| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
   |
Posted - 2008.01.24 14:13:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Tamo Isrect
Edited by: Tamo Isrect on 24/01/2008 11:57:08
"RA's ban on sov warfare between southern coalition members"
One simple question: What makes KOS a coalition member? Sure, noone excepted KOS to be a big help. But did KOS even try? I guess it's your own lazyness that brought you this outcome.
Tamo
Thats BS and you know it.
Of course KOS can't accurately present itself in "coalition" efforts, when AAA camps the pipe to the location.
AAA is as guilty of ganking in mass as any other wannabe self righteous alliance. Heaven forbid there be an overall objective... if easy kills are involved there is obviously no reason to deny them.
AAA is attacking KOS just for the sake of attacking an alliance which will bulster their killboards, while taking minimal loses. Also, what better way to gain space than attacking a region that has no defensive capability what so ever. Multiple entry points from alliances that are NAP'd with both involved parties. Its easy to see, atleast from a tactical stand point, which alliance has the upperhand.
Some real PVP vs Bob would smear a killboard with quite an ugly mark. 
So stop coming up with halfassed excuses that are so called "reasons" why you are attacking.
The weak will always be picked on by the strong.
This is just another statistic.
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.24 14:36:00 -
[2]
Last I checked Xelas had only owned one outpost and lived out of NPC stations before the eviction. I fail to see how Xelas who rented from BOB can be comparied to KOS, tho dispite being relatively weak, owns multiple stations and does not rent from anyone.
Factoring in KOS's resistence, which is yet to be seen, and the inevitable wait for Sovereighty to drop, KOS has quite alot of time to remove items. C3 may be on the brink of being a lost cause, but none of this will happen in a day.
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.24 14:43:00 -
[3]
Originally by: CRUSH3R
1. I doubt our attack is somehow related with RA "masterplan" :)) We have our own reasons.
2. We had about 55 dreads and 15 carriers/motherships + 140-150 bs\support ships.
3. Ofcoarse bob\mc\anyone else are welcomed to the party.
Why don't you take your party to them?
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.24 14:48:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam
Originally by: Corewin
Last I checked Xelas had only owned one outpost and lived out of NPC stations before the eviction. I fail...
Ok. If you look to my original quote, I quoted a rhetoric argument "BoB is evil" when in fact BoB has done not far from the same in the past.
Quit bailing out BoB by pointing the finger at what others do every time there is even a long shot. It doesn't work.
I could care less about BOB. The comparison between Xelas and KOS is a failure all of its own.
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.24 15:18:00 -
[5]
Sounds like, contribute when we want, get help when we need it... act like a gangsta shooting 5 year olds if either don't apply. ahh the glory of battle. 
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.24 15:31:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Evil Thug
It was bob, who relyed on 10+ pet allainces, not aAa. Ask your leadership for history lessons. And if we include all loses from pet alliances, when they fought in bob gangs against us - ratio will be even worse for you.
Now stop trolling and get more kills please.
Why don't you do something about BOB then Thug. You want to preach about how badass AAA is, but your only shooting at KOS. 
|
Corewin
Deathwatch Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.01.30 08:13:00 -
[7]
 Let this thread die. FFS
|
| |
|