Either a candidate with experience and ideas that can make difficult decisions in the interests of others (and take the associated criticism)?

Or vote for a bloc vote candidate with no ideas at all.

Let's keep this thread about ideas to improve the game, regardless of alliance or affiliation.

I'm guessing you're one of the ****** bloc votes everyone keeps bringing up.

You're weak on the issues and have very little to say about anything. I have no doubt that you have down syndrome, and that you are by far the most ******** person to ever run for CSM.

Why would i be mad? I just called you out for ****** posting as usual. Plus you can always holla at me on msn ***.

1.) I don't think CCP will ever stop upgrading the hardware. They have a very dedicated team that talks to IBM and other companies all the time with regard to how to improve things. In this respect, EVE is unique - there is nothing else out there which does what EVE's cluster does so it naturally draws attention from companies on the leading edge of technology. Every FanFest there is a presentation on this where CCP and other tech companies talk about how they are helping each other do cool :nerd: stuff. So, basically, I'm not worried.

2.) This has actually been talked about quite a bit at the last summit but I cannot really go into detail. I can say that I believe the CSM has pushed hard on this issue and CCP acknowledges that it is a problem they are looking to remedy. TLDR - Already on it!

3.) I think that the game should evolve and expand to keep providing challenges to it's older players. Space is vast and full of mysteries. Since Apocrypha, there really hasn't been a push to recover a sense of wonder in EVE for players. CCP needs to find a way to rediscover this through content designed specifically to feed the passions of jaded, older players so we'll stop swinging lightsabers or forging iron daggers when we get bored.

It's because the people who rage against us the hardest only do so because they secretly want to join us. Just make peace with that and give in to the inevitable. I'm pretty sure we've got a spot in SAS saved for you brother.

You make it seem that you are any different? Or that those in you alliance leadership are not. Don't forget for years i was also in the -a- alliance leadership forums. There were a lot of what you call self serving turncoats, but you make it seem like no else does what they feel is in their best interest. You did the same by being in Rage in Terror did you not? So i guess the main question is should you be throwing personal assaults in a CSM thread or actually trying to post something useful instead of the same old usually sith8?

To answer the direct question what is wrong with your post, answer this question then what sov mechanics have actually worked that ccp have spit out? Everything up to this point has been trial and error instead of bitching and complaining at least some people are trying to find something that will work or be somewhat balanced. So maybe instead of armchair quarterbacking and going for personal assaults you could.........i don't know come post something useful and stop being a total ******.

Thanks, man (me too), so let's talk about RL then because you've nailed the main issue. I feel very comfortable in saying that I didn't do one thing different on the CSM regardless of who voted for me. I ran very openly as someone that does not have any intention of bias toward one alliance or style of gameplay. Sure, I have my personal priorities but those are all public record, moreso than many other CSMs. This nonsense that I somehow violated your trust implies that I actively worked against some secret agenda that I would never agree to in the first place.

You cannot offer anything that says I favored PL or any other alliance in my tenure on CSM 6. You have NOTHING but bitching about how I amd Manny and whoever else decided to do what we felt best for us and our bros. The reason you can't is because the CSM is an OUT OF GAME ORGANIZATION. When we sit down in Iceland or talk on Skype, I talk with real people about real issues in the game. I talk with people like Alex, Robert, Mikhal, Josh, Sean and Stephan. In fact, it's pretty funny how rare, if ever, anyone gets ~mad~ about in game politics. If someone comes in amd starts this tinfoil bullshit they are rapidly outcast.

If you are mad about some in game political thing, all right. But stop trying to connect it to the Real Life work that the CSM does on the video game we all play.