Could you advocate for all players recieving the new Quaffe Iteron IV, just not the lucky dudes going to fanfest? Or at least a Tear Iteron IV for all us sad people missing out on the fun of fanfest as well as missing out on the new iteron.

so you're senile?

Wow, this is rather unique.

Have a like, it's part of the democratic process.

a 2003 forum alt

grats

You claim to be sane. Can you please provide us a release of your medical records to verify that claim? Thanks.

From whence originates temerity such that you feel compelled to mock the very race you have joined?

Ah yes, sov. Timers Online: an internet counting down to out of reinforcement cycle game.

Your idea for removing local sucks. Yet before I completely go against you let me ask your views on incursions.

http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=PaleStar

You don't seem very experienced to me. I can't tell if this is a joke thread or not, is it supposed to be funny?

I wouldn't want to remove it... I want to update it. The latest change to player lists was like the first visible change since I can remember. I want to replace the functionality of the count with something that is more effective. Let me ask you this: how many times have you scanned your list in local and tried to count the hostiles when the channel was above 200? Wouldn't you like a readout at the top of the screen that says: "100 in local" 20 blue, 20 light blue, 20 red, 20, orange, 20 neutral" ?

Shameful edit: I forgot to answer your incursion question. I like them. Good isk and it forces people to work together. Unfortunately, it's easy to be shut out of a incursion and I don't know how to solve that. It's also a grind after a while and if the payouts were any lower, they wouldn't be successful.

I didn't like the ability to "jam" local in your idea. If it was an option to switch from full to numbered that would be ok.

As for not getting into Incursions. Many people cry and scream that their T1 Fit mission Drake wont get invites when in reality FCs NEED 70 percent resists and decent buffer because otherwise logis will have to run all 4 reps on you which means more chance they can be alphaed.

However if you can get a remotely decent fit together (About as expensive as a mission fit) getting into the almost 24/7 Assault/HQ fleet that runs is a cakewalk.

PVe is a grind. To make it more dynamic invites alpha strikes that kill fleets. Many that run in the above mentioned fleet are running shiny ships that would get into almost any super VG fleet. Yet they want to run with the big fleets because it involves lots of fun from comms. More sites and variety are always wanted but many runners do understand that PVe will never be as exciting and varied as PVP. That is the reality.

So if you want to help those who are supposedly shut out. Get increased payout on assaults and HQs so its easier to have 2 or 3 of em.

This is EVE. It is right because that is Nullsec. Things are bad enough with AFK cloaking already.

BTW if you happen to be against AFK cloaking. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=204096#post204096 If I get potential CSM support for this I will redo the topic with new images and stating that I now support an amendment to my idea to prevent the probes from registering any contact that is mobile so that wormhole hunters that are active will be unaffected.

Wormhole were added to truly experience that gameplay of fear. Also you forget NPC nullsec which is very 2003 where you are usually alone and hunted. Not much bluing out there.

The difference is that nullsec danger has many different meanings.

An "active" danger is for instance of wormholes were reformed to allow good planning to help bypass the blue wall and allow for active attacking of weak points inside.

The "passive" danger is bad because while people are having to keep their fingers on warp the entire time the inactive cloaker is having a bath and will light the cyno only after he has been away enough to draw people out. All the advantages virtually no disadvantage due to how cheap such ships are.

I like the active danger one.

The issue of "single pilot" is that it is a multiplayer game. How do you prevent say a hundred "single pilots" from shutting down a smaller alliance? That is what AFK cloaking is doing. It may have been a lone wolf tactic half a decade ago. Yet today its nothing more than a tool of large alliances trying to force out smaller ones.

It should be "wolfpacks" Again I would like to see the wormhole system changed a bit to allow large fleets a chance to jump behind the blue wall. Right now you can use that but its limited because of mass. And there is not nearly enough Null to Null wormholes forming. If it was changed it would force alliances to be constantly on the lookout for surprise roaming instead of hiding behind a shield wall.

THAT gives smaller groups a chance and removes any need for supporting AFK cloaking or remove local in my opinion.