EVE Search - [IPO] Ewigkeit

All Channels

Market Discussions

[IPO] Ewigkeit

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
LRN	Posted - 2008.02.19 18:01:00 - [1] Hi, In a gesture of good faith I will reveal my present alts: I'm a production char, freighter pilot, if you check my standings you'll see that I'm capable of lossless recycling in any Caldari Navy station.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.05 05:40:00 - [2] In case you're wondering why I'm relaunching the IPO, I believe that the time spent reading obnoxious threads about "upcoming manipulation" and so on could actually be put to good use.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.05 06:55:00 - [3] What a surprise, I though Hexxx taught you not to pay any more attention to my posts but I see that given your brilliance you couldn't help it. If anyone has "doubts" about my honesty then please do not invest. Period.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 07:16:00 - [4] Setting aside Riethe's sense of humor and Ricdic's determination to discredit any IPO that could threaten business run by Ebank's own directors and also diminish the available capital for crappy 3% Ebank accounts, I would like to remind everyone the 10% minimum return guaranteed for this IPO, my willingness to allow someone to audit my dealings and the intention to take in only small investments.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 07:47:00 - [5] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 07:51:37 I can't compete with the lesser intelligent beings. In fact I can't even bring myself to reading your entire post. Like I said, if there are those that have doubts about my honesty or are unwilling for various reasons to give me the chance to prove that my IPO can be a success then don't invest. It's that simple. To summarize: 10% minimum return guaranteed for this IPO, my willingness to allow someone to audit my dealings and the intention to take in only small investments.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 07:50:00 - [6] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 07:51:03
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.05 08:06:00 - [7] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 08:10:40 How could I be a scammer if I haven't scammed anyone? Your logic is flawless and well suited for someone like you. Now that I read your entire post Kwint, I haven't laughed so much in my entire life. The reason I altered your sig and added to it a quote from you calling me a scammer was to prove to the world you're making irresponsible claims (like usual). I'm asking for a chance to help you and your kind surpass your limitations. I'd suggest you take it.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.05 08:29:00 - [8] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 08:34:53 Now all that's missing is the bald guy to add his own view of the world and we're all set. Jesus, the MD is such in a deplorable state (unfounded claims, personal grudges, noob bashing) that it's no wonder that so many people preice their commodity above all and go for crappy 3% Ebank accounts. The IPO tag is reported to be extinct. And it's not taken from FAO's yearly report, it's a fact here.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 08:52:00 - [9] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 08:55:53 My determination is not to be ignored either. I'm now offering a 20% minimum guaranteed return for this IPO, while adding a clause that allows me to buy back your shares at any moment. Consider your options here: it might be a scam (in which case I suggest you invest the lowest amount that you can dispense with) or it can pay off really well. The choice is yours.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 09:05:00 - [10] Yeah, yeah, yeah I've heard that before. Now you either invest or stfu.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 09:14:00 - [11] You clearly don't get it. We're long past the point where logic matters. Just read the whole thread. I've offered the investors 20% return, it's a gamble, take it or STFU.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.05 09:24:00 - [12] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 09:24:23 20% minimum return guaranteed for this IPO, my willingness to allow someone to audit my dealings, small investments possible, shares buy back on my behalf may occur at any given moment.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 09:38:00 - [13] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 09:40:33 Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 09:39:35 Shares buyback on my behalf may occur at any given moment meaning that depending on how profitable my operation is and time expenses vs profit obtained from a possible expansion there will come a moment when my own amassed salary will be enough to ensure the continuation of the IPO operations without the isk the investors entrusted me with. At that point shares buyback will occur and the IPO will be closed, at least for the public.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 10:00:00 - [14] To summarize: 20% minimum return guaranteed, my willingness to allow someone to audit my dealings, small investments possible, shares buyback on my behalf may occur at any given moment. Still waiting for... gamblers.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 14:01:00 - [15] Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 14:01:23 Every day that passes by reduces the investment return by 5%. Investing tomorrow will only net you 15% return and so on. Keep that in mind.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.05 16:05:00 - [16] Originally by: Daeva Vios Originally by: LRN Edited by: LRN on 05/04/2008 14:01:23 Every day that passes by reduces the investment return by 5%. Investing tomorrow will only net you 15% return and so on. Keep that in mind. I'm certain people are terrified that the return will fall to zero and will hurry to jump at this one. Out of curiosity, why do you think more people would invest when you offer less of a return? It seems to me that if I were throwing my money away, I'd want to throw it at a person who promises to give me more than someone else. I mean, that's what I'd do if I knew I'd never see it again anyway, which is the case here. It so happens that I have a certain consideration for your gullible persona and the values you promote so I will satisfy your curiosity: I am aware that the IPO failed but it's a means of closing it since I haven't specified a time frame for accepting investments.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.06 05:49:00 - [17] Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 05:52:08 Originally by: Shadarle In either case I consider YouGotRipped to be as untrustworthy as I consider Riethe. In fact I'd trust my money with Riethe over YouGotRipped even though I have a sneaking suspicion they are one and the same. Riethe may actually pay out one div or give the money back to some rare investors, YouGotRipped on the other hand is likely to just take whatever he can get as he has had no luck at all so far. Anyone investing in this should go find a T2 BPO to invest in, as crappy an investment as they are they are better than this. You know what, I don't blame you, for how can you blame someone for his limitations?
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.06 05:50:00 - [18] Originally by: Kushion I find it highly comical that Ripped is still playing the victim card - as if he has anyone but himself to blame for the complete failure that is his eve career. He seems feverishly determined to shoot himself in the foot at every turn, and it's almost like he doesn't realize this. His ability to make everyone dislike him exponentially more with each post he makes is so effective it borders on the supernatural. Honestly, you can't buy PR as bad as he casually creates with a two-sentence post. This guy is rivaling Starscream for idiot of the year award... Have you ever considered the fact that I might be honest? Just by a long shot but considered it? Now put yourself in my place. Wouldn't you be irritated when there's already no way to prove your honesty yet there are these posts calling you a scammer on no evidence whatsoever and are also backed by exponential stupidity? Just to give you an example, given the nature of my IPO operations, your request that I reveal all my accounts/alts when it is clear that to avoid freighter ganking requires me not to reveal the name of the freigther pilot. You are a victim of your own limitations. Now gtfo of my sight.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:02:00 - [19] Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 06:02:51 Originally by: Shadarle Originally by: LRN Have you ever considered the fact that I might be honest? The thought crossed my mind long ago. Then you kept posting and removed all doubt in my mind. It seems I'm not the only one that you convinced. The most shocking part is that you seem to not understand why people have this opinion of you. You seem to think it is others that have the issue, yet amazingly every single person seems to acquire this opinion after reading the way you respond to people. Obviously you're the only person who isn't an idiot in your mind. Which begs the question, why do you bother posting here if we are all so stupid? Logic. I'll keep relaunching this IPO from time to time to appraise how much you people have evolved in the in the said field since our the last examination. So far you've made some progress but it's still not good.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:20:00 - [20] Originally by: Nyphur Do you wish for wealth? pending RELAUNCH! 20% minimum return guaranteed !!!2212 I wish for brains actually. On your behalf. I agree 20% was a little too high and would have loaded my schedule but since anything else failed I wanted to emphasize the nature of the deal: pure gamble.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:29:00 - [21] Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 06:33:41 Originally by: Nyphur Originally by: LRN Originally by: Nyphur Do you wish for wealth? pending RELAUNCH! 20% minimum return guaranteed !!!2212 I wish for brains actually. On your behalf. I agree 20% was a little too high and would have loaded my schedule but since anything else failed I wanted to emphasize the nature of the deal: pure gamble. GUARANTEED¼!!"" Exactly. Only that today it's just 15%.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:33:00 - [22] Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 06:33:22 I have the assets to cover a potential loss if that's what you imply.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:41:00 - [23] Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 06:41:45 Originally by: EBANK Ricdic Originally by: LRN Edited by: LRN on 06/04/2008 06:33:22 I have the assets to cover a potential loss if that's what you imply. Ok great, so you shouldn't have an issue with providing them as a security? Not at all. It's just that no one asked. At least no one that expressed his desire to invest.
LRN	Posted - 2008.04.06 06:52:00 - [24] Originally by: Nyphur Originally by: LRN Not at all. It's just that no one asked. At least no one that expressed his desire to invest. It's not the investor's job to tell you how to manage your investment scheme. It's your job to research options like providing security assets with a trusted third party. If I can get away without the stress that implies, you can be sure I will at least try it. I have some T1 BPOs that are valued around 3B. It's just a matter of adjusting the return rate to compensate for a reduction in the number of assets that I might otherwise require for manufacturing and increasing IPO profits, we'll also turn this into a bond. I will need to create a new thread though. Just a moment.
LRN Ewigkeit	Posted - 2008.04.10 09:57:00 - [25] Edited by: LRN on 10/04/2008 09:58:23 Originally by: MilowFV If I am not mistaken he close this thread and open a diff one. I could be wrong I do know there are two threads floating around though. Here's the link: Secured Bond

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.