill something big. Go check eve-kill.net and look at that shiny Chimera... Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
72
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 22:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Two step wrote:In honor of my CSM run, AHARM decided to kill something big. Go check eve-kill.net and look at that shiny Chimera...
I hate you guys for that Chimera :/ |
Slaktoid
Aperture Harmonics K162
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 23:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
I hate them too, Chitsa, since they went and did this while I am at work!
All things aside, Two Step works very hard and would be an excellent rep for us W-Space inhabitats. Don't let the blocs take 100% control guys. Unite the clans! |
|
BlackJack 21
Aperture Harmonics K162
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 01:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
yep carrier killed in honour of two steps (fair play to the pilot as tbh we'd never have killed him if he wanted to sd MUCH respect for that )
as for two step great guy works really hard (maybe to hard we dont see him nearly enough in corp now) |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
681
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 01:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
I have to say it loudly - Two Step is a GOOD MAN. Seriously. The dude single-handedly ensured the elimination of CSM 'alts' because of his drive and dedication. I may have created wormholes, but this man lives the dream. o7 Josh Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
36
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 02:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
Haven't seriously tried WH pvp (living there) yet but have often thought about it. I know where the rest of my support is going I scam on my main |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
895
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 02:46:00 -
[44] - Quote
Added some endorsements from current and former CSM members in post #2 Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3897
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 06:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Two Step is /the/ wormhole candidate. He out-ranked most CSM6 mains in terms of effort.
ps: Get AHARM burn the Taggart Transdimensional hole to the ground, Objectivists are nauseating. If anyone can find and purge them, it's you guys.
pps: (i am completely serious, i hunger for their suffering) The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Nox Arnoux
Black Lion Brigade Tragedy.
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 09:00:00 -
[46] - Quote
+1 from fellow wormhole dweller. Good luck and please help us get Tech 3 assemble option in a PoS |
Lord Lewtz
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 10:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
I think I can say, Most of AQUILA INC will be voting for you.
And don't forget my damn damage window. I want that!
|
Elen A'kram
Aperture Harmonics K162
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 11:04:00 -
[48] - Quote
His avatar makes it look like he's got indigestion, but Two Step is one cool dude! He's got 'big-ups' from Mittens and Seleene, so what are you waiting for (apart from the polls to open)... get voting!
+1 from me.
PS If you live in a wormhole and DON'T vote Two Step for CSM 7, we'll come and invade you. |
roigon
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 12:04:00 -
[49] - Quote
As a WH resident you obviously already have my vote(s). But just for the sake of getting to know your views a bit better I'd like to pose some questions.
I think most (WH) people will agree that the WH mechanics as they are now are in a pretty good place, however, stagnation is death and at some point enhancements or changes will come. Besides POS improvements which we probably would all like, what do you feel would be a logical next step for wormholes in terms of new features or changes?
Secondly, W-space is interesting in that trough the C1-6 system it allows a place for any size corp to venture forth and stake their claim in the unknown without having to worry (too much) about getting their POS removed the very next day. Do you feel that this is right or that C1-3 holes are perhaps a little too safe from player interaction? |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 12:38:00 -
[50] - Quote
Thanks for running - I know a whole bunch of people voting for you (as am I).
I like it that smaller corps / groups get a place without cyno's, local and unpredictable travel. Never know who your going to meet in WH space!
What (if anything) could be improved in WH's?
I.E. :
When is any of the RP stuff going to be iterated on? Sansha is opening WH's everywhere. How's he doing it, and is it replicable? Anyone currently working on the "lore" of WH's?
Small corp oportunites in C1-4 (Homesteading?).
Sleeper buffs/nerfs? (I think it would be kewl to have a random % chance of jumping through a WH to find a coupel of sleeper frigates (in a C-1) guarding the WH, up to a couple BS's/Cruisers guarding Higher class wormholes). And make it random so you can't say "No sleepers here, must be someone found this already" - no free intel!
WH Generators for K-space (See Sansha Incursions).
A,B,C's in WH Space? Where and How Much? What is appropriate for each level?
Gases/Reactions/Drugs - WH's would seem to present perfect "smuggling" opportunites.
Other random questions:
Hi-Sec war-dec mechanics - This new expansion supposedly is called "WAR!" - is CCP involved in looking @ the (currently broken) war-dec mechanics?
Anti-Botting Mining - Random 'roid spawns, random event spawns, random belts?
Mining Buff: Lets face it, for new players Mining represents one "familiar" term/activity from other games. Right now it is more worthwhile to mine w/lasers (i.e. - npc's) - Is mining being looked at/iterated on?
Sorry - I'll stop here, I know your busy.
Again, thanks for running - we look forward to your next term as a full member of the CSM!
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
906
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:15:00 -
[51] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Two Step is /the/ wormhole candidate. He out-ranked most CSM6 mains in terms of effort.
ps: Get AHARM burn the Taggart Transdimensional hole to the ground, Objectivists are nauseating. If anyone can find and purge them, it's you guys.
pps: (i am completely serious, i hunger for their suffering)
We actually already did that, a few months ago. I guess it is time to find their home again... :) Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4020
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:19:00 -
[52] - Quote
The best kind of CSM favor trading is when someone ends up screaming and bleeding at the conclusion of it. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
906
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
roigon wrote:As a WH resident you obviously already have my vote(s). But just for the sake of getting to know your views a bit better I'd like to pose some questions.
I think most (WH) people will agree that the WH mechanics as they are now are in a pretty good place, however, stagnation is death and at some point enhancements or changes will come. Besides POS improvements which we probably would all like, what do you feel would be a logical next step for wormholes in terms of new features or changes?
Secondly, W-space is interesting in that trough the C1-6 system it allows a place for any size corp to venture forth and stake their claim in the unknown without having to worry (too much) about getting their POS removed the very next day. Do you feel that this is right or that C1-3 holes are perhaps a little too safe from player interaction?
For new features, I would love to see CCP add new sites with every expansion. I would also like to see more wormhole connections. Give C4s or C5s dual statics. Our wormhole map too often is a straight line.
I would also love to see Class 7 wormholes, perhaps with interesting mechanics like no moons.
The tier 3 BCs help make C1s a little more vulnerable, but yeah, I am concerned by the relative safety of some of the lower class wormholes. I would have preferred CCP restrict POS size in lower class wormholes, as a large ECM faction POS is awfully safe in a C1 right now. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Oxandrolone
Bite me inc. Exhale.
17
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
Considering voteing for you, we do need a wormhole candidate of some kind. Are you going to push for a change in the self distruct mechanic?
Not being able to s/d within a pos shield would cause alot more fights. Also i think when you self distruct it should turn off all your active mods, its incredibly anoying to watch cap ships self distruct over and over again because you cant drain them of cap and dps them down within 2 minutes. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
909
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:32:00 -
[55] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Thanks for running - I know a whole bunch of people voting for you (as am I).
I like it that smaller corps / groups get a place without cyno's, local and unpredictable travel. Never know who your going to meet in WH space!
What (if anything) could be improved in WH's?
When is any of the RP stuff going to be iterated on? Sansha is opening WH's everywhere. How's he doing it, and is it replicable? Anyone currently working on the "lore" of WH's?
Yes, see the Arek'Jaalan Project on the eve wiki (can't link there because this forum sucks)
Small corp oportunites in C1-4 (Homesteading?).
Is there an issue here? Small corps are already living pretty successfully in C1-C4s.
Sleeper buffs/nerfs? (I think it would be kewl to have a random % chance of jumping through a WH to find a coupel of sleeper frigates (in a C-1) guarding the WH, up to a couple BS's/Cruisers guarding Higher class wormholes). And make it random so you can't say "No sleepers here, must be someone found this already" - no free intel!
Sure, I'd love to see a little more randomness and change from the Sleepers.
WH Generators for K-space (See Sansha Incursions).
These actually already exist, there is a sov upgrade that nobody uses that generates wormholes.
A,B,C's in WH Space? Where and How Much? What is appropriate for each level?
When we saw the actual numbers for amount mined from w-space, this turned out to not be a big issue. I think in general grav sites should scale just like other sites, with better sites only found in higher class wormholes.
Gases/Reactions/Drugs - WH's would seem to present perfect "smuggling" opportunites.
AHARM makes drugs in our wormhole... :)
Hi-Sec war-dec mechanics - This new expansion supposedly is called "WAR!" - is CCP involved in looking @ the (currently broken) war-dec mechanics?
Yes.
Anti-Botting Mining - Random 'roid spawns, random event spawns, random belts?
Would be good, but first "gun mining" needs to be eliminated.
Mining Buff: Lets face it, for new players Mining represents one "familiar" term/activity from other games. Right now it is more worthwhile to mine w/lasers (i.e. - npc's) - Is mining being looked at/iterated on?
If you check the last CSM minutes, you can see that we discussed removing drone mineral drops. All of the current CSM pretty much agree that you need to remove "gun mining" before you can make mining a viable profession again.
Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
909
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:34:00 -
[56] - Quote
Oxandrolone wrote:Considering voteing for you, we do need a wormhole candidate of some kind. Are you going to push for a change in the self distruct mechanic?
Not being able to s/d within a pos shield would cause alot more fights. Also i think when you self distruct it should turn off all your active mods, its incredibly anoying to watch cap ships self distruct over and over again because you cant drain them of cap and dps them down within 2 minutes.
I agree that SDing within a POS shield should not be allowed. I would love to see longer SD timers for cap ships. I have also proposed to CCP that activating SD locks all your racks on overheating, which would burn out the mods before you go down. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
666
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:36:00 -
[57] - Quote
Two Step did an incredible amount of work and takes the CSM seriously. I absolutely endorse Two Step for CSM and strongly encourage you to give his candidacy a look. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
915
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 14:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Two Step did an incredible amount of work and takes the CSM seriously. I absolutely endorse Two Step for CSM and strongly encourage you to give his candidacy a look.
Thanks for the kind words! If you were running again, I would encourage nullseccers of any alliance to vote for you. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 15:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
Two step wrote:Oxandrolone wrote:Considering voteing for you, we do need a wormhole candidate of some kind. Are you going to push for a change in the self distruct mechanic?
Not being able to s/d within a pos shield would cause alot more fights. Also i think when you self distruct it should turn off all your active mods, its incredibly anoying to watch cap ships self distruct over and over again because you cant drain them of cap and dps them down within 2 minutes. I agree that SDing within a POS shield should not be allowed. I would love to see longer SD timers for cap ships. I have also proposed to CCP that activating SD locks all your racks on overheating, which would burn out the mods before you go down.
My alliance feels very strongly about this as we are not only wspace residents but mercs as well. No SD in POS shields would make system invasions way more fun. |
Andree LT
High Intellion Exhale.
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 15:56:00 -
[60] - Quote
We are with u! Hold on:)
And stop that self destructing **** in pos!!!!! :)
Comunity of WHs is with u!!!
Thanx for corp Bookmarks. |
|
Jensk
The Red Circle Inc.
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 17:06:00 -
[61] - Quote
Dropping by to say hi and show my support for the ******* that podded me back in November.
o7 |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
175
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 17:11:00 -
[62] - Quote
Thanks for the fast anwers, let me clarify, as I posted in a hurry:
Two step wrote: (WRT small corp/homesteading in wh's) Is there an issue here? Small corps are already living pretty successfully in C1-C4s.
Last year there was some talk about "farms and fields" for null-sec, with a thread on "homesteading" - has anything happend with that, or has it fallen off the radar and, are there any plans/ideas towards the "farms and fields" ideas spreading to WH space?
Two step wrote:WH Generators for K-space (See Sansha Incursions).
These actually already exist, there is a sov upgrade that nobody uses that generates wormholes. Ahh, sorry I wasn't clearer. I meant specifically *not* the sov upgrade (I doubt sansha has sov in any empire space) but rather, how is the Wormhole generated for Sansha's? Specifically, is there a "wormhole generator" (not upgrade) that is going to be commonly availiable? I.E. - Wormhole/s on demand, so to speak?
Sorry I wasn't clearer!
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
926
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 17:18:00 -
[63] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Thanks for the fast anwers, let me clarify, as I posted in a hurry: Last year there was some talk about "farms and fields" for null-sec, with a thread on "homesteading" - has anything happend with that, or has it fallen off the radar and, are there any plans/ideas towards the "farms and fields" ideas spreading to WH space?
We actually haven't heard much about farms and fields ideas recently. I will point out that POCOs are a big step in the right direction, and are a great source of fights in w-space as well as k-space.
Asuri Kinnes wrote: Ahh, sorry I wasn't clearer. I meant specifically *not* the sov upgrade (I doubt sansha has sov in any empire space) but rather, how is the Wormhole generated for Sansha's? Specifically, is there a "wormhole generator" (not upgrade) that is going to be commonly availiable? I.E. - Wormhole/s on demand, so to speak?
Sorry I wasn't clearer!
I haven't heard any proposals for something like this, but am not opposed to the idea, depending on the specifics.
Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
68
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 19:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
I'm a wormhole inhabitant and I support Two Steps! |
Rahkashi
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 21:28:00 -
[65] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Two step wrote:Oxandrolone wrote:Considering voteing for you, we do need a wormhole candidate of some kind. Are you going to push for a change in the self distruct mechanic?
Not being able to s/d within a pos shield would cause alot more fights. Also i think when you self distruct it should turn off all your active mods, its incredibly anoying to watch cap ships self distruct over and over again because you cant drain them of cap and dps them down within 2 minutes. I agree that SDing within a POS shield should not be allowed. I would love to see longer SD timers for cap ships. I have also proposed to CCP that activating SD locks all your racks on overheating, which would burn out the mods before you go down. My alliance feels very strongly about this as we are not only wspace residents but mercs as well. No SD in POS shields would make system invasions way more fun.
No SD'ing in POS shields, and SD'ing still generates a killmail if aggressed pehaps? |
Shin'alor
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
W-space has your back, Two Step. I'll do what I can to pass this link around as much as I can. |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
207
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:35:00 -
[67] - Quote
One of my Corpies wrote:
Quote:1. Cant SD inside a POS 2. SD while aggressed provides last hitter with killmail 3. SD timer scales with ship size 4. ??? 5. Profit!
Pretty much sums up our POV!
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
966
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
Rahkashi wrote: No SD'ing in POS shields, and SD'ing still generates a killmail if aggressed pehaps?
I would be OK with those changes. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Alexx Luther
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:38:00 -
[69] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:One of my Corpies wrote: Quote:1. Cant SD inside a POS 2. SD while aggressed provides last hitter with killmail 3. SD timer scales with ship size 4. ??? 5. Profit!
Pretty much sums up our POV!
^This^
+1 on voting Two Steps, I suggest all wh dwellers should anchor cans in every wh they visit for some promotion for the only person that will defend our interests |
Oxandrolone
Bite me inc. Exhale.
17
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 22:39:00 -
[70] - Quote
Two step wrote: I agree that SDing within a POS shield should not be allowed. I would love to see longer SD timers for cap ships. I have also proposed to CCP that activating SD locks all your racks on overheating, which would burn out the mods before you go down.
grats you win 5 votes from me :D
|
|
Pocurk
Bite me inc. Exhale.
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 23:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Having flown with and against Twostep, i have nothing but good to say about him, and his time in the csm thinghy...
Good to see you running again Twostep - youll have my vote again this year.
As mentionend i would also like to see selfdestructing dealt with. It might fly round and hit me in the face, but....
-If agressed when SD'ing, produce a mail, -drop loot if agressed during SD
-Corp BM's are Yay!, but....if severeal corps share the same hole, youll still need a can...and thats bad mmmkay ?
- New content in wh's......if so make it different please, and make it hard !- not just more of the same. And maybe something more than just making eviction easier. More content, more players, more pew pew is how i think...
Im sure youll do all you can to get your ideas acros, and im sure ill like them - or learn to like them :)
Best of luck !
Pocurk |
Lups
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
7
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 07:54:00 -
[72] - Quote
u shall have my vote(s)
keep up the good work pal and see u on space o/ |
Lunataria
Blackstar Privateer Consortium Sovereign Technologies
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 10:07:00 -
[73] - Quote
Can't see how any wormhole dweller could not vote for you, you definetly have my votes. |
Llauron
Aperture Harmonics K162
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Two Step is a great guy who always is willing to go the extra mile. He is a huge asset to corp, and that's why you should NOT vote for him.
He has been spending too much time improving the game for us all with the CSM, and not enough time getting his archons blown up with us! Free Two Step!
I'm only joking of course. Please DO vote for him :).
He is THE wormhole candidate, but he will never forget the bigger picture.
|
Brot
Clann Fian Narwhals Ate My Duck
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 16:29:00 -
[75] - Quote
+1 for Two-Step. |
CaldariCitizen 3924833
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:26:00 -
[76] - Quote
Proven to do great work in the past, we can only imagine what wonders he will bring for us in the future.
Vote Two-Step |
Bingo Deux
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:37:00 -
[77] - Quote
WHFTW |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
68
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 03:38:00 -
[78] - Quote
I'll make sure to leave cans in the wormholes I visit and I'll do my best to convince people to vote for you.
In the meanwhile, better keep this thread on the first page. |
Pink Marshmellow
Abyssal Heavy Industries Narwhals Ate My Duck
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 05:44:00 -
[79] - Quote
With the last nullsec members wanting to remove ABC ores from wormholes and proposing wormhole stabilizers, we need a strong wormhole candidate who will protect our space from people who have no idea how wormholes work and want to turn wormhole space into another nullsec k-space.
My vote is for Two-step.
|
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
371
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 05:59:00 -
[80] - Quote
Two Step is a great asset on CSM 6, look forward to seeing him in CSM 7 |
|
czMulti
Posthuman Society
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 09:01:00 -
[81] - Quote
If you live in wh and love it as much as we do, you gotta vote for Two Step.
Posthuman Society votes Two Step! |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
If you use w-space and don't vote for Two Step with his caring attitude and proven record, you are terrible and I want you to suffer
I think his supporters might join me in collecting your corpse
The Mittani wrote:Two Step is /the/ wormhole candidate. He out-ranked most CSM6 mains in terms of effort.
ps: Get AHARM burn the Taggart Transdimensional hole to the ground, Objectivists are nauseating. If anyone can find and purge them, it's you guys.
pps: (i am completely serious, i hunger for their suffering)
Your Majesty, if they irk you that much, DUCK can do much more than enforce their eviction. |
corbexx
Aperture Harmonics K162
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 16:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
really hard working guy.
gl two step
hoping to see alot of "vote for two step" cans in wh space over the next free weeks |
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
573
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 23:06:00 -
[84] - Quote
Two-Step and I both worked to defend wormhole improvements. Despite the limitations of being an alternate, Two Step managed to communicate effectively and lent his voice to things of importance for the wormhole population. He also performed well when he had to step up and join meetings in Iceland.
I can't tell you "vote for him" since I'd rather you vote for me, but if you're a wormhole dweller, check his candidacy out if it's just one of two you check. Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
Captain S04p
Abyssal Heavy Industries Narwhals Ate My Duck
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 00:16:00 -
[85] - Quote
You have Narwhals Ate My Duck's Vote! |
Kwashi
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 09:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
Corp Bookmarks: greatest game improvement in years. Vote this man in again.
Next year get them to fix POS management ! |
Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
199
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 12:22:00 -
[87] - Quote
While I will vote for you as my interest group representative (and one with proven track record, thanks for CSM6!), I'd hope to read more of your ideas about the non-wh part of EVE.
What do you consider important issues for CSM7 and for EVE in general, outside our wonderful unknown space? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1086
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 12:31:00 -
[88] - Quote
Roime wrote:While I will vote for you as my interest group representative (and one with proven track record, thanks for CSM6!), I'd hope to read more of your ideas about the non-wh part of EVE.
What do you consider important issues for CSM7 and for EVE in general, outside our wonderful unknown space?
I think improving 0.0 space is a continuing issue, and one that needs to be addressed by CCP very soon. I think the difference in risk between lowsec and highsec is too big, and there needs to be a more gradual increase in risk. I also think Titans need to not be able to hit much smaller ships, or at least to have their damage reduced when they do hit them (the same applies to sieged dreads, which is a w-space issue as well). I'd like to see continued ship balance improvements, including Black Ops ships, command ships, lower tier t1 frigs and cruisers and EAFs.
CCP is also working on some of the issues already, like wardec mechanics and client-side optimization. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
199
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 13:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
Thanks for the reply!
Looks good, I agree on all things- except the hisec/lowsec part sounds unfamiliar to me. While my personal opinion is that lowsec is a victim of a false mental image and is not very dangerous at all, how would you balance those risk levels out? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1087
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 13:46:00 -
[90] - Quote
Roime wrote:Thanks for the reply!
Looks good, I agree on all things- except the hisec/lowsec part sounds unfamiliar to me. While my personal opinion is that lowsec is a victim of a false mental image and is not very dangerous at all, how would you balance those risk levels out?
I'm not sure, and I don't think the CSM's role is to play Junior Game Designer. I do know there are a lot of people in highsec who venture into lowsec once and get popped on the entrance gate, and never go back. The difference between 0.5 and 0.4 security space is huge, which doesn't seem right to me. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2053
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 13:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
Wormswarm, the kings of wormholes, support Two Step. Wormswarm's votes are called for, but Wormswarm encourages all other wormhole dwellers to vote for Two Step. yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
139
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 13:59:00 -
[92] - Quote
Sure, it is vital that we have a Wormhole representative on the CSM but i won't vote for anyone unless i know their goal and opinions. I know it's not the job of the CSM to design the game but it would help my voting process if you could answer the following:
1. Why do you prefer wormhole space to known space? 2. Why do you feel it's important that residence of C1 wormholes are more easily evicted given the relatively low value of a c1 hole? 3. What's you opinion on a ship/mod that has the ability to hold a WH open past its life or mas allowance (not jumpable mass)? 4. How would you like to see T3 ships expand on? i.e. new ship types t3 mods etc. 5. What UI (D-scan. overview stats) improvements would you make? 6. Where do you stand on WIS/CQ? do you think it should be expanded on or left to die? if the former, how could it be implemented in WH space? 7. Finally, PVP aside, if you could make one change/addition to WH space content or mechanics, what would it be?
Rek |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1088
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 14:18:00 -
[93] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Sure, it is vital that we have a Wormhole representative on the CSM but i won't vote for anyone unless i know their goal and opinions. I know it's not the job of the CSM to design the game but it would help my voting process if you could answer the following:
1. Why do you prefer wormhole space to known space? 2. Why do you feel it's important that residence of C1 wormholes are more easily evicted given the relatively low value of a c1 hole? 3. What's you opinion on a ship/mod that has the ability to hold a WH open past its life or mas allowance (not jumpable mass)? 4. How would you like to see T3 ships expand on? i.e. new ship types t3 mods etc. 5. What UI (D-scan. overview stats) improvements would you make? 6. Where do you stand on WIS/CQ? do you think it should be expanded on or left to die? if the former, how could it be implemented in WH space? 7. Finally, PVP aside, if you could make one change/addition to WH space content or mechanics, what would it be?
Rek
Many of these are answered on my blog - http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com
I will answer them here again though.
1. I am in w-space to get the sort of small-medium size PVP that you can no longer get anywhere else in EVE. I also love the dynamic nature of wormholes, and the lack of instant intel from local chat. 2. Because not all C1 wormholes are low value. Some have good PI, some have lots of moons that are being used as T2 component reaction farms, etc. This is not as big an issue now that we have the Tier 3 BCs though. 3. I address this in a lot of detail on my blog, but I am not a fan of mass modifications. Extending the time of a wormhole would potentially be OK, though it would make some invasions a lot easier. I'd have to see exact details to know how I would feel. 4. To start with, I would like to see the bad subsystems balanced. For nearly every subsystem slot, there are one or more subsystems that are basically never used. I'd like to see that fixed. Past that, I would be OK with T3 Battleships, though perhaps with fewer available subsystem slots. I don't think there is room for T3 frigates, given the great number of existing frigate types and the lack of roles for them. 5. I'd like to see the existing overview bugs fixed before the UI is improved. After that is done, improvements to the watch list and broadcast system are pretty high up on my personal list. I think the ability to display which ships are in optimal range of your weapons would be a nice improvement to the overview, especially for newer players. 6. In general, I am not a fan of WiS. I haven't seen any actual *game play* ideas presented for why I would want to wander around. Until I see those, I don't see a reason for CCP to spend any time or effort on it. Of course, if it did have fun and compelling game content, I would want to see it extended to w-space, perhaps via a POS that you were able to dock in. 7. A small change I would make is to randomize the triggers for new spawns in wormhole sites. Doing PVE in w-space is far too easy and predictable right now, and that is a bad thing. Larger change would be either Class 7 wormholes with harder PVE content or more statics in C4 or C5 wormholes. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
tewkz
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
29
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 14:43:00 -
[94] - Quote
I approve of this product and/or service. I can't think of 6 candidates better than you, you obviously deserve a seat.
E: the fact that you put in so much tireless effort for non wh related things as a K162 candidate is astounding. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
140
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 14:56:00 -
[95] - Quote
Thanks for the swift reply, i will give your blog a read.
For the most we seem to hold the save views on WH and i like your idea of randomising sleeper triggers. This coupled with the idea that sleepers could start to roam WH space (camp WH's attack POS's) would make things more exiting.
However i'm surprised that you haven't given much thought to new T3 ships and their roles... personally i think a T3 industrial ship would be an awesome addition and help to get more industrialists out of HS.
It saddens me that we don't appear to have anyone on the CSM who is pro WiS because it was the thing that got me interested in EVE and if you look back on its development, you'll note that we were told about gameplay features but sadly CCP didn't deliver. IMO, we need to have some new features instead of just polishing and nerfing/buffing existing things.
That said, you have my vote(s) and i'll tell my friends to do the same.
Good luck |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1090
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 15:32:00 -
[96] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Thanks for the swift reply, i will give your blog a read.
For the most we seem to hold the save views on WH and i like your idea of randomising sleeper triggers. This coupled with the idea that sleepers could start to roam WH space (camp WH's attack POS's) would make things more exiting.
However i'm surprised that you haven't given much thought to new T3 ships and their roles... personally i think a T3 industrial ship would be an awesome addition and help to get more industrialists out of HS.
It saddens me that we don't appear to have anyone on the CSM who is pro WiS because it was the thing that got me interested in EVE and if you look back on its development, you'll note that we were told about gameplay features but sadly CCP didn't deliver. IMO, we need to have some new features instead of just polishing and nerfing/buffing existing things.
That said, you have my vote(s) and i'll tell my friends to do the same.
Good luck
I disagree about WiS. The only game play features we were told about was the minigame (Slay), and possibly some sort of thing related to boosters. Those aren't compelling reasons to want to devote so much time and effort into WiS. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Hathrul
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
45
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 16:43:00 -
[97] - Quote
confirming i will use all my accounts to vote for Two step, as will my corp. If you live in wormhole space, there are no other options to vote for
how about SD jam modules? usually you know in what kinda fight people will attempt an SD. and i can see some ships that would have a mid slot free'd easily for such a module |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1097
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 17:32:00 -
[98] - Quote
Hathrul wrote:confirming i will use all my accounts to vote for Two step, as will my corp. If you live in wormhole space, there are no other options to vote for
how about SD jam modules? usually you know in what kinda fight people will attempt an SD. and i can see some ships that would have a mid slot free'd easily for such a module
I'd rather just see SD fixed (give killmails, no SD in POS shields, longer SD times for capitals). Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Jasp3r
Inter Arma Dead On Arrival Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 18:18:00 -
[99] - Quote
A definite vote from me, we need permanent wormhole representation. |
Hathrul
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
47
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 18:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
Two step wrote:Hathrul wrote:confirming i will use all my accounts to vote for Two step, as will my corp. If you live in wormhole space, there are no other options to vote for
how about SD jam modules? usually you know in what kinda fight people will attempt an SD. and i can see some ships that would have a mid slot free'd easily for such a module I'd rather just see SD fixed (give killmails, no SD in POS shields, longer SD times for capitals).
yea, was just a wild idea. making more modules isnt a good idea really
|
|
Elen A'kram
Aperture Harmonics K162
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 21:17:00 -
[101] - Quote
Two step is the only sensible option to ensure your wormhole improvements happen...
And if he gets elected I'll see if I can poke him enough to get the 5th subsystem for t3 strategic cruisers (finally!).
|
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
70
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 21:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
I have a few Industrial issues related to wormholes. I know it's not you're expertise, but I'd like to know your opinion.
-POS refineries; these are horrible. They take too much POS grid and cpu and have a bad output (and they also take forever to reprocess minerals). My corporation lives in a C2 wormhole and we like to do different things depending on the day. Mining might not be the most appealing occupation, but it's relaxing and it helps us provide minerals for our assembly arrays. The problem is that we have to haul everything outside and then back in. Would you change the Refinery arrays?
-Transport ships; Transport Ships and Iteron V are the optimal option for transporting goods in and out of wormholes (the orca tends to collapse wormhole) - the size of regular ship is somewhat limited though. Would you be opposed to the creation of a Transport ship that has more cargo?
-Ice Gravimetrics; You've answered this to me before by stating CCP's opinion on this, but I'd like to know if you'd like to see Ice Gravimetrics inside wormholes - or do you agree with CCP that Ice is necessary to make us leave our wormholes now and then? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1110
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 21:32:00 -
[103] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:I have a few Industrial issues related to wormholes. I know it's not you're expertise, but I'd like to know your opinion.
-POS refineries; these are horrible. They take too much POS grid and cpu and have a bad output (and they also take forever to reprocess minerals). My corporation lives in a C2 wormhole and we like to do different things depending on the day. Mining might not be the most appealing occupation, but it's relaxing and it helps us provide minerals for our assembly arrays. The problem is that we have to haul everything outside and then back in. Would you change the Refinery arrays?
-Transport ships; Transport Ships and Iteron V are the optimal option for transporting goods in and out of wormholes (the orca tends to collapse wormhole) - the size of regular ship is somewhat limited though. Would you be opposed to the creation of a Transport ship that has more cargo?
-Ice Gravimetrics; You've answered this to me before by stating CCP's opinion on this, but I'd like to know if you'd like to see Ice Gravimetrics inside wormholes - or do you agree with CCP that Ice is necessary to make us leave our wormholes now and then?
Refineries are tough, because you don't want to make them better than outposts in nullsec. I would be behind lowering their cycle time, and perhaps CPU and grid (though this seems like less of an issue with the fuel blocks now), but I think making them more efficient would probably be a bad idea. One solution might be to make wormhole-only refineries that are better, but that might be a lot of dev effort.
Transport ships - I don't see a problem with their current sizes. My impel can haul 38K m3, that seems like a rather lot. There is perhaps some room between transport ships and Orcas for something that is maybe just below battleship mass but can haul 100K m3 or so. Given that CCP is now making new ships and stuff, I will suggest something like this.
Ice in wormholes - I do think it is important that wormholes are not self sufficient. People hauling stuff is often the start of some good fights, and I wouldn't want to see that removed. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
RectumRanger
Sparkly Rectums Chained Reactions
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 03:14:00 -
[104] - Quote
Good luck Two Step, you have my vote.
I would also like the see a change to refineries because of the problems mentioned above. |
Bei ArtJay
The Galactic Collective Sovereign Technologies
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 10:44:00 -
[105] - Quote
+ 1 like for someone who clearly cares about the game for all and not their own interests. Not enough of you around.
Quick couple of questions that spring to mind that I would like your opinion on:
With regards to your discussion on wh-stabilisers on your blog. I agree with you that wormhole systems are entirely possible to invade and are by no means safe, particularly with pre-inserting dreadnoughts into C5&6 wormholes. However for C4 and under, the only realistic method of taking out well defended systems is to bring in a huge blob of battleships. As with all w-space combat, keeping fleets under the number of around 20-30 pilots is ideal. Do you have any proposals to make things less safe for corps who have good populations, numerous POS and capitals in lower class systems? I heard somewhere the idea of having T3 battleships that are able to use siege mods, or removing the ability to anchor capital building arrays in C1-4?
I really like your idea of C4+C5 wh's having dual statics, and would like to expand on that by asking if you think C1's and C3's should also? |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
146
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 11:26:00 -
[106] - Quote
Please get CCP to allow us to change clones in WH space. If you have a rorqual in system you should be able to fly up to it and swap to a different clone. |
Eveess
Chemikals Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 11:35:00 -
[107] - Quote
Rahkashi wrote:Chitsa Jason wrote:Two step wrote:Oxandrolone wrote:Considering voteing for you, we do need a wormhole candidate of some kind. Are you going to push for a change in the self distruct mechanic?
Not being able to s/d within a pos shield would cause alot more fights. Also i think when you self distruct it should turn off all your active mods, its incredibly anoying to watch cap ships self distruct over and over again because you cant drain them of cap and dps them down within 2 minutes. I agree that SDing within a POS shield should not be allowed. I would love to see longer SD timers for cap ships. I have also proposed to CCP that activating SD locks all your racks on overheating, which would burn out the mods before you go down. My alliance feels very strongly about this as we are not only wspace residents but mercs as well. No SD in POS shields would make system invasions way more fun. No SD'ing in POS shields, and SD'ing still generates a killmail if aggressed pehaps?
+1 for this statement we need to sort sding caps in wh it makes it to easy for these bears to save face 3 votes from me two step keep up the good work |
corbexx
Aperture Harmonics K162
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 12:18:00 -
[108] - Quote
i like the idea of sd giving kill mails and who ever the pilot is shoudl appear on the mail with the remaining about of damge left on the ship.
i'd love sd in pos's shopped but alteast wiith idea above you could see just how much people lost |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1143
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:23:00 -
[109] - Quote
Bei ArtJay wrote:+ 1 like for someone who clearly cares about the game for all and not their own interests. Not enough of you around.
Quick couple of questions that spring to mind that I would like your opinion on:
With regards to your discussion on wh-stabilisers on your blog. I agree with you that wormhole systems are entirely possible to invade and are by no means safe, particularly with pre-inserting dreadnoughts into C5&6 wormholes. However for C4 and under, the only realistic method of taking out well defended systems is to bring in a huge blob of battleships or drakes. As with all w-space combat, keeping fleets under the number of around 20-30 pilots is ideal. Do you have any proposals to make things less safe for corps who have good populations, numerous POS and capitals in lower class systems? I heard somewhere the idea of having T3 battleships that are able to use siege mods, or removing the ability to anchor capital building arrays in C1-4?
I really like your idea of C4+C5 wh's having dual statics, and would like to expand on that by asking if you think C1's and C3's should also?
Thanks for your support.
My original request was for Tech 2, Tier 2 Battlecruisers that could fit a single XL gun/launcher, plus a siege mod. That way, you have an anti-supercap ship as well as a good POS shooter. I would still like to see this.
I don't think everything should have dual statics, just one more class of wormhole, otherwise the wormhole map would grow way too large. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1143
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:25:00 -
[110] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Please get CCP to allow us to change clones in WH space. If you have a rorqual in system you should be able to fly up to it and swap to a different clone.
If you read the December minutes, you will see that it was requested to make a new POS mod that would let you store and swap clones (not jumpclone to it, but store clones in it). If that happens, I would imagine that Rorqs should allow the same thing. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
149
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:11:00 -
[111] - Quote
That's good to hear. I read you blog btw... Good stuff. i agree with everything you said. The last thing we need is big alliances controlling WH's. I would have quit this game a long time ago if it wasn't for WH space |
naed21
The Dark Space Initiative Revival Of The Talocan Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 16:53:00 -
[112] - Quote
As a resident of WH space, I'm putting all of my hopes and dreams into you Two Step. You have my vote, and I'm sure most of my corp feel the same as I do. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1155
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 17:17:00 -
[113] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:That's good to hear. I read you blog btw... Good stuff. i agree with everything you said. The last thing we need is big alliances controlling WH's. I would have quit this game a long time ago if it wasn't for WH space
I probably would have quit as well, so I will do my very best to defend the wormhole way of life. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 20:37:00 -
[114] - Quote
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1167
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 21:39:00 -
[115] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
I spent a few hours discussing this exact proposal with CCP and other CSMs on Skype. I support it, and I urged CCP to implement similar mechanics. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 21:42:00 -
[116] - Quote
Two step wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting I spent a few hours discussing this exact proposal with CCP and other CSMs on Skype. I support it, and I urged CCP to implement similar mechanics.
ty Two Step, quoted in linked thread
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
Psihius
Anarchist Dawn U N K N O W N
17
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 22:44:00 -
[117] - Quote
I agree with the pilot, who posted about the refineries. The difference in my opinion is that they do not have to be better - I'm personally quite fine with 75% (maybe it can get a little boost - if the pilot has all affecting skills at level 5 - it gives an additional boost of +5-7-10%. But that's just maybe). What is really messing up attempts to refine any useful amount of ore is the cycle time and the amount of resources it takes - you have to seriously compromise your defence buy switching off not only ship bays and resists, but even turrets. You can't leave your pos in that state and go to sleep. And it's frustrating that you have to reload it every two hours. If you don't have people from different timezones - max what you can get out is 2 runs of ore refining per day (i'm talking about the guys and girls that actually have a work and a real life. In my alliance that is the case and people can't devote to EVE more that 2-3 hours at a time and not every day. Such schedule is seriously screwing any plans on using refineries - we had to dump them at this moment). |
Hathrul
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
48
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 23:03:00 -
[118] - Quote
Bei ArtJay wrote:However for C4 and under, the only realistic method of taking out well defended systems is to bring in a huge blob of battleships or drakes. As with all w-space combat, keeping fleets under the number of around 20-30 pilots is ideal.
youre wrong
a well defended c4 or lower:
take a t3 fleet, this can be any size since those ships are tiny. get in, get wh control. bring 1 or 2 battleships, or even an orca to collapse the static, find new one, get control, bring in tower. bring in the battleships. job done |
Jaiimez Skor
Exanimo Inc Psychotic Tendencies.
21
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 23:40:00 -
[119] - Quote
This is something that concerns me, and please correct me if I have got this wrong, given what I know of the AHARM story in Nova with Rook's and King's has come from friends within RnK and the Clarion Call video's the facts I have may be totally wrong or biased, but your alliance knowingly took advantage of an exploit in the game mechanics to make yourselves virtually untouchable.
As I said, assuming the information I have been given is correct and the story is as i've been told, why should I vote for you, you as well as the other members of AHARM stood by and actively exploited a flaw in the game mechanics, my issue is why would I want to vote for a candidate that actively stands by and encourages exploiting bugs, instead of owning up and telling CCP of these issues.
As I said if any of the information I have about the story is false and I have misunderstood AHARM's side of the story then please feel free to correct me and show me proof that I have misunderstood, as a newbie to wormholes and yet loving it on my alts, I would love to see a representative on the CSM to ensure wormholes receive love, I just don't want that person to be someone who knowingly partakes in exploiting the game.
note: I do not intend to start any kind of argument nor any kind of fighting on this thread, it is a valid concern of mine I would like answered so please do not take it as attempting to provoke a fight. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1172
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 23:46:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jaiimez Skor wrote:This is something that concerns me, and please correct me if I have got this wrong, given what I know of the AHARM story in Nova with Rook's and King's has come from friends within RnK and the Clarion Call video's the facts I have may be totally wrong or biased, but your alliance knowingly took advantage of an exploit in the game mechanics to make yourselves virtually untouchable.
As I said, assuming the information I have been given is correct and the story is as i've been told, why should I vote for you, you as well as the other members of AHARM stood by and actively exploited a flaw in the game mechanics, my issue is why would I want to vote for a candidate that actively stands by and encourages exploiting bugs, instead of owning up and telling CCP of these issues.
As I said if any of the information I have about the story is false and I have misunderstood AHARM's side of the story then please feel free to correct me and show me proof that I have misunderstood, as a newbie to wormholes and yet loving it on my alts, I would love to see a representative on the CSM to ensure wormholes receive love, I just don't want that person to be someone who knowingly partakes in exploiting the game.
note: I do not intend to start any kind of argument nor any kind of fighting on this thread, it is a valid concern of mine I would like answered so please do not take it as attempting to provoke a fight.
It is certainly a legitimate question, and one that I was asked a lot last year when I ran. I actually wrote a blog post explaining my side of the story, which you can read at http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html
Basically, the story is a little more complicated than what R&K says in Clarion Call. I certainly bear some responsibility for AHARM's use of the exploit, but I think CCP (and some other current and former AHARM members) bear some as well.
If you still have questions or concerns after reading the blog post, feel free to ask them here, or to eve mail or convo me directly. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Kast Agnet
The Nexus 7's Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 00:18:00 -
[121] - Quote
Two step wrote:Secondly, the talk about the wormhole stabilizer ( My blog post on the topic) just goes to prove that folks who live in w-space cannot see having a CSM rep as just a nice to have, but it is an absolute requirement. Without someone to speak up, CCP and other CSMs might ruin everything we have all worked so long and hard for.
You have my vote assured on this point primarily. With the CSM dominated by Null Sec corps and alliances it is not hard to work out the motives for those on the CSM in favor of this move as it will open the doors to a ridiculous amount of Null Sec invasions into higher class WH's as well as causing ridiculous problems to lower class WH residents as well. In my honest opinion we have to reelect Two Step as a WH voice in the dark and representative of the WH dwellers.
Good luck to you.
|
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 07:41:00 -
[122] - Quote
A few months ago I was all set to vote for Mittens again, but I joined a worm hole corp and found my place in Eve. All the fun of null sec but without all the political baggage and BS that comes with it, along with a lot of fun small scale PVP. I probably would have voted for His Goonness anyway but then someone on the CSM mentioned some sort of new ship or modual that could hold a worm hole open long after it would normally collapse to allow more ships to come through. The blob would be coming to W-space.
*sigh*
So now all three of my active accounts will be voting for you Two Step, and I'll be actively campaigning for you in my alliance (and it looks like Rek Seven will be as well).
If the blob comes to W-space I'll sell all my characters and look for another game...
Now for a humble suggestion: CCP has been talking about re-writing POS code. I'd like to be able to dock in a POS and see the same kind of environment that I see in a station (See all my ships and mods and be able to change fittings, maybe even have a jump clone in there). I know that CCP didn't intend for W-space to be colonized, but the simple fact remains that a lot of people live in it. The current POS mechanics make even the most mundane tasks a total PITA and it's long overdue for an overhaul.
Good luck with your run for CSM and if you see me in W-space don't hesitate to shoot me in the face -I know I won't think twice about cycling my guns
Fly it like you stole it Just like there is no I in Team there is no Fair in Eve... |
Remulon McNab
The Galactic Collective Sovereign Technologies
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:19:00 -
[123] - Quote
In the light of POS changes and wormhole space I'd love to see your opinion
on the following game suggestion: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=433522#post433522 got #tweetfleet? Follow @ZeroNRG |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5083
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
Dorn Val wrote:A few months ago I was all set to vote for Mittens again, but I joined a worm hole corp and found my place in Eve. All the fun of null sec but without all the political baggage and BS that comes with it, along with a lot of fun small scale PVP. I probably would have voted for His Goonness anyway but then someone on the CSM mentioned some sort of new ship or modual that could hold a worm hole open long after it would normally collapse to allow more ships to come through. The blob would be coming to W-space.
*sigh*
So now all three of my active accounts will be voting for you Two Step, and I'll be actively campaigning for you in my alliance (and it looks like Rek Seven will be as well).
I think it was Meissa who suggested the Wormhole Stabilizer, none of the null CSMs actually give a **** about wormholes or 'blobbing w-space', f y i.
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Geertruida Zelle
Quantum Wake Enemy-Fleet
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:39:00 -
[125] - Quote
How would you protect the obvious and overwhelming purity of WH pvp?
For example, what do you think should happen to WH corps who use exploits, especially when they have been told by CCP that they are exploits?
Kicked from the game, or their members banned from running for CSM perhaps?
GZ |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
151
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:47:00 -
[126] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:[quote=Dorn Val] I think it was Meissa who suggested the Wormhole Stabilizer, none of the null CSMs actually give a **** about wormholes or 'blobbing w-space', f y i.
All the more reason for Two Step to get a propper seat on the council i guess, if no one else gives a crap |
Tyrion Struan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 12:04:00 -
[127] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Dorn Val wrote:A few months ago I was all set to vote for Mittens again, but I joined a worm hole corp and found my place in Eve. All the fun of null sec but without all the political baggage and BS that comes with it, along with a lot of fun small scale PVP. I probably would have voted for His Goonness anyway but then someone on the CSM mentioned some sort of new ship or modual that could hold a worm hole open long after it would normally collapse to allow more ships to come through. The blob would be coming to W-space.
*sigh*
So now all three of my active accounts will be voting for you Two Step, and I'll be actively campaigning for you in my alliance (and it looks like Rek Seven will be as well). I think it was Meissa who suggested the Wormhole Stabilizer, none of the null CSMs actually give a **** about wormholes or 'blobbing w-space', f y i.
Aww, but you corp cares. And by care I mean would like to go shoot those Taggart something objectivists. Not necessarily in the face, I'll settle for the back. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1195
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:37:00 -
[128] - Quote
Dorn Val wrote:A few months ago I was all set to vote for Mittens again, but I joined a worm hole corp and found my place in Eve. All the fun of null sec but without all the political baggage and BS that comes with it, along with a lot of fun small scale PVP. I probably would have voted for His Goonness anyway but then someone on the CSM mentioned some sort of new ship or modual that could hold a worm hole open long after it would normally collapse to allow more ships to come through. The blob would be coming to W-space. *sigh* So now all three of my active accounts will be voting for you Two Step, and I'll be actively campaigning for you in my alliance (and it looks like Rek Seven will be as well). If the blob comes to W-space I'll sell all my characters and look for another game... Now for a humble suggestion: CCP has been talking about re-writing POS code. I'd like to be able to dock in a POS and see the same kind of environment that I see in a station (See all my ships and mods and be able to change fittings, maybe even have a jump clone in there). I know that CCP didn't intend for W-space to be colonized, but the simple fact remains that a lot of people live in it. The current POS mechanics make even the most mundane tasks a total PITA and it's long overdue for an overhaul. Good luck with your run for CSM and if you see me in W-space don't hesitate to shoot me in the face -I know I won't think twice about cycling my guns Fly it like you stole it
Thanks for your support. I would also like to see the ability to dock for real at a POS, and hopefully that would be added when POSes are re-written.
I'd like to see some sort of mechanic that cleans up abandoned POSes and mods. The ability to hack them, or perhaps just have the sleepers come and kill them...
Geertruida Zelle wrote:How would you protect the obvious and overwhelming purity of WH pvp?
For example, what do you think should happen to WH corps who use exploits, especially when they have been told by CCP that they are exploits?
Kicked from the game, or their members banned from running for CSM perhaps?
GZ
Again, addressed on my blog here http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html
CCP decided on a punishment, which didn't include banning us or disallowing me from a CSM run. If you are still mad about something that happened 15 months ago, feel free to vote for someone else. I will still do my best to represent everyone living in w-space. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Epigene
Z3R0 RETURN MINING INC. Li3 Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 14:38:00 -
[129] - Quote
Well, for whats its worth, here are 2 votes for Two Step from a WH dweller. WHs are the least broken segment of the game and I'd rather keep it that way. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
1062
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 14:57:00 -
[130] - Quote
Two Step has done a great job so far and he is a great representative for Wormholers. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |
|
Alec Freeman
The Dark Space Initiative Revival Of The Talocan Empire
70
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 16:01:00 -
[131] - Quote
As a wormhole dweller you have my vote. |
jonnykefka
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 20:03:00 -
[132] - Quote
W-space couldn't ask for a better representative. I think you've done a fine job for all of us thus far, and I hope you will continue to do a fine job on the next CSM, keeping W-space fun and functional. Corp BMs was big fat target #1, go for POSes next! |
Timmy Tebow
Saevos Aviation Saevos Aviation LLC
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 20:13:00 -
[133] - Quote
I hope I didn't miss these elsewhere in the thread, but I have three questions for you:
1) How do you feel about time dilation and the potential impact it has on CCP in regards to demotivating them in upgrading server hardware?
2) PLEX/GTC prices are too damn high. How will you leverage your influence on the CSM to bring down the price of game time paid with isk?
3) How should CCP reward veterans for their longevity in playing this game instead of punishing them via "end-game" nerfs?
Thanks for answering and good luck in your campaign! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1230
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 21:58:00 -
[134] - Quote
Timmy Tebow wrote:I hope I didn't miss these elsewhere in the thread, but I have three questions for you:
1) How do you feel about time dilation and the potential impact it has on CCP in regards to demotivating them in upgrading server hardware?
2) PLEX/GTC prices are too damn high. How will you leverage your influence on the CSM to bring down the price of game time paid with isk?
3) How should CCP reward veterans for their longevity in playing this game instead of punishing them via "end-game" nerfs?
Thanks for answering and good luck in your campaign!
1) TiDi is awesome. It certainly isn't the end of all lag, but it is a great stopgap solution. Enough people don't like TiDi that there should still be pressure on CCP to continue to optimize, so I don't see a big problem here.
2) CCP has some limited options to try to reduce PLEX pricing, some of which were discussed in the December summit minutes. Saying any more than that would run up against the NDA. I think the best thing for CCP to do in the long run is to keep making EVE a good game, then people will want to spend RL $ to buy stuff.
3) Again, this was discussed in some detail in the December summit. CCP is working on a veteran rewards program, which is a good thing. I consider having a large number of SP a pretty darn good reward, though CCP does need to continue to add new skills for those of us that are running out of skills to train. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1061
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 01:47:00 -
[135] - Quote
From reading this thread... it seems like some of the most rational people in EVE live in WH space. I'm just enjoying watching Two Step own the issues. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
70
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 03:47:00 -
[136] - Quote
Living in wormhole isn't easy. It requires a lot of independence and a good knowledge of just about everything in EVE to survive.
I learned more in my first week in wormholes than in the year previously. -How to scan -How to PI -How to do industry -How to use d scan -How to scout -How to find a POS or a target with d scan -How to setup an overview to show the info I need -How to manage a POS -Finding sign of hostility in a wormhole -Gathering information in general
There's a little bit of everything in wormholes, so we learn a little bit of everything. |
ski75
Dark Matter Inception Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 04:00:00 -
[137] - Quote
Not like its not been said before, but WH space is the best space for me as well. There is nothing like it in any MMO I have ever played.
Only issue I have is with the POS system which has been discussed, I do not enjoy flogging a dead horse... I would love for that to get some loving.
I have a lot of respect for you and your corp and you seem like a stand up dude. I appreciate the work and dedication you put in this past year and I feel your track record has earned you another go. I look forward to helping - you will have all of my votes. Best of luck
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 05:19:00 -
[138] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:I think it was Meissa who suggested the Wormhole Stabilizer, none of the null CSMs actually give a **** about wormholes or 'blobbing w-space', f y i.
This is not to be unexpected. I'll bet null sec residents care as much about "invading" wormhole space as my alliance cares about taking sovereignty. They're two completely different areas of the game, and we're both happy with where we are.
We wormholers are just a paranoid bunch, is all. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1248
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 13:09:00 -
[139] - Quote
I'm going to be on EVE Radio tonight at 00:00 along with Seleene and Hans talking CSM stuff. Tune in at http://eve-radio.com/ Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2109
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 18:22:00 -
[140] - Quote
there has not been sufficient discussion re: homemade maple syrup yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Jaiimez Skor
Exanimo Inc Psychotic Tendencies.
26
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 19:18:00 -
[141] - Quote
Two step wrote:Jaiimez Skor wrote:This is something that concerns me, and please correct me if I have got this wrong, given what I know of the AHARM story in Nova with Rook's and King's has come from friends within RnK and the Clarion Call video's the facts I have may be totally wrong or biased, but your alliance knowingly took advantage of an exploit in the game mechanics to make yourselves virtually untouchable.
As I said, assuming the information I have been given is correct and the story is as i've been told, why should I vote for you, you as well as the other members of AHARM stood by and actively exploited a flaw in the game mechanics, my issue is why would I want to vote for a candidate that actively stands by and encourages exploiting bugs, instead of owning up and telling CCP of these issues.
As I said if any of the information I have about the story is false and I have misunderstood AHARM's side of the story then please feel free to correct me and show me proof that I have misunderstood, as a newbie to wormholes and yet loving it on my alts, I would love to see a representative on the CSM to ensure wormholes receive love, I just don't want that person to be someone who knowingly partakes in exploiting the game.
note: I do not intend to start any kind of argument nor any kind of fighting on this thread, it is a valid concern of mine I would like answered so please do not take it as attempting to provoke a fight. It is certainly a legitimate question, and one that I was asked a lot last year when I ran. I actually wrote a blog post explaining my side of the story, which you can read at http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html Basically, the story is a little more complicated than what R&K says in Clarion Call. I certainly bear some responsibility for AHARM's use of the exploit, but I think CCP (and some other current and former AHARM members) bear some as well. If you still have questions or concerns after reading the blog post, feel free to ask them here, or to eve mail or convo me directly.
Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to my question and for taking it in the manner it was intended, your blog definitely clears things up, I was aware that AHARM had made some attempt to tell CCP but worded it in such a way that they didn't directly imply it was an exploit, yourself having admitted that the way CCP was informed by AHARM could have been done alot more clearly, and being your absence from the game I am comfortable in considering you a legitimate candidate I may vote for, now to get around to reading some more about what your aims as a CSM representatives are before I make my final decision, and maybe one day will meet you in W-Space, as TBH I love this place, I've not enjoyed eve anywhere near as much in K-Space. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1252
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 20:45:00 -
[142] - Quote
Andski wrote:there has not been sufficient discussion re: homemade maple syrup
I actually did my first boil last night, should be about 3/4 of a quart when it is done. Slow start to the season... Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1252
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 20:47:00 -
[143] - Quote
Jaiimez Skor wrote: Thank you for taking the time to read and respond to my question and for taking it in the manner it was intended, your blog definitely clears things up, I was aware that AHARM had made some attempt to tell CCP but worded it in such a way that they didn't directly imply it was an exploit, yourself having admitted that the way CCP was informed by AHARM could have been done alot more clearly, and being your absence from the game I am comfortable in considering you a legitimate candidate I may vote for, now to get around to reading some more about what your aims as a CSM representatives are before I make my final decision, and maybe one day will meet you in W-Space, as TBH I love this place, I've not enjoyed eve anywhere near as much in K-Space.
No problem, like I said, I am trying to be as completely open and honest about the whole situation as possible. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
I feel exactly the same about w-space as you do, which is why I don't want CCP to mess things up... :) Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
space gator
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 23:30:00 -
[144] - Quote
Two step wrote:I'm going to be on EVE Radio tonight at 00:00 along with Seleene and Hans talking CSM stuff. Tune in at http://eve-radio.com/
Nice, will be there. |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 13:25:00 -
[145] - Quote
Also smaller RF timers. does not seem fair that a small holding pos has 1d17h timer
small 12h med 24h large the usuall |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1262
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 13:56:00 -
[146] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Also smaller RF timers. does not seem fair that a small holding pos has 1d17h timer
small 12h med 24h large the usuall
Can't agree with this one. 12 hours means you could RF a tower and kill it before the owners got a chance to see it was RF'd. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
doombreed52
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
26
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 16:38:00 -
[147] - Quote
How would you feel about increasing the amount of w-space systems and make the sleepers more temperment (randomly warping off/on, sieging a pos, actually neuting triage carriers/logi and dogpiling one ship) |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1263
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 18:26:00 -
[148] - Quote
doombreed52 wrote:How would you feel about increasing the amount of w-space systems and make the sleepers more temperment (randomly warping off/on, sieging a pos, actually neuting triage carriers/logi and dogpiling one ship)
I'd love to see an expansion of w-space. One thing that I have been discussing with folks is the addition of Class 7 systems, perhaps without any moons and with other interesting features (many static wormholes?). I'd love to see Sleepers attack and destroy offline POSes after a period of time, to clean up all the junk in w-space.
I'd love to see more randomness in Sleepers in general. I would start with randomizing the trigger for the next wave in a site, and continue from there. Most folks that have been doing PVE in w-space for a while have it down to an exact science, and that is bad. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Nyok Thiesant
Just Another WH Corp Barbarian Wine and Cheese Society
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 20:59:00 -
[149] - Quote
First, I would give my support. there must be a WH dweller on the CSM7, not just the current blob of Null Sec people.
Wh players need some one to step in and stop the craziness that has been proposed, such as WH stabilization module,
having some in game changes, such as real time sharing of scanning results (and scan results not going poof after every session change) between corp members would be great.
good luck. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1266
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 22:01:00 -
[150] - Quote
Talocan United kindly offered to organize a Q&A session with me about my CSM 7 candidacy. We just finished it, and the recording is here (mp3 format). Hopefully we will organize another of these in the future, so if you missed out, don't worry. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
71
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 22:55:00 -
[151] - Quote
That was a very nice interview. You sound decent.
About ABC's - wormholes are always dangerous, no matter what class wormhole you're in. The difference between C1 and C6 is the size of the group that lives there. Over-all though, ABC isn't worth enough to be made rare. Mining ABC is still lousy income and there's no reason to remove it from low class wormhole.
Using your argument about Ice; having miners in low class wormhole gives us targets to kill. If there weren't any ABC, people probably wouldn't bother. |
Endeavour Starfleet
646
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 05:08:00 -
[152] - Quote
Can you state here your views on incursions and if you are willing to defend them as part of CSM 7 against efforts of major nerfing in the future? |
Rei Seiji
Production N Destruction INC. The Last Chancers.
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 11:35:00 -
[153] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:That was a very nice interview. You sound decent.
About ABC's - wormholes are always dangerous, no matter what class wormhole you're in. The difference between C1 and C6 is the size of the group that lives there. Over-all though, ABC isn't worth enough to be made rare. Mining ABC is still lousy income and there's no reason to remove it from low class wormhole.
Using your argument about Ice; having miners in low class wormhole gives us targets to kill. If there weren't any ABC, people probably wouldn't bother.
Kind of silly and horribly risky to mine in even C1 wormholes, seeing how there isn't the early warning system of Local handy. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1278
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 13:02:00 -
[154] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Can you state here your views on incursions and if you are willing to defend them as part of CSM 7 against efforts of major nerfing in the future?
I think that highsec Vanguard sites are too easy for the amount of ISK they pay out. I ran incursions with some corp-mates when they first came out, and even then, the sites were clearly too easy.
I'd also like to see some sort of incentive to actually end the incursions, not to prolong them as long as possible. It doesn't make sense that people delay ending the sansha invasion, which is supposedly kidnapping people from planets and whatnot, and CONCORD just pays people to not finish it.
I would also like to see the payouts for lowsec incursions raised. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 13:25:00 -
[155] - Quote
Rei Seiji wrote:Tahna Rouspel wrote:That was a very nice interview. You sound decent.
About ABC's - wormholes are always dangerous, no matter what class wormhole you're in. The difference between C1 and C6 is the size of the group that lives there. Over-all though, ABC isn't worth enough to be made rare. Mining ABC is still lousy income and there's no reason to remove it from low class wormhole.
Using your argument about Ice; having miners in low class wormhole gives us targets to kill. If there weren't any ABC, people probably wouldn't bother. Kind of silly and horribly risky to mine in even C1 wormholes, seeing how there isn't the early warning system of Local handy.
I don't disagree. I think mining in Gravimetric sites is safer than doing anomalies since you get a chance to see the probes on d scan. Mining for me is personally a waste of time, however, there's a few people in my corp that had already trained mining skills to fly hulk and sometimes they like to lay back and do some mining. From my calculation, the best income you can get from mining Arkanor is around 40mil/hour - it's much lower than the 80mil/hour I get soloing C2 sites.
However, removing ABC would reduce the profitability to Highsec level, but with wormhole danger. So please keep ABC in C1-2-3-4-5-6 and add a wormhole specific refinery that is affected by refining skills so that we don't have to haul the stuff back to K-space to refine it :/ |
Liastr
Event Horizon Expeditionaries The Watchmen.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 15:51:00 -
[156] - Quote
Two-step, I no longer live in W-Space, but I wholeheartedly agree that it is one of the most fun, well balanced and challenging parts of EVE. Although I'm wary of the already discussed transgressions of your corp, I believe that W-Space absolutely needs representation in the CSM and that you are the best of the candidates that are running on this platform. Having read some of your blog and followed some discussions here, I do believe your heart is in the right space (see what I did there?) and that we share a number of important ideologies. You will have my vote.
Two step wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Can you state here your views on incursions and if you are willing to defend them as part of CSM 7 against efforts of major nerfing in the future? I think that highsec Vanguard sites are too easy for the amount of ISK they pay out. I ran incursions with some corp-mates when they first came out, and even then, the sites were clearly too easy. I'd also like to see some sort of incentive to actually end the incursions, not to prolong them as long as possible. It doesn't make sense that people delay ending the sansha invasion, which is supposedly kidnapping people from planets and whatnot, and CONCORD just pays people to not finish it. I would also like to see the payouts for lowsec incursions raised.
I think a relatively simple fix (and I think this should be applied to all PvE...) is to remove bounty payouts from re-spawning ships. Re-spawns are obviously designed to reset the site should someone fail to finish it, however given that the most lucrative part of most PvE plexes/missions/etc is in the last room and in drops associated with the last rat(s), the incentive is already there to finish the site. I could write an essay on this, but I find Walls of Text seem to scare a lot of people off giving their 2c.
tl;dr I haven't heard any compelling arguments against removing bounties from re-spawned rats.
On another note, I agree wholeheartedly on the randomization of ALL PvE encounters, preferably to an increasing extent relative to the difficulty of the encounter. I find it somewhat suspicious and a little bit crap that this isn't already in place. Similar to the above, I have heard no compelling arguments as to why this is not a good idea. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1281
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 16:23:00 -
[157] - Quote
Liastr wrote:Two-step, I no longer live in W-Space, but I wholeheartedly agree that it is one of the most fun, well balanced and challenging parts of EVE. Although I'm wary of the already discussed transgressions of your corp, I believe that W-Space absolutely needs representation in the CSM and that you are the best of the candidates that are running on this platform. Having read some of your blog and followed some discussions here, I do believe your heart is in the right space ( see what I did there?) and that we share a number of important ideologies. You will have my vote. Two step wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Can you state here your views on incursions and if you are willing to defend them as part of CSM 7 against efforts of major nerfing in the future? I think that highsec Vanguard sites are too easy for the amount of ISK they pay out. I ran incursions with some corp-mates when they first came out, and even then, the sites were clearly too easy. I'd also like to see some sort of incentive to actually end the incursions, not to prolong them as long as possible. It doesn't make sense that people delay ending the sansha invasion, which is supposedly kidnapping people from planets and whatnot, and CONCORD just pays people to not finish it. I would also like to see the payouts for lowsec incursions raised. I think a relatively simple fix (and I think this should be applied to all PvE...) is to remove bounty payouts from re-spawning ships. Re-spawns are obviously designed to reset the site should someone fail to finish it, however given that the most lucrative part of most PvE plexes/missions/etc is in the last room and in drops associated with the last rat(s), the incentive is already there to finish the site. I could write an essay on this, but I find Walls of Text seem to scare a lot of people off giving their 2c. tl;dr I haven't heard any compelling arguments against removing bounties from re-spawned rats. On another note, I agree wholeheartedly on the randomization of ALL PvE encounters, preferably to an increasing extent relative to the difficulty of the encounter. I find it somewhat suspicious and a little bit crap that this isn't already in place. Similar to the above, I have heard no compelling arguments as to why this is not a good idea.
Thanks for your support!
I'm not sure how that solves anything in this case. Incursion rats don't pay bounties, you get rewarded for finishing a site.
I do agree with more randomness, PVE is far too easy in EVE. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
doombreed52
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 18:29:00 -
[158] - Quote
To make the highsecers kill the mom fast constt. Turned to lowsec no cnyo jam weeee hotdrop. |
Rei Seiji
Production N Destruction INC. The Last Chancers.
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 21:31:00 -
[159] - Quote
Long post gets eaten by glitch? Well... damn. |
Bam Stroker
InterSun Freelance Moon Warriors
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 22:50:00 -
[160] - Quote
I'm Bam Stroker, and I endorse this message. |
|
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
75
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 23:50:00 -
[161] - Quote
Rei Seiji wrote:To summarize:
I disagree with just adding a random factor to encounters and missions to add difficulty considering that if you ignore the existence of such sites as Eve-Survival, said encounters are already horrendously difficult with high damage and the potential of way too many nasty red things showing up to shoot that newb cluelessly shooting pirates or sleepers.
Randomness would be nice so that someone can't just turn to a guide to tell him what to do, and more importantly doesn't need to let someone else essentially do the mission for him. But just making things more difficult doesn't make it more interesting.
I would like to propose that k-space encounters have aggro mechanics added to them (You'd think that the pirates would, by now, have learned that maybe they should stop shooting that impossible to kill but barely damaging droneboat, and instead target the drones).
I would also propose that instead of having set triggers, that every so often a random NPC ship would stop and begin transmitting a distress signal. If the player doesn't blow it up in time, they get a few more reds added to the list.
Finally, I would like to propose that Sleepers be able to adapt to the situation. As in if a non-engaged Sleeper comes to the conclusion that it and its buddies brought the wrong tools to this fight, it shuts down momentarily, the ship itself gets visually altered to provide more attentive a hint that it wasn't quite the same drone it was before, and then resumes fighting with an altered weapons setup.
How about having different spawns depending on the ship brought to the site? Doing a Sleeper site in a tech 3 is a lot easier than doing it in a Harbinger. The goal isn't to make the site impossible to do, but to make them a bit more challenging for high up ships.
As for Missions, they were pretty challenging to do when I had low skill levels. If something is done about their difficulty, please keep the newbie in mind .
|
Bent Barrel
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 13:03:00 -
[162] - Quote
Hmm ... no clue about wormholes yet (but soonTM). However a friend of mine was in AHARM for a time, he nejoyed the stay.
I guess this was already talked over and it's an old thing, but my favourite EVE video is the R&K one against AHARM. Particularly the tracking exploit. Have you learned anything from the incident or what is your current view on similar exploit uses ? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1298
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 14:26:00 -
[163] - Quote
Bent Barrel wrote:Hmm ... no clue about wormholes yet (but soonTM). However a friend of mine was in AHARM for a time, he nejoyed the stay.
I guess this was already talked over and it's an old thing, but my favourite EVE video is the R&K one against AHARM. Particularly the tracking exploit. Have you learned anything from the incident or what is your current view on similar exploit uses ?
http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html covers my side of things, it was a lot more complicated than the R&K video made it out to be.
I think we all learned something from it, which is to stay far away from anything that even seems like it might be sketchy. Since then, we have reported several exploits/bugs that we have found, and refrained from using them ourselves. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
doombreed52
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 19:09:00 -
[164] - Quote
Two step wrote:http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html covers my side of things, it was a lot more complicated than the R&K video made it out to be. I think we all learned something from it, which is to stay far away from anything that even seems like it might be sketchy. Since then, we have reported several exploits/bugs that we have found, and refrained from using them ourselves.
a wise decision also on what you said early with a "static wormhole, do you mean a wormhole that never despawns maybe it changes where it leads every DT if its not a k162 on the inside it would change where it would spawn on the other side or do you mean to make it stay in the spot connecting two systems together forever? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1303
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 20:24:00 -
[165] - Quote
doombreed52 wrote:Two step wrote:http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html covers my side of things, it was a lot more complicated than the R&K video made it out to be. I think we all learned something from it, which is to stay far away from anything that even seems like it might be sketchy. Since then, we have reported several exploits/bugs that we have found, and refrained from using them ourselves. a wise decision also on what you said early with a "static wormhole, do you mean a wormhole that never despawns maybe it changes where it leads every DT if its not a k162 on the inside it would change where it would spawn on the other side or do you mean to make it stay in the spot connecting two systems together forever?
Every wormhole has one (or in Class 2 wormholes, two) "static" wormholes. These are wormholes, that when closed, will respawn. They always lead to the same class of wormhole or to high/low/nullsec. http://staticmapper.com is one public source of the statics for a given wormhole. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Bent Barrel
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 12:24:00 -
[166] - Quote
Two step wrote:Bent Barrel wrote:Hmm ... no clue about wormholes yet (but soonTM). However a friend of mine was in AHARM for a time, he nejoyed the stay.
I guess this was already talked over and it's an old thing, but my favourite EVE video is the R&K one against AHARM. Particularly the tracking exploit. Have you learned anything from the incident or what is your current view on similar exploit uses ? http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2011/03/infinite-tracking-wtf.html covers my side of things, it was a lot more complicated than the R&K video made it out to be. I think we all learned something from it, which is to stay far away from anything that even seems like it might be sketchy. Since then, we have reported several exploits/bugs that we have found, and refrained from using them ourselves.
Good answer :-) you are close to getting my vote ... now I need to combine a hard working and honest CSM candidate and some linux support (at least a bit of wine testing on CCP side proposal) and I have my candidate. |
doombreed52
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 14:34:00 -
[167] - Quote
no two step i mean literally static as in you dont have to scan that wh down if you have scanned it down before. at least thats what i understood from your post a few pages ago about class 7s and the like. |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 14:47:00 -
[168] - Quote
Two Step what do you think about easier way to tag targets? Like a keyboard shortcut? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1331
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 15:02:00 -
[169] - Quote
doombreed52 wrote:no two step i mean literally static as in you dont have to scan that wh down if you have scanned it down before. at least thats what i understood from your post a few pages ago about class 7s and the like.
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are asking. Static wormholes appear in a new place in space when closed.
Chitsa Jason wrote:Two Step what do you think about easier way to tag targets? Like a keyboard shortcut?
I am hopeful this will be added sometime soon. CCP is certainly aware that the current system is less than ideal. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1346
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 02:41:00 -
[170] - Quote
Andski wrote:there has not been sufficient discussion re: homemade maple syrup
Maple syrup update: First batch is done, 1/2 gallon of syrup is done. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1346
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 03:07:00 -
[171] - Quote
I just got an endorsement from Ripard Teg, the author of Jester's Trek, http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2012/02/wabbit-season.html.
He said:
Quote: Two Step, more than any other member of CSM5 or CSM6, demonstrates the fundamental correctness of Mynxee's goal of making the so-called "alternate" members of the CSM part of the process. Barely elected to CSM6 at all and dismissed as a wormhole specialty candidate, Two Step showed that he didn't really know or care what the word "alternate" meant. He simply did the work. More than any other single member of CSM6, he has been visible to the EVE Online player base in a variety of places, and has shown interest in multiple play-styles, not just his own. Two Step still represents an important segment of the EVE player base, but I'd now argue that it's larger than simply wormhole dwellers... it's every EVE player that has no interest in sovereignty-based play and super-cap blobs. Two Step deserves a full seat at the table in CSM7, and will be a terrific balance against these powerful forces. Two Step not only has my endorsement, he'll be receiving at least one of my votes.
Thanks for the kind words, Jester! Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
czMulti
Posthuman Society
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 11:56:00 -
[172] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Two Step what do you think about easier way to tag targets? Like a keyboard shortcut?
That. I. Hate. Tagging.
|
Alexander Manu
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 13:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
Spent a long time in that frontier space till life got in the way. Two step, you have done some great things keeping wormholes on CCP's mind. Would like to see you keep doing that.
When those voting starts, you have my votes.
Keep up the good work there. |
Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
237
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:52:00 -
[174] - Quote
Since I now have a guy in a WH I'll be voting for Two step. Stuff Goes here |
raker
Imperial Collective
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 18:31:00 -
[175] - Quote
Wormhole space is often an overlooked and misunderstood part of eve. Personally I view it as the most dangerous part of eve and in many ways it is like the old 0.0 space, before all blue area's and vast allainces
This part of the game does need a voice in the Csm that understands how it works
Two Step gets my vote, keep the good work up fella |
Starbuck Raider
Inter Arma Dead On Arrival Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:55:00 -
[176] - Quote
Dead on Arrival Alliance supports Two Step for CSM 7.
|
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
292
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:32:00 -
[177] - Quote
Two step wrote:Andski wrote:there has not been sufficient discussion re: homemade maple syrup Maple syrup update: First batch is done, 1/2 gallon of syrup is done.
Have you thought about marketing authentic "Two step" brand maple syrup for the rest of us? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1369
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 12:14:00 -
[178] - Quote
Thanks for all the support!
Nathan Jameson wrote:Two step wrote:Andski wrote:there has not been sufficient discussion re: homemade maple syrup Maple syrup update: First batch is done, 1/2 gallon of syrup is done. Have you thought about marketing authentic "Two step" brand maple syrup for the rest of us?
Sadly, I don't think I make enough. My best year, I only get 2 gallons of syrup. Last year, I did offer some to AHARM, with this label
Pics of my first batch Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Abbadon Karis
Aperture Harmonics K162
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:11:00 -
[179] - Quote
Andski wrote: Have you thought about marketing authentic "Two step" brand maple syrup for the rest of us?
If you buy his syrup you better vote for hims as well is my only advice in this case, or else it might taste suspiciously salt for some odd reasons I don't wanna go into
Anyways you have my votes this year as well bud, don't see that coming to you as a shocker after designing your propaganda posters. On a serious note I must admit this guy is gonna burn himself out at some point, a more dedicated man to this game is rare to find. Go Two Step! |
Revolution Rising
Gentlemen of Better Ilk
65
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:28:00 -
[180] - Quote
Some friends of mine and I are just moving into wormholes, but personally I'm also after a serious ******* industry iteration.
What are your thoughts on that?
As you can see I'm harassing the **** out of Seleene on the same issues, but I will either split my votes or give them to one of the two of you as I find you both to be the most worthy of the CSM candidates presently.
So be specific ;)
(Not that I don't want all sectors of eve iterated upon, but WH and indy need some serious attention now).
Manufacturing Papercuts ***CSM Interstellar Debate - Mining Profession**
|
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1394
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 04:37:00 -
[181] - Quote
Revolution Rising wrote:Some friends of mine and I are just moving into wormholes, but personally I'm also after a serious ******* industry iteration. What are your thoughts on that? As you can see I'm harassing the **** out of Seleene on the same issues, but I will either split my votes or give them to one of the two of you as I find you both to be the most worthy of the CSM candidates presently. So be specific ;) (Not that I don't want all sectors of eve iterated upon, but WH and indy need some serious attention now).
I'd love to see a lot more focus on Industry, especially on the UI side for manufacturing. I have an empire alt that does T2 and T3 production out of a POS, and the number of clicks I needed to kick off 11 build jobs was nuts.
It seems like miners are way overdue for some loving. I'd love to see CCP put some effort into this area. Hopefully they will start out with changing drones over to more normal bounties very soon. To go along with that, they probably need to add "super-veldspar" or something in order to provide low end minerals in 0.0/lowsec space. I'd also like to see the long discussed comet mining, to allow people to mine moon minerals from comets that are scanned down.
I don't personally mine, so for more than that, I would be relying on CCP or the community to come up with more specifics. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Alouette Bistrot
FOXH0UND Outer Heaven
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 14:07:00 -
[182] - Quote
I believe that the mechanics surrounding wspace are some of the best features within the game.
Probably the biggest issue we have to deal with is internal security as it relates to POS use.
What are your ideas with regards to POS access, specifically with regards to the Ship Maintenance Arrays?
I think a nice solution would be to have a 'dock for self/dock for corp' choice when using the SMA would be fantastic. Configure Starbase Equip could override or change the mask on a given item.
At a minimum a logging SMA would be great. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1395
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 15:34:00 -
[183] - Quote
Alouette Bistrot wrote:I believe that the mechanics surrounding wspace are some of the best features within the game.
Probably the biggest issue we have to deal with is internal security as it relates to POS use.
What are your ideas with regards to POS access, specifically with regards to the Ship Maintenance Arrays?
I think a nice solution would be to have a 'dock for self/dock for corp' choice when using the SMA would be fantastic. Configure Starbase Equip could override or change the mask on a given item.
At a minimum a logging SMA would be great.
I think I covered this earlier in the thread, but I will answer again.
We are unlikely to get major POS changes without a POS rewrite. I'd love to see actual personal storage at a POS. I'd love to see real security options. I don't think those are minor changes though, sadly. It is likely the best we can hope for are smaller fixes, like letting us rename SMAs. Anything more will have to wait, and I am hopeful the POS rewrite will be part of next winter's expansion. I think when POSes are redone, it will be super important to have a w-space rep on the CSM, so that our unique needs are taken into account. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
174
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 16:32:00 -
[184] - Quote
Question: Invisible deadspace signatures that decloak you next to a wormhole - cool feature or complete BS? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1400
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 16:54:00 -
[185] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Question: Invisible deadspace signatures that decloak you next to a wormhole - cool feature or complete BS?
BS. I think it is a lot of work to fix them though, so I doubt CCP will do anything any time soon. I will ask. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Bellum Scientia
Minesturbators Inc. Intergalactic Crap Coalition
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 17:04:00 -
[186] - Quote
+1
Two Step has my vote. WH needs the representation. |
Ferria
Among the Shadows Seekers of the Unseen
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 00:52:00 -
[187] - Quote
Mr. Two Step As one of the many persons who is looking forward to and wants Dust514 to be as great as EVE I would like to know your stance on Dust514, it's link to EVE, and how you would support it in the CSM if infact you are in favor of it. While I myself am not known or an importnat person, I do speak with a large secetion of the Dust514 EVE fan base. We are looking for someone to support us in CSM7. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1405
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:38:00 -
[188] - Quote
Ferria wrote:Mr. Two Step As one of the many persons who is looking forward to and wants Dust514 to be as great as EVE I would like to know your stance on Dust514, it's link to EVE, and how you would support it in the CSM if infact you are in favor of it. While I myself am not known or an importnat person, I do speak with a large secetion of the Dust514 EVE fan base. We are looking for someone to support us in CSM7.
I'd love to see DUST514 succeed, and have been encouraging CCP to make the EVE-DUST link as meaningful as possible. As soon as CCP sends the CSM DUST beta keys, I will go out and buy a PS3.
I'm not very good at FPSes, but I would love to play DUST as long as the link really matters. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Don Salty
Crit Line
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 11:10:00 -
[189] - Quote
Supported |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
78
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 12:40:00 -
[190] - Quote
Any thoughts on contract improvements? Especially a possibility to have in game merc contracts? |
|
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 18:19:00 -
[191] - Quote
Two step wrote:Revolution Rising wrote:Some friends of mine and I are just moving into wormholes, but personally I'm also after a serious ******* industry iteration. What are your thoughts on that? As you can see I'm harassing the **** out of Seleene on the same issues, but I will either split my votes or give them to one of the two of you as I find you both to be the most worthy of the CSM candidates presently. So be specific ;) (Not that I don't want all sectors of eve iterated upon, but WH and indy need some serious attention now). I'd love to see a lot more focus on Industry, especially on the UI side for manufacturing. I have an empire alt that does T2 and T3 production out of a POS, and the number of clicks I needed to kick off 11 build jobs was nuts. It seems like miners are way overdue for some loving. I'd love to see CCP put some effort into this area. Hopefully they will start out with changing drones over to more normal bounties very soon. To go along with that, they probably need to add "super-veldspar" or something in order to provide low end minerals in 0.0/lowsec space. I'd also like to see the long discussed comet mining, to allow people to mine moon minerals from comets that are scanned down. I don't personally mine, so for more than that, I would be relying on CCP or the community to come up with more specifics.
It wouldn't be on you to come up with original ideas, if I was less cynical about mining and industry I'd want to hear from a CSM candidate that they would be pestering the people responsible for industry game development, that they had got those developer's names and were trying to work out what the problem was.
Does Seleene do the out-of-hours gladhanding & drinks mittens talks about specifically with the people who made asteroid belts what they are today? Does any CSM candidate want to do that with the specific intent of applying pressure to make it gameplay rather than drudgery for insomniacs/botters? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1418
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 18:35:00 -
[192] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Any thoughts on contract improvements? Especially a possibility to have in game merc contracts?
I'm hopeful the Summer expansion might contain content like this (or at least the building blocks for this). We haven't heard anything about merc contracts specifically yet, but CCP knows there should be better support for merc mechanics. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1418
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 18:38:00 -
[193] - Quote
Aiifa wrote: It wouldn't be on you to come up with original ideas, if I was less cynical about mining and industry I'd want to hear from a CSM candidate that they would be pestering the people responsible for industry game development, that they had got those developer's names and were trying to work out what the problem was.
Does Seleene do the out-of-hours gladhanding & drinks mittens talks about specifically with the people who made asteroid belts what they are today? Does any CSM candidate want to do that with the specific intent of applying pressure to make it gameplay rather than drudgery for insomniacs/botters?
In general, basically all of us would like CCP to make mining not suck, even Mittens. It is much more a matter of CCP's priorities. Right now, they don't seem to consider improving mining to be a major priority. At the same time, they are looking at making some improvements, like changing drones to bounties, which should at least make mining more valuable. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
78
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 20:02:00 -
[194] - Quote
What do you think about the ability to fit 2 T2 scanning rigs on Cov Ops? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1418
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 20:08:00 -
[195] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:What do you think about the ability to fit 2 T2 scanning rigs on Cov Ops?
All the electronic superiority rigs are like this, and I don't see a good reason for it. Why do the most common rigs (trimarks and CDFEs) use 50 calibration for T1 and 75 for T2, making fitting them easy, and other rigs are much higher? I think rigs in general need a balance pass. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 02:25:00 -
[196] - Quote
I've been thinking about the POS iteration and how to make the transition work. CCP mentioned that the code behind the POS is a mess and fixing it would be dangerous. I'd expect that if they tried to make extensive changes to the current POS system, it would causes tons of problems, bugs - the universe would burn.
I'm mostly musing here, but if CCP intends to work on a new POS, they should build a completely new system. Instead of trying to transform the current POS, they should leave the old Towers as it is, but change the unanchored tower items into the new towers system. Current active towers would remain the same until the player decided to change it. I'm mostly afraid that if CCP did an automatic transfer from old to new tower of all the currently active towers, guns, items and ships might go missing - maybe some towers would malfunction for a while and create havoc. Letting players upgrade by themselves avoids a lot of potential trouble.
Other potentiel problems; -What happens if a player has 'private' ships (If personal ship hangar becomes reality) inside a POS and get kicked. Same question for items. -Should the new POS become like station where you dock in - what would happen to POS shields? -What would differentiate a station and a POS? Is it important for them to be different?
Anyhow, just rambling!
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1426
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 12:59:00 -
[197] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:I've been thinking about the POS iteration and how to make the transition work. CCP mentioned that the code behind the POS is a mess and fixing it would be dangerous. I'd expect that if they tried to make extensive changes to the current POS system, it would causes tons of problems, bugs - the universe would burn.
I'm mostly musing here, but if CCP intends to work on a new POS, they should build a completely new system. Instead of trying to transform the current POS, they should leave the old Towers as it is, but change the unanchored tower items into the new towers system. Current active towers would remain the same until the player decided to change it. I'm mostly afraid that if CCP did an automatic transfer from old to new tower of all the currently active towers, guns, items and ships might go missing - maybe some towers would malfunction for a while and create havoc. Letting players upgrade by themselves avoids a lot of potential trouble.
Other potentiel problems; -What happens if a player has 'private' ships (If personal ship hangar becomes reality) inside a POS and get kicked. Same question for items. -Should the new POS become like station where you dock in - what would happen to POS shields? -What would differentiate a station and a POS? Is it important for them to be different?
Anyhow, just rambling!
Because all the POS stuff can be reprocessed into PI goo, I would expect them to just add new things, and have people melt down the old towers and mods. There is an issue with faction stuff, but I am sure something could be figured out for that as well.
All of your questions are important, and are really something for CCP to decide. If it were up to me: 1) The corp could do whatever they wanted with them. I think you still need to have corp members with the appropriate roles able to remove items from a personal hangar, or you would never be able to tear down a POS. 2) Yes. There is a lot of functionality that we miss out on without docking, like fitting ships from saved fittings, ship spinning, and even CQ/WiS. 3) Stations would have unlimited storage and would take a lot longer to kill (assuming we get destructible stations). They also would have better refineries and more manufacturing slots. You would be able to set your med clone to one, and also to jump clone to and from them.
Good questions, thanks for asking them! Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
JahMun
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 17:41:00 -
[198] - Quote
Two Step has proven to be very involved, open to reason and a driving force for important stuff (like corp BM's).
I've listened with great interest to the 1h Q&A interview you did with Talocan United.
You have my votes and many of the Transmission Lost votes.
I do have a question, there has been some talk about having a kind of docking mechanism in w-space. I fully support having a few more functions like swapping T3 subsystems and switching clones. Docking like in k-space would remove you from d-scan and hide your presence though. That would change the pvp dynamics a lot, as you would never know if an enemy fleet is hiding docked up. What is your view on this? Would that be a welcome change of rules or should docking be different from k-space and leave you on d-scan? |
S0mveraa
Isotope Laboratories The Laughing Men
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 17:51:00 -
[199] - Quote
You have my vote. Also you have most of our alliance vote as well.....well those who care enough to vote. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1432
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 17:52:00 -
[200] - Quote
JahMun wrote:Two Step has proven to be very involved, open to reason and a driving force for important stuff (like corp BM's).
I've listened with great interest to the 1h Q&A interview you did with Talocan United.
You have my votes and many of the Transmission Lost votes.
I do have a question, there has been some talk about having a kind of docking mechanism in w-space. I fully support having a few more functions like swapping T3 subsystems and switching clones. Docking like in k-space would remove you from d-scan and hide your presence though. That would change the pvp dynamics a lot, as you would never know if an enemy fleet is hiding docked up. What is your view on this? Would that be a welcome change of rules or should docking be different from k-space and leave you on d-scan?
Yeah, I think that would be a big concern if docking was allowed. One solution would be that you can dock, but you ship would still be floating in space (inside the forcefield). Another one would be to include the number of docked pilots in the dscan results for a dockable pos. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1440
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 18:11:00 -
[201] - Quote
The Lost in Eve debate I was in over the weekend has been posted. Go listen to it here Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 02:05:00 -
[202] - Quote
Any chance to not loose skill points when you loose a T3 ship? Many people think it is a dumb feature. |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 02:51:00 -
[203] - Quote
Also what do you think about faction tower situation where you cant get any new ones?
|
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 13:53:00 -
[204] - Quote
While we're asking random questions, what are the clone vat bays on a rorqual for if not a quick route back your w-space home from your empire clone station? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1452
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 14:01:00 -
[205] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Any chance to not loose skill points when you loose a T3 ship? Many people think it is a dumb feature.
I like the extra risk when flying T3s. I know it sucks to lose SP, but maybe you could just not die so much
Chitsa Jason wrote:Also what do you think about faction tower situation where you cant get any new ones?
It is dumb, and they should fix it.
Aiifa wrote:While we're asking random questions, what are the clone vat bays on a rorqual for if not a quick route back your w-space home from your empire clone station?
I don't like that idea, as it would make locking people out of wormholes useless. One thing that Meissa brought up at the last summit was allowing people to switch clones at a Rorqual or a new clone vat POS module or something. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 17:33:00 -
[206] - Quote
Two step wrote:
I don't like that idea, as it would make locking people out of wormholes useless. One thing that Meissa brought up at the last summit was allowing people to switch clones at a Rorqual or a new clone vat POS module or something.
Surely it would work once before you have to fly another clone in? The tactic isn't useless, and I think a counter should be attainable with enough effort. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1460
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 19:06:00 -
[207] - Quote
Aiifa wrote:Two step wrote:
I don't like that idea, as it would make locking people out of wormholes useless. One thing that Meissa brought up at the last summit was allowing people to switch clones at a Rorqual or a new clone vat POS module or something.
Surely it would work once before you have to fly another clone in? The tactic isn't useless, and I think a counter should be attainable with enough effort.
The main issue is that it would let people live most of their time in k-space, and then just jump clone into the wormhole for some PVE or something. You could also set up farming systems, where you jump clone in, scan a route to k-space, install new clone, run sites, and then jump clone to the next system. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
17
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 23:41:00 -
[208] - Quote
Two step wrote:The Lost in Eve debate I was in over the weekend has been posted. Go listen to it here
that was... inebriated |
Dima Che
Wings of Omen Shadow of xXDEATHXx
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 07:39:00 -
[209] - Quote
Hi, would you please expand you CSM program ? I mean not just the general direction \ examples you give in blog and start post for this topic. I mean like a definite set of ideas you will push in CSM. Will provide help in eng-rus translation, if needed. |
Delici Feelgood
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 08:18:00 -
[210] - Quote
"Wholey" can't see why you shouldn't continue to be the candidate of choice for the WH community.
It certainly needs your resolve to protect interests here imho. |
|
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 09:46:00 -
[211] - Quote
Two step wrote:The Lost in Eve debate I was in over the weekend has been posted. Go listen to it here
Cool -thanks!
Ninja bump Just like there is no I in Team there is no Fair in Eve... |
Erelaszun
Rock Locusts Primarch.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 11:03:00 -
[212] - Quote
Has my vote! No breaking wormhole laws with some module or tech, and POS Improvements for WH Corps! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1473
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 12:19:00 -
[213] - Quote
Dima Che wrote:Hi, would you please expand you CSM program ? I mean not just the general direction \ examples you give in blog and start post for this topic. I mean like a definite set of ideas you will push in CSM. Will provide help in eng-rus translation, if needed.
In general, I don't think the role of the CSM is to provide lots and lots of ideas to CCP. They already have game designers to do that. Our role is to identify currently broken areas of the game, and to help CCP evaluate their new ideas for the game. That is why I don't list a ton of things I would like to see added to the game.
Thanks for the translation help, I am about to edit my first post in my thread over on eve-ru with the first post here, if you can help translate it, that would be fantastic Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Josef Huffenpuff
H A V O C
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 06:40:00 -
[214] - Quote
I'll be Voting for Seleene, Two Step and of course, Trebor, this year.
All 3 have done sterling work on CSM6. Please keep up the good work guys |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 16:18:00 -
[215] - Quote
Josef Huffenpuff wrote:I'll be Voting for Seleene, Two Step and of course, Trebor, this year.
All 3 have done sterling work on CSM6. Please keep up the good work guys
Seleene and Trebor have pretty safe seats, if you want to see Two Step on the CSM you should vote for him with everything you've got. I will. |
Demon Azrakel
Bite me inc.
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 05:33:00 -
[216] - Quote
Aiifa wrote:Josef Huffenpuff wrote:I'll be Voting for Seleene, Two Step and of course, Trebor, this year.
All 3 have done sterling work on CSM6. Please keep up the good work guys Seleene and Trebor have pretty safe seats, if you want to see Two Step on the CSM you should vote for him with everything you've got. I will.
This is pretty much my plan, though the incredibly immature part of me wants to get Mintrolio up there, I will resist. |
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 08:37:00 -
[217] - Quote
For the love of god don't re-elect this exploiting douchebag.
At least Alex has some craftiness and charisma. This guy has vinegar and plastic. |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 09:49:00 -
[218] - Quote
Jonathan Ferguson wrote:For the love of god don't re-elect this exploiting douchebag.
At least Alex has some craftiness and charisma. This guy has vinegar and plastic.
Want to put some argument behind your accusations? I don't think I can hope for evidence. |
roigon
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 11:14:00 -
[219] - Quote
Jonathan Ferguson wrote:For the love of god don't re-elect this exploiting douchebag.
At least Alex has some craftiness and charisma. This guy has vinegar and plastic.
Lol, was already going to vote two step, but if even akjon takes the time to post something trollish then he must be the right candidate. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1500
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 13:16:00 -
[220] - Quote
Jonathan Ferguson wrote:For the love of god don't re-elect this exploiting douchebag.
At least Alex has some craftiness and charisma. This guy has vinegar and plastic.
Vinegar and plastic? What I am doing with those? Making salad dressing? Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Xen Solarus
Inner 5phere
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 14:38:00 -
[221] - Quote
You got my vote mate! Continue your great representation of us wormhole people! |
Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 21:03:00 -
[222] - Quote
Two step you are the only honorable dude from the previous CSM. The rest were garbage except that Russian dude and that is only because he probably is unbalanced and stuff. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1503
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 03:59:00 -
[223] - Quote
Xen Solarus wrote:You got my vote mate! Continue your great representation of us wormhole people!
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Two step you are the only honorable dude from the previous CSM. The rest were garbage except that Russian dude and that is only because he probably is unbalanced and stuff.
Thanks for the support. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 13:32:00 -
[224] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Two step you are the only honorable dude from the previous CSM. The rest were garbage except that Russian dude and that is only because he probably is unbalanced and stuff.
*bongo and sitar backing music* ... I'm guessing ferguson was assuming Two Step was implicit in the magnetar tracking bug stuff; silly. |
Malcorath Sacerdos
Unending Dream
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 21:20:00 -
[225] - Quote
i am like # 666 !!
|
Nic Huston
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 20:57:00 -
[226] - Quote
It's a no-brainer. You have my votes. Was good to hear your views when you jumped on the Talocan server a couple weeks back. All the best mate. |
Cerberos Targarian
Crimson Cell
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 03:48:00 -
[227] - Quote
I notice you were on page two and thought it to be an outrage. Free bump and my votes of course. |
Sp0ki3
renditions of madness B A C K B 0 N E
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 07:39:00 -
[228] - Quote
Me and my corp will be voting for you. Hope you get a full seat :D |
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 09:26:00 -
[229] - Quote
M'arek Elan wrote:This guy seems to be one of the hardest working members of CSM 6... and he's only an alternate. Just think of the things he could do if he was to become a full member of CSM 7!
Two thumbs up from me. This is what I'm thinking too. That, and he's supported by Trebor so you know they work well together.
Good luck Two Step!
|
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 09:35:00 -
[230] - Quote
Aiifa wrote:Josef Huffenpuff wrote:I'll be Voting for Seleene, Two Step and of course, Trebor, this year.
All 3 have done sterling work on CSM6. Please keep up the good work guys Seleene and Trebor have pretty safe seats, if you want to see Two Step on the CSM you should vote for him with everything you've got. I will. You are 100% correct, and this is why Two Step is getting my vote.
|
|
Rei Seiji
Production N Destruction INC. The Last Chancers.
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 21:47:00 -
[231] - Quote
Wishing I had more votes to give, and hoping to see you make it to Iceland. Best of luck! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1530
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 01:41:00 -
[232] - Quote
Voting is now open, go to http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=427 to vote directly for me. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 02:20:00 -
[233] - Quote
Two Step, I just want you to know that I just Eve-mailed my corpmates to try and get you more votes. I've never spoken with them about the CSM, so I really don't know if they care enough to take the time, but hopefully I was persuasive enough. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1530
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 02:44:00 -
[234] - Quote
Jet Aeon wrote:Two Step, I just want you to know that I just Eve-mailed my corpmates to try and get you more votes. I've never spoken with them about the CSM, so I really don't know if they care enough to take the time, but hopefully I was persuasive enough.
Awesome, thanks for your help. Just getting me re-elected isn't enough, we also need to make sure that *lots* of people vote in this election. The more people that vote, even if they vote for Riverini or Xenuria, the more CSM represents *all* of the playerbase. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Vjorn Angannon
Fleet Escort Services Exotic Matter Coalition
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 06:49:00 -
[235] - Quote
Last year i could only cast 2 votes, and you were 3rd on my list. I was happy tho when I saw you make the alt list.
However, from what I've seen, you did the work of a full member and then some.
Thanks for all you've done over the past year; and here's looking forward to the next year....
+2 from me |
Malcorath Sacerdos
Deep Space Equinox
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 07:49:00 -
[236] - Quote
two step you got my 4 accs behind you ! |
Andree LT
High Intellion Exhale.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 08:29:00 -
[237] - Quote
One from Me, and as i think All EXHALE. Are with u SIR. |
Bent Barrel
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 09:01:00 -
[238] - Quote
One from me Two Step ... good luck in the vote :-) |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 10:17:00 -
[239] - Quote
The one thing I care to consciously know about Trebor is that he's a spammer. So when I inevitably got two automated mails from him, reply all > Vote Two Step.
oh btw Vote Two Step. |
Loki O'Grady
The Scope Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 10:18:00 -
[240] - Quote
+1 vote for the Hardest Working Man in Srs Business. Keep up the good work, Two step! |
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
187
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 12:03:00 -
[241] - Quote
Just voted for you Two Step. Lets make WH space more exciting.
Good luck! |
Lunataria
Blackstar Privateer Consortium Sovereign Technologies
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 12:32:00 -
[242] - Quote
My votes have been put on two step, good luck, i hope you get a full seat |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 13:10:00 -
[243] - Quote
I casted my vote for you, Two Step! Lets do this! |
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 13:47:00 -
[244] - Quote
Just cast my 3 votes for you Two Step -good luck M8! Just like there is no I in Team there is no Fair in Eve... |
Pax Nilsen
NorCorp Enterprise No Holes Barred
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 14:59:00 -
[245] - Quote
Both my votes go to you, good luck in the election! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1534
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 15:06:00 -
[246] - Quote
Thanks for all the support guys and gals! Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Domin Ique
Team Pizza Viro Mors Non Est
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 15:52:00 -
[247] - Quote
You've got my 2 votes. I'm spreading the word all I can. |
Van Weyden
Crit Line
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 16:10:00 -
[248] - Quote
Both my votes go to you, good luck |
Star P'ergish
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 19:14:00 -
[249] - Quote
Voted for you x 2 , good luck! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1537
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 19:28:00 -
[250] - Quote
Thanks for all the support, and don't forget to eve mail your corp/alliancemates and remind them to cast a vote for me as well! Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
Vax Silver
Aperture Harmonics K162
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:16:00 -
[251] - Quote
Voted x 2. Good luck my friend. |
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 02:13:00 -
[252] - Quote
Two step wrote:Jet Aeon wrote:Two Step, I just want you to know that I just Eve-mailed my corpmates to try and get you more votes. I've never spoken with them about the CSM, so I really don't know if they care enough to take the time, but hopefully I was persuasive enough. Awesome, thanks for your help. Just getting me re-elected isn't enough, we also need to make sure that *lots* of people vote in this election. The more people that vote, even if they vote for Riverini or Xenuria, the more CSM represents *all* of the playerbase. I'm delighted to report that I was able to persuade at least one of my corpmates to vote for you.
|
PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
172
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 03:08:00 -
[253] - Quote
Read the complete Platform here: http://www.eve-online-dark-taboo.com/vote/
If you want your vote to count just once in EVE vote for PsychoBitch.
Sick of CCP devs and their hair-brained, half-baked, blue-balled ideas?
Sick of self-important fat puds and frail half-elves on the CSM?
Sick of things in eve that should have been fixed A G E S ago not being fixed
and new errors being introduced daily?
Make your one vote count finally, vote for PsychoBitch!
If you are voting for someone who has been in the CSM before - you have wasted your vote on F A I L
Don't be a failure, be a hero. Vote for PsychoBitch now!
Campaign Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnOZAEbk7r0
If you don't drink whiskey - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't like having sex with women - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't live life on your own terms - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE
THIS IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW IN LIFE - ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW IGNORE |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1543
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 03:16:00 -
[254] - Quote
Thanks for the free bump, but maybe you might consider not being an idiot and spamming every single thread in this forum? Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 03:32:00 -
[255] - Quote
Just wondering, Two Step, why is your portrait so scary? It looks like one nasty man. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1543
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 03:48:00 -
[256] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:Just wondering, Two Step, why is your portrait so scary? It looks like one nasty man.
I didn't spend nearly enough time on it. When the new character creator came out, I had to get in game quickly, so I only spent like 5 minutes on my avatar, figuring I would remake it later, but never got around to doing that... :) Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
asidburn Enaka
Alpha Arms and Manufacturing BROTHERHOOD OF DESTRUCTION
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 08:07:00 -
[257] - Quote
i just want to let everyone know about this scammer claming to be giving plex for votes dont be caught falling for this scam vote aganist darius III member of interstellar eXodus {IE-EX} they are scaming people pass the word on to everyone you can and vote aganist these undeserving jerks here is a copy of the chat log as proof of there unworthy actions!!!!!!!!
asidburn Enaka > what do i need to do Darius III > http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=480 go there Darius III > vote for me then paste the message you got after vote cast into this chat asidburn Enaka > your vote has been registered. We thank you for your participation. Darius III > Thanks man Darius III > that concludes our business Darius III > Fly safe asidburn Enaka > and what about the contract asidburn Enaka > i will have my alliance vote aganist you about 250 people asidburn Enaka > and then where will you be asidburn Enaka > send me the contract and i will have them vote for you asidburn Enaka > this is what we call a test of charecture Darius III > Have them vote against me Darius III > Sorry for the ssam Darius III > But I wouldnt sleep at night if I didnt do everything in my power to make syure that Goons dont ruin this CSM asidburn Enaka > your an idiot all your going to do is send more votes to the goons Darius III > not really Darius III > Goons will win chairman nbo matetr what, doesnt matter Darius III > nothing can stop them Darius III > and thats a real shame asidburn Enaka > well you just lost 243 votes asidburn Enaka > got 1 lost 243 Darius III > Didnt have them anyway Darius III > didnt lose anything Darius III > Just please dont make forum post about me, it would ruin my campaign asidburn Enaka > not to mentone att the isk spam bans you r about to get asidburn Enaka > too late asidburn Enaka > and i just copyed this conv asidburn Enaka > so i can post Darius III > You wouldnt dare do it Darius III > You too lazy anyway Darius III > I dont have a thing to worry about asidburn Enaka > haha i play eve 8 hrs a day and im retired all i have is time Darius III > no lazy bones like you would waste their time. LOL so much for your empty threats LOL
rember i dont care who you vote for just dont voter for them |
Aidamina Omen
Aperture Harmonics K162
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 08:59:00 -
[258] - Quote
You have my axe... erm votes. |
Axloth Okiah
Banana On A Plate
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 15:53:00 -
[259] - Quote
Cerberos Targarian wrote:I notice you were on page two and thought it to be an outrage. Free bump and my votes of course. I agree |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1543
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 23:26:00 -
[260] - Quote
Axloth Okiah wrote:Cerberos Targarian wrote:I notice you were on page two and thought it to be an outrage. Free bump and my votes of course. I agree
Thanks again for all the support. Given how heavy the voting has been so far, I am very optimistic that some folks who didn't vote in the past voted this time, hopefully for me... :) Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
PsychoBitch
Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo
173
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 23:32:00 -
[261] - Quote
Read the complete Platform here: http://www.eve-online-dark-taboo.com/vote/
If you want your vote to count just once in EVE vote for PsychoBitch.
Sick of CCP devs and their hair-brained, half-baked, blue-balled ideas?
Sick of self-important fat puds and frail half-elves on the CSM?
Sick of things in eve that should have been fixed A G E S ago not being fixed and new errors being introduced daily?
Make your one vote count finally, vote for PsychoBitch!
If you are voting for someone who has been in the CSM before - you have wasted your vote on F A I L
Don't be a failure, be a hero. Vote for PsychoBitch now!
Campaign Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnOZAEbk7r0
If you don't drink whiskey - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't like having sex with women - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't live life on your own terms - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE
THIS IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW IN LIFE - ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW IGNORE |
czMulti
Posthuman Society
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 00:35:00 -
[262] - Quote
too bad i cant vote againts stupid spammers.
At least free bump and 2 votes to Two Step! |
Indy Rider
Lapse Of Sanity Exhale.
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 03:30:00 -
[263] - Quote
3 Votes sent your way. Good luck. |
Malkev
GRUMPS RESEARCH TEAM
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 03:41:00 -
[264] - Quote
+2 to you! |
Star P'ergish
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 06:51:00 -
[265] - Quote
Vote for Two step today! |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.10 19:56:00 -
[266] - Quote
3 votes from me :) |
Kilikas Avoridian
Hard Knocks Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 05:34:00 -
[267] - Quote
Hello Everyone, Kilikas of Hard Knocks fame here to stir up support for two step. Proof of two step love: twitter.com/two_step_eve/status/177971533300502529 twitter.com/two_step_eve/status/177974614515912704
I have revised my voluntarily drawn campaign poster to be safe for work so feel free to print it out and post around the neighborhood. while wearing your Joshua Goldschag face masks and carrying around your twostepfuhcsm posters.
Take a gander and vote twostep for csm SIETE (THAT IS SPANIARD FOR SEVEN LOL!) http://i.imgur.com/xqfqH.png
If your name is two step, hey i heard your girlfriend was in our public channel today. i'm sorry i missed her. hopefully she'll be back cause i gots to schedule dat knife fight
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1549
|
Posted - 2012.03.11 15:16:00 -
[268] - Quote
Kilikas Avoridian wrote:Hello Everyone, Kilikas of Hard Knocks fame here to stir up support for two step. Proof of two step love: twitter.com/two_step_eve/status/177971533300502529twitter.com/two_step_eve/status/177974614515912704I have revised my voluntarily drawn campaign poster to be safe for work so feel free to print it out and post around the neighborhood. while wearing your Joshua Goldschag face masks and carrying around your twostepfuhcsm posters. Take a gander and vote twostep for csm SIETE (THAT IS SPANIARD FOR SEVEN LOL!) http://i.imgur.com/xqfqH.pngIf your name is two step, hey i heard your girlfriend was in our public channel today. i'm sorry i missed her. hopefully she'll be back cause i gots to schedule dat knife fight
With supporters like this, who needs opponents?
You misspelled my name. Joshua Goldshlag (no c!)
My GF is looking forward to the knife fight! Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
hired goon
Legio Prima Victrix Imperius Legio Victrix
129
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 13:32:00 -
[269] - Quote
As a wormhole player I am thinking of voting for you. However, I wonder if I might ask you to explain your ideas on local chat, as that table comparison thing suggests you are not in favour of changing it. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1550
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 14:02:00 -
[270] - Quote
hired goon wrote:As a wormhole player I am thinking of voting for you. However, I wonder if I might ask you to explain your ideas on local chat, as that table comparison thing suggests you are not in favour of changing it.
My view on local is that currently, scouting in 0.0/lowsec is far too easy. Local + d-scan make it trivial to know who is coming and how many of them there are. This is a bad thing, but simply changing 0.0 local to delayed mode isn't really the best solution. I'd rather CCP takes a longer and harder look at the scouting mechanics in general, and makes scouting in EVE a real skill.
The vote match question *should have been*, "Do you think local should be used as a source of intel", and I would have happily said no to that. Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
|
hired goon
Legio Prima Victrix Imperius Legio Victrix
130
|
Posted - 2012.03.12 14:20:00 -
[271] - Quote
Alright, thanks man. Now you mention it, I agree the question was worded in a bad way. Good enough for me! |
Nonnosa
Grey Nomads Combat Mining and Logistics
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 03:54:00 -
[272] - Quote
And another vote for you. :)
Good luck!
|
Anomander Tsuruomo
Shadow Strike Syndicate
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 11:59:00 -
[273] - Quote
+1 (other vote went to Kelduum)
Best of luck mate, your efforts are appreciated. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1555
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:29:00 -
[274] - Quote
I wrote a blog post looking at some of the numbers in the economy. http://twostep4csm.blogspot.com/2012/03/its-econmony-stupid.html Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces Ascendance.
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 03:30:00 -
[275] - Quote
We're moving to a C5, Two Step. Don't kill us :D |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1558
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 11:30:00 -
[276] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:We're moving to a C5, Two Step. Don't kill us :D
As long as you voted for me, you get temporary immunity*.
* temporary immunity is only valid during downtime. Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:18:00 -
[277] - Quote
czMulti wrote:too bad i cant vote againts stupid spammers.
At least free bump and 2 votes to Two Step!
Y DO U ALL
Indy Rider wrote:3 Votes sent your way. Good luck.
HAVE DOTS AFTER
Tahna Rouspel wrote:We're moving to a C5, Two Step. Don't kill us :D
YOUR ALLIANCE NAMES? D:
conspiracy |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1558
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:49:00 -
[278] - Quote
Not everyone can have a cool dot-less alliance name... :) Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
86
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:29:00 -
[279] - Quote
Two step wrote:Not everyone can have a cool dot-less alliance name... :)
Alliance. name. with. the. dot. is. FTW..... Did. I. . mention... I .love. dots.?. |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces Ascendance.
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:20:00 -
[280] - Quote
I have a question regarding your latest blog post (the one about the economy and inflation).
Do you think the inflation as it is is sustainable?
Do you favour any solution in particular?
Incursion is a big isk creator, but it isn't alone. Bounties and sleeper blue books create a serious chunk of isk. After seeing the numbers presented in your blog, I'm starting to think that nerfing Incursion income in high sec wouldn't be enough. Especially with the change coming to Rogue Drones, even more isk will be created and the Incursion nerf by itself will not have any effect.
I don't want to see wormhole income nerfed considering the challenge involved with living there, but what if Blue books were transformed into a commodity that was used for a manufacturing process of some sort? This would be a creative way of removing the isk creation, but it would leave that part of wormhole income at the mercy of the EVE market.
Any thoughts on this?
I should add. I think EVE needs more ship battles. When people lose ships and buy new one, it makes the economy go round. I think the best solution to solve some of the inflation would be to create more opportunity for fights where people lose ship. |
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1558
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:16:00 -
[281] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:I have a question regarding your latest blog post (the one about the economy and inflation).
Do you think the inflation as it is is sustainable?
Do you favour any solution in particular?
I do think CCP needs to reduce the ISK sources some, but I would prefer to see them introduce more *sinks*. For example, making mission bonus rewards LP instead of ISK would not just eliminate an source, but also increase the amount sunk into the LP store. I think the current rate of ISK entering the economy is not good, though you can't really evaluate sustainability just on the flows in and out.
Quote: Incursion is a big isk creator, but it isn't alone. Bounties and sleeper blue books create a serious chunk of isk. After seeing the numbers presented in your blog, I'm starting to think that nerfing Incursion income in high sec wouldn't be enough. Especially with the change coming to Rogue Drones, even more isk will be created and the Incursion nerf by itself will not have any effect.
I don't want to see wormhole income nerfed considering the challenge involved with living there, but what if Blue books were transformed into a commodity that was used for a manufacturing process of some sort? This would be a creative way of removing the isk creation, but it would leave that part of wormhole income at the mercy of the EVE market.
Any thoughts on this?
I should add. I think EVE needs more ship battles. When people lose ships and buy new one, it makes the economy go round. I think the best solution to solve some of the inflation would be to create more opportunity for fights where people lose ship.
Edit again:
There's plenty of potential solutions, of course. I thought of these after posting. It's also possible to increases the isk sinks - you just need something that people want to spend isk on.
This was something proposed at the last fanfest; dynamic agents. The more an agent is used, the less it rewards. This motivates people to migrate and seek less populated areas. Dynamic rewards could also affect null sec; the more a system is used, the less it produces. This would force people to move around. Or instead, perhaps something like wormholes where there's an equal number of site across a region - when one is done in system X, it spawns elsewhere, it becomes a hunting game where you have to move to different system to catch the respawning sites. It also prevents people from jsut staying in their own risk-free isolated systems.
Blue books do put a lot more ISK into the economy than I would have thought, and perhaps they do need to be looked at. I do think Incursions also need a hard look, as they are putting nearly as much ISK into the economy as wormholes, and there is no way there are nearly as many people running incursions as there are living in w-space.
Dynamic agents just sound like a way to punish missioners. With the new agent quality changes I don't see how that would be all that helpful.
In general, I think CCP needs to bite the bullet and take a good hard look at risk vs. reward for all the PVE activities. There are clearly some activities that are far out of line in this area. Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Lunataria
Blackstar Privateer Consortium Sovereign Technologies
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 11:11:00 -
[282] - Quote
Can't have this on page two, good luck! |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1562
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:57:00 -
[283] - Quote
Only a few more days of voting, don't forget to vote! Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
JamesCLK
Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners
71
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 00:11:00 -
[284] - Quote
And back to the top it goes.
<3
|
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:29:00 -
[285] - Quote
Two step wrote:Only a few more days of voting, don't forget to vote! Specifically, don't forget to vote for Two step.
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1566
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 02:03:00 -
[286] - Quote
A true fan made this poster, to explain why to vote for me: http://i.imgur.com/AldkP.png Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Jet Aeon
Two Smoking Barrels
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 03:07:00 -
[287] - Quote
I hope this was fan art and not a commissioned piece. |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1567
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:01:00 -
[288] - Quote
Jet Aeon wrote:I hope this was fan art and not a commissioned piece.
That was pure fan "art"... Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
space gator
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 16:14:00 -
[289] - Quote
You got my vote, good luck Two step! |
Ayeson
Hard Knocks Inc.
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:15:00 -
[290] - Quote
Be sure you get out and vote for two step....remember, he birthed you through his mouthgina!!! |
|
Kilikas Avoridian
Hard Knocks Inc.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:35:00 -
[291] - Quote
HELL YEAH BRONIES. I voted for two step once for each step on all five of my accounts and I pray night and day to my brown haired, blue eyed, white skinned god that is two step, that in his divine goodness he kind of lets the other candidates feel like theyre gonna win, then crushes their hopes when he wins all the votes and is crowned space pop. May he gets elected so he can end the tyranny of carebears. ALL HAIL TWO STEP
DONT FORGET TO VOTE FOR TWOSTEP
hahaohgodlook at these faces this is so awesome lolthisonesapirate |
Galatica789
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 03:36:00 -
[292] - Quote
New England Patriots fan per chance? |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
311
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 17:21:00 -
[293] - Quote
Did you make it to fan-fest?
If so, can you confirm/deny that there is conversation from certain quarters about "Worm Hole Stabilizers", or words to that effect?
If your not there, can you use your contacts to check up on that?
Thanks m8.
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
Lunataria
Blackstar Privateer Consortium Sovereign Technologies
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:21:00 -
[294] - Quote
Congrats :) you made it through |
Fradle
Bite Me inc Exhale.
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:22:00 -
[295] - Quote
Congrats Two Step! Now make WHs better. |
Chitsa Jason
High Intellion Exhale.
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:23:00 -
[296] - Quote
woohoo congrats two!! :) |
Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces Ascendance.
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:24:00 -
[297] - Quote
Congratulation, Two Step! |
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:34:00 -
[298] - Quote
Congrats M8! Just like there is no I in Team there is no Fair in Eve... |
Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:43:00 -
[299] - Quote
Congratulations
I also applaud all w-space residents. I got a lot of mails advertising two step from several different corps. And I saw containers in w-space systems named "vote for two step" in several different systems. We wormholers apparently built a strong bloc and made sure that our interests will be strongly represented in the CSM. Well done! |
Grumpy Owly
388
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:56:00 -
[300] - Quote
Congrats Two Step. Bounty Hunting for CSM7
It's just criminal - Smuggling |
|
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
559
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:57:00 -
[301] - Quote
I didn't want Two Step to be an alternate again. He didn't deserve to be one.
So I had every account in my small corp vote for him. As my corp owes a lot to w-space (some of us have been in w-space since it was on SiSi, but for myself it was only about 2.5 years) convincing them to vote Two Step was easy.
I hoped that Two Step would make the seventh spot, but wow was I thrilled that he scored the second largest number of votes! The number of votes also set Two Step apart from the rest of the pack by a good margin too.
Congratulations Two Step! You deserve it!
|
soranno
14th Legion Sanctuary Pact
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 23:48:00 -
[302] - Quote
A great many of my corporation friends were kind enough to join me in my support of your campaign, and cast their votes in your favour.
I speak for them when I say that we are overjoyed at the success of your campaign, and indeed delighted that not only were you elected to the csm, but second only to the mittani, firmly placed as a strong council member, fully deserving of the support granted to you, I have no doubt.
I, and those of my corp that joined me in support of your campaign, wish you the very best for your time in CSM 7 and beyond.
Congratulations Two Step, and the very best of luck. |
Loki O'Grady
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 04:55:00 -
[303] - Quote
Congratulations, Two step, this is a fantastic result! Well done on winning - the result shows the support you have and we appreciate all the hard work you put into CSM6! |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
308
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 06:25:00 -
[304] - Quote
Wspace ftw - congrats & keep it tight! |
Bent Barrel
45
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 07:50:00 -
[305] - Quote
gratz two step .... now for the hard work part .... |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1568
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 08:34:00 -
[306] - Quote
Wow, you guys are amazing. I was figuring on 6-8th place, I had no idea I would get the second most votes. Still at fanfest, and very, very hung over, but thank you all very much! Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Indy Rider
Lapse Of Sanity Exhale.
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 11:04:00 -
[307] - Quote
Two step wrote:Wow, you guys are amazing. I was figuring on 6-8th place, I had no idea I would get the second most votes. Still at fanfest, and very, very hung over, but thank you all very much!
Grats!
To be perfectly honest I was expecting you to come in the same place :P
|
Starbuck Raider
You Can't Fool Owls
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 14:33:00 -
[308] - Quote
You now have one hell of a mandate to represent the interests of the w-space community |
naed21
The Dark Space Initiative Enclave.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 23:58:00 -
[309] - Quote
Congratulations from TDSIN. And thanks to your second place, CCP will no doubt be aware of how big a deal WH space is and how dedicated we are. |
Ammzi
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
893
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:15:00 -
[310] - Quote
Two step wrote:Wow, you guys are amazing. I was figuring on 6-8th place, I had no idea I would get the second most votes. Still at fanfest, and very, very hung over, but thank you all very much!
Thumbs up Two Step, make us proud. We are standing right behind you full of support! quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
247
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 04:46:00 -
[311] - Quote
no troll question now that you've been elected, there's a small matter of formality are you a wis incarna space barbie lover lisping emote lover? a simple no would do, thank you. wis shall not be a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, devoid of gameplay and consequnces. |
Soon Shin
Caucasian Culture Club Narwhals Ate My Duck
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 06:49:00 -
[312] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:no troll question now that you've been elected, there's a small matter of formality are you a wis incarna space barbie lover lisping emote lover? a simple no would do, thank you.
In wormhole space there is no such thing as Incarna. |
Soon Shin
Caucasian Culture Club Narwhals Ate My Duck
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 06:53:00 -
[313] - Quote
Since Mittani is stepping down, does that make you the Chairman now? |
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 21:53:00 -
[314] - Quote
Congratulations on your seat, Two Step. I hope the community will benefit greatly from having you in the CSM. You deserve every single one of the votes you received, and a lot more on top of that. I don't live in a Wormhole yet with any of my 3 accounts, but I'm going to move two of them soon to work as industrialists, while keeping the third out to play around with the more morally questionable content. I really look forward to seeing how different Wormhole Industry is from regular Industry.
You've already managed to reserve my 3 votes for next year's CSM elections, if you decide to run for then. |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
372
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:10:00 -
[315] - Quote
So will you be the next Chairman?
You naturally have my full support if that happens.
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1796
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 16:21:00 -
[316] - Quote
A full statement will be coming from CCP and the CSM. Until that is out, I am going to have to refrain from commenting. Vote Two step for CSM7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
Revolution Rising
Gentlemen of Better Ilk
229
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:12:00 -
[317] - Quote
Gotta say it will be nice having anyone who isn't a typical 0.0 chair in that position.
Lots of ppl hoping for an industrial/wormhole/POS expansion to get it done - once fixed it won't need to be messed with nearly as much as PVP mechanics.
CSM7 Skype Leak
|
Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
41
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 08:23:00 -
[318] - Quote
Two Step, any comment on why your fellow delegates backstabbed you in the internal elections, completely ignoring the popular vote count? What will it mean for your work on the CSM?
Any notion that this may have been an amiable agreement seems off the table since you ran for both chairman and vice chairman and also voted for yourself. |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 10:25:00 -
[319] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Two Step, any comment on why your fellow delegates backstabbed you in the internal elections, completely ignoring the popular vote count? What will it mean for your work on the CSM?
Any notion that this may have been an amiable agreement seems off the table since you ran for both chairman and vice chairman and also voted for yourself.
I don't want to empty quote but what the hell Two Step??? |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1827
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:07:00 -
[320] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Two Step, any comment on why your fellow delegates backstabbed you in the internal elections, completely ignoring the popular vote count? What will it mean for your work on the CSM?
Any notion that this may have been an amiable agreement seems off the table since you ran for both chairman and vice chairman and also voted for yourself.
I think you really need to be asking them why they voted the way they did. I do think Seleene will do a fine job as Chairman, and he would have been my choice if I were not eligible. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
|
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1119
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:45:00 -
[321] - Quote
Two step wrote:Terrorfrodo wrote:Two Step, any comment on why your fellow delegates backstabbed you in the internal elections, completely ignoring the popular vote count? What will it mean for your work on the CSM?
Any notion that this may have been an amiable agreement seems off the table since you ran for both chairman and vice chairman and also voted for yourself. I think you really need to be asking them why they voted the way they did. I do think Seleene will do a fine job as Chairman, and he would have been my choice if I were not eligible.
In its current iteration specifically what power does the Chair have?
|
discordigant
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:47:00 -
[322] - Quote
This is complete BULLSHIT, the Mittani got chairman because of his highest votes, thus by rights you should be the new chairman, i don't understand why there was an internal vote for chairman at all? It should have passed to the person with the second highest votes and lets also say double that of the next person in line.
If your going to re vote then i sadly and this is really sad to say but agree with the goons and a complete re vote should be done.
I CALL BULLSHIT ON THIS CSM AND CCP. Maybe the CSM's days are over if they can do back door deals to choose who they want above that of the players that voted. |
Terrorfrodo
Deep Space Darwinian Law Enforcement Agency
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 12:08:00 -
[323] - Quote
Two step wrote:I think you really need to be asking them why they voted the way they did. I do think Seleene will do a fine job as Chairman, and he would have been my choice if I were not eligible.
Your attitude does you honor. Many voters will not be as forgiving of this travesty.
Well, there's nothing left but hoping that you'll still have the power to influence things for the good. I wish you all the best. Winner of elections banned, runner-up demoted by rest of the body, the council controlled by the losers. CSM 7 is illegitimate, CCP should remember when dealing with them. Remember what players voted for. |
Starbuck Raider
You Can't Fool Owls
39
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 21:34:00 -
[324] - Quote
It's saddening that the other members of CSM 7, including those who have spent much oxygen proclaiming their better judgement and conduct in upholding the office of the CSM and the importance of this, have, as their first move, chosen to act against the will of the electorate with arrogant disregard for the inevitable controversy and disrepute this would further bring upon the council.
The dignified and honorable way you've conducted yourself in response to being so shamefully snubbed holds a mirror up to them all. |
Revolution Rising
Gentlemen of Better Ilk
315
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 09:32:00 -
[325] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Two step wrote:I think you really need to be asking them why they voted the way they did. I do think Seleene will do a fine job as Chairman, and he would have been my choice if I were not eligible. Your attitude does you honor. Many voters will not be as forgiving of this travesty. Well, there's nothing left but hoping that you'll still have the power to influence things for the good. I wish you all the best.
I can't see how there's a LOT of difference between two-step and Seleene as far as alignment with regard to building a better game. Both want balanced and fun gameplay in low-sec, high-sec, wormholes and 0.0.
I voted for both candidates, I rarely see them disagree about anything.
Both want better industry, both want better POS's... I don't see it as a big issue.
CSM7 Skype Leak
|
Starbuck Raider
You Can't Fool Owls
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 00:11:00 -
[326] - Quote
FYI: http://jestertrek.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/comment-of-week-whitewash.html
I would appear to be responsible for this. I'm afraid I just couldn't let what I've increasingly come to view as a heist pass-by without, at least some, high-profile scrutiny. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3290
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 05:49:00 -
[327] - Quote
I don't suppose it's worth reminding you that "Chairman" isn't all that meaningful a title? I mean you don't get any superpowers or even an extra donut at the conference.
Although it's rather amusing to see how thoroughly you've all bought into mittens' election propaganda. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
None ofthe Above
164
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 19:14:00 -
[328] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:I don't suppose it's worth reminding you that "Chairman" isn't all that meaningful a title? I mean you don't get any superpowers or even an extra donut at the conference.
Although it's rather amusing to see how thoroughly you've all bought into mittens' election propaganda.
Chairmanship is functionally about meaningless.
However, giving credit where credit is due, the Mittani knew how to take the meaningless title and use it. In his hands it meant a lot.
We'll have to see how well Selene can use it (talking to media outlets and such).
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: [one page] |