| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Robeyone
   |
Posted - 2004.04.07 23:08:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Robeyone on 07/04/2004 23:11:56
To Just Support InkZ here,
We have been very clear with both RSA and CoD on what specifically we are looking for, and why we are in this conflict. You have constantly broken statements made to RONA, and your post is littered with misinformation.
RSA has been the only organization to contact me, via Eve-Mail and convo. I have never once heard from CoD on this issue, or any issue in this conflict.
RSA is aware of our terms to cease fire, and I don't think they are in a position to negotiate those terms. Until those terms are met we will continue to act hostility towards that organization.
You are also aware of the circumstances surrounding your station being held by RONA-KIA Forces, and until we can prove otherwise we will continue to hold the station until we are satisfied with the result it has brought about in your organization.
Trying to get the PA involved is utterly ridiculous, this is a RONA matter, and the PA is in no way linked to this engagement at all. Any further acts of aggression will result in the appropriate retaliation. Please refrain from posting erroneous information on the forums.
http://www.ronacorp.com |
Robeyone
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 01:31:00 -
[2]
I have been in one conversation with RSA members, that's it. KIAInkZ invited me to that conversation, not you or the RSA. I have gotten 1 email from Sweatysack, that's it. I do NOT have Auto Reject on, I never have. You have never approached me, and I have never spoken with you.
RSA did in fact take the station tonight; we are still at war with the RSA. They have not replaced the tier II ship that we lost in Fade, and now you have just shown that you are in fact working with RSA. SO FAR you have proven to us that you work with the RSA and have now proven the ôconnectionö we thought your two alliances had. Look in InkZ post for why we are attacking you and why we held your stationà
 Quote:
Yes RSA is our Friendà
I think that sums it up.
I have this funny feeling that you have taken the war up a notch, and this is going to get a bit more active. You want us to continue? Fine we will continue. Your choice.
http://www.ronacorp.com |
Robeyone
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 05:00:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Robeyone on 08/04/2004 07:32:57
Edited by: Robeyone on 08/04/2004 05:06:18
Here it is in a nutshell
1. RONA hears that RSA and COD are alligned or "friends"
2. RONA authorizes the attacks on RSA and COD
3. RONA-KIA takes COD station removing any quick access for RSA and COD members to Retaliate.
4. RONA sets terms with CoD that we will stop hostilities but hold the station. Both parties agree.
5. RONA-KIA takes the RSA station and transfers rights to Celestial Apoc. exact same reason as we took the COD station.
6. RSA denounces piracy.
7. RONA Sets Terms for RSA to replace a Tier II BS
8. RSA and COD become friends again
9. RSA takes station for COD
10. COD breaks terms and RSA still has not met RONA's terms
11. RONA Continues to Fight.
That's it...
I think this pretty much spells out what we are about.
Strategically we removed CoD from the picture. That's why we took the station. We are attacking RSA and their "friend". This is not just RONA attacking CoD, and CoD agreed to the terms after we took the station. I am online now if you want to chat with me. I do not have Autoblock on and I have YET to receive an evemail.
http://www.ronacorp.com |
Robeyone
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 05:11:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Robeyone on 08/04/2004 07:31:31
I'm really confused as to where you can call us Pirates
Here it is simply
We were attacked (RONA-KIA)
We attacked (RSA and CoD)
We took the stations (RSA and CoD)
We set the terms (RSA and CoD)
They broke them or didn't abide by them (RSA and CoD)
We continue attacking
Where is "pirate" in there at all?
http://www.ronacorp.com |
Robeyone
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 07:27:00 -
[5]
I just got out of a convo with a Znaei from Thundercats. We are working on a solution to this conflict. I wrote above what happened and again if you want I will re-iterate it again. As far as your Apoc I apologize but that was not destroyed while having a fun night out with the corp in EC-P8R. We have a RELEVANT issue with RSA we are discussing issues with COD.
All in all Buddrow you need to take a chill pill, I am not calling you names, I don't tell you to shut up, all in all for good relations when going to the table for peace talks it may be a good idea for you to hold your tounge. This does nothing but cause dissentment.
http://www.ronacorp.com |
Robeyone
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 07:33:00 -
[6]
Quote:
Quote:
7. RONA Sets Terms for RSA to replace a Tech II BS
Where can I get one?
Fixed... Sorry about that.
http://www.ronacorp.com |
| |
|