| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
   |
Posted - 2008.02.10 14:13:00 -
[1]
It seems OP was not ever aware he owes you 1 ISK. Just out of curiosity, did you mail him about his 1 ISK loan before you posted this
 Quote:
If that's the case, I suggest you resolve the default EBANK is about to place against you due to the unpaid loan.
in his Iwantpublicmoney thread?
Anyway, you should be able to see difference between forgotten 1 ISK and defaulted loan. 
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 14:54:00 -
[2]
Jesus Christ, you guys are comic. You are speaking about 1 ISK !!! and Ricdic is not even sure if he ever asked OP to repay it...
Do you seriously believe that 1 forgotten ISK is good enough reason to discredit someone in public forum (without disclosing the amount)?
I do not. You should apologize, otherwise you are loosing a lot of creditibility here (at least in my eyes). The fact alone, that you speak in public forum about someone's loan without being sure that the person even know about it, is alarming.
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.02.10 15:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Edited by: LaVista Vista on 10/02/2008 15:43:45
Originally by: Kyrial Tidolfas
practically NULL-risk ok return trading.
Im still interested in knowing how you can say theres null risk. Trading is by far one of the most dangerous way of making isk.
Market speculation is dangerous, buylow/sellhigh module trading is not.
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.02.11 15:11:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ricdic
What if that defaulter released a public corporation tomorrow at 100b and you were 99% sure it was a scam as a result of your BMBE dealings with the individual? How would you address such a scenario?
edit: removed negative spin
Don't forget that defaulter loses collateral, which often has higher value than the loan itself.
I think all details about loans, defaulted or not, should be confidental. Banks are not here to save people from being scammed.
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.02.11 17:04:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Robacz on 11/02/2008 17:04:18
Originally by: Shadarle
Originally by: Ray McCormack
The BMBE has no need to release defaulter information, as under normal circumstances they would also have lost out due to the collateral exceeding the loan amount. It just happens there's one very public case when this was not the case, but it still doesn't allow us to create exceptions willy-nilly.
If BMBE had information regarding someone defaulting and kept it secret while an IPO formed, took billions of ISK, and then scammed it I would hold BMBE as a co-conspirator myself and I doubt I'm alone here.
When you loan money from a bank you may have an expectation of privacy, but if you violate the terms/conditions you most certainly do not. The second you default that should become public knowledge even if you aren't starting an IPO. But if you are starting an IPO there is absolutely no excuse for the bank not mentioning it. The bank is only acting to cover this up if they refuse to disclose the information, thus becoming a conspirator in any scam.
In RL any default is visible by anyone who wishes to do a credit report. So trying to say people in EVE need greater privacy than people in RL is quite silly.
Well you are the guy who wanted to hunt and kill people/corps who vouched for scammers, so your opinion is not surprising. 
BTW, it may be like that in your country, but it is not some world standard. Where I live, loan defaults are only shared between banks; individuals / non-bank organizations have no way to get that information.
|
| |
|