EVE Search - RE-ELECT UAxDEATH FOR CSM 7

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

RE-ELECT UAxDEATH FOR CSM 7

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 252	Posted - 2012.02.16 15:25:00 - [1] - Quote I am announcing today my candidacy for reelection to the Council of Stellar Management. I came into CSM 6 with several issues I wanted addressed, and while a number of them were dealt with (like ship iteration, lag problem (TDi)) what I learned is that being a strong, broadly focused advocate who can lobby CCP on a personal level is a lot more effective than being a nerd pounding on a table waving a spreadsheet. The Mittani likes to say that we got more work done drinking with devs at bars than we did in the daily meetings. I promise you, I will drink as much liquor as necessary to get CCP developers fixing the important issues in EVE instead of haring off on nonsense like in Incarna or GÇ£gold ammo for $GÇ¥. When I first went to Iceland, I fought to get CCP focused on fixing what mattered, spaceships, and not messing around with vampire garbage. After Incarna CCP started listening. CSM 6 and I accomplished some of our goals in three months between Incarna's failure and the launch of Crucible, and I want a full term on CSM 7 to finish the job. What are those important issues? 0.0 space is my biggest concern at this moment. I have been playing EVE since 2004 and have led alliances fighting in most of the Great Wars. Currently I lead two 0.0 alliances, Legion of xXDEATHXx and Shadow of xXDEATHXx. Most of my issues can be divided into two broad categories: - Living in 0.0 and -Fixing broken gameplay. I want to see that pilots get benefits from living in a 0.0 system equal to the effort they put into taking and defending that system. I want to see poses made more interesting and less of a chore, and planetary interaction more engaging and complex. I'd like to see moons rebalanced and mining turned into a viable profession. If 0.0 isn't worth living in then it just becomes a place you leave a couple combat ships and a jump clone while you run missions in empire or NPC space, and that just doesn't make any sense. 0.0 empties out and becomes pointless and people quit because itGÇÖs donGÇÖt make sense. We saw this happen when CCP nerfed anomalies in between CSM 5 & 6. I want to make 0.0 spaces itself worth fighting over instead of it coming down to moons. This brings me to the current sovwar system. ItGÇÖs amazing to me that CCP could come up with a system worse than spamming moons until you get 51% coverage in a system, but they accomplished it. I don't want to bring back poswar but that system had strategy and subtlety that the Dominion mechanics lack. When sovwar mechanics are brought up in CSM 7 I want to be there to argue for a system that doesn't just amount to alarmclocking as many people as you can every night of the week to win a system. The effort CSM 6 put in has done much to pull EVE back from the precipice, but the big breakthrough came too late to fully exploit. CSM 7 is going to have a big impact on how CCP addresses the future development and improvement of EVE. As a member of CSM 6, I want to be there to ensure that CCP's priorities are where they should be: improving the core game and making our spaceship experience better. As a returning CSM member I will be able to get immediately back to work using contacts and personal relationships already established with the CCP staff to remind them that new features are worthless when they are built atop broken old features. Last year we came to Iceland in a last ditch attempt to save EVE. It seems like we accomplished that goal and his year I'm excited and eager to help make it a better game. UAxDEATH for CSM 7
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 252	Posted - 2012.02.16 15:26:00 - [2] - Quote reserved
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 319	Posted - 2012.02.16 15:52:00 - [3] - Quote Seleene wrote: Death is a very vocal CSM and chill dude. He's also scary but likes to give people hugs. This man wants EVE to get better, one bottle of Hennessy at a time. Another term for him would keep EVE headed in the right direction. Thank you, looking forward to see you in CSM7. /me hugs Seleene
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 319	Posted - 2012.02.16 16:03:00 - [4] - Quote The Mittani wrote: UAxDeath is a Kimberly-process certified CSM candidate! HAHAHAHAHHA
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 508	Posted - 2012.02.17 12:21:00 - [5] - Quote Zandramus wrote: Mr. UAxDEATH I want to thank you for your current service on the CSM, can you give me. Your opinions on the following game issues. 1. What is your position regarding delayed local in nullsec. 2. Would you support fixing the physics engine in regards to small ships bumping large ships. 3. What ideas do you have for iterating future capital ships and tier 3 ships. Thanks Zandramus 1) I'd say it would benefit most of the 0.0 pvpers 2) Yes, we all study physics in school - that is nonsense 3) I'd say it would be up to CCP make a decisions of what and why to nerf or boost.
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 598	Posted - 2012.02.18 22:37:00 - [6] - Quote Doctor Eezee wrote: Wow, your corpmates spam even more than I do. Impressive! Since you already were on CSM6 and so far 6 members of the current CSM confirmed that Darius III, was absolutely useless during his term, would you like to weigh in on that topic? He claims that he was working hard on improving the game and accused many members of the CSM of lieing, because they are in love with Mittens. What's your stance on this? I can't comment, I'm in love with mittens. We were together in blue lagoon - naked.!!!
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 599	Posted - 2012.02.19 05:57:00 - [7] - Quote rodyas wrote: Ah didnt happen, mittens would be spamming the forums with those pics if it was true. he is a shy sometimes.
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 660	Posted - 2012.02.23 01:19:00 - [8] - Quote Indanu wrote: I do not think UAxDEATH that you should participate once again in CSM because that you bring that in game is that other as benefit unilaterally. o7
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 701	Posted - 2012.03.07 01:24:00 - [9] - Quote Vote is open, I'm on the bottom of the page. Looking forward for your votes. Thank you http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting VOTE FOR UAxDEATH
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 703	Posted - 2012.03.07 20:50:00 - [10] - Quote direct link to vote http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=474

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.