| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sonja Vladomirovic
   |
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:19:00 -
[1]
We are the folk, and this are the points we have to defend:
1. Keep MWD bonus for Deimos (no cap bonus compensates that loss)
2. Keep the 6.th Low (No armor rep bonus compensates that loss)
3. No need for another med slot (Won"t change the fitting of those who are already flying the deimos)
4. If you need to change the layout of slots: then take a high for the med (It's also a stupid idea, but it's better then the low slot loss)
I ask you folk: please sign (or reject) the listed points. Please don't comment just sign, so CCP can hear the voice of the masses, so they can see, that this changes are just stupid, and we the folk are against it.
Viva la Revolution, Viva la Commandante
|
goodby4u
Logistic Technologies Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:24:00 -
[2]
/reject.
This is what happens when a kestrel with thermal missiles declares war on earth |
the member
Minmatar
Republic University
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:36:00 -
[3]
/signed
 Quote:
"You're obviously from France."
-- Intel CEO Paul Ottelini
|
AvatarOfHope
Amarr
The Nexus Project
space weaponry and trade
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:42:00 -
[4]
/reject
|
Sonja Vladomirovic
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:47:00 -
[5]
Pls folks, sign or reject the points 1 by 1, so we and CCP knows, which 1 is good or bad.
|
Xsag
Caldari
SPECTRE Ops
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 08:55:00 -
[6]
/reject ALL
stop whining
~n00b of all trades~
~if im posting on here its cos im in work~
~Now with a face!~
|
Dristra
Amarr
Shadows of the Dead
The Dawn of Darkness
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 09:16:00 -
[7]
High for low mode enabled
Support the introduction of well thought out Amarr solutions!
I believe rats should avoid you if you have high standing with them. |
Willy Joe
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 09:22:00 -
[8]
/reject
I kinda' like the new flavour of the whine , the amarr one was getting old 
|
Titos Polo
Senseless Violence
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 09:23:00 -
[9]
/signed
|
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.02.07 09:24:00 -
[10]
If this is indeed in favor of retaining the Deimos
/signed
If it messes with it's original glory
/reject
_________________
Burn.
Devs, ISD and GMs mod my sig for cake! \o/
CCP Navigator was here and left some green text and bars _____________
_____________ |
|
|
Dismus
Gallente
Old Guard Industrialists
Combined Planetary Union
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 20:49:00 -
[11]
/signed on all four.
Originally by: Draeca
Domi isn't ugly, it actually looks quite symphatic.
I mean, a crossbreed of a whale and a potato.. Now how cute is that?
|
7shining7one7
Quafe Paladins
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 21:29:00 -
[12]
Deimos is very unhappy camper since you've decided that it somehow needs cap, because you have some illusion that people actually use armor reppers on it, and not plate + damage fast strike.
that ships needs low slots for dmg mods! and it needs a pg rig just to fit the 5 blasters with good skills..
it does NOT need cap, it's quite fine the way it is, it's right between too much gank and very little tank. so rethink that change.
/signed.
|
Raging Knight
Shadow Assasins
The Reckoning.
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 21:37:00 -
[13]
/signed
Deimos is not meant to tank!
|
Zephyr Rengate
Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 22:09:00 -
[14]
/signed
this change was not needed.
|
HitmanUK1
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 22:50:00 -
[15]
Originally by: AvatarOfHope
/reject
|
Sol Mortis
Caldari
An Heroes
|
Posted - 2008.02.08 22:57:00 -
[16]
/Signed
Taking away the low slot is going to make this ship obsolete. 3 mids is a perfect number: MWD, Scram, Web; a 4th mid is unnecessary, but if you must give it one take the USELESS 6th high, or give us another turret hardpoint (lol, yeah right). The cap change will not be enough to offset the mwd bonus loss, and the repair bonus is completely against the entire philosophy behind the ship. this idea is crap.
nuclear pope r4pe |
Lobo Noturno
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 11:15:00 -
[17]
/signed ALL
Taking a low slot to enhance tank ability is kinda dumb. Taking the MWD bonus out and giving more cap(but not enough) goes against the ship history, requirements(deimos is best at close range, needs the mwd to get close fast enough), the sixth high slot could be more useful as a mid slot, but doesn't needs to be changed at all.
Lobo
|
slothe
Caldari
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 12:37:00 -
[18]
or alternatively, post constructive criticism in the original thread that will be looked at by the devs..
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=696416
|
DennoTheHunter
Caldari
Kernkraft 400
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 14:54:00 -
[19]
/signed
_____________________
If I am in a fair fight....
Something went wrong! |
Herz Ing
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 15:19:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Sonja Vladomirovic
1. Keep MWD bonus for Deimos (no cap bonus compensates that loss)
2. Keep the 6.th Low (No armor rep bonus compensates that loss)
3. No need for another med slot (Won"t change the fitting of those who are already flying the deimos)
4. If you need to change the layout of slots: then take a high for the med (It's also a stupid idea, but it's better then the low slot loss)
1. /reject. At this point the added base cap represents a small loss, which could be justified if the new bonus was worthwhile. I don't think the armor rep bonus is worth it, but I'm willing to hold out for something better.
2. /signed.
3. /reject. Both mid or low in my opinion are better than the useless high slot. I'll take the mid, just so long as they don't cut the low slots.
4. /signed. Don't think it's a stupid idea. I'd rather have a cap booster/ECM than a heavy nos/cloak.
|
|
|
Niffetin
Gallente
Omni Research
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 15:37:00 -
[21]
/signed
---
Teeheee!
mematar's Video Archive |
Breed Love
FinFleet
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 15:37:00 -
[22]
this thread is lame, I like the deimos changes, keep em.
not signed.
-----
Originally by: Zhulik
I thought Premium graphics were supposed to fix that bug where people were trying to salvage Minmatar ships.
|
Great Artista
Caldari
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 16:06:00 -
[23]
Deimos is perfect as it is now, don't change it please. 
_______
◕◡◕
|
zwerg
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 16:26:00 -
[24]
^reject
no need in changing it
stop whine thank you
|
Marcus TheMartin
Gallente
Deadly Addiction
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 17:14:00 -
[25]
Internet Petitions Accomplish Nothing
|
Jezze Flay
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 19:48:00 -
[26]
Yes "sign" or "reject" because CCP makes changes based upon the opinions of maybe 100 people out of their 30,000+ player base. I am sure they will act accordingly after reading this.
|
Pans Exual
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 19:49:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Marcus TheMartin
Internet Petitions Accomplish Nothing
Okay, this I will sign.
/signed.
|
Wedge Capulet
Cursed Souls
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 20:16:00 -
[28]
/signed
My deimos needs 6 lows to be of any use.
|
Galcray
Gallente
Sacred Templars
DeStInY.
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 21:32:00 -
[29]
/signed
dont change the deimos! ****, i dont even fit a repper on my deimos, no point really 
_____________
I have ridden the mighty moon worm. |
Javeoon
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 22:17:00 -
[30]
/reject
Rather lose the highslot, but I support it.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |