| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
294
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 12:42:00 -
[31] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Without people using Plex, either to buy aurum (heh) or to subscribe, Plex would have no value.
With a lower number of people using Plex, the plex drops in value. Then people buy less out of game, reducing the numbers. So the price rises a bit. It'll still drop in value over all.
So you can't say that people would buy plex regardless. It's not like CCP are buying them off the market.
This assumes knowledge of the spawn/use rate , if use doesn't actually eat into spawn rate, plex just become another 'chip' for market warriors everywhere.
It is a complex matter of cause and effect though and (dependant on population) Bots must have some effect on it but without more data it's difficult to tell. Regardless of bots though there WILL be a plex market hence the asserrstion 'people will buy plex regardless'
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
316
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 13:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Quote:Well no, but if CCP removes the vast majority of mineral sources, which they seem like they are going for (Drone Compounds) Mineral prices are going to shoot up, and mining will suddenly be viable again, and then there will be more poor bastards waiting to be ganked than there is now :3 Which will drive the price of everything up. I.E. inflation. So you go from making 10 mil an hour to 12 mil an hour. And then you pay an extra 20% for everything in the game. Its like your 12 mil an hour is only worth 10 mil on the market prior to the 'mining buff'.
The inflation already exists in the system, the price of minerals is lower than it should be. This is due to the fact that minerals are sourced from too many activities and in volumes that are too large. Having minerals sourced from only the activity of mining will reduce inflation, although prices of minerals will go up.
Now I am sure you are scratching your head and having a WTF moment. Consider: As mineral prices increase, the attractiveness of mining as a profession also increases. The opportunity cost of mining is not slurping at the ISK faucet. That means less ISK will enter the economy and thus reduce the rate of growth of the monetary base, the monetary base will not inflate as quickly.
Eve, as it is designed, will always have some amount of monetary inflation in the system, so long as the faucets outpace the sinks and the ISK held in wallets by inactive players. But, if the monetary inflation rate can be kept in check, and meets the level of increased productivity gained by new players entering the game and older players increasing the industrial output, then prices will become more stable over the long run. Short term fluctuations will remain of course, but that is to be expected.
|

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
228
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 13:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:I'm sorry but however you want to spin it I simply cannot condone the nerfing of high sec capabilities in order for null sec to have better competition and a controlling influence of resources as healthy for the game. And why the hell not? low sec and especially null sec industry needs a boost to make it viable, and nerffing hi sec a bit is required to do so. CCP have stated, and most of the players agree with this, that null sec should be the most rewarding part of k-space, then low sec, then hi sec, in addition they all need to have a unique aspect that makes them suited for one thing over the rest, be it ore availability or moon mining or whatever.
And like I have stated, allowing for redistribution of minerals from loot will allow for that when adjusted towards mining.
Considering that null sec has the maojrity of ABC type minerals resources in their asteroid fields the rebalance will reflect well for them as a result in mining those resources.
Thus it's an equal change to mechanics accross the universe, null sec still gets an improvement, in principal they get a better portion of ABC capabilities without having to nerf high sec to achieve it. Drone poo doesnt have to go entirely as a conversion to isk causing more inflation or lack of minerals if the recent price changes are attributable. By priincipal of the fact of how null miners have significant better resources available to them is why the rewards associated with risk are better for them as a result.
If mechanics are changed to make T2 production more competative in null simply by design, then you intrisincally make it harder for others to compete. As the intended suggestions are to make asssociated manufacturing costs and times more favourable in null sov.
So in principal just by redistirbuting mining gains without the need to simply remove stuff or nerf other industrial capabilities you can make null sec mining and industry more viable. So it is not necessary or "required" to nerf non null to achieve this. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
228
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 13:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:I'm sorry but however you want to spin it I simply cannot condone the nerfing of high sec capabilities in order for null sec to have better competition and a controlling influence of resources as healthy for the game. Eh no. Removing drone poo as a mineral source will not have that effect. It will have the effect of nerfing a specific nullsec sector's capabilities in order to give all of nullsec better competition GÇö highsec does not even enter the equation. More importantly, it means nerfing GÇ£gun-miningGÇ¥ in favour of actual mining GÇö i.e. giving back purpose to an entire profession. It actually means that it gives all those highsec miners something to strive for again. Removing drone poo entirely will give Jaspet reason to live.
The intentions for certain initiatives regarding drone poo removal are ongoing and intended to be removed as part of iterations which will include everywhere, not just the changes we have seen in NPC null space. It is part of certain CSM 6 candidates campaign. And since drone poo exists as a source for certain minerals in high sec it would remove the capabalities of these sources. So it very much does enter the equation. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
228
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 14:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:if CCP hadn't coded in an inflationary currency to begin with then buffs like these along with incursions wouldn't be a problem, it's because of this items like PLEX have gotten so bloody expensive lately. If there were a limited currency then prices would have gone a lot lower and the game would have ended up being easier for everyone, it looks like CCP are determined to act like a central bank when it comes to this game.
The allocation of mineral resources has nothing to do with inflation if it is kept balanced. So a buff to mining redistributing these resources when done in a blanced way would not change the overall mineral wealth and wouldnt effect mineral prices.
The drone poo example that is being proposed is causing mineral price increases, is simply as a change of removing one source of minerals but not affording any "cheques and balances" elsewhere in the system. This isnt the same as my proposed model, and it certainly doesn't afford to add extra isk into the mix to add to the inflationary problem further especially where isk sinks arent being applied to help compensate.
Minerals and the added value goods they generate are not an isk faucet, they only act to redistribute isk in the system. If anything isk is lost in the process with manufacturing costs with NPCs and taxation/broker fees with their sale.
So if anything it should be miners who are upset with other areas of the game where isk is being generated that should complain about increased plex prices. Largely if they are subbing they will be plexing to supplement their poor income as stands, especially if being hit by suicide gankers. So if they are injecting plex into the system they are adding to supply which should work to reduce plex prices, not increase it and help CCP in the process. If anything the isk values at the moment are more helpful to miners assuming they don't have an intention of plexing for game time. Also increased plex prices makes it harder for any RMT botters to use plex as a medium of sale which is in CCP interests. But really that shouldn't be a valid reason or enter the argument as intentionally those concerns should be being persued and removed.
So please don't missconstrue plex issues with mining where they don't exist. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Stabs McShiv
MINUS4
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
1. For the Drone regions introduce faction 'drone' items and buff the stats of 'Augmented' and 'integrated' Drones then increase the drops of the build items used to make them. Ratting in other areas of the game gives isk but also faction items since drones do not give bounties they should drop more faction items/region specific items. e.g serpentis drop 1600mm plates and meta 4 hybrids Sanshas drop lots of meta4 nuets etc etc.
2. Remove all meta 0 t1 drops from the game and replace all the meta1-4 drops with drops of bpc's that use minerals as the main component of the build.
3. Profit |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5019
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:29:00 -
[37] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:So in principal just by redistirbuting mining gains without the need to simply remove stuff or nerf other industrial capabilities you can make null sec mining and industry more viable. So it is not necessary or "required" to nerf non null to achieve this. You keep harping on about nerfing non-nullGǪ where do you get that idea from?  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Serge Bastana
GWA Corp
195
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:52:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:E.g. if refining yields from loot/drone goo where reduced and mining yields increased to "balance" it then effectively you havent changed the total amount of mineral assests in the game, thus not effetively changed anything in a global way within the economy.
GǪ
Mining mineral value = 100, Loot mineral value = 10,000 Total mineral value = 10,100 The figures are closer to 40 + 60 = 100. Removing drone poo (but leaving T1 meta-X loot in NPC drops) will do more to boost the profitability of mining than any other possible change. When profitability goes up, more people will do it, which will bring the profitability right back down.
Another advantage of removing meta 0 loot from high sec mission loot would be to give starting manufacturers a foothold in industry and would probably help miners too since they would have modules to build that didn't compete with the loot drops being sold by mission runners in the thousands. Meta 1-4 stuff could stay and not cause any problems for them, but currently there's little reason to build most meta 0 modules since so much is dropped in mission loot.
I always though it was barring new industrialists from getting a decent start by having regular meta 0 loot in missions WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place... |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 18:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:So in principal just by redistirbuting mining gains without the need to simply remove stuff or nerf other industrial capabilities you can make null sec mining and industry more viable. So it is not necessary or "required" to nerf non null to achieve this. You keep harping on about nerfing non-nullGǪ where do you get that idea from? 
As per Farms and fields initiatives as described in CSM minutes.
CSM minute May 2011 wrote:The CSM believes that nullsec needs to be more self-sufficient from hisec, at the industrial level. The CSM suggested that nullsec should be able to produce T2 goods at higher margins than in hisec. Many ideas were thrown around, such as making T2 production superior in nullsec compared to hisec as well as adding many more factory and research slots in nullsec outposts. The CSM suggested that high technology products come from nullsec - they can be done in hisec, but with better margins in null. The CSM was intrigued by the idea of allowing meta-level item production in lowsec, creating a continuum of t1 - meta - t2 across hi/low/null. Most of the CSM favored the idea of increasing invention chances in 0.0 compared to hisec.
CSM Minutes Dec 2011 wrote:- References to industrialization, moving t2 production to 0.0, interdependence of regions, market hubs in nullsec. CCP commented that player built stations should always be better than NPC stations.
...
- General industrial boosts would be good. Such as adding more slots in stations or increasing invention chance in nullsec with an IHUB upgrade? This would then lead to a greater demand for datacores which would partially boost those who run exploration sites.
The Mittani wrote:Some other ideas include incentivizing invention by giving superior success chances on invention jobs in sov space. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
952
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 18:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Issler Dainze wrote: Mining needs to be more fun!!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend Csm 7 Candidate
Indeed it does, but try making proposals to make it more challenging and interesting and see what response you get from the "but mining also needs to be dull and easy enough so that I can make ISK while semi AFK" miners.
The existing casual experience should remain but there needs a new "taking mining to 11" experience that is dynamic, affected by real time decisions and where ship choice and fittings become part of optimized results, just like you find in ship combat.
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate |

Cipher Jones
329
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:01:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:So in principal just by redistirbuting mining gains without the need to simply remove stuff or nerf other industrial capabilities you can make null sec mining and industry more viable. So it is not necessary or "required" to nerf non null to achieve this. You keep harping on about nerfing non-nullGǪ where do you get that idea from? 
its not nerfing per se, its the causality of what will happen in hisec.
1. nerf drone poo. 2. less minerals in game. 3. minerals worth more. 4. all of new eden effected.
People can only speculate if it will make more people want to mine or not. It certainly would be beneficial to botters. It will not make me want to mine.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5026
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:06:00 -
[42] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:its not nerfing per se, its the causality of what will happen in hisec.
1. nerf drone poo. 2. less minerals in game. 3. minerals worth more. 4. all of new eden effected. All good things.
It doesn't really answer the question, though: you keep mentioning some odd non-null nerf, and I'm asking you what it is and where you're getting the idea from? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
Tippia wrote:It doesn't really answer the question, though: you keep mentioning some odd non-null nerf, and I'm asking you what it is and where you're getting the idea from?
I answered above. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:20:00 -
[44] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:So in principal just by redistirbuting mining gains without the need to simply remove stuff or nerf other industrial capabilities you can make null sec mining and industry more viable. So it is not necessary or "required" to nerf non null to achieve this. You keep harping on about nerfing non-nullGǪ where do you get that idea from?  its not nerfing per se, its the causality of what will happen in hisec. 1. nerf drone poo. 2. less minerals in game. 3. minerals worth more. 4. all of new eden effected. People can only speculate if it will make more people want to mine or not. It certainly would be beneficial to botters. It will not make me want to mine.
It is kind of funny that if as a result of removal of drone poo which was supposed to incentivise mining in Null sec as per the architects design, that even with the now supposedly linked rising mineral prices people are not actually doing the very thing it was intended to promote.
Of course there could be a delay and other factors of course. But it certainly appears to be an opportunity for people to get mining at the moment as a result. Certainly if they don't want to see prices soaring out of control as a result of CSM initiatives. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Cipher Jones
329
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:its not nerfing per se, its the causality of what will happen in hisec.
1. nerf drone poo. 2. less minerals in game. 3. minerals worth more. 4. all of new eden effected. All good things. It doesn't really answer the question, though: you keep mentioning some odd non-null nerf, and I'm asking you what it is and where you're getting the idea from?
Yeah that was him, like i said its not a "nerf".
As far as the "all good things" is concerned, meh. I will deal with inflation, its easier the older you are/more chars/professions you have. As with most things it helps the rich get richer and the poor stay poor.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:25:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Yeah that was him, like i said its not a "nerf".
Yeah ok, technically in the literal sense is a "buff" to null. I used the logical twist of calling it a non-null "nerf". Sorry for incorrect scemantics. But it's still apparent. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5026
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Yeah that was him, like i said its not a "nerf". Yes. Sorry about that. 
Grumpy Owly wrote:I answered above. Then I've missed it. What's the non-null nerf? No, just because null gets buffed doesn't mean non-null gets nerfed. Again, it's a redistribution of null resources so that one section isn't removing the point of having minerals in all other regions. Non-null isn't part of the equation.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:38:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Yeah that was him, like i said its not a "nerf". Yes. Sorry about that.  Grumpy Owly wrote:I answered above. Then I've missed it. What's the non-null nerf? No, just because null gets buffed doesn't mean non-null gets nerfed. Again, it's a redistribution of null resources so that one section isn't removing the point of having minerals in all other regions. Non-null isn't part of the equation.
It is if null gets a buff to their capabilites for T2 production, as its says it makes them more competative as a result. As per my comments.
Also if mineral worth is improved for mining across new eden, then the "better" mineral worth of null sec who have the lion's share of the most profitable minerals is also in favour of their mining capabilties. Also if all drone poo is to be removed including high sec then those opportunites for sources are simply excluded and limited more to regional capabilites.
I'm sorry but if you can't see those points as improving conditions for null as the intention is for them, then you are either missing the point or simply in denial becuase it goes against your own selfish interests.
Go idiot troll some other thread Tipia, cause your making yourself look stupid here. And I won't respond to your "lets wind all conclusions" back to the invention of the wheel approach, so don't think about starting that exercise. I provided clear evidence that catagorically compared improveing things for null as compared to high sec. How you can turn around and simply deny that is just absurd. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5026
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:41:00 -
[49] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:It is if null gets a buff to their capabilites for T2 production, as its says it makes them more competative as a result. As per my comments. GǪexcept that it doesn't change their capabilities for T2 production in the slightest, since they are already the source of the required minerals GÇö it just means that it's miners all across nullsec extracting those minerals, rather than ratters in the drone regions.
It also doesn't affect any other region's capability for T2 production since they are not a source of those minerals to begin with.
Quote:Also if all drone poo is to be removed including high sec then those opportunites for sources are simply excluded and limited more to regional capabilites. The portion of drone poo that comes from highsec is minimal.
Quote:I provided clear evidence that catagorically compared improveing things for null as comapred to high sec. GǪexcept that you didn't show any kind of improvement for nullsec GÇö it's a redistribution of what's already in null.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:44:00 -
[50] - Quote
Tipia I suspect you simply havent gone back to read the point where i specifically adressed your question. I did point it out to you. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5026
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 20:22:00 -
[51] - Quote
Ok, like I said: I missed it. It also doesn't have anything to do with the mining buff of removing drone poo.
That's all I'm talking about: the redistribution of a nullsec resource to a larger portion of nullsec, and the return of a profession that has been usurped by ratting. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
231
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 20:27:00 -
[52] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Ok, like I said: I missed it. It also doesn't have anything to do with the mining buff of removing drone poo. That's all I'm talking about: the redistribution of a nullsec resource to a larger portion of nullsec, and the return of a profession that has been usurped by ratting.
Well we were talking about the holistic aspects of various changes and considering the big picture rather than just being focussed on individual points as per the conversation in the thread. Nice of you to join it at last, however. Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
335
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 20:35:00 -
[53] - Quote
T0RT0ISE wrote:People keep asking for various boosts to the mining industry in EvE but everything that makes mining more profitable as an activity has the knock on effect of raising the costs of every ship and module in the game that relies on minerals in order to exist.
Largest load of Horse-Puckey deposited about mining ever. Please post proof of this. OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |

T0RT0ISE
KRAFTSTOFF GmbH KRAFTSTOFF
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:T0RT0ISE wrote:People keep asking for various boosts to the mining industry in EvE but everything that makes mining more profitable as an activity has the knock on effect of raising the costs of every ship and module in the game that relies on minerals in order to exist.
Largest load of Horse-Puckey deposited about mining ever. Please post proof of this. Take five minutes to peruse the forums. Or dont; I care not what the uninformed wish to believe. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |