| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Korvin
Shadow Kingdom
Best Alliance
240
   |
Posted - 2012.02.22 10:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
I can see 2 proposals on a link, concerning 2 different systems in EVE.
1st is a bounty hunting system.
2nd is a killrights system.
The 2nd proposal is pretty clear for me. Allowing players to contract their killrights to revenge seems like a good idea for me.
The 1st is much more complex.
I agree, that the current bounty hunting system in EVE does not fulfill it's goal - to punish the bad guy.
On the other hand, in a complex game of EVE, every player have it's own values, and keeping his pod alive is just a single option through all other available.
Making most of my ingame money as a mercenary, I'm aware of these issues. The problem is, that every time you want to revenge and seek a mercenary, you need to find out - what type of damage should be more painful to your victim: Is it a pod, or the most expensive ship he owns, or a pos, or you want him to stay docked forever? The second step is to make sure, the mercenary did the job the way you want it. This is a real issue, all you can check at the moment is a reputation of the "punisher" corp. Some tools could be improved to control this. Lucky for us we have an API killmail verification now. The most difficult question is the payment. Each side does not tend to trust the other. The KPI determining the success of the revenge are hard to define. Obviously, the only way this could be solved in a current time is a third party service. Sigh, we need more Chribbas.
We had alot of discussions on the subject in CCP during CSM4 and 5 terms, I remember same discussions on a last fanfest, I can assure you, CCP are aware on this issue.
__________________________________
Member of CSM 4&5, your CSM 7 candidate. |
Loka Hask
Cosmic Clowns Killers
Red Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 11:19:00 -
[92] - Quote
Supported. |
Prakith
Cosmic Clowns Killers
Red Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 11:29:00 -
[93] - Quote
Supported. |
Dostaevski
Anarchist Dawn
U N K N O W N
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 14:17:00 -
[94] - Quote
Supported |
DeadSleeper
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:33:00 -
[95] - Quote
Supported. |
Grumpy Owly
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 01:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
Korvin wrote:I can see 2 proposals on a link, concerning 2 different systems in EVE. 1st is a bounty hunting system. 2nd is a killrights system. The 2nd proposal is pretty clear for me. Allowing players to contract their killrights to revenge seems like a good idea for me. The 1st is much more complex. I agree, that the current bounty hunting system in EVE does not fulfill it's goal - to punish the bad guy. On the other hand, in a complex game of EVE, every player have it's own values, and keeping his pod alive is just a single option through all other available. Making most of my ingame money as a mercenary, I'm aware of these issues. The problem is, that every time you want to revenge and seek a mercenary, you need to find out - what type of damage should be more painful to your victim: Is it a pod, or the most expensive ship he owns, or a pos, or you want him to stay docked forever? The second step is to make sure that the mercenary did the job the way you want it. This is a real issue, all you can check at the moment is a reputation of the "punisher" corp. Some tools could be improved to control this. Lucky for us we have an API killmail verification now. The most difficult question is the payment. Each side does not tend to trust the other. The KPI determining the success of the revenge are hard to define. Obviously, the only way this could be solved in a current time is a third party service. Sigh, we need more Chribbas. We had alot of discussions on the subject in CCP during CSM4 and 5 terms, I remember same discussions on a last fanfest, I can assure you, CCP are aware on this issue.
ty for comments Korvin, and thanks for the link, have entered comments in the linked thread for prosterity.
Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |
Djerella
Judgment Day Technology
SOLAR WING
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 05:21:00 -
[97] - Quote
Supported |
darkpan
Fatal Union of Cruel Killers
White Noise.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 07:45:00 -
[98] - Quote
Supported |
Masrur
The Scope
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 16:57:00 -
[99] - Quote
+1
Good luck, dude! |
Zuru Carter
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 16:59:00 -
[100] - Quote
Good luck! |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
977
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 22:03:00 -
[101] - Quote
Damm, I should have trademarked the term "reason" in all it's variants in CSM candidate slogans!
Issler Dainze
The founder of the "Voice of Reason" party in Eve! |
Internet Lawyer
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 04:27:00 -
[102] - Quote
Six pages and you've barely had to answer a thing. Intolerable.
How do you feel about the current state of factional warfare?
What would you do to make low sec more interesting?
What is your stance on supercaps? Nerf bat or no? Why?
What is your opinion on the changes CCP made to war dec mechanics last year?
Tech 2 BPOs - Nerf, eliminate or leave alone?
You served on the CSM in the past, in 4 and 5. What did you do in each term that you were most proud of? What did you not get a chance to do that frustrated you the most?
What did you think about CSM 6, the people on it and the job they did? What about the CSM's you served on as well?
Let's see how you do with this and I'll check back later.
Issler Dainze wrote:Damm, I should have trademarked the term "reason" in all it's variants in CSM candidate slogans!
Issler Dainze
The founder of the "Voice of Reason" party in Eve!
Go back to your own horrible campaign thread and stop signing your posts.
EVE Online Public Defender |
Triksia Bonsol
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 06:29:00 -
[103] - Quote
Supported |
Nashuatec
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 06:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
Supported |
Ali Lin
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 06:40:00 -
[105] - Quote
Supported |
Eelify
Only For People Corp
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 07:08:00 -
[106] - Quote
Supported. |
Lina Pret
Providing of the first medical aid
SOLAR FLEET
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 08:05:00 -
[107] - Quote
Supported |
Pretorik
Providing of the first medical aid
SOLAR FLEET
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 08:07:00 -
[108] - Quote
Supported |
Art Kz
Iris Covenant
The Gorgon Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 10:17:00 -
[109] - Quote
Supported |
Kataky
FSPalm
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 11:17:00 -
[110] - Quote
Supported |
Korvin
Shadow Kingdom
Best Alliance
271
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 15:15:00 -
[111] - Quote
Thank you for your questions.
Internet Lawyer wrote:How do you feel about the current state of factional warfare?
What I had expected from FW when it was announced is not what I see now.
I had expected it to be a roleplaying PVP environment, scripted and managed by CCP stuff, with lots of events, in game history evolution, based on backstories, and players that could participate in the show.
The first thing I thought when it was announced was GÇ£Wow, where do they expect to find the stuff to support this?GÇ¥.
The answer was trivial, they didnGÇÖt. We god a mix of unfinished wardec system with the unfinished missions system and a rejected prototype of sov warfare system.
What I want to ask CCP, is to define the goal that FW should achieve.
The way I see it GÇô itGÇÖs a good ground for CCP events, CCP stuff could lead those armies on a pre-made script, having fun (I know, lots of CCPeer want to play EVE), evolving the background history with those players enjoying events.
The main restriction is that those FW events should be limited to FW and game backstories, and have no influence to the rest of the sandbox. ItGÇÖs a tricky thing, considering the butterfly effect, but I believe CCP can manage this.
Internet Lawyer wrote:What would you do to make low sec more interesting?
I have a lot of fun in Low sec environment right now. There is a lot of small scale PVP there, and I think thatGÇÖs the best part of the Low sec. What are the main points, that leads to a small scale PVP, that we could improve? Pirates vs Anti pirates and caravan defense. There is several known places, to make the shortcut between empire regions, camped by pirates. We all know them. Rancer and neighbor systems, Tama and Tannolen, Amamake, Zinkon exit ets. Those systems are priceless. We need more systems like that. Some routes have significant shortcuts, some makes only 1-2 jumps difference, making them pointless. FW the way I described it could be a good addition to the motion. Boosters revamp and contraband the way it was described in CSM5 could also give some interesting results. There are also some small grab and run sites for the risky chance based profit gain, that could be added, like the old stati-ü deadspaces, still generating the good portion of smallscale PVP and fun.
Internet Lawyer wrote:What is your stance on supercaps? Nerf bat or no? Why?
The way I see capital fleet treated is not like normal ships, but the mobile structures, fortresses, that makes the sence to another dimension of the game GÇô the sov warfare strategy game. They should not take any roles of a normal sub-cap ship. They should operate only in siege, and in the non-siege mode they should be as good as a fat BS. Why surer capitals are way more better? Maybe the main reason is that they donGÇÖt need a siege to operate? I stand for the idea that supercapital ships should need the siege mode as much as dreadnoughts needed it at the very beginning of the POS warfare era.
Internet Lawyer wrote:What is your opinion on the changes CCP made to war dec mechanics last year?
Had something really changed?
Internet Lawyer wrote:Tech 2 BPOs - Nerf, eliminate or leave alone?
No need to change this at the moment. The demand of T2 BPC is much higher, than the supply that T2 BPO can cover. We have a lot of new t2 modules, that nave no T2 BPO, and that is good enough for me.
__________________________________
Member of CSM 4&5, your CSM 7 candidate. |
Korvin
Shadow Kingdom
Best Alliance
271
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 15:17:00 -
[112] - Quote
Internet Lawyer wrote:You served on the CSM in the past, in 4 and 5. What did you do in each term that you were most proud of? What did you not get a chance to do that frustrated you the most?
Being the non-block aligned candidate in CSM4 and also the first Russian CSM member I was in a situation of extra responsibility for the localization process improvement, and looking back, IGÇÖm proud of the job done. It was obvious, that I could not get a major support from the rest of CSM, regarding most of those issues, but even in this case we could find a compromise suitable for everyone, and IGÇÖm glad to see improvements in the localization not only in Russian client, but the all other languages CCP eventually are going to implement.
The main goal of my CSM 4 platform was to bring attention for the small fixes in game, awaiting their chance for years, IGÇÖm glad CCP have the team BFF now, solving those issues. IGÇÖm also glad CCP had paid attention to my research of a mineral source issue and insurance. My corporation has supported me by buying and suicide a ton of Ravens, showing that the mineral cost and insurance systems are imbalanced. We got the fastest CCP reaction I ever saw. Thanks for all CSM 4 members for their dedication to improve the game, regardless the standings and ingame relationships. It was a pleasure to work side by side.
The main focus of my CSM5 platform was shifted to the PVP balance issues, paying attention to the useless items appeared in the game. The change of the CSM process itself, sorting out the backlog and several hundred proposals from the previous 4 CSMs, left forgotten by CCP. It was obvious for me, that to make a proper implementation of all that proposals, we need a global plan, considering the evolution of the game. CSM 5 members were consistent in their efforts to improve the communication between CCP, CSM and all players. It was a hard time, since CCP had their internal issues, regarding the huge growth of a company, but most of our efforts were not left unnoticed, and in the darkest hours of the summer CCP crisis, they still had a great influence.
Internet Lawyer wrote:What did you think about CSM 6, the people on it and the job they did? What about the CSM's you served on as well?
The main thing that I can say about CSM6 is that I know nothing about their work. No offence for all CSM6 members, but what I was expected is the continuation of the process to improve the communication between the players and CCP, making the CCP policy more transparent, their goals and plans more detailed so players could make their proposals according to the CCP plan, not opposite to it. We all know what troubles we have as players; we have a very active community, willing to help CCP to solve those troubles, but to make this possible, we also need to consider the CCP plans and interests. The CSM6 process was closed even more, than it was required by NDA. I canGÇÖt see the discussion process itself, I canGÇÖt see the voting pattern of a particular issue, how can I decide if my interests match the particular CSM6 candidate opinion? I want the CSM process to be as transparent as it could be.
__________________________________
Member of CSM 4&5, your CSM 7 candidate. |
Allan Cassius
Suchii Kot Corp
Unknown and Beyond
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 12:38:00 -
[113] - Quote
Supported. |
Aksi Niminen
Leprosorium.
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.27 20:32:00 -
[114] - Quote
Supported. |
Brusanan
Sardaukar Merc Guild
General Tso's Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 22:09:00 -
[115] - Quote
Supported. |
Saggy Ballz
Sardaukar Merc Guild
General Tso's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 22:15:00 -
[116] - Quote
Supported. |
Manalapan
Dynasty Banking
General Tso's Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 01:07:00 -
[117] - Quote
Supported
Korvin is almost as awesome as me. |
Burseg Sardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild
General Tso's Alliance
99
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 01:18:00 -
[118] - Quote
Supported! Any dude that kills an Utu has my vote, especially since it was my member that lost it!
Go Korvin!
We have a blog, it is terrible.
How to fix Bounty Hunting |
Ellen Reeplay
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 12:30:00 -
[119] - Quote
supported |
Iron Straw
Sardaukar Merc Guild
General Tso's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 01:02:00 -
[120] - Quote
I don't always support Russians, but when I do, I support Korvin. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |