| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mahn AlNouhm
The Bastards
   |
Posted - 2008.02.16 00:49:00 -
[31]
Thank you. That's exactly what I'm trying to say. :)
.
.
.
|
Wet Ferret
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 01:06:00 -
[32]
The only reason the Hawk even sells is because looks so damn cool. 
|
Hannobaal
Gallente
Igneus Auctorita
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 01:15:00 -
[33]
 Originally by: Maverick 52
a tackler Inty. Better scan resolution,
Not by much. Assault ships have pretty good scan resolutions. Also, unlike interceptors they can get into webbing range and web a bigger ship, and still survive.
|
Maverick 52
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 07:57:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Hannobaal
Originally by: Maverick 52
a tackler Inty. Better scan resolution,
Not by much. Assault ships have pretty good scan resolutions. Also, unlike interceptors they can get into webbing range and web a bigger ship, and still survive.
Depending how your Inty is setup, you can still get in web range of battleship sized ships and survive. You just wont be using that MWD. But again, only a handful of large vessels need to be webbed before the whole gang shows up, which is why the Inty still will be a better overall choice for gang PvP.
|
Julius Romanus
Blood Corsair's
Blood Blind
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 08:41:00 -
[35]
Af's have been tossed back and forth on the forum for ages. The fix starts with matching mass to the t1 hull. This will bring speeds back up to frigate levels, and give AF's a lot more agility than a cruiser.
The next step is making the resist bonus innate, all t2 ships get 4 bonuses, AF's deserve no less. In almost every case this bonus should be a damage or tank bonus. An assault ship should spit slightly less DPS than a gank cruiser, or tank slightly worse on paper than a tank cruiser, while providing much better mobility and performance against small ships.
|
Cpt Branko
Surge.
Night's Dawn
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 11:21:00 -
[36]
Originally by: ceyriot
Uhhh, no. Cruisers aren't really used in PvP (im assuming you're talking about the T1 variety)...while AFs are useful. AFs are faster, do the same...if not more damage, and look like a t1 frigate. So the miner or whatever you're trying to kill will be all like "lulz a frigate" and then die. Also, AF's can do some types of complexes that cruisers cannont.
Youre argument fails.
T1 cruisers aren't used in PvP? 
Er, AFs are faster? Most AFs have about 10m/s advantage over cruisers except in case of the jaguar, and stupid destroyers align faster then they do.
AFs do same/more damage? (Yeah, a Jaguar with a sensible fit will do something in the 140 DPS region, a Rupture will do something over 300, outdamaging it by more then double).
Please don't argue that AFs are worth the ISK they cost, they aren't. They're for frig enthusiasts who like flying them, and are quite definitely not a cost-effective ship in any respect.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Tozz
Velvet Underground Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.02.16 12:37:00 -
[37]
Give AFs their 2nd t1 bonus!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |