EVE Search - Marauders = fail?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

Marauders = fail?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Falkus Widowmaker	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:45:00 - [1] Edited by: Falkus Widowmaker on 29/02/2008 16:50:31 Discuss. They needed a paladin or something imo.
ry ry StateCorp Insurgency	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:48:00 - [2] good win for cry havok. Signature removed. Too large and flashing signatures are not really permitted. Navigator
konjev Minmatar Enrave	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:48:00 - [3] well if they were tanked it would have helped LOADS
Afale II The X-Trading Company Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:48:00 - [4] impressive
Weeaboot	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:48:00 - [5] Not very impressive so far. :)
Phelsior AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:49:00 - [6] Yea impressive win with great repping / cap transfer!
SuPeRcHeEzIt Gallente Eve Defence Force Insurgency	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:49:00 - [7] :(
ry ry StateCorp Insurgency	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:49:00 - [8] also, jammable ships with all the jamming going on? Signature removed. Too large and flashing signatures are not really permitted. Navigator
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:49:00 - [9] well the biggest advange I can see is that they could run 3 smartbombs AND 8 weapons worth of dps. Also I personal think the golem is the worst ship to use when there are logistics on the other side. unless your close I suppose.
TimGascoigne	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:51:00 - [10] MC made themselves vulnerable to both the logistics gangs and ECM gangs both of which are in abundance :) I guess that gambling on sume setups not occuring doesn't work.

Hey You Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:51:00 - [11] no idea why mc didnt took out guardian tbfh. Epic Fail __________________________________ We Ride Together We Die Together We Few, We Happy Few...
Gnulpie Minmatar Miner Tech	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:51:00 - [12] Originally by: MotherMoon well the biggest advange I can see is that they could run 3 smartbombs AND 8 weapons worth of dps. Also they can fit remote reppers in their highs if I am not mistaken.
Gavin Neltharek Caldari Blood Corsair's Blood Blind	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:52:00 - [13] As stated I think the setup wasn't the right one. Doesn't mean that teh marauder setup was bad. maybe just not the right ones. It's still early in the tourney though. Everything is up to change. <----------------------------------> Carebears aren't people, they're giant flying piniatas.
konjev Minmatar Enrave	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:53:00 - [14] 3 ships with bonus to shield tanking then put a plate or w/e on it is just epic fail
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:56:00 - [15] Originally by: Gnulpie Originally by: MotherMoon well the biggest advange I can see is that they could run 3 smartbombs AND 8 weapons worth of dps. Also they can fit remote reppers in their highs if I am not mistaken. your right... wait a min... MC! why weren't your golems running 3 large reps in the highs?
sakana North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:59:00 - [16] marauders are terrible ships in general.
TimGascoigne	Posted - 2008.02.29 16:59:00 - [17] "MC! why weren't your golems running 3 large reps in the highs?" well cap Might be an issue you'd have to have capacitor transfers to create free cap and then you might not have the high slots left.
Myndpyre Ryche Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2008.02.29 17:00:00 - [18] Just to clear a few things up. The marauders were never jammed, not once. We did lose target once to being damped, but with a swap of scripts we were able to continue to target the enemies. The rook was called primary because even with the ECCM, we were still worried about not being able to target each other for remote repairing. We did have 2 large remote armor reps on each of the Golems. The bouncers were an absolutely amazing idea that we were not expecting, and it caught us completely off guard. Great match, see everyone tomorrow. Lets hope "Plan B" works better. =)
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N	Posted - 2008.02.29 17:00:00 - [19] Originally by: TimGascoigne "MC! why weren't your golems running 3 large reps in the highs?" well cap Might be an issue you'd have to have capacitor transfers to create free cap and then you might not have the high slots left. well they should be able to self tank too. I bet they died with tons of cap left.
Weeaboot	Posted - 2008.02.29 17:06:00 - [20] Oh well, props for bringing the shiny.

Floppy Disk Einherjar Rising Cry Havoc.	Posted - 2008.02.29 17:07:00 - [21] Originally by: MotherMoon Originally by: TimGascoigne "MC! why weren't your golems running 3 large reps in the highs?" well cap Might be an issue you'd have to have capacitor transfers to create free cap and then you might not have the high slots left. well they should be able to self tank too. I bet they died with tons of cap left. Killmails are up on Cry Havoc's killboard. Good fight MC.
Myndpyre Ryche Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2008.02.29 17:08:00 - [22] Since we will not be repeating the same setup, I will state that the marauders had 4 turrets, 2 large remote reps, and a large smartbomb. The smartbombs were to counter combat-drone spammers, which is what we thought we were facing when the man said go. We were set anti-drone, anti-ecm, anti-damp, and had decent spider tanks. The bouncers were outside of something we planned to fight, it was a very strong move on their part.
Mistress Suffering Einherjar Rising Cry Havoc.	Posted - 2008.02.29 22:55:00 - [23] Thanks to MC for the match. I have nothing but respect for you guys. Good luck in the following rounds.
Donna Maria Amarr	Posted - 2008.02.29 23:05:00 - [24] gotta love sentry drones :) Im the girl momma warned you about..
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong FOUNDATI0N	Posted - 2008.02.29 23:57:00 - [25] Originally by: Myndpyre Ryche Since we will not be repeating the same setup, I will state that the marauders had 4 turrets, 2 large remote reps, and a large smartbomb. The smartbombs were to counter combat-drone spammers, which is what we thought we were facing when the man said go. We were set anti-drone, anti-ecm, anti-damp, and had decent spider tanks. The bouncers were outside of something we planned to fight, it was a very strong move on their part. I see so the sentry drones were not what you wanted to see :P
PaRaZiTuRL Amarr modro CORPVS DELICTI	Posted - 2008.03.01 00:24:00 - [26] Originally by: Hey You no idea why mc didnt took out guardian tbfh. Epic Fail This.And i got isk on them.
Myndpyre Ryche Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2008.03.01 01:13:00 - [27] IMO, in hindsight, the only correct move we could have made would have been to primary the bouncers. Any ship that we could have targeted would still have resulted in our tanks breaking before we could have neutralized the DPS from those drones. The golems did switch targets to the guardian and we were rewarded for our efforts with faction cruise missiles hitting for 30-50 damage a missile depending on resistance. I was very happy with the ships and setups that we put on the field, but 3b a match on the line is just too rich even for MC's wallet. ;)
Error404	Posted - 2008.03.01 02:48:00 - [28] They aint PVP ships but still suprised at how little damage they did but I spose it's because they are new and noones using them properly yet.
Buhhdust Princess Naughty 40 Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.03.01 08:54:00 - [29] Well. You hear people say that Amarr need a boost. Tbh, wake up. Paladin is probably the best bet you have here for a Maruader. Seeing as it managed to hit a megathron of mine from 160km + for over 800 damage. (yeah, h4x?) So personally, i'd like to see a paladin fielded today in the Tourny would be a nice change. And great to see someone using more amarr! -Buhh <3 ________________________________________
Calmdown Minmatar	Posted - 2008.03.01 10:00:00 - [30] Originally by: Buhhdust Princess Well. You hear people say that Amarr need a boost. Tbh, wake up. Paladin is probably the best bet you have here for a Maruader. Seeing as it managed to hit a megathron of mine from 160km + for over 800 damage. (yeah, h4x?) So personally, i'd like to see a paladin fielded today in the Tourny would be a nice change. And great to see someone using more amarr! -Buhh <3 Me too. 3 Paladins is on my list of teams that would do well. 3 Abaddons is still better though, due to the amount of support you can bring.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.