EVE Search - Micro Aux Power Cores Tech II - When will we see these in game

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Micro Aux Power Cores Tech II - When will we see these in game

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Paulson The Fated Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.01.30 12:52:00 - [1] Hi CCP. I am an avid fan of frigate sized ships and use MAPC's alot for vaious fittings. Can you please indicate when you will likely add the ability to invent the tech II version of these modules? Thanks Paulson =============================================== Are we there yet?
Gordon Red SteelVipers YouWhat	Posted - 2008.01.30 15:21:00 - [2] I thought that of myself already, but their CPU cost would be immense and mostly there is not much left after I used even a good named aux.
Paulson The Fated Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.01.30 16:47:00 - [3] For the most part I would not expect the CPU requirement to exceed the Tech 1 MAPC by much if at all. My obervations of tech II is the fitting requirements are the same as or a little higher than a tech I basic Module for the same bonus as the best named module. =============================================== Are we there yet?
Commander Awkward	Posted - 2008.01.30 19:11:00 - [4] /signed Another opportunity to add invention only tech II content. As for stats they could look something like CPU 25/GRID +13, requiring Energy Management V. Could be a great addition for frigate/AF fans.
DigitalCommunist Obsidian Core	Posted - 2008.01.30 19:12:00 - [5] MAPC are so overpowered :I _______________________________ http://epicwords.net/
Paulson The Fated Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.01.31 00:30:00 - [6] Originally by: DigitalCommunist MAPC are so overpowered :I Care to elaborate DC. You could say the Power Diganosic on a Battleship is overpowered too given the boost they give. A Frigate is fragile enough that giving up a low slot to enable the next tier up in guns or a better tank is not game breaking and this module will never see use on anything but frigates. =============================================== Are we there yet?
Chruker	Posted - 2008.02.01 04:32:00 - [7] Originally by: Paulson Hi CCP. I am an avid fan of frigate sized ships and use MAPC's alot for vaious fittings. Can you please indicate when you will likely add the ability to invent the tech II version of these modules? Thanks Paulson First they need to seed the tech 1 blueprint :-) ----- http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online ----- Top wishes: - No daily downtime - Faster training on sisi - Speedup IGB table rendering
Thenoran Caldari Frontier Economics	Posted - 2008.02.01 10:45:00 - [8] Originally by: Chruker Originally by: Paulson Hi CCP. I am an avid fan of frigate sized ships and use MAPC's alot for vaious fittings. Can you please indicate when you will likely add the ability to invent the tech II version of these modules? Thanks Paulson First they need to seed the tech 1 blueprint :-) Last I checked I have a T1 BPO of the MAPC in my hangar... ------------------------ Mining roughly 4000m3 per cycle...with a Rokh
Maeltstome Minmatar D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.02.01 11:18:00 - [9] Id rather see 'small auxiliary power core', 'medium auxiliary power core' and 'large auxiliary power core' first ------- [12:07] w33Daz: a trained 1 skill fur 24 mins n it took 2 days aff drones lvl 5 [12:07] w33Daz: A WIS LIKE WTF
Chruker	Posted - 2008.02.01 14:01:00 - [10] Originally by: Thenoran Originally by: Chruker Originally by: Paulson Hi CCP. I am an avid fan of frigate sized ships and use MAPC's alot for vaious fittings. Can you please indicate when you will likely add the ability to invent the tech II version of these modules? Thanks Paulson First they need to seed the tech 1 blueprint :-) Last I checked I have a T1 BPO of the MAPC in my hangar... Damn, I was thinking of the Micro Capacitor Battery I ----- http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online ----- Top wishes: - No daily downtime - Faster training on sisi - Speedup IGB table rendering
Commander Awkward	Posted - 2008.02.01 23:27:00 - [11] Originally by: Maeltstome Id rather see 'small auxiliary power core', 'medium auxiliary power core' and 'large auxiliary power core' first Why would we need those? We already got power diagnostics and reactor controls.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.