| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
75
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 10:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
I was discussing the meaning of life with people in a channel somewhere when I had a sudden and life altering question about Eve. Does CCP show favoritism to some players more than others?
If CCP ever find out that somebody relevant to them, like Chribba for example, were to have violated the EULA in a bannable manner, do you think they'd burry it or let them off with a lesser punishment than they would say John Doe?
Take Mittens for example. He's the head of the CSM, runs Goonswarm, proclaims he's the most influential player, and all together makes a lot of noise in Eve. CCP has player accounts that are anonymously apart of the population, hire people from Eve, and is very active in the community. It stands to reason CCP has some kind of relation to Mittens. If mittens were to bot and raise the flags that CCP uses to track bots, do you think they'd go easier on him than anybody else? Perhaps let him off with a warning where they'd usually ban somebody? After all, he's on the CSM, leads an alliance, and does stuff. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
75
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 10:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'd like to think CCP is unbiassed. But the fact is, CCP is run by people and not computers. And people become attached to others, get toilet paper stuck to their shoe, and have their sleeves get stuck on door knobs. So, it can happen. Just wondering if it does and if the community thinks it does.
Edit: What I'm trying to ask is if you and mittens were busted for doing eula violation a with no priors for both of you, would mittens get off with a warning when you would be banned? |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2812
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 10:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Of course it exists.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |

Eternus8lux8lucis
Whack-A-Mole
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Youd have to be an idiot to believe it doesnt happen ANY time people group together. So yes it has, is and will continue to happen for a lot of underlying psychological reasons. Strength isnt measured in numbers but in force of will. For if one motived willful individual stands many will fall around him that are weak.
http://tinyurl.com/YarrFace |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
339
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP bans people off and on. Usually they lift the ban unless its really extreme. Like most punishment cases Time can be part of the punishment and CCP uses that as well.
Signature removed, CCP Phantom |

ILikeMarkets
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
57
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote: Take Mittens for example. He's the head of the CSM, runs Goonswarm, proclaims he's the most influential player...
lol. Sure he is  Protect highsec.-áWe are the 66%.
https://p.twimg.com/Ajc6KNBCQAAT9my.png (Source: https://twitter.com/ccp_diagoras ) |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
307
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
I am confuse, is this a legitimate question or a stealth attack on Mitani?
As far as Im aware, if you do a bannable offence you get banned. There have been influential peoepl banned previously, even if its not game making influence they wielded. There has always been talk of ccp favoritism, and there always will be.
I think the talk just depends on who the general public hate most at the time, they will get accused fo having ccp influence. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2812
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:56:00 -
[8] - Quote
Are you going on about the Xenuria is a paedo thread?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:I am confuse, is this a legitimate question or a stealth attack on Mitani?
It is a stealth attack. |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1122
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 11:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
I highly doubt CCP would give a tough punishment on any CSM member caught for the first time.
Hell, CCP probably settle with a promise not to do it again.
Last thing CCP want's to do is have the CSM mad at them, especially since CCP is still busy placating the player base for last summer. |

Tora Bushido
Count With Teddy Mercenaries Stay Calm Don't Panic
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 12:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
In the end, its all about just one thing.......me.....euhhhh..... I mean $$$$$.  'We need Tora on CSM like we need holes in our heads.... Both will get you metal plates
Copyright : Tallian Saotome EVE PR Services |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
it is in any company's best interest to give preferential treatment to exceptionally well-known/influential customers
on the other hand (especially in gaming) no company wants this preferential treatment to get too much public coverage lest other customers feel disadvantaged.
for a somewhat recent example of the awkward dance this results in see this summary of the aftermath of Blizzard banning a very well-known WoW player. of course they lifted the ban after a few days and of course this decision had nothing to do with the person on the receiving end, the publicity he had managed to generate around the whole event and his sponsor - Razer - intervening on his behalf but was based on a careful review of evidence. |

Ptraci
StoneWall Metals Productions Bloodbound.
319
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
If CCP ever find out that somebody relevant to them, like Chribba for example, were to have violated the EULA in a bannable manner, do you think they'd burry it or let them off with a lesser punishment than they would say John Doe?
There's another school of thought that says that Chribba would receive a harsher penalty since he is so "popular" and therefore easier to be made an example of than some John Doe that no one knows/cares about. Favoritism can work in different directions, but if it exists you can safely bet that the direction will always be in favor of the hidden agenda of the one using favoritism. |

Patient 2428190
DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School
61
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
They usually ban first, figure it out later.
In the case of an e-celeb, it usually works out against the company to ban him, because then the "victim" can parade around like some sort of holy martyr. In the case where they wouldn't ban an e-famous person over a regular Joe, I'd imagine it would have have more to do with avoiding neckbeard fallout than actual favoritism |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
340
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nah CCP doesnt show any favoritism, When T2BPOs dropped from their loot caravan they dropped for everyone. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
802
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:36:00 -
[16] - Quote
yes it's biased, CCP Punkturis hates me, therefore she loves you all and by doing this her feelings are biased towards me 
CCP Punkturis hear meh
|

Something Random
The Barrow Boys
126
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:53:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sure they do.
Im getting little love letters from them all the time. Some are quite kinky actually.
"caught on fire a little bit, just a little." "Delinquents, check, weirdos, check, hippies, check, pillheads, check, freaks, check, potheads, check .....gangsn++ all here!" |

Riley Moore
Sentinum Research
324
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 13:58:00 -
[18] - Quote
Of course it exists, CCP Soundwave knows that I know what he did two summers ago. I'm untouchable! Large volumes of highly researched Ammo, drones, charges and ship bpo's. Biggest BPO store in EVE! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524 |

Hainnz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
88
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 14:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
I know you're talking about EULA-breaking and not EVE-legal bad behavior, but I find myself getting upset at the idea that Chribba would do something underhanded. (His alts can do whatever, though and it wouldn't bother me.) :-) |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
2814
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 15:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
Do you actually know for a fact that it was The Mittani that broadcasted that 'Xenuria is a Paedophile' slanderbait?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki |

Pok Nibin
Viziam Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 15:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
Gawd! Mitt IS a violation of the EULA. In the fine print there it says "...and you CAN'T be UGLY and play this game." Poor kid. His momma says he's ugly! U - G - L - Y, ugly, ugly UGLY! Don't fight it.-á Rejoin your Amarrian patriarchs.-á You know you want to. |

Nephilius
Grey Legionaires
313
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
2bhammered wrote:Rico Minali wrote:I am confuse, is this a legitimate question or a stealth attack on Mitani? It is a stealth attack.
Baaa, says the sheep. Slaughterhouse is thataway. To stand before a man at an inquisition, knowing that he will rejoice when we die, knowing that he will commit us to the stake and its horrors without a moment's hesitation or remorse if we do not satisfy him, is not an experience much less cruel because our inquisitor does not whip us or rack us or shout at us. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1551
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
CCP give me 5 plex a week to keep the forums lively so yes, favouritism exists. The important question is; why does it matter? (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released 0ccupational Hazzard
452
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:I highly doubt CCP would give a tough punishment on any CSM member caught for the first time.
Hell, CCP probably settle with a promise not to do it again.
Last thing CCP want's to do is have the CSM mad at them, especially since CCP is still busy placating the player base for last summer.
Guess you weren't around when CCP removed Ankhesentapemkah from the CSM. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
584
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mittani support boting does it count |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
394
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:38:00 -
[26] - Quote
Nephilius wrote:2bhammered wrote:Rico Minali wrote:I am confuse, is this a legitimate question or a stealth attack on Mitani? It is a stealth attack. Baaa, says the sheep. Slaughterhouse is thataway. lmao sheep calling hahaahh |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
394
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
Killstealing wrote:Nephilius wrote:2bhammered wrote:Rico Minali wrote:I am confuse, is this a legitimate question or a stealth attack on Mitani? It is a stealth attack. Baaa, says the sheep. Slaughterhouse is thataway. lmao sheep calling hahaahh hahaahaha i know right
e: oops forgot to swap alt oh well   |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4593
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 19:36:00 -
[28] - Quote
this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Soporo
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 19:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
Look up the T20 threadnought debacle and then decide if blatant favoritism can't exist in EVE.
Devs are in normal player Corps and Alliances at all levels, they allways have been and always will be, and people will be people, particularly when there seems to be zero evidence of mitigating controlls. Whether or not that's true, only CCP knows, butthat is the perception. Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - H.L. Mencken |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
803
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 20:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Mittani support boting does it count
I wouldn't go there since seems old TCF space doesn't seem to have drones, however they do have rating bots just go there and sit you'll figure it out by yourself, just like every alliance, do you really think a "normal" player can do several billions daily/weekly,monthly (regular amounts)?
Is he an asshat drunken mittens raper? -probably yes, arrogant for sure. (it's some english native skill anyway ) Is he a boter? -well if you have proves then show us |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1122
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 21:47:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alpheias wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:I highly doubt CCP would give a tough punishment on any CSM member caught for the first time.
Hell, CCP probably settle with a promise not to do it again.
Last thing CCP want's to do is have the CSM mad at them, especially since CCP is still busy placating the player base for last summer. Guess you weren't around when CCP removed Ankhesentapemkah from the CSM.
Back then CCP also didn't have a multitude of events happen that almost toppled their empire.
Not to mention that was for breaking NDA which usually has severe consequences in real life.
This topic is about violating the EULA which rarely has an impact on real life events. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
ILikeMarkets wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote: Take Mittens for example. He's the head of the CSM, runs Goonswarm, proclaims he's the most influential player...
lol. Sure he is 
Just quoting Eve News |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute
Used you as an example. It was 0500 and I couldn't remember Montolio's name at the time |
|

CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
1214

|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:yes it's biased, CCP Punkturis hates me, therefore she loves you all and by doing this her feelings are biased towards me CCP Punkturis hear meh
whaaaaaat how could I hate you?
you're the only one who has offered to make streets of flowers just for me!  CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer | @katrinat |
|

Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
106
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
I don't know about how it works for bans and such, but I got a bug report answered within less than 3 hours. On a Sunday. Please support: export of settings in editable format
Your stuff goes here. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 23:39:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:yes it's biased, CCP Punkturis hates me, therefore she loves you all and by doing this her feelings are biased towards me CCP Punkturis hear meh whaaaaaat how could I hate you? you're the only one who has offered to make streets of flowers just for me! 
I can't tell if you're trying to reassure us it doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't look like it. |

Duvida
The Scope Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 23:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:yes it's biased, CCP Punkturis hates me, therefore she loves you all and by doing this her feelings are biased towards me CCP Punkturis hear meh whaaaaaat how could I hate you? you're the only one who has offered to make streets of flowers just for me! 
This was offered to be planted/created in Iceland? (In Atlanta, she could just throw some Kudzu around, toss polka-dot paint on it and it'd look like 'streets of flowers') |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1230
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 00:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
CCP hates lone wolf players and for some uncomfortable reason it turns me on.
|

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
346
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 00:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
Super Signature removed, CCP Phantom |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
338
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 01:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:CCP hates lone wolf players and for some uncomfortable reason it turns me on. Nah. I'm lone most of the time... I've done some messed up smack to people. One time I got petitioned by someone who I was trying to discredit and make a few bucks from, and it was legal grey area. Obviously I'm not going into detail on that, but they sided w/ the famous guy and not me. They did, however, go in and edit evelopedia and associated policy threads to make it crystal clear that what I did was a no-go. That's a lot of trouble those GMs went to for something I did that took only a few moments just to make sure the rules were clear. The thing is, if I (or most others who ride the grey line) were to have something happen where I felt favoritism was shown, I'd probably be yapping about it in the forums. This player community is insane. By that I mean there are some real nutters that share space with us and will go to ridiculous lengths to support whatever stupid crusade they are on. I'm certain CCP is more cognizant of that than I... they know you can't bury a story (a'la T20).
If there is a fair shake to be had, it's the petition system. They will take the time to explain everything and make sure both parties are satisfied, or if not satisfied at least aware of the rules and why the judgement shook out the way it did. It's all standard fair.
Acac Sunflyier wrote:If CCP ever find out that somebody relevant to them, like Chribba for example, were to have violated the EULA in a bannable manner, do you think they'd burry it or let them off with a lesser punishment than they would say John Doe? Let's say Chribba was selling Veldspar for RL money, as a hypothetical. What I would do is ban him outright because if anyone knows what CCP's policies are, it's him. What you are suggesting, OP, is that CCP might just ignore him? I think in practice though, it would be handled like anyone else getting busted for RMT. He would get a warning and maybe some of his smack or ISK would be impounded. Second offence probably a two week ban and other stuff confiscated. After that, he might get his chars banned altogether. Dealing with it in that vanilla way ensures that when Chribba comes back to the forums to complain about how unfairly he was treated, everyone will be able to see all the events that transpired were handles the same as they might have been handled for anyone else. When Hellicity (sp?) got banned during the riots yah people complained... but eventually all the ins and outs of why ended up on the table and people realized that it would have been the same for anyone else.
Acac Sunflyier wrote:Take Mittens for example. He's the head of the CSM, runs Goonswarm, proclaims he's the most influential player, and all together makes a lot of noise in Eve. CCP has player accounts that are anonymously apart of the population, hire people from Eve, and is very active in the community. It stands to reason CCP has some kind of relation to Mittens. If mittens were to bot and raise the flags that CCP uses to track bots, do you think they'd go easier on him than anybody else? Perhaps let him off with a warning where they'd usually ban somebody? After all, he's on the CSM, leads an alliance, and does stuff.
Again, Mittens knows the rules better than most, certainly better than I. ...and while I would again ban his a55 in a second for any infraction, CCP wouldn't. He's done some really crazy smack in this game, but like anyone else, he has to follow the rules. If he breaks them the punishment would be no less or greater than it would be for any of us "common" people. He's just in a position to do something huge that effects the whole game... and if what he did was against the rules and it wasn't a repeat offence, I'm sure he would just get a warning. So when you look at it like that, I think at a glance it might seem unjust that everyone is treated the same, but you can't say that it's unfair or favoritism, because after T20 I really haven't heard of even a single creditable case of a dev showing favoritism.
|

Ai Shun
262
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 02:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
I find myself strangely at ease with the idea of favouritism in EVE Online; to a point. Allow me to explain, using Gogela's example. If, for example, I was engaged in RMT and were caught doing so I would expect a full ban immediately. This would seem fair to me, because, well. I broke the rules and in terms of my value to EVE Online I'm just another $15.
If the same happened to the Mittani or to Chribba or to another of the EVE celebrities I'd expect them to receive a warning, a wallet hit and closer scrutiny in the future. Because, the cost of banning them is far larger than just another $15. They are the types of players who devote a significant amount of their personal time and real resources to the game. In a way they are like mini CCP employees. So while I wouldn't expect them to get off scot-free; I would expect the penalties against them to be lower because they are more valuable to the game overall.
By that token, of course, I expect the odds of them being involved in something dodgy is also commensurately lower because of the higher level of scrutiny they automatically have. Or maybe that's just a day-dream 
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
339
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 02:51:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:I find myself strangely at ease with the idea of favouritism in EVE Online; to a point. Allow me to explain, using Gogela's example. If, for example, I was engaged in RMT and were caught doing so I would expect a full ban immediately. This would seem fair to me, because, well. I broke the rules and in terms of my value to EVE Online I'm just another $15. If the same happened to the Mittani or to Chribba or to another of the EVE celebrities I'd expect them to receive a warning, a wallet hit and closer scrutiny in the future. Because, the cost of banning them is far larger than just another $15. They are the types of players who devote a significant amount of their personal time and real resources to the game. In a way they are like mini CCP employees. So while I wouldn't expect them to get off scot-free; I would expect the penalties against them to be lower because they are more valuable to the game overall. By that token, of course, I expect the odds of them being involved in something dodgy is also commensurately lower because of the higher level of scrutiny they automatically have. Or maybe that's just a day-dream  See... I disagree with this. In particular the way you are monetizing your "value" vs someone better known is wrong within the context of the policy. If it could be said for the sake of argument that your character, Ai Shun, is worth 129 bucks a year and Mittani is worth say 3 grand a year (again, just speaking hypothetically here) it wouldn't matter in the grand scheme of things because even with Mittens significantly higher subscription premiums they are a drop in the bucket for CCP in terms of total revenue or operating budget. The quality of the game play is the draw for all of these subscriptions. If it was understood that CCP would arbitrarily pull the plug on your accounts on a whim, or that the field of play would be actively tilted by CCP away from a newcomer, this game would be as worthless as any other MMO that pops up and goes away in a few months. CCP's only currency is the legitimacy of the game. That's all they have. 10 years from now EVE will look like Elite in relative terms of graphics and assuming no further development is done. People in this game make a 1 and 2 year plan (I had never even heard of such a thing in a game until I played this one) because they have faith in CCP's commitment to continue to develop the game and keep what few rules there are in place and adjudicated in an even handed way. Most of those subscriptions would go away if this were not the case. So to paraphrase my Marine drill instructor from boot: "we are all equally worthless pieces of sh**". No single pilot's subscription money makes that big a difference. The perception overall of EvE is what has value. If you combined your subscription fees with Mittens, CCP could buy a few rolling chairs for some coder's office. If the perception was that there is favoritism in eve and a nub can't get a fair shake, CCP's going to have to sell their whole building.
|

Ai Shun
262
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 04:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
Gogela wrote:See... I disagree with this. In particular the way you are monetizing your "value" vs someone better known is wrong within the context of the policy.
-- snip ---
If the perception was that there is favoritism in eve and a nub can't get a fair shake, CCP's going to have to sell their whole building.
Ah, I hear you. If I gave the impression a new player would not get a fair shake, my apologies. I'd want them to get a fair shake according to the rules published by CCP. However, I see more value in the notoriety and fame that brand names like the Mittani and Chribba and others bring to EVE Online than I see in the value of their subscription dollars, so I am okay with the idea of people who are very visible testaments to EVE Online getting a bit more slack on their first offences.
|

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1561
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 06:52:00 -
[44] - Quote
OP is just a jealous nobody that probably got caught rmting or something to compensate for losing failfit myrmidons. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
|

CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
1215

|
Posted - 2012.02.13 09:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to reassure us it doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't look like it.
Yeah, I think Tanya might be my favorite weird stalker - it's a tough competition though, I have a few
Duvida wrote:This was offered to be planted/created in Iceland?  (In Atlanta, she could just throw some Kudzu around, toss polka-dot paint on it and it'd look like 'streets of flowers')
just in New Eden  CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer | @katrinat |
|

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 09:57:00 -
[46] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to reassure us it doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't look like it.
Yeah, I think Tanya might be my favorite weird stalker - it's a tough competition though, I have a few Duvida wrote:This was offered to be planted/created in Iceland?  (In Atlanta, she could just throw some Kudzu around, toss polka-dot paint on it and it'd look like 'streets of flowers') just in New Eden 
Did you even read my original post? Or, is your lack of an out right denial an attempt to say there is favoritism when it comes to enforcing the EULA? |
|

CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
1215

|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to reassure us it doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't look like it.
Yeah, I think Tanya might be my favorite weird stalker - it's a tough competition though, I have a few Duvida wrote:This was offered to be planted/created in Iceland?  (In Atlanta, she could just throw some Kudzu around, toss polka-dot paint on it and it'd look like 'streets of flowers') just in New Eden  Did you even read my original post? Or, is your lack of an out right denial an attempt to say there is favoritism when it comes to enforcing the EULA?
I have nothing to do with banning people or seeing if people are enforcing the EULA. I just saw Tanya was talking about me so I replied to her. My reply to her wasn't a reply to your original post.
I'm sorry I posted unrelated stuff in your thread - won't post again. CCP Punkturis | EVE UI Developer | @katrinat |
|

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:03:00 -
[48] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to reassure us it doesn't exist. It certainly doesn't look like it.
Yeah, I think Tanya might be my favorite weird stalker - it's a tough competition though, I have a few Duvida wrote:This was offered to be planted/created in Iceland?  (In Atlanta, she could just throw some Kudzu around, toss polka-dot paint on it and it'd look like 'streets of flowers') just in New Eden  Did you even read my original post? Or, is your lack of an out right denial an attempt to say there is favoritism when it comes to enforcing the EULA? I have nothing to do with banning people or seeing if people are enforcing the EULA. I just saw Tanya was talking about me so I replied to her. My reply to her wasn't a reply to your original post. I'm sorry I posted unrelated stuff in your thread - won't post again.
Oh god, I chased off the only CCP person I ever see do forum stuff. I'M SORRY! |
|

CCP Prism X
C C P C C P Alliance
508

|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:31:00 -
[49] - Quote
I dont know how the CCP officials which actually carry out our policy avoid any favouritism. There should be some basic due diligence and checks and balances in place, just like there are in any executive branch of any entity in the western world. This is why we have IA.
But favoritism is just a bad word for "experience". I show favoritism in all aspects of my life and do not feel that it is inappropriate. I will treat people differently based on my experience with them. For example I will avoid talking to that annoying guy who wouldn't leave me alone the last time I met him at the pub. I will also not buy him any drinks because he's shown that he's rather annoying when he is drunk and I don't feel like being annoyed.
This is of course not favouritism, but I would then most likely extend that opinion of mine to any of his friends that I do not know. Again this is because I do not want to be annoyed while I'm at the pub interacting with people and I'm not going to "test" their character and risk being stuck with someone explaining the finer points of his 2nd edition AD&D Paladin (I've been stuck in this conversation, yes. And I love AD&D.. at some point I just have to be allowed to talk as well because your Paladin is only that interesting to me).
But that just tells me how I deal with people in the pub. It has no effect on CCPs policy or the practice thereof. I just saw philosophical wonderings about the human condition and thought I'd post some nonsense about it. After all, I do like the sound of my fingers striking the keys! 
P.S. Be nice to Punkturis. I'd give you a reason but you shouldn't need one to be nice to people.  ~ CCP Prism X EVE Database Developer If anything in this post was informative or could be considered as 'good news' to you - chances are you've misread it. |
|

My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:31:00 -
[50] - Quote
Well, from remembering the "Monkey incident" which was (is) a member of PL, EULA was broken for MANY times/ways. And, as far as i know nobody was banned, so there might be some kind of "favors" for the biggies. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
225
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 10:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Officially? Of course CCP don't play favourites. Unofficially? Is anyone really naive enough to believe that it doesn't happen? The only thing you can do is hope that its not to widespread and doesn't shaft the players to any great extent. Not that I believe that CCP is particularly corrupt or anything, its just how it works for any company or service provider.
People who work in IT call centres at a telecoms firm get friends moved up the priority list, GMs from MMO providers pass things along to RL friends that play the game, the guy who works in supply's will get stationary for his friends.
All that day to day dodgyness and corruption is a part of life, CCP as a company made up of human beings isn't magically exempt from it. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2911
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 11:06:00 -
[52] - Quote
My Postman wrote:Well, from remembering the "Monkey incident" which was (is) a member of PL, EULA was broken for MANY times/ways. And, as far as i know nobody was banned, so there might be some kind of "favors" for the biggies.
Many assertions were made but nothing was actually proven IIRC. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2450
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 12:04:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP Prism X wrote:For example I will avoid talking to that annoying guy who wouldn't leave me alone the last time I met him at the pub. I will also not buy him any drinks because he's shown that he's rather annoying when he is drunk and I don't feel like being annoyed. All I wanted to know was what cool SELECT and UPDATE statements you used 
  
|
|

oustade Habalu
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 12:07:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jhagiti Tyran wrote:Officially? Of course CCP don't play favourites. Unofficially? Is anyone really naive enough to believe that it doesn't happen? The only thing you can do is hope that its not to widespread and doesn't shaft the players to any great extent. Not that I believe that CCP is particularly corrupt or anything, its just how it works for any company or service provider.
People who work in IT call centres at a telecoms firm get friends moved up the priority list, GMs from MMO providers pass things along to RL friends that play the game, the guy who works in supply's will get stationary for his friends.
All that day to day dodgyness and corruption is a part of life, CCP as a company made up of human beings isn't magically exempt from it.
This, its all there...
Also, this forum needs a "dislike" option, or just remove the "like" one.
Also, we are Writing, Not Talking!
|

ASadOldGit
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
133
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 12:24:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Gogela wrote:See... I disagree with this. In particular the way you are monetizing your "value" vs someone better known is wrong within the context of the policy.
-- snip ---
If the perception was that there is favoritism in eve and a nub can't get a fair shake, CCP's going to have to sell their whole building. Ah, I hear you. If I gave the impression a new player would not get a fair shake, my apologies. I'd want them to get a fair shake according to the rules published by CCP. However, I see more value in the notoriety and fame that brand names like the Mittani and Chribba and others bring to EVE Online than I see in the value of their subscription dollars, so I am okay with the idea of people who are very visible testaments to EVE Online getting a bit more slack on their first offences. CCP could also use the fame of those people to their advantage, by forcing them to publicly apologise if they want to keep playing the game (in addition to a punishment, not a replacement), with the idea of raising the profile of that issue (EULA violation, botting, RMT, etc) and showing potential violators that anyone can and will be caught.
My container is NOT imploding! It's just a bit upset that it only sees cheap crap. |

Shazzam Vokanavom
Hedion University Amarr Empire
135
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 13:56:00 -
[56] - Quote
What no IF THEN ELSE for cross referencing validity statements and coroboration? 
@OP;
Does favouratism exist? Yes, else the world would be grey.
"Are CCP corruptable?" I think is the question and ironically due to the nature of that questioning and who it's targetted at you either have faith in that or push for transparency or an informed view, but even then you would question the source if corruptability was an issue. Having reasonable doubts however is a healthy start rather than simply accepting things verbatum especially with some of the outlandish claims some of the CSM are pandering currently.
If I can ask the OP, what kind of responce would placate your suspicions? |

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
313
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 14:38:00 -
[57] - Quote
Favoritism has existed in EVE for a very long time and there have been multiple incidents in the past due to this. Mostly because it is the negative part of developers communicating close with their player base. So alternatively we could have developers never posting on the forums and being (even more ) out of touch with their player base than currently.
There have not been any major blatant favoritism incidents for some time now, but that generally just means that a new one will pop up soon as part of the cycle. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
238
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 14:38:00 -
[58] - Quote
CCP Prism X wrote:P.S. Be nice to Punkturis. I'd give you a reason but you shouldn't need one to be nice to people. 
God love you for trying but this the is EVE forums, are you new round here or something? 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

oustade Habalu
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 14:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
Professor Alphane wrote:CCP Prism X wrote:P.S. Be nice to Punkturis. I'd give you a reason but you shouldn't need one to be nice to people.  God love you for trying but this the is EVE forums, are you new round here or something? 
Well in his favor, at least the guy has the balls to admit his favoritism...
CCP Prism X wrote: I show favoritism in all aspects of my life and do not feel that it is inappropriate.
|

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 15:05:00 -
[60] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute
Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
159
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 19:06:00 -
[61] - Quote
Oh dear.
I just got a very disturbing picture in my mind of a seriously drunk^h^h^h^h^h happy Chribba wanting to argue the finer points of an SQL statement at 02:30 am at the pub ...
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
339
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 20:44:00 -
[62] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? Don't over-think anything the Goons say. It's usually a troll anyway... either that or a scam.
|

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
74
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 21:18:00 -
[63] - Quote
CCP favors those who bring in the most revenue.
Obvious answer is obvious. 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
870
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 21:40:00 -
[64] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? Don't over-think anything the Goons say. It's usually a troll anyway... either that or a scam.
Got to love the sheer amount of autonomous Goon-Hate from a bunch of people that have probably never talked to or encountered a goon in EvE. We just take forums very, very seriously... and have our own internal humor and witty sense of sarcasm, sorry if thats hard to understand.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?
shazbot Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2919
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 21:48:00 -
[65] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Gogela wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? Don't over-think anything the Goons say. It's usually a troll anyway... either that or a scam. Got to love the sheer amount of autonomous Goon-Hate from a bunch of people that have probably never talked to or encountered a goon in EvE. We just take forums very, very seriously... and have our own internal humor and witty sense of sarcasm, sorry if thats hard to understand. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?shazbot
What's the "we" you talk about, Mr non-Goon?
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
870
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 21:57:00 -
[66] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:What's the "we" you talk about, Mr non-Goon?
I was going to type a witty reply.. but lol, Initiative.
Tell me all about ship losses without tech income.
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
339
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 22:24:00 -
[67] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Gogela wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? Don't over-think anything the Goons say. It's usually a troll anyway... either that or a scam. Got to love the sheer amount of autonomous Goon-Hate from a bunch of people that have probably never talked to or encountered a goon in EvE. We just take forums very, very seriously... and have our own internal humor and witty sense of sarcasm, sorry if thats hard to understand. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?shazbot
Ha! Suicide Kings! Actually since your recruitment has opened up I've been kicking around the idea of applying to join. I'm a fan of your work.
I don't have a problem w/ Goons... but yah let's be honest: scam/troll/lulz is 90%+ of their in-game content w/ respect to others. 
|

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
870
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 22:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Ha! Suicide Kings! Actually since your recruitment has opened up I've been kicking around the idea of applying to join. I'm a fan of your work. I don't have a problem w/ Goons... but yah let's be honest: scam/troll/lulz is 90%+ of their in-game content w/ respect to others. 
We like to party, toss in an app if you want- but if you turn out to be another J4G Space-*** I'll kill you myself . Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Borun Tal
Cubicle Warriors from 'merica
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 23:32:00 -
[69] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM?
"The Mittani" is too cool to play computer games. Don't you know ANYTHING?!?!?! |

Serene Repose
Perkone Caldari State
244
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 00:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
I am my favorite person. I am in the game. Yes. Favoritism exists in the game. When are you guys gonna learn to cut to the chase? 
Smokestack lightnin' shinin' just like gold. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
235
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 05:25:00 -
[71] - Quote
ccp has been trying to end goons for years
it just isnt going to happen m8 |

Trainwreck McGee
Ghost Ship Inc.
217
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 05:59:00 -
[72] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute
O good the head of CSM doesn't play EVE. Cant say im surprised......But can we please have a vote to see who wants to abolish this farce of a committee? CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 11:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Gogela wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The Mittani wrote:this guy thinks i log into eve online more than once in a blue moon
cute Unless I am missing the point of some sort of Mittani whimsical joke, why is he on the CSM? Don't over-think anything the Goons say. It's usually a troll anyway... either that or a scam. Got to love the sheer amount of autonomous Goon-Hate from a bunch of people that have probably never talked to or encountered a goon in EvE. We just take forums very, very seriously... and have our own internal humor and witty sense of sarcasm, sorry if thats hard to understand. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?I know little and care even less about the Goons. As do most folk in Eve. But if they and their friends need to feel that I have any interest in them they are welcome to do so. My only, and even then, rather mild interest in The Mittan, is in his role as a serving member of the CSM. shazbot
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2053
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 12:08:00 -
[74] - Quote
"I don't care about goons they are irrelevant" *posts 2000 word essay on goon irrelevance* yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
76
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 12:34:00 -
[75] - Quote
I wasn't particularly concerned about which alliance leader I used. It was an example. I could have used Vuk Lau (granted he's a little dated), Shamis Orzoz, or even PsixoZZ KAHI. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2928
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 14:05:00 -
[76] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Malcanis wrote:What's the "we" you talk about, Mr non-Goon? I was going to type a witty reply.. but lol, Initiative. Tell me all about ship losses without tech income.
9 months of uninterrupted Angel LP soothed the pain.
Now: Tell me about pretending to be a goon when you're not one. No, wait. Just carrying on showing me. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |