|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
forator2
Meet The Fockers
Vera Cruz Alliance
0
   |
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Congrats Elise.
I want you to clarify something for us please.
I know that all the discussions csm-ccp are posted on internet to be seen.
Now, if I read well the last post of CCP Greyscale in section Incoming titan adjustments he says "We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though." talking about tracking, scan resolution and tracking changes.
In the last meeting minute "CSM meeting minutes GÇô Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011" the only thing about titan is "The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix.
The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes."
http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf
Maybe I am wrong, so please clarify this for me. Where are the discutions about the scan resolution and targeting. did csm ever asked anything like that?
thank you. |
forator2
Meet The Fockers
Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andski wrote:acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything
fyi nobody cares
You are illiterate, mon petit ... use punctuation |
forator2
Meet The Fockers
Vera Cruz Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 19:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Andski wrote:None ofthe Above wrote:Andski wrote:forator2 wrote:Andski wrote:acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything
fyi nobody cares You are illiterate, mon petite ... use punctuation learn to use punctuation yourself, that is now how you use ellipses br0 fly away~ Surely you meant to write "...that is not..."? surely you are an idiot you understood what I posted to begin with and he brought up the whole grammar thing
So, for everybody who reads this to understand, we are all idiots cause you are eating characters ( I am sorry, maybe you were hungry and ate the keyboard )
Now really... you don't see everybody's laughing at you? |
|
|
| |
|